testbug
|
|
August 14, 2017, 05:57:16 PM |
|
poolinat0r.com: Missing payouts
First of all, i would like to say big sorry for not getting this fixed faster. There was a problem with the payouts makeing some of them getting completely stuck, requireing manually releasing of the payouts. The problem has been fixed. I am currently sending out all the missing payouts to all the miners, sending out emails to the registered email address.
All missing payouts for both pools will be send out in the next 30mins and after that everything is fine again.
Sorry again. Testbug
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"This isn't the kind of software where we can leave so many unresolved bugs that we need a tracker for them." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
HashFace
|
|
August 15, 2017, 02:07:20 AM |
|
What does this error mean?
[2017-08-15 01:55:11] Total: 381.14 H/m [2017-08-15 01:56:08] Total: 381.33 H/m [2017-08-15 01:57:06] Total: 381.46 H/m [2017-08-15 01:57:41] stratum_recv_line failed [2017-08-15 01:57:41] Stratum connection interrupted [2017-08-15 01:57:41] Total: 381.35 H/m [2017-08-15 01:58:42] Total: 379.67 H/m [2017-08-15 01:59:41] Total: 377.79 H/m [2017-08-15 02:00:39] Total: 380.17 H/m [2017-08-15 02:01:36] Total: 382.25 H/m
I'm getting it pretty regularly and the pool is not showing me accomplishing any work.
Is this where the worker is trying to send the work done to pool, but the pool doesn't accept it?
|
|
|
|
matttheman43
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
August 15, 2017, 04:06:06 PM |
|
So, combined I have probably mined for a few hours, yet all my balances across the vault still remain at zero? Do you have to type something in the console for the "balance" to start to show numbers and manually pull?
|
|
|
|
ljglug
|
|
August 15, 2017, 05:44:55 PM |
|
poolinat0r.com: Missing payouts
First of all, i would like to say big sorry for not getting this fixed faster. There was a problem with the payouts makeing some of them getting completely stuck, requireing manually releasing of the payouts. The problem has been fixed. I am currently sending out all the missing payouts to all the miners, sending out emails to the registered email address.
All missing payouts for both pools will be send out in the next 30mins and after that everything is fine again.
Sorry again. Testbug
I tried to withdraw 53 coins from the ore pool manually, But reminds me I need 150 coins, I don't have that much, I'm not going to continue mining Can you help me withdraw money?
|
|
|
|
cyberspacemonkey
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1002
|
|
August 16, 2017, 06:59:24 AM |
|
Hey all I'm trying to sync my wallet but it seems to take forever and it crashes sometimes, is it still worth mining this with a CPU?
|
|
|
|
pnosker
|
|
August 16, 2017, 02:43:58 PM |
|
So, combined I have probably mined for a few hours, yet all my balances across the vault still remain at zero? Do you have to type something in the console for the "balance" to start to show numbers and manually pull?
Mining requires your computer find the correct hash for a current block. You don't accrue coins in small bits slowly, you need to get lucky enough to find the entire block. Check your estimated time to a block, and on average, you will find one within that time.
|
Support the VeriFund Endowment. VRC: VFEndownxxnHea9mv59kZx8c7TysGbndYx
|
|
|
dasgardo87
|
|
August 16, 2017, 09:32:46 PM |
|
Hi guys just try to mining this one, can someone tell me if there is calcutor profitability for this coin verium? or can you guys tell me with hashrate 41 H, how many coin verium i can get for 1 month? thanks
|
|
|
|
cyberspacemonkey
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1002
|
|
August 16, 2017, 10:07:55 PM |
|
Hi guys just try to mining this one, can someone tell me if there is calcutor profitability for this coin verium? or can you guys tell me with hashrate 41 H, how many coin verium i can get for 1 month? thanks
Block reward is around 4 VRM, I'm using an i7 processor and it tells me it's going to take about 748 hours to find a block which is about a month so at this point it's really not worth mining unless you have some one else's AMD threadripper that you can use for free.
