Bitcoin Forum
December 09, 2016, 09:53:07 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 [186] 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1200 TH] EMC: 0 Fee DGM. Anonymous PPS. US & EU servers. No Registration!  (Read 461702 times)
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
November 03, 2012, 09:57:10 PM
 #3701

Yes, all three servers do this.  They each have a different target.  But yeah at 2.5GH/s, you probably won't see above Diff1 very often.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481277187
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481277187

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481277187
Reply with quote  #2

1481277187
Report to moderator
1481277187
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481277187

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481277187
Reply with quote  #2

1481277187
Report to moderator
1481277187
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481277187

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481277187
Reply with quote  #2

1481277187
Report to moderator
DobZombie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756


TheBitcoinMuseum.com


View Profile
November 04, 2012, 09:14:41 AM
 #3702

why is eclipse pool becoming so unlucky?

I don't know about you, but I'm pretty damn sure I'm increasing the luck Smiley

Blocks Found: 8

Paid Out: 182.37

The Bitcoin Museum is back under my control, but I still need to go through all the code. DO NOT PURCHASE ANYTHING FROM IT

The Biggest Collection of Bitcoin Memorabilia The Bitcoin Museum
Series 2 BitcoinNerd 1g Silver coin thread!
Discount Jewellery! Noella Jean Jewellery



Buy premium Champanges, Spirits & Wines in Australia! My Bitmit Items

Tip Me if you Hate Justin Bieber 1DobZomBiE2gngvy6zDFKY5b76yvDbqRra
betatest512
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140


View Profile
November 04, 2012, 11:55:10 AM
 #3703

Is there a way to disable Dynamic Difficulty so I get only Diff 1 shares even if I have a high hashrate?
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
November 04, 2012, 10:03:01 PM
 #3704

Nope.  Why would you want to do that?

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
cyberlync
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226



View Profile
November 05, 2012, 03:00:49 AM
 #3705

Something wrong with NMC? Pretty wild invalid streak.

noticed the quick stats changes, nice Smiley

Giving away your BTC's? Send 'em here: 1F7XgercyaXeDHiuq31YzrVK5YAhbDkJhf
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
November 06, 2012, 01:50:17 AM
 #3706

Just released the first version of cgminer to natively support GBT, version 2.9.0.

However, the block change performance of EMC on GBT is lacklustre:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=108854.msg1317574#msg1317574

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
November 06, 2012, 02:26:28 AM
 #3707

Where did my posts go after my answer to Cyberlync?  There's a bunch of posts missing.

Thanks for the work Con, I appreciate it.  Hopefully the problems with GBT can get worked out.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
November 06, 2012, 02:44:19 AM
 #3708

Con, I have some changes pushed to all servers that should help with the problem you list.  Can you check if that solves the problem?

One question, though, it appears you are polling for a new block template every 30 seconds is that intended?

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
November 06, 2012, 02:47:39 AM
 #3709

Con, I have some changes pushed to all servers that should help with the problem you list.  Can you check if that solves the problem?

One question, though, it appears you are polling for a new block template every 30 seconds is that intended?

Great. Will check.

Yes it is intentional, to keep transactions current, much like stratum does. It's also a reliable way to know you can still receive stuff from the pool to know when it's down.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
November 06, 2012, 03:47:53 AM
 #3710

Here we go. Same test case:

Code:
[2012-11-06 14:46:08] Accepted e40fc282 Diff 1/1 GPU 1 pool 2
 [2012-11-06 14:46:09] Stratum from pool 3 detected new block
 [2012-11-06 14:46:10] Stale share detected, submitting as user requested
 [2012-11-06 14:46:10] Accepted 1ec336f1 Diff 8/1 GPU 0 pool 2
 [2012-11-06 14:46:10] Accepted 7feedf4b Diff 2/1 GPU 2 pool 2
 [2012-11-06 14:46:12] Accepted b4d46b3d Diff 1/1 GPU 0 pool 2
 [2012-11-06 14:46:12] Accepted 1cae983c Diff 8/1 GPU 0 pool 2
 [2012-11-06 14:46:12] Accepted e9e286b4 Diff 1/1 GPU 3 pool 2
 [2012-11-06 14:46:13] Accepted 41e88213 Diff 3/1 GPU 1 pool 2
 [2012-11-06 14:46:14] Accepted 85495569 Diff 1/1 GPU 0 pool 2
 [2012-11-06 14:46:15] GBT LONGPOLL from pool 2 requested work restart
 [2012-11-06 14:46:15] Rejected 83a701d9 Diff 1/1 GPU 2 pool 2 (stale-prevblk)
 [2012-11-06 14:46:18] Accepted f7216fee Diff 1/1 GPU 1 pool 2
 [2012-11-06 14:46:18] Accepted 01486fe5 Diff 199/1 GPU 3 pool 2
 [2012-11-06 14:46:19] Accepted 8447cf5a Diff 1/1 GPU 0 pool 2
 [2012-11-06 14:46:20] Accepted 398c9fd9 Diff 4/1 GPU 1 pool 2
 [2012-11-06 14:46:21] GBT LONGPOLL from pool 2 requested work restart
 [2012-11-06 14:46:25] Accepted 93a5f6e9 Diff 1/1 GPU 1 pool 2

Stratum is seeing the block change faster routinely up to 10 seconds faster, but at least you're not rejecting shares now before your own longpoll.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
November 06, 2012, 03:56:44 AM
 #3711

Do you still see the same behavior on say US3 vs US1?

