Carlton Banks
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3430
Merit: 3080
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 15, 2016, 03:00:55 PM |
|
how many Millisats will the Lightning "node" money supply be inflated by?
(not that this question doesn't even make any sense, I'm just using Franky's non-logic against him, lol)
You cannot provide a straight answer to this (or any) question, huh?
which no one can predict speculation accurately. all that can be learned is that changing the units of measure WILL change how people perceive it. and it WILL affect things. Exactly, you're trying to affect people's perception of what a change like that would mean, using overcomplicated, vague and inaccurate descriptions deliberately contrived to lead people to think "well, I don't totally get it, but maybe something funny is going on". The only funny going's on is your warped description, though.
|
Vires in numeris
|
|
|
franky1
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4326
Merit: 4646
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 15, 2016, 03:20:27 PM Last edit: October 15, 2016, 03:41:00 PM by franky1 |
|
Exactly, you're trying to affect people's perception of what a change like that would mean,
and you pretend nothing will happen because your dreams tell you to think of fairy utopia's that corporate dictatorship is the solution to bitcoin, without understanding bitcoin the funny thing is that carlton wants to screw with bitcoin to make LN compatible rather than making LN compatible with bitcoin.. (facepalm) now thats settled your off topic question back on topic, prove with code, documentation and knowledge that LN signed payment can be broadcast to bitcoin and be accepted remember A)the deposit (prechannel) is not LN B)the LN payment (in channel) on the LN node is LN C)the withdrawal (post channel) is not LN demonstrate (B) stay on topic and talk about (B) comparison A)the deposit (pre-exchange trading) is not exchange trading B)the LN payment (exchange trading) on the exchange is the exchange trading C)the withdrawal (post exchange trading) is exchange trading
demonstrate a exchange trade-order can be broadcast to bitcoin stay on topic and talk about exchanges and trade-orders
|
I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER. Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
|
|
|
Carlton Banks
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3430
Merit: 3080
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 15, 2016, 03:40:57 PM |
|
prove with code, documentation and knowledge that LN signed payment can be broadcast to bitcoin and be accepted
That's not what I said. When you offer a reply to a question that the other party didn't ask, that's called a strawman argument. I said: Every Lightning transaction is validated by the mempool of the nodes on the Bitcoin network.
|
Vires in numeris
|
|
|
franky1
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4326
Merit: 4646
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 15, 2016, 03:42:44 PM |
|
That's not what I said. When you offer a reply to a question that the other party didn't ask, that's called a strawman argument. I said: Every Lightning transaction is validated by the mempool of the nodes on the Bitcoin network.
ok ill edit prove with code, documentation and knowledge that Every Lightning transaction is validated by the mempool of the nodes on the Bitcoin network.
prove it.. you cant because you dont even know what an TN transaction is but you you suggest you do know what a LN transaction is PROVE IT
|
I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER. Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 15, 2016, 03:44:31 PM |
|
lets word it a different way, exchanges accept bitcoin but while an exchange holds the bitcoin, they separately allow users to play with their 'balances'(mysql database) to make orders. exchanges are not bitcoin, they are a SERVICE/BUSINESS layer at the edges of bitcoin, but it is not bitcoin. the trades do no appear on the blockchain. the trades are incompatible with bitcoin consensus only the deposits and withdrawals are part of bitcoin. not the service offering itself. LN is just a service layer.
even blockstream admit LN is a second layer. even blockstream admit LN is OFFCHAIN.
This is a false analogy. While you do not own the Bitcoins on a exchange, which is a service, you very much own the coins locked within a payment channel (with or without LN). *Nobody* can take these away from you, which is not the case with exchanges.
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
franky1
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4326
Merit: 4646
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 15, 2016, 03:48:11 PM |
|
lets word it a different way, exchanges accept bitcoin but while an exchange holds the bitcoin, they separately allow users to play with their 'balances'(mysql database) to make orders. exchanges are not bitcoin, they are a SERVICE/BUSINESS layer at the edges of bitcoin, but it is not bitcoin. the trades do no appear on the blockchain. the trades are incompatible with bitcoin consensus only the deposits and withdrawals are part of bitcoin. not the service offering itself. LN is just a service layer.
even blockstream admit LN is a second layer. even blockstream admit LN is OFFCHAIN.