|
|
|
|
dasgardo87
|
|
August 16, 2017, 10:17:56 PM |
|
Hi guys just try to mining this one, can someone tell me if there is calcutor profitability for this coin verium? or can you guys tell me with hashrate 41 H, how many coin verium i can get for 1 month? thanks
Block reward is around 4 VRM, I'm using an i7 processor and it tells me it's going to take about 748 hours to find a block which is about a month so at this point it's really not worth mining unless you have some one else's AMD threadripper that you can use for free. no i dont want solo mining i just wonder what profitability i can get (estimation) if i do mining at pool , can you tell me how many i verium coin i can get for 1 month with 41 H hashrate? if not in USD also alright
|
|
|
|
cyberspacemonkey
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1002
|
|
August 16, 2017, 10:49:10 PM |
|
Hi guys just try to mining this one, can someone tell me if there is calcutor profitability for this coin verium? or can you guys tell me with hashrate 41 H, how many coin verium i can get for 1 month? thanks
Block reward is around 4 VRM, I'm using an i7 processor and it tells me it's going to take about 748 hours to find a block which is about a month so at this point it's really not worth mining unless you have some one else's AMD threadripper that you can use for free. no i dont want solo mining i just wonder what profitability i can get (estimation) if i do mining at pool , can you tell me how many i verium coin i can get for 1 month with 41 H hashrate? if not in USD also alright Are you serious? I get like 900 H/m to earn only 4 VRM a month with that in mind think about how much you would earn
|
|
|
|
uralcryptocoin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1042
Merit: 328
SIGNATURE CREATION by uralcryptocoin
|
|
August 17, 2017, 10:35:19 AM |
|
Is there any info about hashrate of different CPUs with this algo? I tested some INTEL CPUs and got following (in H/s not H/m): # | CPU model | Cores/threads | MINER | OS | Hashrate | 01 | Core i5 7600 | 4 / 4 | cpuminer-opt-3.6.5 | Windows 10 x64Pro | 26 H/s | 02 | Pentium G 4400 | 2 / 2 | cpuminer-opt-3.6.5 | Windows 8.1 x64Pro | 10 H/s | 03 | Xeon E5 2650 | 8 / 16 | cpuminer-opt-3.6.5 | Windows 7 x64Pro | 40 H/s | 04 | Pentium G 3260 | 2 / 2 | cpuminer-opt-3.6.5 | Windows 7 x64Pro | 10 H/s |
Is these hashrates actual or I made something wrong?
|
|
|
|
BTC Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System BTC A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending. We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network. The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing the proof-of-work. The longest chain not only serves as proof of the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest pool of CPU power. As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network, they'll generate the longest chain and outpace attackers. The network itself requires minimal structure. Messages are broadcast on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone.
|
|
|
wgd
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1815
Merit: 1005
|
|
August 17, 2017, 02:32:08 PM |
|
Is there any info about hashrate of different CPUs with this algo? I tested some INTEL CPUs and got following (in H/s not H/m): # | CPU model | Cores/threads | MINER | OS | Hashrate | 01 | Core i5 7600 | 4 / 4 | cpuminer-opt-3.6.5 | Windows 10 x64Pro | 26 H/s | 02 | Pentium G 4400 | 2 / 2 | cpuminer-opt-3.6.5 | Windows 8.1 x64Pro | 10 H/s | 03 | Xeon E5 2650 | 8 / 16 | cpuminer-opt-3.6.5 | Windows 7 x64Pro | 40 H/s | 04 | Pentium G 3260 | 2 / 2 | cpuminer-opt-3.6.5 | Windows 7 x64Pro | 10 H/s |
Is these hashrates actual or I made something wrong? These hash values look good to me, I have similar performance
|
|
|
|
gildinglite
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 101
These packets fly
|
|
August 17, 2017, 09:04:41 PM |
|
Nodes for Verium.conf @ https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/CoinInfo/?coin=VRMaddnode=129.232.166.250:36988 addnode=83.149.121.207:36988 addnode=66.189.176.102:36988 addnode=167.114.120.107:36988 addnode=107.181.183.242:36988 addnode=71.202.251.210:36988 addnode=128.77.98.151:36988 addnode=5.9.39.9:36988 addnode=47.196.81.11:36988 addnode=76.185.165.68:36988 addnode=64.166.55.3:36988 addnode=221.113.28.24:36988 addnode=196.15.180.46:36988 addnode=79.161.254.101:36988 addnode=47.20.234.249:36988 addnode=72.200.43.89:36988 addnode=91.192.62.28:36988 addnode=125.0.160.70:36988 addnode=118.93.175.102:36988 addnode=107.190.52.158:36988
|
|
|
|
BitcoinOnFire
|
|
August 18, 2017, 12:19:28 PM |
|
any reason price is growing?
