Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 12:45:06 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 [191] 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 ... 352 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitmain's Released Antminer S9, World's First 16nm Miner Ready to Order  (Read 530803 times)
NotFuzzyWarm
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3612
Merit: 2506


Evil beware: We have waffles!


View Profile
February 28, 2017, 12:28:05 AM
 #3801

Not going to retyped it all again so ref https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1769399.msg17968291#msg17968291
Done that way each cable is protected plus easier to wire and fuses cost less.
I hope I got it right sir. Is this what I should do for my S9? Put a 35a fuse inline with the positive 3wires going to the Hashboard?
How about the controller? Do I need to fuse it also?

Only thing I would change is the fuse size. For a s9 take it down to 20-25A per cable.
Again, to save typing, ref https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1769399.msg18004006#msg18004006

- For bitcoin to succeed the community must police itself -    My info useful? Donations welcome! 1FuzzyWc2J8TMqeUQZ8yjE43Rwr7K3cxs9
 -Sole remaining active developer of cgminer, Kano's repo is here
-Support Sidehacks miner development. Donations to:   1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr
1714005906
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714005906

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714005906
Reply with quote  #2

1714005906
Report to moderator
1714005906
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714005906

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714005906
Reply with quote  #2

1714005906
Report to moderator
I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES I HA(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ TABLES I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
Sr.Urbanist
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 315
Merit: 118


View Profile
February 28, 2017, 02:25:16 AM
 #3802

Not going to retyped it all again so ref https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1769399.msg17968291#msg17968291
Done that way each cable is protected plus easier to wire and fuses cost less.
I hope I got it right sir. Is this what I should do for my S9? Put a 35a fuse inline with the positive 3wires going to the Hashboard?
How about the controller? Do I need to fuse it also?

Only thing I would change is the fuse size. For a s9 take it down to 20-25A per cable.
Again, to save typing, ref https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1769399.msg18004006#msg18004006

What does this solve that a high quality PSU doesn't?
NotFuzzyWarm
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3612
Merit: 2506


Evil beware: We have waffles!


View Profile
February 28, 2017, 02:49:41 AM
 #3803

Quote
What does this solve that a high quality PSU doesn't?
It solves the problem of what happens from a short circuit. That short will draw all available power from a PSU. In a heartbeat the voltage will droop and more than likely the other hash boards will drop out giving the entire PSU capacity to feed the short ciruit. That set of cables/connectors feeding the offending hashboard burn.

The only thing ANY PSU will do in that scenario is supply all it can until it overcurrents. That -- takes time during which things burn. As in flames until the PSU shuts down.

Overall to me, this is really more of a concern when using a several-kw supply to feed 2 or more miners eg the 4kw monsters. 333A of sustained current available and probably a short duration margin capacity for 150% of that...

- For bitcoin to succeed the community must police itself -    My info useful? Donations welcome! 1FuzzyWc2J8TMqeUQZ8yjE43Rwr7K3cxs9
 -Sole remaining active developer of cgminer, Kano's repo is here
-Support Sidehacks miner development. Donations to:   1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr
Swimmer63
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1593
Merit: 1004



View Profile
February 28, 2017, 04:26:28 AM
 #3804

What are the recommendations on pools for a single S9 miner at present? Eligius seems to be de-funked - it was a nice free anonymous pool with useful stats...

Bitmain's pool? They seem to have a charge. P2pool is not an option at the moment.

Thanks for any info.
Kano or Slush for example..

BTC.COM (also Bitmain owned) is 0% fee and pays transaction fees.  They call it "subsidy."  No guarantee how long it will last.  Plus it's PPS.  So you get paid consistently.  If you started with them back in October when they took over the domain I think your cumulative payout would be around 103%.
Sr.Urbanist
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 315
Merit: 118


View Profile
February 28, 2017, 05:01:34 AM
 #3805

BTC.COM (also Bitmain owned) is 0% fee and pays transaction fees.  They call it "subsidy."  No guarantee how long it will last.  Plus it's PPS. 

