Electrum 2.7.0

[ThomasV]

EDIT: There was no major issue with the release candidate, so here is the official release.
http://download.electrum.org

Release notes:
# Release 2.7.0 (October 2016)

 * The wallet file format has been upgraded. This upgrade is not
   backward compatible, which means that a wallet upgraded to the 2.7
   format will not be readable by earlier versions of
   Electrum. Multiple accounts inside the same wallet are not
   supported in the new format; the Qt GUI will propose to split any
   wallet that has several accounts. Make sure that you have saved
   your seed phrase before you upgrade Electrum.
 * This version introduces a separation between wallets types and
   keystores types. 'Wallet type' defines the type of Bitcoin contract
   used in the wallet, while 'keystore type' refers to the method used
   to store private keys. Therefore, so-called 'hardware wallets' will
   be referred to as 'hardware keystores'.
 * Hardware keystores:
   - The Ledger Nano S is supported.
   - Hardware keystores can be used as cosigners in multi-signature
     wallets.
   - Multiple hardware cosigners can be used in the same multisig
     wallet. One icon per keystore is displayed in the satus bar. Each
     connected device will co-sign the transaction.
 * Replace-By-Fee: RBF transactions are supported in both Qt and
   Android. A warning is displayed in the history for transactions
   that are replaceable, have unconfirmed parents, or that have very
   low fees.
 * Dynamic fees: Dynamic fees are enabled by default. A slider allows
   the user to select the expected confirmation time of their
   transaction. The expected confirmation times of incoming
   transactions is also displayed in the history.
 * The install wizards of Qt and Kivy have been unified.
 * Qt GUI (Desktop):
   - A fee slider is visible in the in send tab
   - The Address tab is hidden by default, can be shown with Ctrl-A
   - UTXOs are displayed in the Address tab
 * Kivy GUI (Android):
   - The GUI displays the complete transaction history.
   - Multisig wallets are supported.
   - Wallets can be created and deleted in the GUI.
 * Seed phrases can be extended with a user-chosen passphrase. The
   length of seed phrases is standardized to 12 words, using 132 bits
   of entropy (including 2FA seeds). In the wizard, the type of the
   seed is displayed in the seed input dialog.
 * TrustedCoin users can request a reset of their Google Authenticator
   account, if they still have their seed.

[1713548667]

1713548667

[1713548667]

1713548667

[1713548667]

1713548667

[1713548667]

1713548667

[OmegaStarScream]

I usually delete the old version (the whole thing) and install the new then use the seed to recover my wallet , is there is another way to upgrade when 2.7.0 is released ? taking the files from C:\Users\xxx\AppData\Roaming\Electrum\wallets should be enough or not ? and once again , thanks for your hard work , It's being sometime since a new release came out , I thought you dropped the project at some point.

[ThomasV]

I usually delete the old version (the whole thing) and install the new then use the seed to recover my wallet , is there is another way to upgrade when 2.7.0 is released ? taking the files from C:\Users\xxx\AppData\Roaming\Electrum\wallets should be enough or not ? and once again , thanks for your hard work , It's being sometime since a new release came out , I thought you dropped the project at some point.

Taking the files should be enough.
I usually advise people to make sure they saved their seed, just in case something goes wrong with the update.

This version required a lot of testing because of the wallet file upgrade, that's why it has been delayed so much.

[altcoinhosting]

Hi ThomasV,

Thanks for the new version, it runs smooth... I do have some remarks/questions:
- It might be a good idear to add the show/hide address tab in the preference dialog? I didn't find it at first, and only after re-reading your OP, i realised ctrl-A could be used
- I really liked the fact that i could manually set the fee in 2.6.x versions, the slider is nice, but it's not so fine-grained as completely manual setup
- I can't find the setting to enable/disable the dialog to view the transaction before signing it, and the setting to manually broadcast a transaction after signing it...

Sorry if the questions are dumb, i just looked at the new version for 10 minutes and these were my initial problems/questions...

Once again: love your software, it's a great help

[ThomasV]

- It might be a good idea to add the show/hide address tab in the preference dialog? I didn't find it at first, and only after re-reading your OP, i realised ctrl-A could be used

The function can be reached from the menu. The last status is remembered when you leave the app.