|
|
|
|
trinitrotoluene
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
August 18, 2017, 04:02:07 PM Last edit: August 19, 2017, 06:07:11 AM by trinitrotoluene |
|
The new Poolium.win mining pool has launched! Come join us at https://vrm.poolium.winWe have ports available for low, medium and high hash rate miners. https://vrm.poolium.win is located in the US, but I am more than willing to open up additional pools in EU and Asia if the demand is there. Features- Nominal Pool Fee (1%)
- Multiple difficulty ports (3332-3334)
- Auto Payout Option: 5 - 50 VRM
- Manual Payout: 20 VRM
- Small bonus if your worker find a block
|
|
|
|
asket3man
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
August 18, 2017, 04:16:16 PM |
|
Is there any info about hashrate of different CPUs with this algo? I tested some INTEL CPUs and got following (in H/s not H/m): # | CPU model | Cores/threads | MINER | OS | Hashrate | 01 | Core i5 7600 | 4 / 4 | cpuminer-opt-3.6.5 | Windows 10 x64Pro | 26 H/s | 02 | Pentium G 4400 | 2 / 2 | cpuminer-opt-3.6.5 | Windows 8.1 x64Pro | 10 H/s | 03 | Xeon E5 2650 | 8 / 16 | cpuminer-opt-3.6.5 | Windows 7 x64Pro | 40 H/s | 04 | Pentium G 3260 | 2 / 2 | cpuminer-opt-3.6.5 | Windows 7 x64Pro | 10 H/s |
Is these hashrates actual or I made something wrong? These hash values look good to me, I have similar performance 1. Intel Atom N455 1.9 H/s 15W (netbook) 2. 2x Xeon 3200DP (800/2mb) Socket 604 4.8 H/s 312W (server) 3. 2x Xeon 3400DP (800/1mb) Socket 604 4.5 H/s 315W (server) 4. Intel Pentium 2020M 8.8 H/s 35W (laptop) 5. AMD A10 5800K 11.8 H/s 250W (desktop)
|
|
|
|
cico76
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
August 18, 2017, 07:39:40 PM |
|
Hi there ! I have a problem with verium wallet 1.0.4.0
Last transaction get conflicted error, details below:
Stato: conflicted Data: 13/08/17 12:31 A: VEodtSqnbF1T8UNbYGvJTZryCDV67DRJPD Debito: -2.20424670 VRM Tranzakciós díj: -0.20 VRM Importo netto: -2.40424670 VRM ID della transazione: 8956cb78dabfa0aeebb4bcd4d41191cead72d0ae26856cf76de1d6815e00b6f7
Someone knows how to recover ?
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
uralcryptocoin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1042
Merit: 328
SIGNATURE CREATION by uralcryptocoin
|
|
August 19, 2017, 05:36:48 PM |
|
.......
1. Intel Atom N455 1.9 H/s 15W (netbook) 2. 2x Xeon 3200DP (800/2mb) Socket 604 4.8 H/s 312W (server) 3. 2x Xeon 3400DP (800/1mb) Socket 604 4.5 H/s 315W (server) 4. Intel Pentium 2020M 8.8 H/s 35W (laptop) 5. AMD A10 5800K 11.8 H/s 250W (desktop)
Tell please the OS and miner you use. And I will add the data to the table. I think it's enough important for all who would like to start mining VRM
|
|
|
|
BTC Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System BTC A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending. We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network. The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing the proof-of-work. The longest chain not only serves as proof of the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest pool of CPU power. As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network, they'll generate the longest chain and outpace attackers. The network itself requires minimal structure. Messages are broadcast on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone.
|
|
|
kamikaza
|
|
August 19, 2017, 06:27:45 PM |
|
Hi, I am trying to create a account on this poolinar0r.com but i dont receive any email to activate my account.... What is wrong
|
|
|
|
cyberspacemonkey
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1002
|
|
August 20, 2017, 12:57:59 AM |
|
Hi, I am trying to create a account on this poolinar0r.com but i dont receive any email to activate my account.... What is wrong
I tried to mine at poolinat0r but was never credited for anything in a few days so decided to stop, tried the second pool Blockster but they're not taking new registrations
|
|
|
|
|