That sounds like the best payout/lowest risk pool out there.  I'm on Kano.  I may point my new S9 to BTC.com, but I really prefer to stay outside the Great Firewall.
bitsink
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 81
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 28, 2017, 05:58:22 AM
 #3806

No measurements done yet. Still trying to get the thing to actually start hashing... Undecided

I'm just curious if it could be not getting enough power?   Huh  Undecided

Power is fine. After leaving it running over night, it actually started hashing. Not sure after how long and for how long (no stats available). Clearly this is crap and is not the behavior it exhibited before the hard reset. I am guessing there is a quirk in the recovery firmware, which needs fixing. Maybe a script or something. A timeout maybe (sleep 20s?). Has anybody ventured into the linux filesystem and looked at things in detail? For one it would be interesting to start bmminer manually and see what happens. The single-board-test program seems to do rather little.

Not sure if the thing really *was* hashing. After 1h30 it is still not hashing and the "sleep 20s" is running, at some point this seems to change to "sleep 20m". The log shows 2x63 asics detected (2 boards powered) and all seems well, but the bmminer is not starting. Does anone have the commandline (from ps axf) to start the miner manually?

Further reading has revealed that the "single-board-test" seems to test the pic firmware on the hashboards? Well, surely this does not take more than a few minutes and if there is a problem there would be an error message to be found somewhere...

Why would a hard reset cause such problems?
solteykr
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 116
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 28, 2017, 07:23:55 AM
 #3807


Give that person a cigar, they got it right!

As for the controller, while there is nothing there using very high power and I don't ever recall reading about one catastrophically failing on an Antminer actually it *would* be a good idea to fuse it. Because the fans pull a fair bit of current - like up to about 2.5a each at full speed - I'd think an 8-10a fuse would be perfect.

Perfect sir! Thank you for the cigar! Smiley Have a great day.

COINS.PH Share the gift of convenience by inviting your friends to Coins.ph
Show your friends how easy it is to send money, buy load and pay bills.
You both receive 50 PHP every time a friend signs up through your referral link and verifies ID and Selfie.
solteykr
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 116
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 28, 2017, 07:30:06 AM
 #3808

Not going to retyped it all again so ref https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1769399.msg17968291#msg17968291
Done that way each cable is protected plus easier to wire and fuses cost less.
I hope I got it right sir. Is this what I should do for my S9? Put a 35a fuse inline with the positive 3wires going to the Hashboard?
How about the controller? Do I need to fuse it also?

Only thing I would change is the fuse size. For a s9 take it down to 20-25A per cable.
Again, to save typing, ref https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1769399.msg18004006#msg18004006

Will do sir. Thank you.

COINS.PH Share the gift of convenience by inviting your friends to Coins.ph
Show your friends how easy it is to send money, buy load and pay bills.
You both receive 50 PHP every time a friend signs up through your referral link and verifies ID and Selfie.
bitsink
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 81
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 28, 2017, 09:22:11 PM
 #3809

Could someone please do a quick "ps axf" or send output from the "monitor" gui tab on their hashing S9 miner (autotune version?) to see the command line options for launching bmminer. I am still struggling to get this machine start hashing again... ;-/

Appreciate the help!
aarons6
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006


View Profile
February 28, 2017, 11:21:13 PM
 #3810

Not going to retyped it all again so ref https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1769399.msg17968291#msg17968291
Done that way each cable is protected plus easier to wire and fuses cost less.

I hope I got it right sir. Is this what I should do for my S9? Put a 35a fuse inline with the positive 3wires going to the Hashboard?

