The Electric Universe theory

[CloudStrife]

Interesting, I'll see some of the documentaries.

The do have videos of lab experiments conducted, they simulated a galaxy formation in a lab, seems kinda way out their but check it out.

Pretty hard to do that, you need a black hole in the middle that swirls the gas around it and creates the disk shape of the galaxy.

I'm sure you don't want to make a black hole on earth

These experiments have the potential to generate microscopic black holes. They have very short lifespan and not enough to cause significant damage around.

[1713884878]

1713884878

[1713884878]

1713884878

[1713884878]

1713884878

[1713884878]

1713884878

[RealBitcoin]

These experiments have the potential to generate microscopic black holes. They have very short lifespan and not enough to cause significant damage around.

Please no black holes, I dont want the Earth to be sucked in

Besides the evaporation of a microscopic black hole causes a blast that is stronger than 10,000 nukes, so no black holes please!

[CloudStrife]

These experiments have the potential to generate microscopic black holes. They have very short lifespan and not enough to cause significant damage around.

Please no black holes, I dont want the Earth to be sucked in

Besides the evaporation of a microscopic black hole causes a blast that is stronger than 10,000 nukes, so no black holes please!

lol I'm not the one doing this.
I think these guys know what they are doing anyway.

[RealBitcoin]

These experiments have the potential to generate microscopic black holes. They have very short lifespan and not enough to cause significant damage around.

Please no black holes, I dont want the Earth to be sucked in

Besides the evaporation of a microscopic black hole causes a blast that is stronger than 10,000 nukes, so no black holes please!

lol I'm not the one doing this.
I think these guys know what they are doing anyway.

I'm not so sure about that, i think the Cern guys are crazy and reckless, they should setup their dangerous experiments on the Moon or Mars, not in the middle of Europe, where anything could go wrong.

[Megaquake]

To all you mathematicians take 6 minutes to check out this video.

Elegant Math and Failed Theory

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRFCNCMANws

What is the cause of the gravitational lense effect if there is no space time topology?

Exposing the Myth of Gravitational Lensing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fePQdJNVF9g

[BADecker]

These experiments have the potential to generate microscopic black holes. They have very short lifespan and not enough to cause significant damage around.

Please no black holes, I dont want the Earth to be sucked in

Besides the evaporation of a microscopic black hole causes a blast that is stronger than 10,000 nukes, so no black holes please!

lol I'm not the one doing this.
I think these guys know what they are doing anyway.

I'm not so sure about that, i think the Cern guys are crazy and reckless, they should setup their dangerous experiments on the Moon or Mars, not in the middle of Europe, where anything could go wrong.

Besides, nobody knows that the Cern guys aren't creating the particles rather than simply finding them.

[criptix]

To all you mathematicians take 6 minutes to check out this video.

Elegant Math and Failed Theory

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRFCNCMANws

What is the cause of the gravitational lense effect if there is no space time topology?

Exposing the Myth of Gravitational Lensing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fePQdJNVF9g

Please point me to just one gravitational lens that was not achromatic.

The nobel prize with some million dollars are waiting.

Btw. You could also try to tell me what the size of the lens for refraction would be for example our sun.

[BADecker]

^^^ He should answer the question of course, but you have to show that there even is a gravitational lens, now that we have seen that it is simple aberration of light through particles near a star or other object.

[criptix]

To all you mathematicians take 6 minutes to check out this video.

Elegant Math and Failed Theory

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRFCNCMANws

What is the cause of the gravitational lense effect if there is no space time topology?

Exposing the Myth of Gravitational Lensing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fePQdJNVF9g

Please point me to just one gravitational lens that was not achromatic.

The nobel prize with some million dollars are waiting.

Btw. You could also try to tell me what the size of the lens for refraction would be for example our sun.

^^^ He should answer the question of course, but you have to show that there even is a gravitational lens, now that we have seen that it is simple aberration of light through particles near a star or other object.

I bolded what is important to answer your post.
The material that is needed for the refraction doesnt exist.

If we take our sun for example and do some calculations then the thickness of the lens has to be around 20.000 km and more of water or air. Or some other material with 700.000 km thickness.

It just doesnt work.

[BADecker]

To all you mathematicians take 6 minutes to check out this video.

Elegant Math and Failed Theory

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRFCNCMANws

What is the cause of the gravitational lense effect if there is no space time topology?

Exposing the Myth of Gravitational Lensing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fePQdJNVF9g

Please point me to just one gravitational lens that was not achromatic.

The nobel prize with some million dollars are waiting.

Btw. You could also try to tell me what the size of the lens for refraction would be for example our sun.

^^^ He should answer the question of course, but you have to show that there even is a gravitational lens, now that we have seen that it is simple aberration of light through particles near a star or other object.

I bolded what is important to answer your post.
The material that is needed for the refraction doesnt exist.

If we take our sun for example and do some calculations then the thickness of the lens has to be around 20.000 km and more of water or air. Or some other material with 700.000 km thickness.

It just doesnt work.

Personally, I am not into this enough to answer your points. But the people in the videos seem to think that the material is there. Didn't they say that it exists in the form of nutrinos?

[BADecker]

Here is a string of videos from Youtube that shows the flaws in nuclear and gravitational theory in the stars and cosmos.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_9n3cOL690&list=PL0851C89BD3B6ADBA&index=1

[Megaquake]

The Dark matter hoax

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmROfjgViLE