How old is earth

[RealBitcoin]

Big Bang suggests that in an instant, stars, planets, all kinds of materials and energy were spewed from a single point into a gigantic size

No that is not what it suggests.

Galaxies formed billion years after the big bang, when the universe started cooling down.

[BADecker]

Big Bang suggests that in an instant, stars, planets, all kinds of materials and energy were spewed from a single point into a gigantic size

No that is not what it suggests.

Galaxies formed billion years after the big bang, when the universe started cooling down.

LOL!

Here you are. You can't answer the point that the speed of light is variable. So you distract into the idea that galaxies formed later.

Well, the whole BB doesn't have any known thing factual behind it. So it doesn't matter at all.

The thing that matters is that the scientific community is trying hard to hide the fact that the speed of light isn't constant, and that they know a lot less than they claim to know.

[ivan.daineko23]

Big Bang suggests that in an instant, stars, planets, all kinds of materials and energy were spewed from a single point into a gigantic size

No that is not what it suggests.

Galaxies formed billion years after the big bang, when the universe started cooling down.

LOL!

Here you are. You can't answer the point that the speed of light is variable. So you distract into the idea that galaxies formed later.

Well, the whole BB doesn't have any known thing factual behind it. So it doesn't matter at all.

The thing that matters is that the scientific community is trying hard to hide the fact that the speed of light isn't constant, and that they know a lot less than they claim to know.

It's all clear around conspiracies You are the one who privately said that the speed of light, and not as savsem, which everyone knows. And most importantly, you personally, because this knowledge to the real speed of light? Are you a scientist? Are you a politician? Or you just do not what activities?

[eEngelan]

6 billion years according to science

[BADecker]

Big Bang suggests that in an instant, stars, planets, all kinds of materials and energy were spewed from a single point into a gigantic size

No that is not what it suggests.

Galaxies formed billion years after the big bang, when the universe started cooling down.

LOL!

Here you are. You can't answer the point that the speed of light is variable. So you distract into the idea that galaxies formed later.

Well, the whole BB doesn't have any known thing factual behind it. So it doesn't matter at all.

The thing that matters is that the scientific community is trying hard to hide the fact that the speed of light isn't constant, and that they know a lot less than they claim to know.

It's all clear around conspiracies You are the one who privately said that the speed of light, and not as savsem, which everyone knows. And most importantly, you personally, because this knowledge to the real speed of light? Are you a scientist? Are you a politician? Or you just do not what activities?

Internet researcher.

Are you a first hand experimenter who has proven the speed of light?

[criptix]

Big Bang suggests that in an instant, stars, planets, all kinds of materials and energy were spewed from a single point into a gigantic size

No that is not what it suggests.

Galaxies formed billion years after the big bang, when the universe started cooling down.

LOL!

Here you are. You can't answer the point that the speed of light is variable. So you distract into the idea that galaxies formed later.

Well, the whole BB doesn't have any known thing factual behind it. So it doesn't matter at all.

The thing that matters is that the scientific community is trying hard to hide the fact that the speed of light isn't constant, and that they know a lot less than they claim to know.

It's all clear around conspiracies You are the one who privately said that the speed of light, and not as savsem, which everyone knows. And most importantly, you personally, because this knowledge to the real speed of light? Are you a scientist? Are you a politician? Or you just do not what activities?

Internet researcher.

Are you a first hand experimenter who has proven the speed of light?

I can still remember our school caretaker build a machine to determine the speed of light for our 7/8th physics class. He could determine the speed of light with less then 0.1% failure rate.

It is not hard to use your brain to think - you just need some patience and endurance.

[BADecker]

Big Bang suggests that in an instant, stars, planets, all kinds of materials and energy were spewed from a single point into a gigantic size

No that is not what it suggests.

Galaxies formed billion years after the big bang, when the universe started cooling down.

LOL!

Here you are. You can't answer the point that the speed of light is variable. So you distract into the idea that galaxies formed later.

