NATO: Putin is ready to start World War III Overnight

[mv__]

World war 3 will not start.The must be crazy to attack NATO.Bith sides have nuckear bomba so it is very risky to war with nuclear bomb army.NATO also have so many sjips for airplane which are crazy powerful.

Nato is a joke, wake up to reality. It's a US military industry welfare program. It's not designed to fight any real wars.

[1713555844]

1713555844

[1713555844]

1713555844

[1713555844]

1713555844

[1713555844]

1713555844

[1713555844]

1713555844

[mindrust]

NATO is already falling apart. They will probably lose (will have to kick) Turkey out of the union and  Turks will take sides with Putin.

Saudi's are having troubles with USA, they may also change sides.

Syria is with Russia since the beginning. They are not stupid, they know USA made ISIS up to take their land and oil.

Putin is gaining new friends everyday. Who is going to fight for USA and EUR? McDonald's fatties? On the other hand; Iran, Russia, Turkey, Syria... all of those countries do know how to fight.

[CroIsBest]

I trust that  ISIL isnt created only  by America it is created by America,EU leaders I think about countrues most powerful,Turkey and Saudi Arabia.Turkey and Saudi Arabia muslim countries are also bad because they created ISIL to destroy Syria,Iraq and Europe.

[clickerz]

NATO is already falling apart. They will probably lose (will have to kick) Turkey out of the union and  Turks will take sides with Putin.

Saudi's are having troubles with USA, they may also change sides.

Syria is with Russia since the beginning. They are not stupid, they know USA made ISIS up to take their land and oil.

Putin is gaining new friends everyday. Who is going to fight for USA and EUR? McDonald's fatties? On the other hand; Iran, Russia, Turkey, Syria... all of those countries do know how to fight.

I think Russia is reorganizing itself and becoming stronger everyday as they have a strong and dependable leader like Putin. I like Putin being firmed and decisive leader. Now they are also a force to reckon with as they might challenge USA in the future or I think it already begins when the take over Crimea?

[Masha Sha]

World war 3 will not start.The must be crazy to attack NATO.Bith sides have nuckear bomba so it is very risky to war with nuclear bomb army.NATO also have so many sjips for airplane which are crazy powerful.

Nato is a joke, wake up to reality. It's a US military industry welfare program. It's not designed to fight any real wars.

LoL, hihihi when an army program become a welfare program you know it's over... Ahahahah... I up vote you best and most funny comment of the week!!!

NATO is already falling apart. They will probably lose (will have to kick) Turkey out of the union and  Turks will take sides with Putin.

Saudi's are having troubles with USA, they may also change sides.

Syria is with Russia since the beginning. They are not stupid, they know USA made ISIS up to take their land and oil.

Putin is gaining new friends everyday. Who is going to fight for USA and EUR? McDonald's fatties? On the other hand; Iran, Russia, Turkey, Syria... all of those countries do know how to fight.

Good analysis... The problem is that nothing is done against the endemic and systemic corruption in Washington D.C.. They all serve their party, how bad the corruption is never addressed on the pretext of party unity. The food supply is fucked, incarceration rate trough the roof, balant violation of national security policy not enforce for the protected class...

One of the big trick is to down play and trash as much as possible the Shanghai alliance, why? To buy cheap and find bargain while the transfer of asset occurs... Try to pull down a building in Shanghai... Who ever you are and where ever your days will be numbered.

Putin isn't perfect, but at least he doesn't sell Russia for a profit from the money printers... They tried to buy Russia with papers printed... OMG never seen such stupidity. Do you any other country on Earth who could say fuck pieces of shit subtrash rapists and gmo protectionists to the nsa and cia and protect Snowden?

Dia boss nsa boss or cia bosses and families, friends and prostitues can't survive fsb/svd death squads. Those bogey mother fuckers have sold their country for papers printed, they have all the analytics to see the problem but say they respect the law for them when those abusing them don't. They put themselves as such in a systemic asymmetric position... Like the kgb when the Yeltsin looters were in charge.

This is the moment Russian patriots took a stand... And this stand is way bigger and history affecting that planting a flag on the moon. The spirit of the Alamo. Do you understand against whom the LIBERATION army in PLA stands for?

