redmonski
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2016, 02:57:16 AM |
|
So v3 showed me Hash Rates and Total's
v4 seems to be sitting there and occasionally shows Real: 67XXXXXXXXXX across the screen.
Am I just not waiting long enough or did I miss something?
Benchmark in v4 is noticeably faster.
Found a nonce but showed 0 hash rate and total 0 GPU Usage shows 98% so it's definitely doing something ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Well I switched back to v3 and it instantly started working again... not sure whats up with v4 I'm using SM30 Some additional testing of V4: I can confirm argument for additional GPU's doesn't work on V4, works fine on V3 What's the command line for additional GPU? I Can't get to work more than 1 GPU.
|
|
|
|
thedreamer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1002
Go Big or Go Home.....
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2016, 03:47:03 AM |
|
Anyone see their wallet show a solved block it solved, the solved # up, miner name in the blockchain, then it just disappeared!??! Happened 2x now. WTH?
|
Go Big or Go Home.
|
|
|
xhomerx10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3948
Merit: 8511
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2016, 03:57:15 AM |
|
Anyone see their wallet show a solved block it solved, the solved # up, miner name in the blockchain, then it just disappeared!??! Happened 2x now. WTH?
I've seen it even with CPU mining of PascalCoin. I will see a number beside "Blocks found" but it doesn't match the blocks I actually have. They must be orphans... edit: Wow. Diff is screaming up.
|
|
|
|
|
doktor1897
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2016, 04:28:22 AM |
|
To answer a few questions about the GPU miner I've seen pop up:
Is the GPU miner compatible with 1.0.7? Not currently, although I plan to make a GPU miner for 1.0.7 sometime soon (this weekend?).
Is there a memory leak in the current GPU miner? Yup, leaks about a megabyte-ish a minute. I'm pretty sure I found the problem, testing the new version now to make sure it still performs as expected.
Do I need to use different users in Windows to mine with multiple GPUs? Probably--each GPU will be essentially duplicating the work of the other GPUs if they're fed the same mining data, since they run deterministically (no 'random' nonce generation, though the number of threads running on the GPU do affect the nonce range explored).
Can the different GPU miners all run from the same folder? No, you need to run a separate instance of PascalCoin from a separate folder for each GPU on the same machine.
Why do I need to use different users for multiple GPUs? You need to run multiple instances of PascalCoin either with a different public key you mine with, or with a different miner name in order to make sure the GPUs aren't duplicating each other's work.
Will I be able to mine with multiple GPUs to a single wallet in the future? Yes. The version that supports 1.0.7 and it's RPC functionality will allow you to specify a different miner name for each GPU. As long as you let each GPU use a different miner name, they won't duplicate any work between them (because the miner name is part of what gets hashed when producing a block).
Does it still make sense to CPU mine? If you have free electric or just want to play around, sure. Unless you have free electric, it isn't going to be profitable.
whether the cpu ordinary users will continue to be able to continue this mining?
|
|
|
|
DaniellPlasmmer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2016, 04:38:13 AM |
|
When have most GPU miners, it is bad for CPU miners?
|
|
|
|
thedreamer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1002
Go Big or Go Home.....
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2016, 04:40:25 AM |
|
To answer a few questions about the GPU miner I've seen pop up:
Is the GPU miner compatible with 1.0.7? Not currently, although I plan to make a GPU miner for 1.0.7 sometime soon (this weekend?).
Is there a memory leak in the current GPU miner? Yup, leaks about a megabyte-ish a minute. I'm pretty sure I found the problem, testing the new version now to make sure it still performs as expected.
Do I need to use different users in Windows to mine with multiple GPUs? Probably--each GPU will be essentially duplicating the work of the other GPUs if they're fed the same mining data, since they run deterministically (no 'random' nonce generation, though the number of threads running on the GPU do affect the nonce range explored).
Can the different GPU miners all run from the same folder? No, you need to run a separate instance of PascalCoin from a separate folder for each GPU on the same machine.
Why do I need to use different users for multiple GPUs? You need to run multiple instances of PascalCoin either with a different public key you mine with, or with a different miner name in order to make sure the GPUs aren't duplicating each other's work.
Will I be able to mine with multiple GPUs to a single wallet in the future? Yes. The version that supports 1.0.7 and it's RPC functionality will allow you to specify a different miner name for each GPU. As long as you let each GPU use a different miner name, they won't duplicate any work between them (because the miner name is part of what gets hashed when producing a block).
Does it still make sense to CPU mine? If you have free electric or just want to play around, sure. Unless you have free electric, it isn't going to be profitable.
whether the cpu ordinary users will continue to be able to continue this mining? Sure can. If they want to waste electricity.
|
Go Big or Go Home.
|
|
|
cptfisher
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2016, 04:42:00 AM Last edit: October 11, 2016, 04:53:39 AM by cptfisher |
|
Thank you for the source. i have implemented it and now i can dualmine ETHEREUM and pascal
Geforce gtx 1070 8 gb GAINWARD @ 50 % power meter + 160 MHZ core + 456 mhz memory (micron)
26 mh/s ETHEREUM 60 Mh/s PASCAL
*3 = PROFIT BABY ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Geforce gtx 1070 8 gb GAINWARD @ 70 % power meter + 200 MHZ core + 456 mhz memory (micron) 28 mh/s ETHEREUM 67 Mh/s PASCAL if anyone interested pm me ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
go6ooo1212
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2016, 04:42:58 AM |
|
Is this the unneutered version of your software or have you not released it yet? He released the unmetred one last night to support the network. Vorsholk is solid and a great person. Actually totally spaced this, here's an unneutered version with the memory leak fix: http://www.filedropper.com/pascalcudav4Tested , but now the parameter , which sets which card to mine with , doesn't work and always starts card #0 , instead of pointed one...
