|
oslak
|
 |
November 20, 2016, 03:14:20 AM |
|
testing.. fuck i swear it wanted to include every dll cygwin had... :|
21 dll's. ohyeah! there are 1000 more missing.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlike traditional banking where clients have only a few account numbers, with Bitcoin people can create an unlimited number of accounts (addresses). This can be used to easily track payments, and it improves anonymity.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
barrysty1e
|
|
November 20, 2016, 03:55:14 AM |
|
testing.. fuck i swear it wanted to include every dll cygwin had... :|
21 dll's. ohyeah! there are 1000 more missing. settle man, you're flooding my link with those two posts. |
my father wears sneakers in the pool
|
|
|
|
|
|
zcoinofficial (OP)
|
|
November 20, 2016, 05:30:16 AM |
|
Why won't Roger Ver even fire off a simple tweet about Zcoin? He's favorited one of my Zcoin tweets but he won't make a public statement of support himself.
You'd think a guy $500k invested in this thing would be a bit more proactive....
Ver simply provided capitals for Wilcox to start off right. ZEC is not Zcoin and, as far as I know, Vers unrelated to Zcoin. He and others will be paid back over the course of several months off the taxable miners income. Its 20% revenue coming from each block mined. Vers is a confirmed investor of Zcoin while also being an investor of Zcash. You can check out the articles on Bitcoin.com which discloses this and he has been posting under his MemoryDealers account on Reddit. Roger Ver's style isn't one of shilling and he remains supportive of both projects. You can see this in his tweet style as well. |
|
|
|
|
barrysty1e
|
|
November 20, 2016, 05:39:24 AM |
|
|
my father wears sneakers in the pool
|
|
|
|
oslak
|
|
November 20, 2016, 05:46:39 AM |
|
testing.. fuck i swear it wanted to include every dll cygwin had... :|
21 dll's. ohyeah! there are 1000 more missing. settle man, you're flooding my link with those two posts. Im not. Its fun to see the whole dll dependencies. |
|
|
|
|
oldDIN
Member
 Offline
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
|
|
November 20, 2016, 06:55:20 AM |
|
ocminer - miner not working - reject
You have to use new version of the miner Yes, the link to your pool, the port is changed, but ..... start cpuminer.exe -t 3 -a lyra2rev2 -o stratum+tcp://xzc.suprnova.cc:5596 -u c -p x reject reject spuminer not an executable file..  What he lacks? |
|
|
|
|
|
barrysty1e
|
|
November 20, 2016, 07:01:59 AM |
|
ocminer - miner not working - reject
You have to use new version of the miner Yes, the link to your pool, the port is changed, but ..... start cpuminer.exe -t 3 -a lyra2rev2 -o stratum+tcp://xzc.suprnova.cc:5596 -u c -p x reject reject spuminer not an executable file.. What he lacks? are you running windows 64bit? |
my father wears sneakers in the pool
|
|
|
|
|
|
doktor83
|
|
November 20, 2016, 09:02:24 AM |
|
OCminer could you compile your miner for windows and upload it on git ?  |
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1240
|
|
November 20, 2016, 09:52:10 AM |
|
OCminer could you compile your miner for windows and upload it on git ? This one isn't working ? http://bazco.in/cpuminer-xzc-win64.zip |
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools |
|
|
|
doktor83
|
|
November 20, 2016, 10:03:44 AM |
|
404 not found
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
barrysty1e
|
|
November 20, 2016, 10:44:23 AM |
|
OCminer could you compile your miner for windows and upload it on git ? pulled it down as i've got a better source, but given some of the attitudes cant be bothered. MSVCR120.DLL missing |
my father wears sneakers in the pool
|
|
|
|
doktor83
|
|
November 20, 2016, 11:01:31 AM |
|
don't take this personally but when i see one .exe and nothing more i automatically assume it contains a virus. |
|
|
|
Daniko7
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 424
Merit: 106
https://Newrewardcoins.com
|
|
November 20, 2016, 11:14:43 AM |
|
since using the new miner and new port more than 50% of my (Linux) servers are having problems with the difficulty and receive many rejects and boooo's... low difficulty shares.... what can be the reason? |
|
|
|
|
majoh
|
|
November 20, 2016, 12:02:36 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
doktor83
|
|
November 20, 2016, 12:42:40 PM |
|
since using the new miner and new port more than 50% of my (Linux) servers are having problems with the difficulty and receive many rejects and boooo's... low difficulty shares.... what can be the reason? i have lots of stratum_recv_line failed paired with stratum connection interrupted |
|
|
|
Daniko7
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 424
Merit: 106
https://Newrewardcoins.com
|
|
November 20, 2016, 12:49:15 PM |
|
since using the new miner and new port more than 50% of my (Linux) servers are having problems with the difficulty and receive many rejects and boooo's... low difficulty shares.... what can be the reason? i have lots of stratum_recv_line failed paired with stratum connection interruptedyes, this problem too... i, m so sad, because before the hardfork i had nearly no problems. My pool efficiency was straight 100%. now its between 60 and 80%. if i cannot fix this today i will probably stop mining this coin |
|
|
|
noobtrader
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 20, 2016, 01:41:29 PM |
|
i start to think that this coin should do this kind of fork more often to kick out botnet miner  btw : i have 100% efficiency |
"...I suspect we need a better incentive for users to run nodes instead of relying solely on altruism...", satoshi@vistomail.com |
|
|
|