Well, the whole BB doesn't have any known thing factual behind it. So it doesn't matter at all.

The thing that matters is that the scientific community is trying hard to hide the fact that the speed of light isn't constant, and that they know a lot less than they claim to know.

It's all clear around conspiracies You are the one who privately said that the speed of light, and not as savsem, which everyone knows. And most importantly, you personally, because this knowledge to the real speed of light? Are you a scientist? Are you a politician? Or you just do not what activities?

Internet researcher.

Are you a first hand experimenter who has proven the speed of light?

I can still remember our school caretaker build a machine to determine the speed of light for our 7/8th physics class. He could determine the speed of light with less then 0.1% failure rate.

It is not hard to use your brain to think - you just need some patience and endurance.

The standard light speed is suggested at 186,000 miles per second. Point 1 % is 18,600 MPS. Even the suggested variation and deviation by Sheldrake and others is less than that.

The point is, nobody knows what it was 1,000 years ago, 5,000 years ago, or at the time of the creation before light was created, when the stabilization of the "stuff" that the electro-magnetic energies are made of hadn't settled down yet.

If you are a Big Bang believer, even the first several seconds of the BB show us that the whole electromagnetic spectrum acted quite differently than it does now. All we have is speculation about the past.

The thing to look for is the best speculation. The Bible record is the best we have, because it is eye-witness accounts of the times of the stubborn Hebrew people. See http://www.albatrus.org/english/theology/creation/biblical_age_earth.htm.

The people of the Hebrews unvaryingly upheld the information about family lines and other things that go back to the Beginning. Do you know how stubborn they are? And family is the thing that they stubbornly hold to the most.

[SanjaPaulina]

Yeah, there's always an amusing love-hate relationship between BADlogic and carbon dating. He just cherrypicks when it works and when it doesn't, desperately trying to patch up his untenable beliefs.

Young earth oddballs try desperately to instill doubt in carbon dating, yet if they paid a little more attention to what was going on they would discover, to their horror, that heat is their downfall.

Earth could not of possibly cooled down quickly enough in their absurd timeframe. Heat we are talking about here is enough to easily boil all earths oceans to steam.

Amusing.

[BADecker]

Yeah, there's always an amusing love-hate relationship between BADlogic and carbon dating. He just cherrypicks when it works and when it doesn't, desperately trying to patch up his untenable beliefs.

So, you are trying to hide the fact that carbon dating doesn't tell us anything about the age of the earth, right?

Young earth oddballs try desperately to instill doubt in carbon dating, yet if they paid a little more attention to what was going on they would discover, to their horror, that heat is their downfall.

There isn't any doubt that carbon dating works. It works very well, in fact. It's just that it can't be applied beyond 4,500 years ago, or so. Why not? Because up to 4,500 years in the past is all the further back we can go with standard "pottery-style" dating methods. What do standard "pottery-style" dating methods have to do with it? We don't know beyond that time how much C-14 was in the atmosphere IF ANY. And the further back we go, the less certain about C-14 in the atmosphere we become.

Now, this wouldn't be so bad if the scientists and the media and the books all said it straight out, rather than trying to hide the fact that we don't know if carbon dating can be accurately applied beyond 4,500 years back.

Earth could not of possibly cooled down quickly enough in their absurd timeframe. Heat we are talking about here is enough to easily boil all earths oceans to steam.

Amusing.

We don't know that earth was hot. Without even considering what religions say, we simply don't know that earth was hot in the first place. All that formation of stars and planets info is simply unproven theory. The FACT is that we just don't know about heat on the earth in the distant past.

Wake up. You are becoming denser than the earth's core.

[kodes88]

Since the planet Earth doesn't have a birth certificate to record its formation, scientists have spent hundreds of years struggling to determine the age of the planet. By dating the rocks in the ever-changing crust, as well as neighbors such as the moon and visiting meteorites, scientists have calculated that Earth is 4.54 billion years old, with an error range of 50 million years.