- I really liked the fact that i could manually set the fee in 2.6.x versions, the slider is nice, but it's not so fine-grained as completely manual setup

Disable dynamic fees and you'll have the manual setup.

- I can't find the setting to enable/disable the dialog to view the transaction before signing it, and the setting to manually broadcast a transaction after signing it...

It's been replaced by the 'preview' button in the send tab.


Thanks for your feedback. Tests have been runing smoothly so far, so the official release should happen soon.

[altcoinhosting]

Thanks for the answers, so far, all my questions were solved, and i was able to generate, sign and broadcast my transactions.
Since some settings and features are called in a different way in this version, it'll take a while to get used to them, but so far, every feature available in 2.6.x seems to be available in 2.7 (with some nice extra's like RBF)
I'll continue to run this version, and i'll give some feedback in case something goes wrong

[BitcoinNewsMagazine]

ThomasV does 2.7.0 still support use of passphrase hidden accounts when using Trezor like earlier versions?

[ThomasV]

ThomasV does 2.7.0 still support use of passphrase hidden accounts when using Trezor like earlier versions?

yes it does; did you encounter any issue with it?

[BitcoinNewsMagazine]

ThomasV does 2.7.0 still support use of passphrase hidden accounts when using Trezor like earlier versions?

yes it does; did you encounter any issue with it?

Thanks. Have not tried yet but will the comment in OP "Multiple accounts inside the same wallet are not supported in the new format" was a concern is all.

[Coin-Keeper]

Thomas,

Does this support use of Trezor with 64 bit Linux Debian?  Remember we had some small "glitches" there with 2.6.4.

Your software just basically rocks!!

[Coin-Keeper]

ThomasV does 2.7.0 still support use of passphrase hidden accounts when using Trezor like earlier versions?

I am really glad that Thomas said it supports those hidden accounts.  I use those for many different accounts on each Trezor!!


ps --- sorry for the double post here.  I thought I was editing!!!!

[ThomasV]

Thomas,
Does this support use of Trezor with 64 bit Linux Debian?  Remember we had some small "glitches" there with 2.6.4.
Your software just basically rocks!!

Well, you would need to try.
It works for me on linux 64 bits (ubuntu).

[ThomasV]

This is my experience with a Trezor @1.4.0, and MacOS Sierra @10.12 (tried both the Github python version, and the supplied binary from the DMG file, with the same results):

1.  Open Electrum with a standard default_wallet, as the last opened wallet.
2.  Select File -> Open option and select my Trezor wallet file
3.  Window appears telling me that I have multiple accounts in my Trezor and this is no longer supported - do I want to create multiple wallets ?   If the answer is no, the windows says "please wait" and nothing is happening - I can return to the default wallet window, but the "please wait" windows stays up and can't be closed unless Electrum is shut down.
4. If yes is selected, the multiple wallets are created (in the wallet sub-directory).  A new window appears requesting to delete the original file or not.  If no is selected, again, the "please wait" window stays up and it can't be shut down unless Electrum is shut down.  If yes, is selected, the file is deleted, and again, the "please wait" window stays up...

On OSX some windows do not open/close properly
See https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/1946
Check if it is solved by clicking on the dock icon.

5. If Electrum is shut down, and then re-started with again a default_wallet.  Opening one of the newly created Trezor accounts (with the extension XXX.0, or XXX.1, or XXX.2) will display correctly the individual Trezor account in a second window, and everything is back to normal afterwards.


EDIT1:

I did have a hard time to connect to any the servers after the upgrade - running the python version with verbose enabled, showed a lot of connection timeouts on servers that are known to be good and present (they show up at https://foundry.electrum.org/server-peer-hashes.txt) .  I deleted everything in the .electrum directory, including the blockchain_headers and certs sub-directory (except the wallet sub-directory) and it helped to start fresh.  Once the new blockchain_headers file was downloaded (32MB), I got the green light - it would have helped to get the blue arrows during the download process - I got a red light instead, all that time.  

As a caveat, is it normal to have only 8 non-onions Electrum servers reported by https://foundry.electrum.org/server-peer-hashes.txt ?  There used to be over 40 of them before the upgrade  

this has nothing to do with the upgrade; I guess it's a connectivity issue at the server.

