911

[awesome31312]

Just three days from now, we will reach the 15th Anniversary of the September 11, 2001 attacks in New York.

As always, I will ask the most important questions regarding 911. I'm not a truther, in fact, I am a reverse truther. I do not claim to know who was behind the September 11 attacks, but I do know who wasn't. I certainly know it wasn't "angry Muslims who hate us for our freedom". By way of deduction, it's really easy to figure out:

* Who benefit from the attack?

Sometimes, it is better to answer a question with more questions. In this case:

* Without the 911 attacks, could the Bush Administration have ever justified the invasion of Iraq?

* Without 911, could the Government be able to appoint shills to try and justify mass surveillance, such as NSA's PRISM, as well as numerous other attacks and infringement of civil liberties disguised as National Security (ie The Patriot Act, NDAA, etc)?

It's quite obvious that the answer to, "Who benefit from the attacks" is clearly:

* The Saudi Arabian and American Governments, respectively

* The various corporations that sold weapons and related stocks which increased as a result of the foreign invasion of Afghanistan

* The various corporations appointed for "reconstruction" of the now permanently destabilized regions of the Middle East

* Anybody who wants to pass anti-immigration legislation by pulling the 911 card

And this is not even focusing on the physics behind the collapse of the towers, or building 7 either. These are just regarding the politico-social climate that has existed even prior to the September 11 attacks.

[1713543701]

1713543701

[otrkid70]

I watched Loose Change on youtube....It's an eye opener that's for sure. it mentions a lot of your points.

[Spendulus]

Just three days from now, we will reach the 15th Anniversary of the September 11, 2001 attacks in New York.

As always, I will ask the most important questions regarding 911. I'm not a truther, in fact, I am a reverse truther. I do not claim to know who was behind the September 11 attacks, but I do know who wasn't. I certainly know it wasn't "angry Muslims who hate us for our freedom". By way of deduction, it's really easy to figure out:

* Who benefit from the attack?

Sometimes, it is better to answer a question with more questions. In this case:

* Without the 911 attacks, could the Bush Administration have ever justified the invasion of Iraq?

* Without 911, could the Government be able to appoint shills to try and justify mass surveillance, such as NSA's PRISM, as well as numerous other attacks and infringement of civil liberties disguised as National Security (ie The Patriot Act, NDAA, etc)?

It's quite obvious that the answer to, "Who benefit from the attacks" is clearly:

* The Saudi Arabian and American Governments, respectively

* The various corporations that sold weapons and related stocks which increased as a result of the foreign invasion of Afghanistan

* The various corporations appointed for "reconstruction" of the now permanently destabilized regions of the Middle East

* Anybody who wants to pass anti-immigration legislation by pulling the 911 card...

Like some government cunt said, "Let no crisis go to waste."

This would imply that once 9/11 had occurred by way of Islamic Terrorists' actions, in the reaction to that outrageous set of actions, various things such as you mention would be expected.

[mamichula]

I watched Loose Change on youtube....It's an eye opener that's for sure. it mentions a lot of your points.

I've heard of that movie. I'm going to go watch it right now.

[awesome31312]

I watched Loose Change on youtube....It's an eye opener that's for sure. it mentions a lot of your points.

I've heard of that movie. I'm going to go watch it right now.

Go ahead and watch Zeitgeist while you're at it too. Be warned though, not everybody can stomach that, and severe cognitive dissonance will strike you right in the gut.

[mamichula]

I watched Loose Change on youtube....It's an eye opener that's for sure. it mentions a lot of your points.

I've heard of that movie. I'm going to go watch it right now.

Go ahead and watch Zeitgeist while you're at it too. Be warned though, not everybody can stomach that, and severe cognitive dissonance will strike you right in the gut.

I'm watching it. But still the best one I've watch is September Clues. It's wow.

[zakorus]

I watched the original lose change when it was first released 11 years ago
then down the rabbit whole i went.

[zakorus]

I watched Loose Change on youtube....It's an eye opener that's for sure. it mentions a lot of your points.

I've heard of that movie. I'm going to go watch it right now.

Go ahead and watch Zeitgeist while you're at it too. Be warned though, not everybody can stomach that, and severe cognitive dissonance will strike you right in the gut.

zeitgeisters are strange group of people they dont believe in money!

[d4rkv01d]

Im sure that 911 was CIA operation. It's a pity but it's not a first time when US government stroke it's own people. Just remember pearl harbor. After 911 and patriotic act USA is not a country of freedom anymore.

[saddampbuh]

why can't it be angry muslims who hate you for your freedom and also benefit the foreign and domestic policy objectives of neocons who wanted an excuse to start trouble in the middle east and bring in mass surveillance?

[awesome31312]

why can't it be angry muslims who hate you for your freedom and also benefit the foreign and domestic policy objectives of neocons who wanted an excuse to start trouble in the middle east and bring in mass surveillance?

Because that's a story that makes no sense whatsoever, and appeals only to the lowest common denominator.