This is a false analogy. While you do not own the Bitcoins on a exchange, which is a service, you very much own the coins locked within a payment channel (with or without LN). *Nobody* can take these away from you, which is not the case with exchanges. the coins locked within the multisig require dual signatures. thus its not all your property. you require the second party to sign too..
|
I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER. Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
|
|
|
Carlton Banks
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3430
Merit: 3080
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 15, 2016, 03:48:54 PM |
|
you cant because you dont even know what an TN transaction is but you you suggest you do know what a LN transaction is PROVE IT
prove any of that. You're the one with a long, long history of inventing nonsense claims about Bitcoin, the onus is on you
|
Vires in numeris
|
|
|
franky1
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4326
Merit: 4646
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 15, 2016, 03:50:10 PM |
|
you cant because you dont even know what an TN transaction is but you you suggest you do know what a LN transaction is PROVE IT
prove any of that. You're the one with a long, long history of inventing nonsense claims about Bitcoin, the onus is on you https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoinnot a single line of code deals with LN transactions job done not a single line of code deals communicating with LN nodes job done not a single line of code deals with storing inchannel payments on bitcoins mempool job done not a single line of code deals with LN's millisats job done
|
I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER. Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 15, 2016, 03:53:37 PM |
|
the coins locked within the multisig require dual signatures. thus its not all your property. you require the second party to sign too..
Correct. This, however, does not change the fact that no one can take these coins away from you regardless of whether the secondary party chooses to properly interact with you or not.
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
franky1
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4326
Merit: 4646
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 15, 2016, 03:57:08 PM Last edit: October 15, 2016, 04:07:30 PM by franky1 |
|
the coins locked within the multisig require dual signatures. thus its not all your property. you require the second party to sign too..
Correct. This, however, does not change the fact that no one can take these coins away from you regardless of whether the secondary party chooses to properly interact with you or not. by the second party not signing. first party cant have them back, they remain locked. because it requires dual signing to release by this i agree the second party cannot simply "take it from you" without your signature, because they remain locked, but you cant take it without theirs either here is the point.. they can blackmail you to sign X over to them just to get an agreement. thus taking it from you via extortion (they win) or locking you out of ever getting them back (no one wins, but second party feels good about screwing first party)
|
I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER. Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 15, 2016, 04:07:53 PM |
|
by the second party not signing. you cant have them back. because it requires dual signing. by this i agree the second party cannot simply "take it from you" without your signature, but you cant take it without theirs
IIRC there is a timeout period after one party initiates the closing of a payment channel. Please take this with a grain of salt, as I'm unsure and this would be a *stupid flaw* to enable the possibility of indefinite state of irresoluteness. I'll do some research on this once I find more time.
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
Carlton Banks
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3430
Merit: 3080
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 15, 2016, 04:10:28 PM |
|
you cant because you dont even know what an TN transaction is but you you suggest you do know what a LN transaction is PROVE IT
prove any of that. You're the one with a long, long history of inventing nonsense claims about Bitcoin, the onus is on you https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoinnot a single line of code deals with LN transactions job done not a single line of code deals communicating with LN nodes job done not a single line of code deals with storing inchannel payments on bitcoins mempool job done not a single line of code deals with LN's millisats job done well, you proved a strawman, well done! (and you know you didn't check anything) I've said already today: nothing used for Lightning is merged into mainline yet, apart from Segwit (merged a day or two ago).
|
Vires in numeris
|
|
|
franky1
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4326
Merit: 4646
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 15, 2016, 04:21:37 PM |
|
by the second party not signing. you cant have them back. because it requires dual signing. by this i agree the second party cannot simply "take it from you" without your signature, but you cant take it without theirs
IIRC there is a timeout period after one party initiates the closing of a payment channel. Please take this with a grain of salt, as I'm unsure and this would be a *stupid flaw* to enable the possibility of indefinite state of irresoluteness. I'll do some research on this once I find more time. thank you for doing research to help you the timeout. is just a timeout. signatures still need to be signed. hopefully a ETHICAL pre-channel transaction (the reset) was signed initially so the deposits can go back out the same way they came in. but that can be then abused the other way. EG previous post was party A deposits 1btc, B deposits nothing.. B can extort funds with UNETHICAL pre-channel transaction (the reset) and flipping it to this new scenario previous post was party A deposits 1btc, B deposits nothing..ethical reset created where A gets funds back. then A-B trade goods and services. now A has the power. A refuses to sign unless he gets the majority back. and eventually A gets the whole thing back and keeps the goods because of the reset is released. now the problem and flaw carlton is missing. signing a transaction of 100,000,000,000units results in a different signature AND TXID compared to signing a transaction of 100,000,000units bitcoin will reject it as an invalid tx. also B cannot just broadcast an in-channel tx based on blockstreams current demonstration as the settlement tx onchain due to in-discrepancies. LN only works if LN is measuring in sats. LN will only work using milisats if (in carltons dream) bitcoin is measured in millisats
|
I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER. Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
|
|
|
franky1
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4326
Merit: 4646
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 15, 2016, 04:26:15 PM |
|
I said: Every Lightning transaction is validated by the mempool of the nodes on the Bitcoin network.