Once the final version of this wallet is released, may I suggest to upgrade the version to a number like 3.X - to clearly indicate that the file formats are no longer compatible between version 2.X and version 3.X, similar to when version 1.X file format was upgraded to version 2.X last year?  

No, this is going to be named 2.7. There have been other file format upgrades in the past.
The upgrade from 1.X to 2.X was more than that, it was here to indicate a change of the seed version system.

Starting with this new version, does this mean that the Electrum wallets are now fully BIP-44 compliant ?  

Not at all. BIP44 is about having multiple accounts in the same wallet.

Finally, are there plans for Electrum to elect the BIP-39 wordlist in the future?  Or the Electrum "unique" wordlist will remain in force?

Electrum uses the same English wordlist as BIP39 since version 2. The way it differs from BIP39 is not about the wordlist.
The problem is that BIP39 seeds do not include a version number.
I suggest you read this to understand what it is about: http://docs.electrum.org/en/latest/seedphrase.html

EDIT2:

Tried the new Multisignature feature using two different Macs with two different Trezors: Flawless!  

However, I have two questions;
A.  for the multi-signature derivations, are you using BIP44 derivation scheme: m / purpose' / coin_type' / account' / change / address_index, with purpose = 45 (BIP45 Multisignature) and account = co-sign 1, co-sign 2, etc.?  If not, how will Electrum-Litecoin derivations be different than Electrum-Bitcoin derivations, and similar for Dash, Ethereum, etc.

We use BIP45 derivation for multisig hardware wallets.
However, you seem to have a very confused idea about BIP44 and BIP45.
BIP45 does not have / coin_type' / account'.
See https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0045.mediawiki

B.  Electrum used to have a way for the first signatory to send a partially signed transaction (encrypted) to a temporary server, to be extracted by the second signatory.  Is this feature still available with this Hardware Wallet Multisignature feature?

yes it should be, although there has been some server downtime. You need to enable the cosignerpool plugin.

[Dassi]

I wonder what "broadcasting" means when sending funds from an electrum wallet.

[ThomasV]

I understand the difference between BIP44 and 45 (and the lack of alt-coin inclusion in BIP 45...) - therefore, my question... will Electrum be more inclusive than BIP45 was?

Please note that the the difference between BIP45 and BIP44 is not only the lack of coin type.
BIP45 uses a non-hardened cosigner index, instead of a hardened account number.

I did not want to use BIP44 for multisig hardware wallets in order to prevent key reuse.
I decided to follow BIP45 because it's the only standard around for deriving multisig addresses from a BIP39 seed.
At least it might make Electrum interoperable with Copay.

How will Pooler be able to implement 2.7.0 changes on Electrum-LTC, or Buterin with Electrum- ETH, if the BIP45 derivation doesn't include a "coin-type" ?

Well, I guess altcoins developers will have to patch that part. But that seems to be an issue with BIP45, more than with Electrum itself.

The only situation where Electrum uses BIP43/BIP44/BIP45 is with hardware wallets, because their seed is a BIP39 seed.
However, I am strongly against BIP39. I hope the industry will move away from this standard, once they realize the mess it creates.
Seeds with a version numbers are a better solution.

[japerry]

I'm using 2.7.0 under Windows 7 Home Edition with a Ledger HW.1. Whenever I try to send BTC using my HW.1 Wallet I get the error Exception: Invalid Status 6985. I can reproduce the error every time.

[viking02]

hey guys i downloaded electrum 2.7 on the new computer.


Options are


standard wallet

wallet with two factor authorization

multi-signature wallet

watch bitcoin addresses



Its the 1st one i assume i click on?  When i previously restored electrum on another computer it was 2.6.4.



Thanks guys.

[viking02]

okay so i assume click on


standard wallet


then


I already have a seed


then input my 12 word phrase




After i enter the 12 word phrase, do i need to check add a passphrase to this seed or BIP39 seed?  I have no idea what is this.


Also where is the option to add a password that you have to enter before you send your bitcoins?  For example when i restored my bitcoins in my computer, i put the 12 word phrase and put a password to encrypt my bitcoin?  Thus if i dont do this, anyone with access to my laptop could send bitcoins easily since there is no password.  Where is the option for this on electrum 2.7?