How about the controller? Do I need to fuse it also?




instead of going from the psu you could do pci-e on both sides so they plug right into standard cables..
i think many people on here including myself might purchase a premade set of 9.

also you might want to use something like this for the fuse
im not sure if you need 20 or 25 amps tho..

https://www.amazon.com/Qty-Slow-Blow-Ceramic-MDA20A-MDA20/dp/B004I36FJA/ref=pd_lpo_200_bs_t_2?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=7Y6DE6WW8591A6JW8TEE
Swimmer63
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1593
Merit: 1004



View Profile
March 01, 2017, 01:49:16 AM
 #3811

BTC.COM (also Bitmain owned) is 0% fee and pays transaction fees.  They call it "subsidy."  No guarantee how long it will last.  Plus it's PPS.  

That sounds like the best payout/lowest risk pool out there.  I'm on Kano.  I may point my new S9 to BTC.com, but I really prefer to stay outside the Great Firewall.

That's my thinking.  There is no other pool I know of the has 0 fee for PPS.  And getting the fees on top of that is real nice.

EDIT - And they are merge mining Namecoin too.
Sr.Urbanist
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 315
Merit: 118


View Profile
March 01, 2017, 02:52:46 AM
 #3812

BTC.COM (also Bitmain owned) is 0% fee and pays transaction fees.  They call it "subsidy."  No guarantee how long it will last.  Plus it's PPS.  

That sounds like the best payout/lowest risk pool out there.  I'm on Kano.  I may point my new S9 to BTC.com, but I really prefer to stay outside the Great Firewall.

That's my thinking.  There is no other pool I know of the has 0 fee for PPS.  And getting the fees on top of that is real nice.

EDIT - And they are merge mining Namecoin too.

How is that possible?  Maybe the higher S9 prices? This PPLNS is good when it's good, but not steady ... been 48 hours.
aarons6
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006


View Profile
March 01, 2017, 06:12:03 AM
 #3813

BTC.COM (also Bitmain owned) is 0% fee and pays transaction fees.  They call it "subsidy."  No guarantee how long it will last.  Plus it's PPS.  

That sounds like the best payout/lowest risk pool out there.  I'm on Kano.  I may point my new S9 to BTC.com, but I really prefer to stay outside the Great Firewall.

That's my thinking.  There is no other pool I know of the has 0 fee for PPS.  And getting the fees on top of that is real nice.

EDIT - And they are merge mining Namecoin too.
be VERY careful with PPS pools that dont take a fee.. they will eventually go broke and stop paying out. it only takes a couple of long blocks before the pps outweighs the block rewards.

RadekG
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 01, 2017, 07:28:19 PM
 #3814

Definitely ouch.  Angry Its very weird. my S9 has a AVR. but it still got burned. My pocket is hurting now.

I investigated your pictures of failed hash boards. I think the failure was outside to S9 and board is NOT DAMAGED (except connectors).

From your pictures it is clearly visible that only GND is affected. Also controller board's GND is burned. It has nothing to do with AVR or PSU, the problem is outside - check all possible things which was able to touch between PSU's case and S9's case. Carefully investigate what caused high current flow between PSU and S9 case. Maybe S9 touched something at AC mains.

Hope it will save you some money. Anyway, this failure is very specific and adding fuses to +12V will not prevent this kind of failure (since this failure is on GND line which remains unfused).

NotFuzzyWarm
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3612
Merit: 2506


Evil beware: We have waffles!


View Profile
March 01, 2017, 08:22:46 PM
Last edit: March 01, 2017, 11:48:10 PM by NotFuzzyWarm
 #3815

Definitely ouch.  Angry Its very weird. my S9 has a AVR. but it still got burned. My pocket is hurting now.

I investigated your pictures of failed hash boards. I think the failure was outside to S9 and board is NOT DAMAGED (except connectors).

From your pictures it is clearly visible that only GND is affected. Also controller board's GND is burned. It has nothing to do with AVR or PSU, the problem is outside - check all possible things which was able to touch between PSU's case and S9's case. Carefully investigate what caused high current flow between PSU and S9 case. Maybe S9 touched something at AC mains.