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
November 06, 2012, 04:11:46 AM
 #3712

Do you still see the same behavior on say US3 vs US1?
Testing...

Much the same. pool 2  is us3 in this example.

Code:
[2012-11-06 15:10:28] Accepted 546c28db Diff 3/1 GPU 1 pool 2
 [2012-11-06 15:10:33] Stratum from pool 3 detected new block
 [2012-11-06 15:10:36] Accepted 3bbe84f0 Diff 4/1 GPU 0 pool 2
 [2012-11-06 15:10:37] Accepted a017ef1d Diff 1/1 GPU 2 pool 2
 [2012-11-06 15:10:37] Accepted c1b972f0 Diff 1/1 GPU 1 pool 2
 [2012-11-06 15:10:38] Accepted aaaeaba9 Diff 1/1 GPU 0 pool 2
 [2012-11-06 15:10:41] GBT LONGPOLL from pool 2 requested work restart
 [2012-11-06 15:10:42] Rejected a9542179 Diff 1/1 GPU 1 pool 2 (stale-prevblk)
 [2012-11-06 15:10:44] Accepted 5ca1ab35 Diff 2/1 GPU 2 pool 2
 [2012-11-06 15:10:44] Accepted 21e2296e Diff 7/1 GPU 2 pool 2
 [2012-11-06 15:10:45] Accepted 20cdce48 Diff 7/1 GPU 3 pool 2
 [2012-11-06 15:10:46] Accepted 86978852 Diff 1/1 GPU 3 pool 2
 [2012-11-06 15:10:48] Accepted 022acdbb Diff 118/1 GPU 1 pool 2
 [2012-11-06 15:10:49] Accepted c4a25647 Diff 1/1 GPU 3 pool 2
 [2012-11-06 15:10:51] Accepted 659a84b6 Diff 2/1 GPU 1 pool 2
 [2012-11-06 15:10:51] Accepted ad389866 Diff 1/1 GPU 2 pool 2
 [2012-11-06 15:10:54] GBT LONGPOLL from pool 2 requested work restart
 [2012-11-06 15:10:54] Stale share detected, submitting as user requested
 [2012-11-06 15:10:54] Accepted aad92828 Diff 1/1 GPU 2 pool 2

EDIT: Note this is not unique. Other pools struggle trying to notify of blocks as fast as slush does too, over and above the stratum vs GBT difference. No idea what his magic is.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
November 06, 2012, 04:28:41 AM
 #3713

I took all my high performance connections out of bitcoind because it was crashing it.  I think he may be connected to a few supernodes... I need to find a few stable nodes and connect directly to them.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
November 13, 2012, 04:20:01 AM
 #3714

EMC should now support Stratum on all servers.  You can connect to port 3333 for Stratum.

Give it a shot and let me know how it works... but it is working great in my testing.  CGminer had some issues and I've sent in a pull request, hopefully Con will accept and merge it in the main branch soon.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
Mobius
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 957



View Profile
November 13, 2012, 04:50:13 AM
 #3715

EMC should now support Stratum on all servers.  You can connect to port 3334 for Stratum.

Give it a shot and let me know how it works... but it is working great in my testing.  CGminer had some issues and I've sent in a pull request, hopefully Con will accept and merge it in the main branch soon.


Why not keep it as 3333, as other pools are doing, and it seems that cgminer is working well with the other pools using stratum.
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
November 13, 2012, 04:54:27 AM
 #3716

I was using 3334 for testing. I  switched them all over to 3333, so that should work.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
November 13, 2012, 06:23:46 AM
 #3717

Tried your stratum implementation. It seems that you send a mining difficulty in response to the mining authorise request while cgminer is only expecting an auth message at that stage so it will fail to connect.

EDIT: Also, expecting "auth" as an "id" is wrong since id is an integer for json in stratum. This appears to be a hangover of luke-jr making fucking bullshit up.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
November 13, 2012, 05:32:29 PM
 #3718

With regard to ID being an int, I was going by JSON-RPC 1.0 specifications, is there an updated one somewhere?  The 1.0 (and 2.0) specs say ID is of any type, but maybe I'm looking in the wrong place? (I used this doc: http://json-rpc.org/wiki/specification)

For difficulty, it's being sent following mining.subscribe as per the spec, yeah?  Do you have a link to the documentation on how that should be handled if EMC isn't doing it right?  mining.subscribe comes before the auth, so difficulty would naturally follow prior to auth, no?  Since minining.authorize can happen any time in the session, difficulty should come before that (for example, if you decide to add workers in the middle of a session).




If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
punin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 559


View Profile WWW
November 13, 2012, 06:53:29 PM
 #3719

Hmm.. it just worked for a few moments, and now it's back to non-working again.

Head of Product Development
Bitfury Group
www.bitfury.com
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
November 13, 2012, 06:56:03 PM
 #3720

What did?

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
Pages: « 1 ... 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 [186] 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!