Is this the


Add a passphrase to this seed



Or


It comes up on next page?

[viking02]

okay i have an issue with this.  After i typed the 12 word phrase and then not check any of the 2 options below... i then click next.


Electrum then shuts off.  I then click on electrum again.  It did same thing


Clicked on

standard wallet


then


I already have a seed



Input the 12 word phrase, the same thing happens.


Do you know why this is happening?

[ThomasV]

Do you know why this is happening?

that's a bug, thanks for pointing it out. I'll fix it asap.

[viking02]

do you have a time frame on this?


and did electrum 2.7 just released?


thanks.

[ThomasV]

do you have a time frame on this?

I just published a bugfix release, see version 2.7.1.

[ThomasV]

I'm using 2.7.0 under Windows 7 Home Edition with a Ledger HW.1. Whenever I try to send BTC using my HW.1 Wallet I get the error Exception: Invalid Status 6985. I can reproduce the error every time.

the Ledger team is investigating that.

[ThomasV]

Please upgrade to 2.7.2.
A critical bug was fixed, https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/1954

[steven0021]

Is it just me or the cancel button when creating/restoring wallet not working? I'm using 2.7.4.
Once you click it, the next button stops working too.

[modulate]

I'm trying to get my new Nano S working with electrum 2.7.4, but after I select "an unnamed ledger" whilst creating a hardware device wallet, I get a hang on the new page "please wait"

I'm on OSX 10.12

any help appreciated

[ThomasV]

I'm trying to get my new Nano S working with electrum 2.7.4, but after I select "an unnamed ledger" whilst creating a hardware device wallet, I get a hang on the new page "please wait"

I'm on OSX 10.12

any help appreciated

I believe this is because it cannot sync with the server. This seems to be a regression from 2.6

[modulate]

ok, so its a bug.

Do I need to/can I report it somewhere?

[viking02]

Hi there.  Can you confirm this electrum is fine for installing on a new computer and then putting the 12 word phrase and it wouldn't have that issue that i had before?


I'm going to restore my electrum.

[viking02]

anyone?

[ThomasV]

Hi there.  Can you confirm this electrum is fine for installing on a new computer and then putting the 12 word phrase and it wouldn't have that issue that i had before?


I'm going to restore my electrum.

it should work with the latest version. please report

[viking02]

hi there.  Does that mean almost no one has electrum 2.7 and everyone else has the old version?  The electrum that was on my old computer was electrum 2.6.4.


So if i have a copy of electrum 2.6.4, can install that one and not use 2.7?


Thanks.

[longbob72]

hi there.  Does that mean almost no one has electrum 2.7 and everyone else has the old version?  The electrum that was on my old computer was electrum 2.6.4.


So if i have a copy of electrum 2.6.4, can install that one and not use 2.7?


Thanks.

Yes you can install 2.6.4 over 2.7. But it's recommended to use the latest version which is 2.7.7.
There's no way to know who has 2.6.4 and who has 2.7 and it doesn't matter. ThomasV only said that it was fixed in 2.7.1, he meant nothing else.

If you have the seed saved You shouldn't be too worried to try other versions ONLY to see if they will open or not.

[Capricious Goat]

Electrum 2.7.7

Hey Thomas V

New to Electrum.
Issue on Confirm Seed stage of Standard Wallet.

Steps to reproduce:
New Wallet > Custom Options >Confirm Seed 'Next' not working.

Added an extra word to the seed and the app got stuck.
Eventually created a new wallet (default_wallet) with 12 word seed.

Downloaded Electrum 2.7.7 from official site (Setup.exe)
Windows 10

Thanks

[viking02]

hi there.  Does that mean almost no one has electrum 2.7 and everyone else has the old version?  The electrum that was on my old computer was electrum 2.6.4.


So if i have a copy of electrum 2.6.4, can install that one and not use 2.7?


Thanks.

Yes you can install 2.6.4 over 2.7. But it's recommended to use the latest version which is 2.7.7.
There's no way to know who has 2.6.4 and who has 2.7 and it doesn't matter. ThomasV only said that it was fixed in 2.7.1, he meant nothing else.

