Bitcoin Forum
June 15, 2024, 04:30:33 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: ClosedCoin: Why is OC's Ripple Closed-Source?  (Read 2617 times)
duckbillp
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 02, 2013, 04:40:10 AM
 #41

...If the transaction costs are a major hurdle in getting people to start using Ripple...Users won't want the transaction cost to fluctuate orders of magnitude overnight, but that goes for holders of any currency.

It is a very common misconception to view the marginal XRP costs of a transaction as important (right now transactions cost 10 XRP). The real cost is the cost of opening a new Ripple account, which is 200 XRP. This is orders of magnitude greater.

Transaction costs are not particularly relevant to average users. In fact, Ripple transaction costs are orders of magnitude less than even Bitcoin! I think it would really help clarify things if people just forgot about Ripple's transaction costs and focused on the bigger effect of how new accounts get funded with their 200 XRP allocation.


For the statements I made above transaction costs can be substituted with account opening costs -- whatever costs are a hurdle to new users will do. You're right though that there should be more focus on the amount of XRP that is required to fund an account (and is bound to that account ever after).
Beepbop
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100



View Profile
March 02, 2013, 07:06:13 AM
 #42

It is a very common misconception to view the marginal XRP costs of a transaction as important (right now transactions cost 10 XRP). The real cost is the cost of opening a new Ripple account, which is 200 XRP. This is orders of magnitude greater.
Right now it is, but that's because people aren't using it. If Ripple was to take off and people actually used it for something useful, the transaction cost is what really would eat up XRPs. After all, one person only needs one Ripple account in their life*, but they'll presumably conduct thousands of transactions in their lifetime.

*: Add any that would be used by businesses.
Transactions would be expensive if the supply of XRP were scarce, but it wouldn't be scarce just because the founders kept half of the supply.
You are of course correct about this as long as nobody uses Ripple. If transaction costs and reserves start eating up XRPs, those who hold XRP have to sell it at a cost that keeps the Ripple system competitive with its competing systems. If they don't do that correctly, their hoard becomes worth next to 0 as Ripple fails.
Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!