Evidence that Craig Wright might be Satoshi after all

[jbreher]

search "gavin matonis wright block 9" to see lots of people discussing how wright showed them a signature that is validated by the address held in block 9

No. How 'bout you post a link to either Andresen or Matonis state that the evidence they were presented with by Wright may have been the same as the spoof.

Unless you can, then I believe I am fully caught up with the situation.

[1714319544]

1714319544

[1714319544]

1714319544

[1714319544]

1714319544

[RocketSingh]

search "gavin matonis wright block 9" to see lots of people discussing how wright showed them a signature that is validated by the address held in block 9

No. How 'bout you post a link to either Andresen or Matonis state that the evidence they were presented with by Wright may have been the same as the spoof.

Unless you can, then I believe I am fully caught up with the situation.

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/4hfyyo/gavin_can_you_please_detail_all_parts_of_the/d2plygg

Craig signed a message that I chose ("Gavin's favorite number is eleven. CSW" if I recall correctly) using the private key from block number 1.

That signature was copied on to a clean usb stick I brought with me to London, and then validated on a brand-new laptop with a freshly downloaded copy of electrum.

I was not allowed to keep the message or laptop (fear it would leak before Official Announcement).

I don't have an explanation for the funky OpenSSL procedure in his blog post.

[chek2fire]

are any serious to continue support this hoaxer after what happen before one month? lol 

[jbreher]

search "gavin matonis wright block 9" to see lots of people discussing how wright showed them a signature that is validated by the address held in block 9

No. How 'bout you post a link to either Andresen or Matonis state that the evidence they were presented with by Wright may have been the same as the spoof.

Unless you can, then I believe I am fully caught up with the situation.

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/4hfyyo/gavin_can_you_please_detail_all_parts_of_the/d2plygg

Craig signed a message that I chose ("Gavin's favorite number is eleven. CSW" if I recall correctly) using the private key from block number 1.

That signature was copied on to a clean usb stick I brought with me to London, and then validated on a brand-new laptop with a freshly downloaded copy of electrum.

I was not allowed to keep the message or laptop (fear it would leak before Official Announcement).

I don't have an explanation for the funky OpenSSL procedure in his blog post.

Was that supposed to be a reply to my inquiry? Because it is not.

[iv4n]

with all of them patents
with all the corporations he set up
with all the grabbing funds from government
with all the scamming rather then sharing philosophy.
craig wright is definetly not satoshi..

the real satoshi didnt do non-disclosure-orders, he had open conversations
the real satoshi didnt work on secret projects that will revolution the world and then sell the idea to corporations. he released it freely
the real satoshi didnt patent anything, he made everything open licence.

all i can see craig wright doing is not having a working product or assets and instead is "creating" vapour to sell at a high fee.. definetly not a satoshi personality at all

Very nicely said, I think you pointed very nice arguments why CW can never be real Satoshi. I see logic in your words, you explained something with simple words for everyone to understand.
From the first moment's I doubt that he is Satoshi, and how time is passing "everyone is Satoshi" starting to have more sense in my head.
What you just said is something that every rightful man should follow!

[numismatist]

are any serious to continue support this hoaxer after what happen before one month? lol 

Nope. He is "nice to have" as a panic asset, but not much more.

[BrewMaster]

no matter how many formula craig wright writes on glass and how many long 10 page, 1000 page articles are written about him being satoshi i will listen and believe if only i see a proper signed message the rest is just waste of time

[TofuLover]

after marked as a scumbag with his previous videos which using trick to faking the owning rights,i'm sure only idiots would trust him

[BankrJr]

Has anyone noticed that the CSW made a wish on the Genesis Block?  50 btc of it can't be moved from the Genesis block but the real Satoshi would be able to pull that extra 16 btc out.

Check out the public note: https://blockchain.info/tx/94da714faefee60be3066ec3326f158d4872996975766e25f39c83c0317315aa

Maybe this wasn't CSW but he sure seems to like a lot of attention as opposed to Satoshi that was obviously private about his identity.

[practicaldreamer]

Was it absolutely necessary to put the BTC in trust ? I know the idea was that it would prevent their use (even in desperation) till 2020 , so as not to spook the market.
But what would be the real effect of moving some of the Satoshi coins on the market ? I'm not talking about dumping the lot, more 50 here, 100 there maybe ? Would it really be so catostrophic over the medium to long term ? Wasn't tying them up in a trust overkill ?
Does it mean that the coins should rightfully never move for fear of spooking the market ? Seems daft to me. Bitcoin is established now, its sailing by its own steam.

Hey, maybe we could start a collection for Craig. I think Franky1 should start the ball rolling.

Failing that, what do the trustees think ? We know you are out there somewhere