Bitcoin Forum
December 04, 2016, 03:52:45 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 [221] 222 223 224 225 226 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1200 TH] EMC: 0 Fee DGM. Anonymous PPS. US & EU servers. No Registration!  (Read 461066 times)
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1988


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
December 23, 2013, 08:43:27 AM
 #4401

us1 appears to be down , or maybe I just can't access it from here  Huh

EDIT: Some loss along the way it  seems.
Code:
mtr --report us1.eclipsemc.com
Start: Mon Dec 23 21:32:43 2013
HOST: hex                         Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
  1.|-- 192.168.1.254              0.0%    10    0.5   0.5   0.5   0.7   0.0
  2.|-- lns20.mel4.on.ii.net       0.0%    10   26.2  26.2  25.5  26.6   0.0
  3.|-- te2-2.cor3.mel4.on.ii.net  0.0%    10   26.6  35.0  25.6 113.2  27.5
  4.|-- ae2.br1.syd7.on.ii.net     0.0%    10   37.6  42.0  37.4  58.0   6.4
  5.|-- ae0.br1.syd4.on.ii.net     0.0%    10   37.9  46.1  37.8  65.0  11.4
  6.|-- te0-1-1-2.br2.lax1.on.ii.  0.0%    10  184.4 184.8 184.3 185.3   0.0
  7.|-- ???                       100.0    10    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
  8.|-- ???                       100.0    10    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
  9.|-- .                         10.0%    10  216.3 199.7 186.2 216.5  15.7

mtr --report us2.eclipsemc.com
Start: Mon Dec 23 21:37:57 2013
HOST: hex                         Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
  1.|-- 192.168.1.254              0.0%    10    0.5   0.6   0.5   0.6   0.0
  2.|-- lns20.mel4.on.ii.net       0.0%    10   25.9  26.3  25.7  27.0   0.0
  3.|-- te2-2.cor3.mel4.on.ii.net  0.0%    10   25.9  32.2  25.9  55.6  11.7
  4.|-- ae0.cr1.mel8.on.ii.net     0.0%    10   30.2  35.9  26.3  72.8  14.4
  5.|-- ae1.cr1.cbr1.on.ii.net     0.0%    10   37.4  34.8  33.6  37.4   1.4
  6.|-- ae0.cr1.cbr2.on.ii.net     0.0%    10   34.4  35.1  33.7  38.2   1.3
  7.|-- ae2.br1.syd4.on.ii.net     0.0%    10   37.3  41.5  37.0  68.4   9.8
  8.|-- te0-1-1-3.br2.lax1.on.ii.  0.0%    10  184.5 184.7 183.8 185.4   0.0
  9.|-- ???                       100.0    10    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
 10.|-- ???                       100.0    10    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
 11.|-- .                         10.0%    10  215.2 203.1 185.8 216.7  15.0

mtr --report us3.eclipsemc.com
Start: Mon Dec 23 21:38:23 2013
HOST: hex                         Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
  1.|-- 192.168.1.254              0.0%    10    0.6   0.5   0.5   0.7   0.0
  2.|-- lns20.mel4.on.ii.net       0.0%    10   25.8  26.2  25.6  27.1   0.0
  3.|-- te2-2.cor3.mel4.on.ii.net  0.0%    10   26.1  26.4  26.0  27.2   0.0
  4.|-- ae2.br1.syd7.on.ii.net     0.0%    10   37.8  38.0  37.8  38.7   0.0
  5.|-- ae0.br1.syd4.on.ii.net     0.0%    10   38.6  43.6  37.4  77.1  12.1
  6.|-- te0-1-1-2.br2.lax1.on.ii.  0.0%    10  184.8 184.7 183.9 185.2   0.0
  7.|-- any2ix.coresite.com        0.0%    10  271.2 271.9 271.0 275.6   1.3
  8.|-- 206-51-235-233.static.hvv 10.0%    10  241.5 242.0 241.5 242.9   0.0
  9.|-- 162-216-4-199.static.hvvc 10.0%    10  242.2 252.0 241.9 271.9  14.6

Seems to only be relatively good to us3. Switched to that and it's ok. I guess it's out of your control being along the way.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1480823565
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480823565

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480823565
Reply with quote  #2

1480823565
Report to moderator
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
December 23, 2013, 10:14:20 PM
 #4402

How does the EU server look from your location?

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1988


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
December 23, 2013, 10:18:14 PM
 #4403

How does the EU server look from your location?


Similar to US3 but slower.