If you have the seed saved You shouldn't be too worried to try other versions ONLY to see if they will open or not.

So most of you are all using the updated version of electrum?  Does electrum prompt you to update to the latest version each time?

[longbob72]

hi there.  Does that mean almost no one has electrum 2.7 and everyone else has the old version?  The electrum that was on my old computer was electrum 2.6.4.


So if i have a copy of electrum 2.6.4, can install that one and not use 2.7?


Thanks.

Yes you can install 2.6.4 over 2.7. But it's recommended to use the latest version which is 2.7.7.
There's no way to know who has 2.6.4 and who has 2.7 and it doesn't matter. ThomasV only said that it was fixed in 2.7.1, he meant nothing else.

If you have the seed saved You shouldn't be too worried to try other versions ONLY to see if they will open or not.

So most of you are all using the updated version of electrum?  Does electrum prompt you to update to the latest version each time?

Like I said, there is no way to know how many people are using the latest version. Using the latest version isn't a must, only recommended. You can use previous versions if they work better for you.
You don't get a notification every time a new version comes out, you need to check for updates manually from https://electrum.org/#download.

[Abdussamad]

hi there.  Does that mean almost no one has electrum 2.7 and everyone else has the old version?  The electrum that was on my old computer was electrum 2.6.4.


So if i have a copy of electrum 2.6.4, can install that one and not use 2.7?


Thanks.

Yes you can install 2.6.4 over 2.7. But it's recommended to use the latest version which is 2.7.7.
There's no way to know who has 2.6.4 and who has 2.7 and it doesn't matter. ThomasV only said that it was fixed in 2.7.1, he meant nothing else.

If you have the seed saved You shouldn't be too worried to try other versions ONLY to see if they will open or not.

There was a change in the wallet file format in 2.7.0 so 2.6.4 electrum won't be able to read your wallet file. You will have to restore from seed.

[viking02]

i reinstalled electrum on new computer.  I then put in the 12 word phrase and bitcoin restored.  My issue though is there is no transaction history at all for my previous addresses.


For example i know there were a few addresses i used but i used 1 main address to receive.  However when i look at receive... there is only 1 address that is shown?  What about the option where it shows address, change etc?  I know the bitcoin address i have shown for my receive isn't the main one i used.


So the address that shows as receiving address is my bitcoin receiving address.


Why do i see requested amount and request expires in 1 day?  Can someone explain this?  So if someone send me bitcoin, i give them this receiving address.  But i leave everything else empty right?  However, what does request expires mean?  Should i stay at 1 day or put never?  For example if i request a bitcoin payout from a site, and put my receiving address, let say i don't know the exact amount of bitcoin i receive, then obviously this doesn't get filled out right?  I'm very confused what this request expire mean?   I assume it doesn't mean you are requesting bitcoin from a specific address right?  Like paypal where you bill someone for something?  That would clearly make no sense?


So i only have 1 bitcoin receiving address now with electrum 2.7.8?  How do i generate a new address?  Or just stick with this one?  How do i get the old bitcoin address i used before many times or i cannot do this?


For sending bitcoin, i assume everything is still the same?  I have transaction fee per kb is set at 0.0005 btc/kb.  Don't change this right?  So this should come out to 6-8 cents a transfer when sending?  But if you leave it at 0, then it takes very long for transaction to confirm and thus never do this and leave it at 0.0005?

[longbob72]

i reinstalled electrum on new computer.  I then put in the 12 word phrase and bitcoin restored.  My issue though is there is no transaction history at all for my previous addresses.

Are you saying that the wallet doesn't show any transaction but have balance (you said bitcoin restored)?

For example i know there were a few addresses i used but i used 1 main address to receive.  However when i look at receive... there is only 1 address that is shown?  What about the option where it shows address, change etc?  I know the bitcoin address i have shown for my receive isn't the main one i used.


So the address that shows as receiving address is my bitcoin receiving address.


Why do i see requested amount and request expires in 1 day?  Can someone explain this?  So if someone send me bitcoin, i give them this receiving address.  But i leave everything else empty right?  However, what does request expires mean?  Should i stay at 1 day or put never?  For example if i request a bitcoin payout from a site, and put my receiving address, let say i don't know the exact amount of bitcoin i receive, then obviously this doesn't get filled out right?  I'm very confused what this request expire mean?   I assume it doesn't mean you are requesting bitcoin from a specific address right?  Like paypal where you bill someone for something?  That would clearly make no sense?