[BADecker]

Since the planet Earth doesn't have a birth certificate to record its formation, scientists have spent hundreds of years struggling to determine the age of the planet. By dating the rocks in the ever-changing crust, as well as neighbors such as the moon and visiting meteorites, scientists have calculated that Earth is 4.54 billion years old, with an error range of 50 million years.

This is the point. The ever-changing part.

When you find out how fast water can create a canyon if it running fast enough and strong enough, you will find that this form of standard geology is way off.

Trees lying across several hundred thousands of years of standard dated strata in the ground, shows how far off this can be.

Dating by moon and meteors doesn't really mean anything, because nobody knows what goes on in space geology.

I don't doubt that scientists do their best, but their best can be way off.

[criptix]

Since the planet Earth doesn't have a birth certificate to record its formation, scientists have spent hundreds of years struggling to determine the age of the planet. By dating the rocks in the ever-changing crust, as well as neighbors such as the moon and visiting meteorites, scientists have calculated that Earth is 4.54 billion years old, with an error range of 50 million years.

This is the point. The ever-changing part.

When you find out how fast water can create a canyon if it running fast enough and strong enough, you will find that this form of standard geology is way off.

Trees lying across several hundred thousands of years of standard dated strata in the ground, shows how far off this can be.

Dating by moon and meteors doesn't really mean anything, because nobody knows what goes on in space geology.

I don't doubt that scientists do their best, but their best can be way off.

But maybe you are just way off? ^^

[botija]

The Earth is 4.543 billion years.

[Xester]

I have no idea but I think you could answer that through yourself.  It is easy tk know since everything can be searched just type and then enter.  But they said according to bible it is around 6000 years. The scientists on the contrary said that itnis about billion years. 

[BADecker]

Since the planet Earth doesn't have a birth certificate to record its formation, scientists have spent hundreds of years struggling to determine the age of the planet. By dating the rocks in the ever-changing crust, as well as neighbors such as the moon and visiting meteorites, scientists have calculated that Earth is 4.54 billion years old, with an error range of 50 million years.

This is the point. The ever-changing part.

When you find out how fast water can create a canyon if it running fast enough and strong enough, you will find that this form of standard geology is way off.

Trees lying across several hundred thousands of years of standard dated strata in the ground, shows how far off this can be.

Dating by moon and meteors doesn't really mean anything, because nobody knows what goes on in space geology.

I don't doubt that scientists do their best, but their best can be way off.

But maybe you are just way off? ^^

Consider, even the scientists and geologists tell you that they aren't sure. The say things like "maybe" and "if" and "it looks like," and a few of them will actually come right out and say that they really don't know.

The Bible, on the other hand, says it all in a factual way. The Bible writers were eye witnesses, and witnesses of other eye witnesses. When you look at the Dead Sea Scrolls, you will find very few differences between what they say and what the Hebrew Bible says today. In other words, the Bible is a faithful witness, copied faithfully, down through the ages. It has power in it, and the people of Bible times recorded the power in the Bible, and the fact that there are so many powerful Christians today, shows that the power of God is in the Bible.

Essentially, the Bible beats all the other records hands down. Study it. I am not making this up.

[awesome31312]

I'd like to see how Young Earth Creationists try to explain the existence of aged dinosaur fossils. I mean, I do admit that everything I know could be wrong. But I don't rely on alternatives like absolute certainty from a book whose supporters literally claim humans coexisted with dinosaurs.

[BADecker]

I'd like to see how Young Earth Creationists try to explain the existence of aged dinosaur fossils. I mean, I do admit that everything I know could be wrong. But I don't rely on alternatives like absolute certainty from a book whose supporters literally claim humans coexisted with dinosaurs.