Code:
mtr --report eu.eclipsemc.com
Start: Tue Dec 24 09:16:45 2013
HOST: hex                         Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
  1.|-- 192.168.1.254              0.0%    10    0.5   0.5   0.5   0.7   0.0
  2.|-- lns20.mel4.on.ii.net       0.0%    10   25.7  26.1  25.6  26.7   0.0
  3.|-- te2-2.cor3.mel4.on.ii.net  0.0%    10   26.7  26.5  25.8  28.0   0.5
  4.|-- ae2.br1.syd7.on.ii.net     0.0%    10   38.2  41.0  37.5  67.4   9.3
  5.|-- ae0.br1.syd4.on.ii.net     0.0%    10   38.0  43.2  37.7  57.3   7.5
  6.|-- te0-1-1-2.br2.lax1.on.ii.  0.0%    10  184.9 184.7 184.1 185.2   0.0
  7.|-- init7.net.any2ix.coresite  0.0%    10  183.8 184.7 183.8 186.7   0.8
  8.|-- r1nyc1.core.init7.net      0.0%    10  255.9 257.5 255.7 261.9   2.1
  9.|-- r1lon1.core.init7.net      0.0%    10  329.8 333.7 329.7 341.3   3.9
 10.|-- r1nue1.core.init7.net      0.0%    10  371.2 372.9 368.6 379.7   4.1
 11.|-- gw-hetzner.init7.net       0.0%    10  344.5 346.6 344.5 362.0   5.4
 12.|-- core12.hetzner.de         20.0%    10  344.7 344.5 343.8 345.0   0.0
 13.|-- core21.hetzner.de         10.0%    10  342.4 342.7 342.0 343.4   0.0
 14.|-- juniper1.rz20.hetzner.de  10.0%    10  347.3 349.2 346.8 363.7   5.4
 15.|-- hos-tr2.ex3k5.rz20.hetzne 10.0%    10  347.5 348.1 347.3 350.4   0.7
 16.|-- eu.eclipsemc.com          10.0%    10  344.0 351.2 342.8 372.2  11.8

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
happyagnostic
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14


View Profile
December 24, 2013, 03:10:32 AM
 #4404

I have been out of the country for almost 3 weeks now... still in India at the moment.  Not much time to handle these sorts of things, but I'm working on it as time allows.  Hopefully I'll have a break here when I get back on Sunday and can catch up.


My IP is still banned. Still no response to any of the emails I've sent.

Is this one of those situations where I should just give up? This whole experience has been rather discouraging. I mean, someone/something made the effort to put me on a blacklist for trying to log into my own account, so I figure someone could take 1 minute and say, "Your concerns are very important to us, we are very back logged, please allow 3 months for us to respond"

This is my last post regarding this issue unless I get a response. Any response would be better than sitting here not know why i can't access my account.

Like what I have to say? Don't like what I have to say?
DONATE BTC:17HwWF5vfNfD8LqiPUsJonTmeadGc3d3S4
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
December 24, 2013, 05:07:39 PM
 #4405

We are working on creating an automated system to unban IPs.  The solution is not to have multiple failed login attempts from your IP address; it's a security measure.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1988


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
January 08, 2014, 09:57:15 AM
 #4406

Load on the US servers seems very high, total pool hashrate is way down and stats are reporting 0 for me despite my rigs merrily mining away on us1. Issues?

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
January 08, 2014, 04:49:12 PM
 #4407

Everything seems OK at the moment, are you still seeing issues? 

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1988


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
January 08, 2014, 08:55:50 PM
 #4408

Seems to have gone away whatever it was, thanks.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
eddlow
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 52


View Profile
January 14, 2014, 01:24:51 AM
 #4409

I'm mining on EMC for about 2/3 months now and received 0.02BTC every day. Since one week I get that amount every 3(!!) days. Is something wrong with the pool or is the difficulty just breaking the roofs? Seems kinda strange that it happend so fast...
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
January 14, 2014, 10:18:35 PM
 #4410

Difficulty is increasing rather rapidly at the moment... it will be probably be another month or two before it starts to level off again I'd guess.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
January 17, 2014, 02:18:40 AM
 #4411

Just wondering if that has any roll on effect anywhere that you need to look into:

280732
(5878)
02:48:57
2014-01-16 04:59:10
1,248,837,248
(14,001,529)
49.77%

Block 280732 had difficulty 1,789,546,951.05 - so the % should be over 50%
Same for 280673

I wonder if all the % might be wrong since the diff change?

Pool: https://kano.is BTC: 1KanoiBupPiZfkwqB7rfLXAzPnoTshAVmb
CKPool and CGMiner developer, IRC FreeNode #ckpool and #cgminer kanoi
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with Stratum, the best protocol to mine Bitcoins with ASIC hardware
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
January 17, 2014, 02:39:26 AM
 #4412

Just wondering if that has any roll on effect anywhere that you need to look into:

280732
(5878)
02:48:57
2014-01-16 04:59:10
1,248,837,248
(14,001,529)
49.77%

Block 280732 had difficulty 1,789,546,951.05 - so the % should be over 50%
Same for 280673

I wonder if all the % might be wrong since the diff change?