So i only have 1 bitcoin receiving address now with electrum 2.7.8?  How do i generate a new address?  Or just stick with this one?  How do i get the old bitcoin address i used before many times or i cannot do this?

Go to Wallet > Addresses. It will show your addresses tab which shows your other addresses.
The expire date is useful for giving time limit for a payment and nothing else. Just pick "Never" if you don't want it. But if you don't know the exact amount you'll be receiving just leave everything empty or give them the address (if you don't need the QR).
It doesn't mean you are requesting bitcoin from a specific address like paypal and yes, that would clearly make no sense.

For sending bitcoin, i assume everything is still the same?  I have transaction fee per kb is set at 0.0005 btc/kb.  Don't change this right?  So this should come out to 6-8 cents a transfer when sending?  But if you leave it at 0, then it takes very long for transaction to confirm and thus never do this and leave it at 0.0005?

Leaving it alone would be fine for now. But setting it to dynamic fee (from Tools > Preference > Use dynamic fee) and moving the slider a little to the right side would be better if you don't know much about transaction fees.

[viking02]

It does show the transactions on the history.  I meant on the receive tab... i use to have a few addresses.  It showed how many times i used each address etc.  For example, there is one bitcoin address i used so many times compared to others.  So do i still have this address or not?


When i go to wallet, addresses, it just shows the receive page.


Shows my receiving address which is just 1 address.


So that means i only have 1 receiving bitcoin address now?  Thus my old bitcoin address that i used so many times with electrum 2.6.4... i dont have it anymore?

[longbob72]

It does show the transactions on the history.  I meant on the receive tab... i use to have a few addresses.  It showed how many times i used each address etc.  For example, there is one bitcoin address i used so many times compared to others.  So do i still have this address or not?


When i go to wallet, addresses, it just shows the receive page.


Shows my receiving address which is just 1 address.


So that means i only have 1 receiving bitcoin address now?  Thus my old bitcoin address that i used so many times with electrum 2.6.4... i dont have it anymore?

You should still have all your addresses from before.
Addresses page (tab) and receive page are two completely different thing. Can you post a screenshot of this "receive page" you mentioned?

[viking02]

My receive page looks like this


Receiving Address:  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Description: 

Requested amount        BTC

Request Expires      1 day



There is only one receiving address.  Unless there is something in the settings i have to change?

[Abdussamad]

My receive page looks like this


Receiving Address:  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Description: 

Requested amount        BTC

Request Expires      1 day



There is only one receiving address.  Unless there is something in the settings i have to change?

press ctrl+a to bring the addresses tab into view. you will see all your receiving addresses there.

[viking02]

i did this and it does show the addresses now.


It shows 20 addresses for receiving tab but all of them show 0.


For the change option... theres about 15 addresses and one of them is the one i used the most and it shows the amount of times i used it.



So how many bitcoin receiving addresses do i have then?  So i have 35 different bitcoin receiving addresses?


The one that shows on the receive tab is the first bitcoin address on the Receiving on the addresses tab.

[panju1]

How do we set custom fees in the new electrum version?
The slider bar doesn't lend itself to selection of fees at the satoshi level.
I usually adjust the fees so that there are no dust outputs.

[Jhanzo]

How do we set custom fees in the new electrum version?
The slider bar doesn't lend itself to selection of fees at the satoshi level.
I usually adjust the fees so that there are no dust outputs.

Tools > Preferences > Uncheck "Use dynamic fee" (under the fees tab).

[Abdussamad]

So how many bitcoin receiving addresses do i have then?  So i have 35 different bitcoin receiving addresses?

You have an unlimited number of addresses. These are just the ones that have been generated to date. More will be generated once you start using addresses.