[BADecker]

why can't it be angry muslims who hate you for your freedom and also benefit the foreign and domestic policy objectives of neocons who wanted an excuse to start trouble in the middle east and bring in mass surveillance?

Who is to say that the inside-job people aren't Muslims - Bush, Cheney, Silverman, many others - secretly.

[awesome31312]

why can't it be angry muslims who hate you for your freedom and also benefit the foreign and domestic policy objectives of neocons who wanted an excuse to start trouble in the middle east and bring in mass surveillance?

Who is to say that the inside-job people aren't Muslims - Bush, Cheney, Silverman, many others - secretly.

1) We have no evidence of that
2) Most of them are either far right winged Christians or pro-eugenics atheists

[Slow death]

Just three days from now, we will reach the 15th Anniversary of the September 11, 2001 attacks in New York.

As always, I will ask the most important questions regarding 911. I'm not a truther, in fact, I am a reverse truther. I do not claim to know who was behind the September 11 attacks, but I do know who wasn't. I certainly know it wasn't "angry Muslims who hate us for our freedom". By way of deduction, it's really easy to figure out:

* Who benefit from the attack?

Sometimes, it is better to answer a question with more questions. In this case:

* Without the 911 attacks, could the Bush Administration have ever justified the invasion of Iraq?

* Without 911, could the Government be able to appoint shills to try and justify mass surveillance, such as NSA's PRISM, as well as numerous other attacks and infringement of civil liberties disguised as National Security (ie The Patriot Act, NDAA, etc)?

It's quite obvious that the answer to, "Who benefit from the attacks" is clearly:

* The Saudi Arabian and American Governments, respectively

* The various corporations that sold weapons and related stocks which increased as a result of the foreign invasion of Afghanistan

* The various corporations appointed for "reconstruction" of the now permanently destabilized regions of the Middle East

* Anybody who wants to pass anti-immigration legislation by pulling the 911 card

And this is not even focusing on the physics behind the collapse of the towers, or building 7 either. These are just regarding the politico-social climate that has existed even prior to the September 11 attacks.

totally agree!

One of the questions I saw in the newspaper and would like to know:

The terrorists were skilled pilots enough to make maneuvers with the aircraft?

[BADecker]

why can't it be angry muslims who hate you for your freedom and also benefit the foreign and domestic policy objectives of neocons who wanted an excuse to start trouble in the middle east and bring in mass surveillance?

Who is to say that the inside-job people aren't Muslims - Bush, Cheney, Silverman, many others - secretly.

1) We have no evidence of that
2) Most of them are either far right winged Christians or pro-eugenics atheists

Well, now. If we knew they were Muslims, it wouldn't be a secret, would it?

[awesome31312]

why can't it be angry muslims who hate you for your freedom and also benefit the foreign and domestic policy objectives of neocons who wanted an excuse to start trouble in the middle east and bring in mass surveillance?

Who is to say that the inside-job people aren't Muslims - Bush, Cheney, Silverman, many others - secretly.

1) We have no evidence of that
2) Most of them are either far right winged Christians or pro-eugenics atheists

Well, now. If we knew they were Muslims, it wouldn't be a secret, would it?

That's ridiculous. How do I know you're not a shill designed to make Bitcointalk users look bad, if it's meant to be a secret?

[BADecker]

why can't it be angry muslims who hate you for your freedom and also benefit the foreign and domestic policy objectives of neocons who wanted an excuse to start trouble in the middle east and bring in mass surveillance?

Who is to say that the inside-job people aren't Muslims - Bush, Cheney, Silverman, many others - secretly.

1) We have no evidence of that
2) Most of them are either far right winged Christians or pro-eugenics atheists

Well, now. If we knew they were Muslims, it wouldn't be a secret, would it?

That's ridiculous. How do I know you're not a shill designed to make Bitcointalk users look bad, if it's meant to be a secret?

There you go again. You don't have anything solid, so you post with vague words, just to mix people up?

What is ridiculous? You can't even say what that you are posting about.

You don't know about my designs on Bitcointalk users, or if I have any. But, if you could think even a little, you would see that the things that I say are logical, and often profound. So, is it meant to be a secret? Think!

[saddampbuh]

Because that's a story that makes no sense whatsoever, and appeals only to the lowest common denominator.

in hindsight it made no sense for communists to set fire to the reichstag further inflaming public opinion against them and making it easier for the german government to suspend civil liberties and bring in tough anti communist measures but that's exactly what happened

there's no doubt neocons were over the moon when 9/11 went down i mean these are the people who spoke of a "new pearl harbor" being needed before something could be done about iraq, but that doesn't mean they had anything to do with it. the american retaliation also turned islamic opinion further against the west which was what al qaeda wanted

[saddampbuh]

Who is to say that the inside-job people aren't Muslims - Bush, Cheney, Silverman, many others - secretly.

[awesome31312]

Who is to say that the inside-job people aren't Muslims - Bush, Cheney, Silverman, many others - secretly.

You realize that the star of David does not have any affiliation with being a Muslim right? Even your URL reads "Neoconservative Jews". Unless you think they're the same people (White people: Damn, all these sand n*****s are the same to me!)