operabit
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000
|
 |
August 12, 2016, 07:21:46 AM |
|
My signature design I hope you like it. Sr. MEMBER HERO/LEGENDARY MEMBER Nice bro!  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin addresses contain a checksum, so it is very unlikely that mistyping an address will cause you to lose money.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
antshares
|
|
August 12, 2016, 08:21:53 AM |
|
My signature design I hope you like it. Sr. MEMBER HERO/LEGENDARY MEMBER That's cool. But I'm sorry we already got a hero/legendary signature design and we are ready to adopt that one. Will let you know if your Sr.member design is adopted. Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
lindin99
|
|
August 12, 2016, 08:32:29 AM |
|
Why you don;t create other spreadsheets (expect sign)
Because i can not find me in the sign list , and think that thise may be and for twitter and other campaigns
|
|
|
|
|
|
kaicrypzen
|
|
August 12, 2016, 08:55:47 AM |
|
Just wanted to point out that Indian Hindi is the translation of the ANN, whereas Indian is the translation of the PRE-ANN and that both are in the same language which is Hindi. Maybe there should be a separate section for the PRE-ANN translations? |
|
|
|
|
lindin99
|
|
August 12, 2016, 09:53:10 AM |
|
You have very slow-slow server For your project with thousands of BTC it's not appropriate  |
|
|
|
|
|
antshares
|
|
August 12, 2016, 11:52:11 AM |
|
Why you don;t create other spreadsheets (expect sign)
Because i can not find me in the sign list , and think that thise may be and for twitter and other campaigns
Are you in the triple bounty？ If you are and your name is not on the list, let us know. |
|
|
|
|
antshares
|
|
August 12, 2016, 11:53:03 AM |
|
Just wanted to point out that Indian Hindi is the translation of the ANN, whereas Indian is the translation of the PRE-ANN and that both are in the same language which is Hindi. Maybe there should be a separate section for the PRE-ANN translations? I'll fix that now Thanks |
|
|
|
|
sunce33
|
|
August 12, 2016, 11:54:38 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
antshares
|
|
August 12, 2016, 11:56:50 AM |
|
You have very slow-slow server For your project with thousands of BTC it's not appropriate Which country are you in? Let us know and maybe we can contact the server and try to improve Also we do need to ensure high speed within China and that may cause slow for oversea users Hope u can understand. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
DomainMagnate
|
|
August 12, 2016, 12:00:34 PM |
|
You have very slow-slow server For your project with thousands of BTC it's not appropriate Which country are you in? Let us know and maybe we can contact the server and try to improve Also we do need to ensure high speed within China and that may cause slow for oversea users Hope u can understand. Thanks I am in India and your site working perfectly here whenever I check it |
|
|
|
|
dahongfei (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 13
|
|
August 12, 2016, 12:03:54 PM |
|
Thanks we'll add it to ANN later |
|
|
|
|
dahongfei (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 13
|
|
August 12, 2016, 12:05:31 PM |
|
You have very slow-slow server For your project with thousands of BTC it's not appropriate Which country are you in? Let us know and maybe we can contact the server and try to improve Also we do need to ensure high speed within China and that may cause slow for oversea users Hope u can understand. Thanks I am in India and your site working perfectly here whenever I check it Cool. Glad to know that. Guess it's because we are close |
|
|
|
|
|
ttookk
|
|
August 12, 2016, 12:15:50 PM |
|
Is there any information about the 1000 BTC buy? Does anybody have a clue who this person/persons is/are?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simple858
|
|
August 12, 2016, 12:17:46 PM |
|
Is there any information about the 1000 BTC buy? Does anybody have a clue who this person/persons is/are?
maybe DEV!?  |
|
|
|
|
|
DomainMagnate
|
|
August 12, 2016, 12:21:15 PM |
|
You have very slow-slow server For your project with thousands of BTC it's not appropriate Which country are you in? Let us know and maybe we can contact the server and try to improve Also we do need to ensure high speed within China and that may cause slow for oversea users Hope u can understand. Thanks I am in India and your site working perfectly here whenever I check it Cool. Glad to know that. Guess it's because we are close Hope antshares bring us even closer |
|
|
|
|
|
Bybox
|
|
August 12, 2016, 12:22:04 PM |
|
Is there any information about the 1000 BTC buy? Does anybody have a clue who this person/persons is/are?
maybe DEV!? I think they already buy in the first ICO |
|
|
|
|
|
OrsonJ
|
|
August 12, 2016, 12:40:23 PM |
|
I am confused about the previous ICO phase I in 2015. What's up with that? Is this a continuation? A fork of the previous project?  That's the first round of funding for our project. This is the second round not a continuation. Project is Antshares all along Where can I get more info on the first ICO (money raised, coins allocated and at what price etc.)? You can check the second reply (under the bounty) of this thread to find more information. Let me know if those are not enough. Thanks! Thanks for your response. Actually the links don't give all that much information (at least not in English) about the first ICO. How many Antshares were distributed during it and at what price? Thanks |
|
|
|
|
kaicrypzen
|
|
August 12, 2016, 12:49:45 PM |
|
- Certainty Bookkeeping without Forks
Antshares uses Joint mode for bookkeeping. Joint mode is advantageous over consistency and finality, it requires nodes to authenticate themselves to achieve a weak trust from other nodes.
I am having a bit of trouble understanding this section. I know what bookkeeping is, but what is "Certainty Bookkeeping without Forks" ? What is "joint mode" ? What does "Joint mode is advantageous over consistency and finality" mean? Does it mean joint mode enables consistency and finality? Or does it mean joint mode is better than consistency and finality? Also "it requires nodes to authenticate themselves to achieve a weak trust from other nodes", why would nodes athenticating themselves achieve WEAK trust? Wouldn't it on the contrary provide trust? I would really appreciate some explanation about that. Thank you. |
|
|
|
Dirac
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
August 12, 2016, 02:01:46 PM |
|
Support made in China  |
|
|
|
|
dahongfei (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 13
|
|
August 12, 2016, 03:33:32 PM |
|
- Certainty Bookkeeping without Forks
Antshares uses Joint mode for bookkeeping. Joint mode is advantageous over consistency and finality, it requires nodes to authenticate themselves to achieve a weak trust from other nodes.
I am having a bit of trouble understanding this section. I know what bookkeeping is, but what is "Certainty Bookkeeping without Forks" ? What is "joint mode" ? What does "Joint mode is advantageous over consistency and finality" mean? Does it mean joint mode enables consistency and finality? Or does it mean joint mode is better than consistency and finality? Also "it requires nodes to authenticate themselves to achieve a weak trust from other nodes", why would nodes athenticating themselves achieve WEAK trust? Wouldn't it on the contrary provide trust? I would really appreciate some explanation about that. Thank you. “Certainty Bookkeeping w/o forks” means you know a transaction is valid as soon as there is one confirmation, as opposite to bitcoin's 6 confirmation. "Confirmed" is a probability expression under bitcoin, any transaction can be removed from the blockchain as long as there is a alternative history with more hashing power. Joint mode means every block is validated by multiple parties, unlike a single node as in PoW/PoS/DPoS. You are right, joint mode enables finality with one confirmation. "it requires nodes to authenticate themselves to achieve a weak trust from other nodes", authenticate here means approving it's own identity. Revealing one's real identity is a more economical way to get "trust" comparing to demonstrate(waste) hashing power. Although PoW is more suitable if anti-censorship is the prioritized design goal. |
|
|
|
|
|