[conspirosphere.tk]

I tried to install v 2.7.9 on Linux Mint 18 and it did not work. This is the output I got:

Collecting https://download.electrum.org/2.7.9/Electrum-2.7.9.tar.gz
  Downloading https://download.electrum.org/2.7.9/Electrum-2.7.9.tar.gz (2.0MB)
    100% |████████████████████████████████| 2.0MB 607kB/s
Exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pip/basecommand.py", line 209, in main
    status = self.run(options, args)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pip/commands/install.py", line 317, in run
    requirement_set.prepare_files(finder)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pip/req/req_set.py", line 360, in prepare_files
    ignore_dependencies=self.ignore_dependencies))
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pip/req/req_set.py", line 600, in _prepare_file
    req_to_install.check_if_exists()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pip/req/req_install.py", line 1011, in check_if_exists
    self.req.project_name
AttributeError: 'Requirement' object has no attribute 'project_name'
You are using pip version 8.1.1, however version 8.1.2 is available.
You should consider upgrading via the 'pip install --upgrade pip' command.

Any idea on how to fix it?

edit: never mind. It worked by "Installation from Python sources"

[viking02]

okay so curious on this.  Do most of you use the receiving address that is shown on electrum on the receive tab?


Or you use the other ones?  So that means based on what i described, i have 35 different bitcoin addresses that i can give others if i want to receive bitcoin right?

[longbob72]

okay so curious on this.  Do most of you use the receiving address that is shown on electrum on the receive tab?


Or you use the other ones?  So that means based on what i described, i have 35 different bitcoin addresses that i can give others if i want to receive bitcoin right?

They are the same thing. You'll find the address shown on the receive tab on the address tab also.

[viking02]

But i never used that address once.  I used this other one at least 50 times etc.  No issue with me using the one i always use right?

[longbob72]

But i never used that address once.  I used this other one at least 50 times etc.  No issue with me using the one i always use right?

Yes. Though it's not recommended to use one address too much (privacy concern, mostly).

[Abdussamad]

But i never used that address once.  I used this other one at least 50 times etc.  No issue with me using the one i always use right?

don't fixate too much on addresses. think of them as disposable entry points into your wallet. you use an address once and then you never use it again. that doesn't mean that you can't use it again. it's just that it is bad for your privacy because all transactions are public. so best not to reuse addresses.

[bitcoinslave]

2.6.4
Is Still possible to use it? for how long?

[longbob72]

2.6.4
Is Still possible to use it? for how long?

You should be able to use it just fine until it's no longer supported or an update that makes it obsolete/problematic comes out. Probably won't happen anytime soon, if ever.

[bitcoinslave]

Thanks longbob

[Jonasch]

I just installed the latest version 2.7.14 on OSX over the old version. When opening electrum it tells me that my trezor wallet contains multiple accounts, it should not. I don't know why it is telling me that ...
I don't know how to proceed. I might find an older version and install it before opening the latest version to make sure nothing important is lost.

I can also absolutely not lose my transaction history from the old version for example or names I have given to addresses... I guess my old version was something like 2.6.x ..  is there a risk that I will lose anything whatsoever?

Solved: After backing up the wallet, I answered to split the wallet. It created two new wallet files  wallet.0 and wallet.1. I answered not to delete the old wallet file, as a result the question to split the wallet came up every time I opened electrum so I moved the old wallet out of the folder.
All functionality is available as far as I can see. Initially the "Addresses" tab was gone but it can be brought back easily from the menu. Trezor was recognized.

[ThomasV]

I just installed the latest version 2.7.14 on OSX over the old version. When opening electrum it tells me that my trezor wallet contains multiple accounts, it should not. I don't know why it is telling me that ...
I don't know how to proceed. I might find an older version and install it before opening the latest version to make sure nothing important is lost.

I can also absolutely not lose my transaction history from the old version for example or names I have given to addresses... I guess my old version was something like 2.6.x ..  is there a risk that I will lose anything whatsoever?

Solved: After backing up the wallet, I answered to split the wallet. It created two new wallet files  wallet.0 and wallet.1. I answered not to delete the old wallet file, as a result the question to split the wallet came up every time I opened electrum so I moved the old wallet out of the folder.
All functionality is available as far as I can see. Initially the "Addresses" tab was gone but it can be brought back easily from the menu. Trezor was recognized.

we removed the logic that handles several accounts in the same wallet file and gui window.
accounts are now handled in separate files.
it also improves user privacy.