♠ BETCOIN.AG ♠ Fixed Signature Campaign - Monthly Payments - No Free Spots ♠

[tokeweed]

Hi everyone, we want to announce an important change of rules which will come into force from the beginning of the next stage. Change are the minimum and maximum post limit. From the fourteenth stage minimum post limit change from 50 to 30 and maximum post limit change from 150 to 100.

We are  full but recruitment continues. New candidates can get a chance to join the queue and get a chance to receive stage bonus if meets our requirements. Thank you.

Stage 13:
2016-10-29 00:01 Forum time   -  2016-11-27 23:59 Forum Time


From Stage 14 policy change:
Maximum: 100 constructive posts per month
Minimum: 30 constructive posts per month

I beg you to reconsider.  Maybe allow only a number of campaigners to get a maximum of 150 posts a month?  If you reconsider, I would want to be one of them, please.

[1713904086]

1713904086

[1713904086]

1713904086

[1713904086]

1713904086

[1713904086]

1713904086

[1713904086]

1713904086

[panjul07]

Hi everyone, we want to announce an important change of rules which will come into force from the beginning of the next stage. Change are the minimum and maximum post limit. From the fourteenth stage minimum post limit change from 50 to 30 and maximum post limit change from 150 to 100.

We are  full but recruitment continues. New candidates can get a chance to join the queue and get a chance to receive stage bonus if meets our requirements. Thank you.

Stage 13:
2016-10-29 00:01 Forum time   -  2016-11-27 23:59 Forum Time


From Stage 14 policy change:
Maximum: 100 constructive posts per month
Minimum: 30 constructive posts per month

I beg you to reconsider.  Maybe allow only a number of campaigners to get a maximum of 150 posts a month?  If you reconsider, I would want to be one of them, please.

It will not good for the campaign and the participants imo, no need to make a difference between participants. It may cause jealousy, lets just follow the new rules.

[tokeweed]

Some produce better posts than others if you noticed and imho, the better posters deserve better pay.  No offense but I think it's only fair.  And if you're ok with 100 maximum posts per month then that's up to you.  I personally would want to apply for a 150 post maximum limit if Betcoin reconsiders.

[panjul07]

Some produce better posts than others if you noticed and imho, the better posters deserve better pay.  No offense but I think it's only fair.  And if you're ok with 100 maximum posts per month then that's up to you.  I personally would want to apply for a 150 post maximum limit if Betcoin reconsiders.

I did not say that I'm OK with the new rules to be honest, but what I like is that participants only need to make less posts with the new rules and as the consequence we will get lower payment from the previous stages. Indeed what we earn per stage will be down signficantly with the new rules because they have reduced the rate per post before reducing the max post limit.
I used to earn around $110 per stages and with new rules I will only earn around $90, $20 difference is not that big for me. But it would be great if we can still earn the same amount in every stage (converted to $), maybe they can increase the rate per post again. IMHO this is the main disadvantage of having a campaign with monthly payment. At the beginning of the stage we get new rules because the btc price up, but it may be down badly at the end of the stage. Maybe they can consider to make a fixed payment in $ so they will not need to be worry when btc price up and participant will not worry as well when btc price down.
Just my opinion.

[The_prodigy]

Stage 14 will be nice and easier is the payment will be increase too ? Like you are going to add some 20k satoshi per post? for every rank so it will be up Im okay with this and new rules are quite really good for me and for those who in this campaign less post.

[poptok1]

-snip-
Maybe they can consider to make a fixed payment in $...

That would be lovely, very good idea. However this is bitcoin forum and bitcoin casino...
Where if not here payments in BTC could take place? Just saying.
I like the rules, have nothing against that, never did more than 100 posts and I think lower minimum
will only improve post quality. Sometimes having less is having more

Nevertheless a little rise per post would be appreciated, but not mandatory.
Cheers 4 Betcoin & all participants.

[Karartma1]

Better to accept less people and retain a good payment rate to attract only the best contributors rather than having an army of posters coming here to have a paid signature.
I wish you would reconsider this.

If a decision has been made I'll respect it but, regrettably, after this stage I'll quit the betcoin campaign.

[cjmoles]

These new changes make sense when the increase of value of bitcoin is considered....when this campaign started, the price of bitcoin was significantly less than what it is now.  However, I do think that the differences in the length of time between stages and the length of time between payments might need to be adjusted....It might be more effective to run a weekly stage because with a monthly stage, a person can go 3/4th's of the month inactive and complete their quota the last 4th of the month....not very efficient advertising in my opinion.  A weekly stage would promote a more fluid advertisement range because it insures weekly participation....just a thought.

[NorrisK]

These new changes make sense when the increase of value of bitcoin is considered....when this campaign started, the price of bitcoin was significantly less than what it is now.  However, I do think that the differences in the length of time between stages and the length of time between payments might need to be adjusted....It might be more effective to run a weekly stage because with a monthly stage, a person can go 3/4th's of the month inactive and complete their quota the last 4th of the month....not very efficient advertising in my opinion.  A weekly stage would promote a more fluid advertisement range because it insures weekly participation....just a thought.

