Well its funny the things the people can do to scam the community.
First, as i stated in the thread, "I bought 0.03 BTC" that was sent to my deposit address in my casino.bitcoin.com account. I bought 0.03 BTC from a guy who was selling low volume bitcoins and was promoting your website in his signature and i was curious about the casino domain and wanted to play a little bit.
Indeed it is, and we are not going to allow ourselves to fall victim to scams.
You certainly did state that you "bought 0.03 BTC" two days ago, but this tells us nothing more than the fact that you purchased some bitcoins. In the post above you make it sound like you had the BTC sent directly to the deposit address in your Casino.bitcoin.com account; while that would be quite unusual, it is certainly possible, and I have no immutable evidence with which to refute that specific claim.
However, I do have to take this opportunity to point out a few things which don't quite give your explanation a grounding in reality:
There is no way that this supposed person who sold you BTC would have known that the address the BTC was sent to was owned by us. It simply appears to be a normal multi-sig address, which it is. It is entirely indistinguishable from any other multi-sig address. Therefore - assuming you were telling the truth - if he attempted to double-spend so you wouldn't receive the bitcoins you paid for then he was attempting to defraud you as he almost certainly would have presumed the address was owned by you. In this case you should converse with this supposed "guy" and ask why he scammed you.
But wait! The story continues!
You are then asking us to believe that - in a coincidence of unbelievable proportions - the
same amount, minus 0.001 BTC (an amount which funnily enough was the fee for previously sending 0.029 BTC
from the
same input to the
same input; very odd that this "guy" would send his funds from his own single address to his own address) - was sent to
somebody else's Casino.bitcoin.com account from the
same input address (i.e. from this same "guy").
Bizarrely, this happened after the amount that you supposedly purchased was lost on bets in our Casino, and only then was it double-spent to stop the deposit from ever confirming. What a considerate fellow this "guy" is - perhaps he's psychic and somehow knew that you had placed a bet and lost in our online Casino, and he decided that he'd like to make sure you got the funds back so he double-spent the bitcoins in order to stop you losing money!
Even stranger than that, the second deposit was NOT double-spent after winning on bets in our Casino! Wow! This supposed "guy" that sold you BTC is a very strange selective scammer if, thinking that you owned the address, he only scammed you after you lost the funds in our Casino, but didn't scam the next person he sold the exact same amount of BTC to after that person had a
win in our Casino!
Shocking! [Vice-versa, but I'm sure my point is clear!]
With this you are assuming that all the people who send transactions with a low fee are making a double-spending
? Maybe there is some people that don't have much money to spend and do everything to save, including sending transactions with a small fee.
Second, i thought you would disclose some of my information publicly as you said in PM and i accepted, but you are disclosing other people information that i have not anything to do, thats not good.
I am making no such assumptions; I have quite clearly shown that the double-spend attack was the reason for the low transaction fees in this instance. Sending a low fee transaction does not mean you automatically double-spend. You have to
actively try to double-spend your input, it cannot 'just happen' due to adding a low transaction fee. Furthermore, if some people do not have much money to spend and - crucially - are doing "everything to save, including sending transactions with a small fee", it is
highly unlikely that
A) they would have wasted 0.001 BTC (~€0.41) in a transaction fee sending funds
from their own address to their own address, and
B) that they would consider even a very generous 0.0001 BTC (~€0.04) transaction fee prohibitively expensive, instead attaching an inadequate 0.00000568 BTC (~€0.002327) transaction fee.
Secondly, I am not disclosing other people's information. I am disclosing
your information, which I sought prior approval for via PM and which you have acknowledged here. The first email address is your own Hotmail address, the second is a disposable Yopmail address. Both are owned by you, and you and I both know that. As you are now falsely accusing us of disclosing
other people's information, we will defend ourselves accordingly. Below you will find screenshots (note Player URL) of you actually using the same VPN IP address (192.160.102.164) on both accounts - perhaps consider covering your tracks better next time if you do not wish for your explanations to be torn to shreds:
https://i.imgur.com/VvBhuKi.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/i5sASpQ.pngThis is completely unacceptable, but i will have to accept this loss because i see that you won't give up trying to scam all the people you can and making excuses.
Thankfully i only bought 13$!
--Mark
Attempting to scam us is completely unacceptable, but thank you for helping test our fraud detection system and allowing our employees to get even more experience in detecting and preventing double-spends. It is most appreciated, and we expect that you won't feel the need to throw any more of your money away testing it again. If you do feel like repeating this charade then you will experience the exact same result - loss of funds and another thorough rebuttal of your scam accusation, with the proof included to show that you are a barefaced liar, a reviled scammer and are absolutely not to be trusted.
We will not be responding to any further communication from you, and any further attempts by you to call us scammers will simply be met with a link to my two explanatory posts in this thread.
To add a little humour to an outrageous, unnecessary situation, I believe the much-loved book and film character Mr. Willy Wonka said it best:
https://i.imgflip.com/14ueal.jpg