Hope it will save you some money. Anyway, this failure is very specific and adding fuses to +12V will not prevent this kind of failure (since this failure is on GND line which remains unfused).

And to that I must add that the GND lines MUST remain un-fused for safety!

If is the DC return (aka GND) lines that fried then something is seriously wrong with the AC power setup. Yes placing a fuse there would save the wiring/connectors BUT once the fuses in a return line blow then the case of the miner or PSU is going be be live with the power -- possibly a lethal situation.

Query: What are the miners sitting on? A grounded metal shelf? If so, any signs of arc damage on the miner/shelf area?

- For bitcoin to succeed the community must police itself -    My info useful? Donations welcome! 1FuzzyWc2J8TMqeUQZ8yjE43Rwr7K3cxs9
 -Sole remaining active developer of cgminer, Kano's repo is here
-Support Sidehacks miner development. Donations to:   1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr
NotFuzzyWarm
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3612
Merit: 2506


Evil beware: We have waffles!


View Profile
March 01, 2017, 08:47:37 PM
Last edit: March 01, 2017, 11:50:35 PM by NotFuzzyWarm
 #3816

On a different note:
Today I got a bill from Michigan Dept. of Treasury regarding 5x s7 miners I got from Bitmain in Jan-Feb 2016. Seems that when Customs gets involves (1 order was for $3,725, the other was for $3,100) and you have to pay Duty, that imported goods information is reported to your state. Now Michigan wants $409.50 out of state/internet purchase Use Tax for the miners I brought in Sad

Just another reason to stay under the Customs Duty-free limits...

- For bitcoin to succeed the community must police itself -    My info useful? Donations welcome! 1FuzzyWc2J8TMqeUQZ8yjE43Rwr7K3cxs9
 -Sole remaining active developer of cgminer, Kano's repo is here
-Support Sidehacks miner development. Donations to:   1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr
wolfen
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 523


View Profile
March 01, 2017, 10:12:26 PM
 #3817

backed up transactions hit 68000

https://blockchain.info/unconfirmed-transactions

https://btc.com/stats/unconfirmed-tx

Have been waiting 12 hours for one confirmation

For those about to block we salute you! AC->BTC
leowonderful
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1624
Merit: 1129


Bitcoin FTW!


View Profile
March 01, 2017, 10:43:52 PM
 #3818

backed up transactions hit 68000

https://blockchain.info/unconfirmed-transactions

https://btc.com/stats/unconfirmed-tx

Have been waiting 12 hours for one confirmation
We're nearly at 70000 now. Best you can do is use your own node or increase fees or wait till this is all over. Horrible time for txs :/
Sr.Urbanist
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 315
Merit: 118


View Profile
March 02, 2017, 03:54:09 AM
 #3819

backed up transactions hit 68000

https://blockchain.info/unconfirmed-transactions

https://btc.com/stats/unconfirmed-tx

Have been waiting 12 hours for one confirmation

I have raised my fees, but once waited 5 days before finally using a website to advance it.  Even at 0.0003350 per tx fee, it's taking about an hour.
Sr.Urbanist
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 315
Merit: 118


View Profile
March 02, 2017, 03:56:27 AM
 #3820

BTC.COM (also Bitmain owned) is 0% fee and pays transaction fees.  They call it "subsidy."  No guarantee how long it will last.  Plus it's PPS.  

That sounds like the best payout/lowest risk pool out there.  I'm on Kano.  I may point my new S9 to BTC.com, but I really prefer to stay outside the Great Firewall.

That's my thinking.  There is no other pool I know of the has 0 fee for PPS.  And getting the fees on top of that is real nice.

EDIT - And they are merge mining Namecoin too.
be VERY careful with PPS pools that dont take a fee.. they will eventually go broke and stop paying out. it only takes a couple of long blocks before the pps outweighs the block rewards.

I moved to BTC.com and I think they may skim some hash, but I got my first payment okay.
Pages: « 1 ... 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 [191] 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 ... 352 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!