Bitcoin Forum
February 25, 2017, 09:26:14 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.2  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 [128]
  Print  
Author Topic: Feathercoin [FTC] - time proven, fast, secure and unique POW coin  (Read 297648 times)
LondonMP
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 353


I/O Digital Where Dreams Become Technology


View Profile
February 21, 2017, 07:45:25 PM
 #2541

New Website is released! - Would love to hear your feedback.

www.feathercoin.com

Regards,
ChekaZ

Thank you ChekaZ, very nice and straight to the point

I would just like to make a comment about the "buying feathercoin" section, Could you please add Bittylicious to the mix, they have re enabled the FTC/GBP pair recently, not many alts make it there so i think it is a huge plus for FTC

I would also love to see if possible, current supply instead or next to total supply in the block halving timer section

Thank you very much

1488014774
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1488014774

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1488014774
Reply with quote  #2

1488014774
Report to moderator
1488014774
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1488014774

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1488014774
Reply with quote  #2

1488014774
Report to moderator
1488014774
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1488014774

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1488014774
Reply with quote  #2

1488014774
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
remistevens
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434


View Profile
February 22, 2017, 04:14:10 PM
 #2542

I think with LTC and other older coins potentially adopting segwit FTC is in a great position. BTC miners aren't going to switch, the high fees are too profitable and I don't see them wanting to risk messing around with a more complicated code. Their refusal will force us to wait until solutions to scaling and such happen without hard forks. But solutions will come, and one day they'll be running the same BTC core with DAOs and millions of transactions per second. Today BTC isn't being used for commerce anyways, its being used for investment and international transfers- neither of which require a faster network.

Looking 10 years from now. BTC is worth a ton and scalability is solved without hard forks. No one remembers segwit, unlimited or whatever else except that certain older coins adopted them and permanently changed. Whereas FTC not taking any of these hard forks can remain using a simpler code, and then adopt bitcoin's non-fork solutions when they come. Which coin will you want at that point? FTC which stuck to bitcoin's simpler method, or the old coins that adopted betamax?

Im on the fence here. I think SegWit has its advantages and Im actually glad Litecoin has adopted it - even if only for the reason of going down a different path than Bitcoin. I used to be a hard believer that there would only be ONE crypto and all others would fail however I now am on the boat of thinking many side-by-side will be the future. In our current world we have many ways to exchange money, cash (in hundreds of currencies of which each has its own different denominations), check, bankers check, money orders, wire transfers, credit cards (Visa, Mastercard, etc), etc. I see the same happening for crypto. Some will be used for smaller purchases, some for major, some for investment, play, who knows...

With LTC going a different route (I doubt Bitcoin will ever adopt SegWit unless Litecoin proves its value), that opens the door for Litecoin to be used in places Bitcoin cant be. Same goes for Feathercoin and NeoScrypt (being ASIC resistant, today). Its kinda like Linux... there are hundreds of different distros out there, all of which can do the same basic functions but most are tailored to something specific - crypto will be the same way.

I only have interests in a handful of coins, Feathercoin is one of them, and Im here for the long haul - whatever direction (up/down) that may be.

I went the same way. At one point figured there would be 1 and only 1 eventually, but now, no way. I think there will be a lot of different currencies for sure, and like you say fulfilling different roles....But ultimately I think its all going to come down to age of the ledger. When was it started, has it been well maintained since? That will be the ultimate measure of trust decades from now. To that end, the NeoScrypt upgrade helps greatly toward ledger maintenance by ensuring a unique offering to miners. LTC's SegWit upgrade could attract more devs, which is a great thing, but its not really about ledger maintenance. If anything, it adds risk that something could go off the rails and disrupt the most important thing LTC has (an old trustworthy ledger).

But hey I still happily have some of both coins, old coins are #1 for me... How many times can they re-release "anonymous" and "smart contracts"? If the function is the same, who cares that you've invented a new way to do it.....sorry tangent rant.
remistevens
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434


View Profile
February 22, 2017, 04:25:00 PM
 #2543

New Website is released! - Would love to hear your feedback.

www.feathercoin.com

Regards,
ChekaZ

Overall I think its pretty awesome!

Love "Leading NeoScrypt Altcoin"

Layout is great, easy to find everything, smooth running.

Minor criticism/suggestion: "Features" could maybe be a bigger font more like "Wallets". Also "features", looks to me to be black whereas "wallets" is in the dark blue/green? (could just be the smaller font size and less space to really see the color). Also, I feel like the top banner light blue could use a bit more usage throughout the body of the website to tie it in. So suggestion would be to use the top banner bright blue on the 2 titles "Features" and "Wallets" and bring them to a consistent size for both.

And maybe add logos (windows, mac...)  to wallets section?

Totally nit picking here though, like i said overall its awesome and works as is for sure!
ChekaZ
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204



View Profile
February 22, 2017, 05:20:22 PM
 #2544

Thanks to all for your feedback, going to review it and implement it Smiley

Regards,
ChekaZ

BTC: 1Ges1taJ69W7eEMbQLcmNGnUZenBkCnn45
FTC: 6sxjM96KMZ7t4AmDTUKDZdq82Nj931VQvY
uralcryptocoin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18


View Profile
February 23, 2017, 07:13:28 AM
 #2545

The site looks great and works fine.

But as a suggestion I would propose to add some information about mining. For example in "How to start" section, maybe most popular pools, mining programs and so on.
gavrilo77
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 519



View Profile
February 24, 2017, 09:41:17 PM
 #2546

I am using wallet 0.9.6 and have got message "Inconsistent checkpoint found! Stop enforcing checkpoints and notify developers to resolve the issue".

Anyway, transactions are coming and it is sync


    
    

    
    

BitSend ◢◤Clients | Source
www.bitsend.info
|Your Digatal Network | 10MB Chain
| New XEVAN Algo !
| Longterm Airdrop 80* BSD every week
| Bittrex | C.Gather | S.Exchange
| Cryptopia || Livecoin
| Currently over 250+Giveaway members

████
 ████
  ████
   ████
    ████
     ████
      ████
       ████
        ████
       ████
      ████
     ████
    ████
   ████
  ████
 ████
████
logictense
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392


View Profile WWW
February 24, 2017, 11:03:15 PM
 #2547

Lets get real and stop talking about encryption techniques in this thread, its pointless as long as crypto does not need any cryptographic procedures to function normally and deliver transactions from senders to recipients. Who the fuck thinks crypto is bound to be encrypted?

pazor_true
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 908


i love Emerald (EMD)


View Profile
Today at 08:12:40 AM
 #2548

i am using the android wallet of feathercoin.
last few days it is not possible to get peer connections.
any solutions for this problem ?


BTC 12jiBjT2GSWYk2HwYdPqsQMuLqZ1br9D37
kelsey
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386


View Profile
Today at 08:22:41 AM
 #2549

But hey I still happily have some of both coins, old coins are #1 for me... How many times can they re-release "anonymous" and "smart contracts"? If the function is the same, who cares that you've invented a new way to do it.....sorry tangent rant.

+1


(ton of snake oil salesmen plugging this is "all original code" as if original code automatically makes it better then btc/ltc/ftc etc  Roll Eyes, personally i'd rather tried and tested improvement on btc's original code/idea)
Pages: « 1 ... 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 [128]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!