0.4976536 is the upper tail CDF for 0.6978511 d1 shares/difficulty. I don't have time to check atm, but if you calculate:

exp(-shares/difficulty) and this figure is the same as the percentage figure given, then the percentage is of the CDF.

Edit: Or it could just be a big fat coincidence.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
January 17, 2014, 04:53:50 AM
 #4413

Just wondering if that has any roll on effect anywhere that you need to look into:

280732
(5878)
02:48:57
2014-01-16 04:59:10
1,248,837,248
(14,001,529)
49.77%

Block 280732 had difficulty 1,789,546,951.05 - so the % should be over 50%
Same for 280673

I wonder if all the % might be wrong since the diff change?

0.4976536 is the upper tail CDF for 0.6978511 d1 shares/difficulty. I don't have time to check atm, but if you calculate:

exp(-shares/difficulty) and this figure is the same as the percentage figure given, then the percentage is of the CDF.

Edit: Or it could just be a big fat coincidence.
Oh - I thought it was just that 50% means expected number of shares.

Pool: https://kano.is BTC: 1KanoiBupPiZfkwqB7rfLXAzPnoTshAVmb
CKPool and CGMiner developer, IRC FreeNode #ckpool and #cgminer kanoi
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with Stratum, the best protocol to mine Bitcoins with ASIC hardware
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
January 17, 2014, 04:58:56 AM
 #4414

I thought it was just that 50% means expected number of shares.

I just logged in - it looks like he's using the upper tail CDF to indicate luck. I reckon this is probably the best way to do it since the "luck" definition is bounded equally at 0 and 1, but not many other pools are doing this.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
January 17, 2014, 05:30:06 AM
 #4415

Yes, luck factor is calculated exactly as you describe Organofcorti.

I'm certainly open to other interpretations of luck that would be more relevant, if anyone has suggestions.


If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
January 17, 2014, 06:46:46 AM
 #4416

Yes, luck factor is calculated exactly as you describe Organofcorti.

I'm certainly open to other interpretations of luck that would be more relevant, if anyone has suggestions.



I think that the CDF and shares per round are both useful, but both need to be explained clearly for miners.

My preference is for the CDF. Maybe others prefer shares per round, although it's only under proportional payment methods that shares per round is linked closely to reward for each miner.


Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
January 17, 2014, 10:35:41 AM
 #4417

Yes, luck factor is calculated exactly as you describe Organofcorti.

I'm certainly open to other interpretations of luck that would be more relevant, if anyone has suggestions.

Nope, none of them really make much sense anyway (to me) when you 'average' them Smiley

I just took the comment at the bottom about 50% to mean that 50% was expected.
Clearly, I did that wrong Cheesy

Certainly not a request to change it.

Pool: https://kano.is BTC: 1KanoiBupPiZfkwqB7rfLXAzPnoTshAVmb
CKPool and CGMiner developer, IRC FreeNode #ckpool and #cgminer kanoi
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with Stratum, the best protocol to mine Bitcoins with ASIC hardware
vulgartrendkill
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518



View Profile WWW
January 17, 2014, 06:30:06 PM
 #4418

Josh can you look into my login issues please?

my account says my 2fa failed but i know its right.

Thanks
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
January 18, 2014, 09:18:23 PM
 #4419

I have tried to catch up with all of the GA & password reset requests today.  There are inevitably some I have missed (Why do people want to send me 12 page dissertations when sending password reset requests?  The world may never know...)  ...

If I have missed your request, please send it again to admin@eclipsemc.com.  Please be as brief and succicnt as possible, in addition to including the necessary information, which is basically email address and account name.  Requests must come from the email address associated with the account, other requests will be ignored.  If you do not have an email address associated with your account, you need to create a new one as your account is not recoverable.


If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
January 28, 2014, 06:53:02 AM
 #4420

Had some strangeness show for my workers.
One now says no shares for 4 days but had (lotsa) shares yesterday.
I guess there was some web issue?
OK Ignore that - I clearly am unable to keep track of my own workers and which ones are doing what Smiley

Pool: https://kano.is BTC: 1KanoiBupPiZfkwqB7rfLXAzPnoTshAVmb
CKPool and CGMiner developer, IRC FreeNode #ckpool and #cgminer kanoi
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with Stratum, the best protocol to mine Bitcoins with ASIC hardware
Pages: « 1 ... 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 [221] 222 223 224 225 226 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!