Dinosaurs were created along with everything else. All the fossils are generally miss-dated. Consider, there is such a thing as rot. Delicate ferns and mollusk and other fossils would have completely rotted away long before they could ever think about fossilizing, if the standard of 10,000 or more years for fossilization was accurate.

Fossilization in the ancient past was a process that we probably don't understand at all. But, we DO have several fossilized people and other things that we know are only a hundred years old or less.

In other words, fossilization that takes less than a hundred years is in evidence. So the whole theory about the age of "aged dinosaurs" needs to be re-hashed.

[awesome31312]

I'd like to see how Young Earth Creationists try to explain the existence of aged dinosaur fossils. I mean, I do admit that everything I know could be wrong. But I don't rely on alternatives like absolute certainty from a book whose supporters literally claim humans coexisted with dinosaurs.

Dinosaurs were created along with everything else. All the fossils are generally miss-dated. Consider, there is such a thing as rot. Delicate ferns and mollusk and other fossils would have completely rotted away long before they could ever think about fossilizing, if the standard of 10,000 or more years for fossilization was accurate.

Fossilization in the ancient past was a process that we probably don't understand at all. But, we DO have several fossilized people and other things that we know are only a hundred years old or less.

In other words, fossilization that takes less than a hundred years is in evidence. So the whole theory about the age of "aged dinosaurs" needs to be re-hashed.

Which dinosaur did Jesus ride? Why aren't dinosaurs ever mentioned in the Bible?

[BADecker]

I'd like to see how Young Earth Creationists try to explain the existence of aged dinosaur fossils. I mean, I do admit that everything I know could be wrong. But I don't rely on alternatives like absolute certainty from a book whose supporters literally claim humans coexisted with dinosaurs.

Dinosaurs were created along with everything else. All the fossils are generally miss-dated. Consider, there is such a thing as rot. Delicate ferns and mollusk and other fossils would have completely rotted away long before they could ever think about fossilizing, if the standard of 10,000 or more years for fossilization was accurate.

Fossilization in the ancient past was a process that we probably don't understand at all. But, we DO have several fossilized people and other things that we know are only a hundred years old or less.

In other words, fossilization that takes less than a hundred years is in evidence. So the whole theory about the age of "aged dinosaurs" needs to be re-hashed.

Which dinosaur did Jesus ride? Why aren't dinosaurs ever mentioned in the Bible?

Now you are being just silly. By far the majority of animals and birds and fish are not mentioned in the Bible by kind. Like the rest, dinosaurs are mention in general reference to all the animals.

Probably the dinosaurs died out shortly after the Great Flood of Noah's day, not being able to find enough food to keep them going after they were let out of the ark.

[awesome31312]

I'd like to see how Young Earth Creationists try to explain the existence of aged dinosaur fossils. I mean, I do admit that everything I know could be wrong. But I don't rely on alternatives like absolute certainty from a book whose supporters literally claim humans coexisted with dinosaurs.

Dinosaurs were created along with everything else. All the fossils are generally miss-dated. Consider, there is such a thing as rot. Delicate ferns and mollusk and other fossils would have completely rotted away long before they could ever think about fossilizing, if the standard of 10,000 or more years for fossilization was accurate.

Fossilization in the ancient past was a process that we probably don't understand at all. But, we DO have several fossilized people and other things that we know are only a hundred years old or less.

In other words, fossilization that takes less than a hundred years is in evidence. So the whole theory about the age of "aged dinosaurs" needs to be re-hashed.

Which dinosaur did Jesus ride? Why aren't dinosaurs ever mentioned in the Bible?

Now you are being just silly. By far the majority of animals and birds and fish are not mentioned in the Bible by kind. Like the rest, dinosaurs are mention in general reference to all the animals.

Probably the dinosaurs died out shortly after the Great Flood of Noah's day, not being able to find enough food to keep them going after they were let out of the ark.

I guess that explains why so many bugs went extinct. They were stomped on by T-Rexes on the ark. Natural selection at work.