CRYPTODEVIL trust abuse on LEGENDARY member PT 2.

[siameze]

This guy gave me negative trust because I wear a signature to support an investment. I don't really care too much because for me it makes no difference in my financial life if I have neg trust, I still earn no matter what, but... He did fuck up one of my biggest investments for no other reason but to let his scamming friend Eric Hansen pull off a 400+ btc scam. They wont get away with this. Just letting everyone know.

[1713560967]

1713560967

[1713560967]

1713560967

[Quickseller]

This guy gave me negative trust because I wear a signature to support an investment. I don't really care too much because for me it makes no difference in my financial life if I have neg trust, I still earn no matter what, but... He did fuck up one of my biggest investments for no other reason but to let his scamming friend Eric Hansen pull off a 400+ btc scam. They wont get away with this. Just letting everyone know.

You are an alt of phoenix1969...

[suchmoon]

This guy gave me negative trust because I wear a signature to support an investment. I don't really care too much because for me it makes no difference in my financial life if I have neg trust, I still earn no matter what, but... He did fuck up one of my biggest investments for no other reason but to let his scamming friend Eric Hansen pull off a 400+ btc scam. They wont get away with this. Just letting everyone know.

CD's feedback says:

This is a purchased account and is eagerly shilling for the 'LIR' ICO, a project now proven to have been initiated through bought and stolen forum accounts.

Highly likely to be under the control of the 'LIR' fraudsters.

Nothing about a signature.

You also posted these feedbacks:


Edited 2020-11-29 to fix a broken image

However neither Searing nor myself have negged your "siameze" account. I did neg Phoenix1969 and so did Searing. Not that there is any more proof needed of your puppetry but amusing nonetheless.

[siameze]

This guy gave me negative trust because I wear a signature to support an investment. I don't really care too much because for me it makes no difference in my financial life if I have neg trust, I still earn no matter what, but... He did fuck up one of my biggest investments for no other reason but to let his scamming friend Eric Hansen pull off a 400+ btc scam. They wont get away with this. Just letting everyone know.

CD's feedback says:

This is a purchased account and is eagerly shilling for the 'LIR' ICO, a project now proven to have been initiated through bought and stolen forum accounts.

Highly likely to be under the control of the 'LIR' fraudsters.

Nothing about a signature.

You also posted these feedbacks:



However neither Searing nor myself have negged your "siameze" account. I did neg Phoenix1969 and so did Searing. Not that there is any more proof needed of your puppetry but amusing nonetheless.

You are probably them too. And I bet you are even part of the scam and if I find out you are you'll be in for some fun too.

[suchmoon]

You are probably them too. And I bet you are even part of the scam and if I find out you are you'll be in for some fun too.

Just to make sure - are you threatening me? For a moment there it sounded like you were threatening but then I started to doubt that even a shithead like yourself could be so immensely dumb. But please clarify.

[betlord90]

I think crypto-devil should give ultimatum to the sig campaign participants its because some of them are investor also and the only thing that they can accumulate their money is to get the salary in sig campaign. They will surely get the salary since mexxer-2 are holding the funds for the campaign.

And if the members are didn't take of their sig after these incoming pay week well that is the perfect time to paint them.

Thats a fair deal.

Lir devs are scam.

[cryptodevil]

You are probably them too. And I bet you are even part of the scam and if I find out you are you'll be in for some fun too.

Well good thing you know we're not part of the scam, then, what with you being an obvious sock-puppet account for the criminal fraudsters.

I think crypto-devil should give ultimatum to the sig campaign participants

All they have to do is remove their sig and I'll cancel the rating. The rating is there for other people to be made aware of the fraudulent nature of this operation, not to punish the investors who are the victims in all this.

[betlord90]

You are probably them too. And I bet you are even part of the scam and if I find out you are you'll be in for some fun too.

Well good thing you know we're not part of the scam, then, what with you being an obvious sock-puppet account for the criminal fraudsters.

I think crypto-devil should give ultimatum to the sig campaign participants

All they have to do is remove their sig and I'll cancel the rating. The rating is there for other people to be made aware of the fraudulent nature of this operation, not to punish the investors who are the victims in all this.

If you really want to help the investor just let them finish the last round of campaign im very sure mexxer would released the payment and so by that investors who are in the campaign Can get back their little money.

If you make them stop by now its pretty unfair to them since they can lost big money by forcing them to remove their sig on this mid stage.

And if the payment is done they can happily remove their sig aswell as they are relief since they got accumalate the little peecentage of their invested money.


dont be one sided cryptodevil let the investor regain what they are about to lose, dont force them to lose huge money from it.

Make the last stage of this campaign the ultimatum.

[cryptodevil]

I have only just posted in their thread that the best solution for them would be for the ICO funds to be handed to an independent escrow to manage while a committee of investors sets out to use the money to hire professionals to create the platform they paid for.

The scammers should have no more part to play in this fraud otherwise there will be no hope of ever legitimising the project.

[Redacted-]

TRUTH:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1584976.new#new

[Redacted-]

1st complaint.


http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Eric-Hansen/Internet/Eric-Hansen-Phoenix1969-MrPresident-250000-BTC-scam-Internet-1322320

[betlord90]

I ask Two Lir Participants/investors that has been tag with red trust that there payments will be happen in this upcoming saturday and they want it to be completed so they can get their money and their effort for posting will be worth aswell as they can collect back even a little amount for their invested money.

well thats decent and fair to let them finish the last week since it was bi weekly campaign, efforts and money will regain back and little heartaches will be made.

If the saturday ultimatum will be done and yet there still participants want to continue that scam campaign will should be tag by red trust.

[siameze]

Will anyone be formally pressing charges Against Eric Hansen for fraud.

He sold his account and then claimed it was stolen. That is major fraud.

[satmas]

Will anyone be formally pressing charges Against Eric Hansen for fraud.

He sold his account and then claimed it was stolen. That is major fraud.

Do you have any evidence that his account was sold? Even if it was, there's no rule against selling bitcointalk account although if you can prove he sold the account, then if he claimed it was stolen without evidence, that would be shady.