|
|
|
|
proletariat
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1005
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2016, 04:52:08 AM |
|
Silly question: I want to send my mined coins to a single secure address... The most basic thing but I'm lost. help? ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif)
|
|
|
|
redmonski
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2016, 04:52:42 AM |
|
can no longer find a block, time for a pool ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
redmonski
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2016, 04:53:56 AM |
|
Silly question: I want to send my mined coins to a single secure address... The most basic thing but I'm lost. help? ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) Can check the video tutorial in the OP. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
DaniellPlasmmer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2016, 05:00:42 AM |
|
To answer a few questions about the GPU miner I've seen pop up:
Is the GPU miner compatible with 1.0.7? Not currently, although I plan to make a GPU miner for 1.0.7 sometime soon (this weekend?).
Is there a memory leak in the current GPU miner? Yup, leaks about a megabyte-ish a minute. I'm pretty sure I found the problem, testing the new version now to make sure it still performs as expected.
Do I need to use different users in Windows to mine with multiple GPUs? Probably--each GPU will be essentially duplicating the work of the other GPUs if they're fed the same mining data, since they run deterministically (no 'random' nonce generation, though the number of threads running on the GPU do affect the nonce range explored).
Can the different GPU miners all run from the same folder? No, you need to run a separate instance of PascalCoin from a separate folder for each GPU on the same machine.
Why do I need to use different users for multiple GPUs? You need to run multiple instances of PascalCoin either with a different public key you mine with, or with a different miner name in order to make sure the GPUs aren't duplicating each other's work.
Will I be able to mine with multiple GPUs to a single wallet in the future? Yes. The version that supports 1.0.7 and it's RPC functionality will allow you to specify a different miner name for each GPU. As long as you let each GPU use a different miner name, they won't duplicate any work between them (because the miner name is part of what gets hashed when producing a block).
Does it still make sense to CPU mine? If you have free electric or just want to play around, sure. Unless you have free electric, it isn't going to be profitable.
whether the cpu ordinary users will continue to be able to continue this mining? Mining needs a country with low taxes of electricity, a man with good calcs and knowledge in computing, and a powerfull machine. Too, it depends on the coin worth. Mining can be a salary or a investment.
|
|
|
|
cptfisher
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2016, 05:50:27 AM |
|
ok playing a bit with my dual miner. PASCAL/ethereum :
so far better to use the neutered version of pascal gpu as the unnetered seems broken... (cant use 3 gpus nor seems to submit shares)
Hash rate @ 50 % power rates is 20 eht stable and 30 pascal stable
THIS MEANS that on 3 cards it will be possible to have same FULL hash rates of 2 cards mining EHTEREUM and 1 mining PASCAL coin but with HALF power consumnption (pascal coin hashrate with limited miner version is 90 mhs / 1 card ... eth hashrate is approx 30 mhs for card but power consumption is way bigger around 400w ... now at the moment pulling out from my outlet 267 watt)
|
|
|
|
MysterE
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2016, 06:48:46 AM |
|
Updated to V4 of the miner, so this one is unrestricted?
The display from the miner keeps reporting 'Real:....' with no indication of hash rate. Has been running over an hour now with several of these entries so is it working?
|
|
|
|
anorganix
Copper Member
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 970
Merit: 287
Per aspera ad astra
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2016, 06:52:56 AM |
|
Yup, this one is the unrestricted version and for me it's working nicely. I got a few blocks with it already.
|
I will never send private messages with payment requests for my auctions. I only communicate transparently via the forum (not Telegram, Discord, Skype & others). Please be wary of scammers.
|
|
|
cryptospreader_temp
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2016, 06:57:35 AM |
|
Yup, this one is the unrestricted version and for me it's working nicely. I got a few blocks with it already.
What's your cpu? I'm running for 2 days but not found a block still. Any help appreciated.
|
|
|
|
anorganix
Copper Member
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 970
Merit: 287
Per aspera ad astra
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2016, 07:00:34 AM |
|
This miner is for GPU mining, you will most likely not get any blocks with your CPUs anymore since difficulty is way up now. My GPU is Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060 6GB WindForce. I have only a mild overclock on it currently.
|
I will never send private messages with payment requests for my auctions. I only communicate transparently via the forum (not Telegram, Discord, Skype & others). Please be wary of scammers.
|
|
|
MysterE
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2016, 07:08:08 AM |
|
Just got a block so V4 is working fine for me ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
cryptospreader_temp
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2016, 07:11:00 AM |
|
This miner is for GPU mining, you will most likely not get any blocks with your CPUs anymore since difficulty is way up now. My GPU is Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060 6GB WindForce. I have only a mild overclock on it currently.
You may be right. Due to high diff I may not be getting any block with cpu. Thanks for the information.
|
|
|
|
|