Now what you don't see is Japan... Emails? Digital communication? Traitors? What's that in the world of the Bushido? It's possible to maintain the illusion until the election... As soon as diesbold machine elect Hillary (or the national intelligence complex counter cheat for trump as the last hope) then if her, domino fall slower than America will be alone...

Their gov want to control your food supply... Flame throwers are the only solution against those psychotic maniacs...

Remember most of the corporate profits of global corporations are now outside of America... It's only natural to move the corporate centers where the profits is... You wouldn't want to let this edge to your competitors...

[Noctis Connor]

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/692601/NATO-military-chief-warns-Vladimir-Putin-invade-Poland-start-World-War-Three

This link is a joke the info inside there is a false statement. Don't be fooled by clickbaits, this is just a propaganda. We already know that the russia has issue with NATO since the Turkey issue, Russia will not start a world war 3!

[Kvazimoda]

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/692601/NATO-military-chief-warns-Vladimir-Putin-invade-Poland-start-World-War-Three

This link is a joke the info inside there is a false statement. Don't be fooled by clickbaits, this is just a propaganda. We already know that the russia has issue with NATO since the Turkey issue, Russia will not start a world war 3!

Why Russian World War 3? Russia and so happy with everything. Well, if something stops and arrange, change because she likes and permits especially at anybody will not ask. Russia wants to be a civilized power, but in this case it is constantly in the way. No need to climb into the den to bear. Especially with its rules.

[virtualx]

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/692601/NATO-military-chief-warns-Vladimir-Putin-invade-Poland-start-World-War-Three

This link is a joke the info inside there is a false statement. Don't be fooled by clickbaits, this is just a propaganda. We already know that the russia has issue with NATO since the Turkey issue, Russia will not start a world war 3!

Why Russian World War 3? Russia and so happy with everything. Well, if something stops and arrange, change because she likes and permits especially at anybody will not ask. Russia wants to be a civilized power, but in this case it is constantly in the way. No need to climb into the den to bear. Especially with its rules.

Russia had a decline in territory in the last 50 years, that could be a reason. I think its more probable to have economic war, look at China, it's not in many wars but economy has been rising.

[horace08122]

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/692601/NATO-military-chief-warns-Vladimir-Putin-invade-Poland-start-World-War-Three

This link is a joke the info inside there is a false statement. Don't be fooled by clickbaits, this is just a propaganda. We already know that the russia has issue with NATO since the Turkey issue, Russia will not start a world war 3!

Why Russian World War 3? Russia and so happy with everything. Well, if something stops and arrange, change because she likes and permits especially at anybody will not ask. Russia wants to be a civilized power, but in this case it is constantly in the way. No need to climb into the den to bear. Especially with its rules.

Russia had a decline in territory in the last 50 years, that could be a reason. I think its more probable to have economic war, look at China, it's not in many wars but economy has been rising.

Do you know exactly what Russia need all what you think it is lost? Territory Rosiyskoy fediratsii and today is huge. And much of it has not been developed. The economic situation is quite tolerable. Well, for military power, it is better to remain silent. It is foolish to think that Russia does not have the strength to defend themselves.

[Nemo1024]

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/692601/NATO-military-chief-warns-Vladimir-Putin-invade-Poland-start-World-War-Three

Why Poland?   Why would China or Argentina care about this?  Propaganda?
Western news writes again that Putin is planning to take over the world  

When one reads something like this, apply Owrellian double-speak. NATO has come so close to the Russian borders that it may cross them at any time (even by a pre-planned "accident") and provoke Russia into a symmetric response.

As I wrote in my thread Is the West gearing up to invade Russia once again?, USNATO and its launching facilities (which can carry nuclear warheads) are so close to Moscow, that even a small accident at those sites, which may look like a launch towards Russia will mean a response from Russia. When the launching sites were further from the Russian border, the world could be more at peace - Russia would have time to evaluate the threat and not resort to a nuclear response.

Oh fuck! Very good point you make... Those Americans are so irresponsible... Where would it be more acceptable to Russia?

Russia used to place nuclear missile in Cuba. Is that responsible? Why can't Russia join NATO?  

1. USSR placed nuclear missiles in Cuba as a response to USA placing nuclear missiles in Turkey. that was responsible. After some off-channel negotiations between Khrushev and Kennedy, USA removed those missiles from Turkey and USSR removed theirs from Cuba.