I've said already today: nothing used for Lightning is merged into mainline yet, apart from Segwit (merged a day or two ago).
proved yourself wrong go research. atleast lauda seems awake to atleast try finding the truth. follow his mindset and atleast try lastly (and you know you didn't check anything)
ive read the code. ive checked the code. ive understand the code. have a nice day
|
I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER. Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
|
|
|
Carlton Banks
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3430
Merit: 3080
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 15, 2016, 04:29:15 PM |
|
This is really where Franky comes into his forte, because I just can't be bothered to check this right now, it would involve taking Franky seriously
But as I've said: listen to Franky's propaganda at your own risk. He's the most blatant propaganda pusher on the board, and has a long long history as such.
|
Vires in numeris
|
|
|
franky1
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4326
Merit: 4646
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 15, 2016, 04:51:11 PM Last edit: October 15, 2016, 05:04:27 PM by franky1 |
|
because I just can't be bothered to check this right now, it would involve taking Franky seriously
carlton you have since 21 hours ago. be saying nonsense and avoided checking, learning, researching.. 21 hours and you are still no further forward then you were yesterday next time dont wast your 21 hours with baseless non factual dreams. and instead sleep for 9 hours. wake up do 2 hours of research and then using logic, documentation and facts to make a valid point. which means IF you actually done some research you would have had a valid point HOURS ago, thus not wasting time. by not researching and not making valid points you are only wasting your own time. the funnier part is carlton has been tryng to make a point about LN since the 11th of the month on several topics.(4 days) failing each time, getting no further forward then he did before.. learning not one extra thing to make a valid point. i even suggested he take a break and try to learn something, to really think about it and try making a valid point. kind of a shame he wastes his own time trolling and not learning think about it... real hard. sit down have a cup of coffee and think about it
|
I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER. Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
|
|
|
Carlton Banks
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3430
Merit: 3080
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 15, 2016, 05:09:30 PM |
|
You're posting in a thread calld "SegWit and LN are altcoins", and you've tried already (and abandoned) to establish Segwit is an altcoin, when it isn't any kind of separate coin at all.
So this fake persona you present of an honest technical researcher is a total joke. You've been arguing easily refuted technical garbage already in this thread, and this is what you do all day every day. We all know, I'm just trying to warn newbies.
|
Vires in numeris
|
|
|
franky1
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4326
Merit: 4646
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 15, 2016, 05:16:54 PM |
|
You're posting in a thread calld "SegWit and LN are altcoins", and you've tried already (and abandoned) to establish Segwit is an altcoin, when it isn't any kind of separate coin at all.
i didnt try to establish segwit as an altcoin agreed LN in its blockstream concept is an alt.
segwit however is within bitcoin..
segwit debate over, but nice try on diverting away from your lack of LN valid points. care to take a break and research for an hour, to make a point...or waste an hour not making a point your choice. you really should learn though. id love to see a valid point backed up by research. within the hour your only wasting ur own time if you just keep posting pointlessly within the hour
|
I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER. Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
|
|
|
Carlton Banks
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3430
Merit: 3080
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 15, 2016, 05:22:02 PM |
|
You're posting in a thread calld "SegWit and LN are altcoins", and you've tried already (and abandoned) to establish Segwit is an altcoin, when it isn't any kind of separate coin at all.
i didnt try to establish segwit as an altcoin agreed LN in its blockstream concept is an alt.
segwit however is within bitcoin..
Lol nice edit job Franky @Mods: remove Franky's ability to edit his posts, or keep a copy of every edit. I'd suggest doing the same for the other known Bitcoin trolls trying to sabotage the project
|
Vires in numeris
|
|
|
TKeenan (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 15, 2016, 08:22:49 PM |
|
Qualify any of those statements with facts lol. Off you go to en.bitcoin.it Franky, see you back here in an hour, huh (Franky's doing his homework ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) ). You might need to get dictionary.com ready in another tab, lol A negroloid telling others to get a dictionary, lol. Hey 'thug', how's life? ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F9Kg12.jpg&t=665&c=a6LhLixw1gXf1Q) quoted for preservation Thank you for doing that. I hate when they delete my messages. Assholes.
|
|
|
|
|