During the first rise of bitcoin towards 1000 usd, there were still campaigns paying .0016 per post. If it was possible then, why not now?

All things considered, we don't have insight in what amount of traffic the campaign generates for betcoin and how the increased bitcoin price affects the betting behaviour of people.

It's a shame that the payrate gets cut one month and the maximum amount of posts the next, but atleast they share the information ahead of the round. Ultimately it is up to everybody to decide if they are ok with the new rules.

[Betwrong]

I have been a member of this Signature Campaign for more than 10 months and I can say that it had always been a great experience. The payments were always in time and the rates were among the highest on this forum.

I actually have no complaints whatsoever and can say only good words about the Betcoin.ag.

However I agree with others before me that reducing the rates and the number of paid posts is something to be reconsidered.

I don't mind being paid a bit less than before but now it is almost two times less.

[Roboabhishek]

I have been promoted to Sr. Member Today please update it in the spread sheet

Updated the signature as well
Thanks

[Karartma1]

It would be good to receive an official reply from Betcoin to our questions. Surely we are being paid for our time to promote Betcoin in our signature space but this comes as a service. We also know we have no power to change things over here but our reasons should be heard.

What I liked of this signature campaign was the difficulty of being accepted and the quality of its contributors: I think we should continue this way.

My last two satoshis 

[raphma]

Hi Manager!
I'm a Sr. Member now, could you please update the sheet?

one question: can i have my bitcoin referral on the link to betcoin website at my signature?

PS: i didnt made any change(beside update to sr member signature), i'll be waiting your answer.

[tokeweed]

Why not open this campaign for application to have a 150 max limit if the campaigners improve their posts or already has good posts.  This will achieve two things.  1) It will improve the overall quality of this campaign.  2) It will make this campaign more recognized for giving more quality posts in the forum.  Tbh, the Fortune Jack campaign has some of the worst posters.  That's really bad considering they are among the highest paid and are giving low quality posts in this forum.

[BetcoinCasino]

Hi, we understand that our decision for some of you is good because many barely do the 50 posts, and others of you with over 100 posts in a stage, for those of you probably our decision is not good. However, from all other possible ways we chose this one as the best for you and best for us. We stay with the current number of participants.

We congratulate those who promoted. Spreadsheet updated.

We are  full but recruitment continues. New candidates can get a chance to join the queue and get a chance to receive stage bonus if meets our requirements. Thank you.

Stage 13:
2016-10-29 00:01 Forum time   -  2016-11-27 23:59 Forum Time


From Stage 14 policy change:
Maximum: 100 constructive posts per month
Minimum: 30 constructive posts per month

[cjmoles]

These new changes make sense when the increase of value of bitcoin is considered....when this campaign started, the price of bitcoin was significantly less than what it is now.  However, I do think that the differences in the length of time between stages and the length of time between payments might need to be adjusted....It might be more effective to run a weekly stage because with a monthly stage, a person can go 3/4th's of the month inactive and complete their quota the last 4th of the month....not very efficient advertising in my opinion.  A weekly stage would promote a more fluid advertisement range because it insures weekly participation....just a thought.

During the first rise of bitcoin towards 1000 usd, there were still campaigns paying .0016 per post. If it was possible then, why not now?

All things considered, we don't have insight in what amount of traffic the campaign generates for betcoin and how the increased bitcoin price affects the betting behaviour of people.

It's a shame that the payrate gets cut one month and the maximum amount of posts the next, but atleast they share the information ahead of the round. Ultimately it is up to everybody to decide if they are ok with the new rules.

Yes, this is true....good points.  There are a lot of variables to consider.  I guess we just leave it up to the professionals and trust that they know what's best for the brand....It's up to each participant to decide their own value in the end; that's the amazing virtue of free markets! 

Personally, though, I just love the Betcoin POKER platform and would sport their signature regardless of the pay rate....I'm in it for the poker....I've never experienced faster, no hassle payouts, on any other site with comparable player pools....I hope to see it grow while it works out any of the kinks it might encounter by providing us the opportunity of playing in the much larger USD poker pools while utilizing the speeds of the cryptocurrency platform....

[tokeweed]

Instead of 100 maximum posts, why not 120 since it seems like the standard in most signature campaigns?  Just a suggestion.  What do you guys think?

[sulendra12]

Instead of 100 maximum posts, why not 120 since it seems like the standard in most signature campaigns?  Just a suggestion.  What do you guys think?

That I was saying earlier , it's good to set it on 120 because it's standard amount of post for fixed rate campaign (30/week or 4+5/day).
And the minimum is OK (30/month) . But that's a final decision so we just following the rules with 100 posts in a month (25/week or 3+4/day)

[Roboabhishek]

Instead of 100 maximum posts, why not 120 since it seems like the standard in most signature campaigns?  Just a suggestion.  What do you guys think?

Only 20 posts wont make a difference because many users like me barely make 80 posts a month because they don't have much time to post with full potential however 120 posts are good for those users who excel in quantity of posting..

[ahmedjadoon]

I appreciate the policy changes as my post count is always at lower side.