2. Russia will not join NATO for the very reason of NATO being an organisation, created with the sole purpose of destroying Russia. It's like asking why a bear won't join the hunters... Besides, Russia did try hones cooperative approach to USNATO, opening cooperation channels, striking agreement, but NATO broke each and every of those agreement.

Russia had a decline in territory in the last 50 years, that could be a reason. I think its more probable to have economic war, look at China, it's not in many wars but economy has been rising.

Um... Really? Last I checked Russia increased its territory with the return of Crimea. If you mean the lands of Malorossia and Novorossia, they were chopped off from Russia by Lenin 100 years ago, and not 50. Same with Belorussia.

May I suggest that you refine the quality of your posts to something that is at least remotely historical accurate.

[Dahhi]

Should WWIII happen, it will not be anytime soon.

So relax everyone, grab a cookie and watch the battle of the Titans

[designerusa]

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/692601/NATO-military-chief-warns-Vladimir-Putin-invade-Poland-start-World-War-Three

according to me, some evil forces want to sound society out with this fake news..because they really desire to know whether this world is ready for world war 3 or not. but they dont know that nobody believes these fake news..

[virtualx]

Russia had a decline in territory in the last 50 years, that could be a reason. I think its more probable to have economic war, look at China, it's not in many wars but economy has been rising.

Um... Really? Last I checked Russia increased its territory with the return of Crimea. If you mean the lands of Malorossia and Novorossia, they were chopped off from Russia by Lenin 100 years ago, and not 50. Same with Belorussia.

All Russians I met considered the Soviet Union countries to be part of Russia. The fall of the union was the biggest disaster for them. We could argue if these were part of Russia or not, but fact is the nuclear missiles are moving closer to Moscow which means Russia power abroad seems to be on a decline.

[bryant.coleman]

Russia had a decline in territory in the last 50 years, that could be a reason. I think its more probable to have economic war, look at China, it's not in many wars but economy has been rising.

Um... Really? Last I checked Russia increased its territory with the return of Crimea. If you mean the lands of Malorossia and Novorossia, they were chopped off from Russia by Lenin 100 years ago, and not 50. Same with Belorussia.

May I suggest that you refine the quality of your posts to something that is at least remotely historical accurate.

The Russians should blame themselves. In the mid 1990s, Ukraine wanted to merge with Russia, to create a Union state. It was Boris Yeltsin who turned down that proposal, after consulting with Bill Clinton. And in the late 1990s, the same happened with a proposal to merge Russia and Belarus. Yeltsin should have been toppled before he was able to destroy the RF.

[Nemo1024]

Russia had a decline in territory in the last 50 years, that could be a reason. I think its more probable to have economic war, look at China, it's not in many wars but economy has been rising.

Um... Really? Last I checked Russia increased its territory with the return of Crimea. If you mean the lands of Malorossia and Novorossia, they were chopped off from Russia by Lenin 100 years ago, and not 50. Same with Belorussia.

May I suggest that you refine the quality of your posts to something that is at least remotely historical accurate.

The Russians should blame themselves. In the mid 1990s, Ukraine wanted to merge with Russia, to create a Union state. It was Boris Yeltsin who turned down that proposal, after consulting with Bill Clinton. And in the late 1990s, the same happened with a proposal to merge Russia and Belarus. Yeltsin should have been toppled before he was able to destroy the RF.

In which case you'd remember that there was an attempt to democratically impeach Yeltsin in November 1993, when it became clear where he was leading the country (to destruction), and the bloody US-sponsored de-facto coup which followed - with tanks in Moscow shooting at the Parliament, something that kept Yeltsin and hime American advisors in power for 7 more years (in a way Russia between 1994 and 2000 was not much different from Ukraine of 2014 onwards)...

In 1991 Russians were naive, after 1993 and until 2000 the Russians were enslaved...

PS: As an additional answer to virtualx: if Russia were to respond no to the American actions in the same way USSR did back then, Russia would have needed to conduct a coup in Canada, install 5-6 military bases in Mexico and a couple on Cuba, and then sponsor a bunch of NGOs in USA to scream in all American media that the Obama regime must be toppled, all the while complaining in the same media that under Obama there is no freedom of speech in the USA.