|
yeniruieni
|
 |
December 11, 2016, 03:57:07 AM |
|
I do not want refund my investing and support ark to be exchange
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Every time a block is mined, a certain amount of BTC (called the
subsidy) is created out of thin air and given to the miner. The
subsidy halves every four years and will reach 0 in about 130 years.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
matsud2
|
|
December 11, 2016, 04:09:05 AM |
|
If we dont want a refund and keep invest on this project we still get the bonus right?
i want ark launch and booming at the end of this year!
|
|
|
|
|
|
cannabanana
|
|
December 11, 2016, 04:13:49 AM |
|
If we dont want a refund and keep invest on this project we still get the bonus right?
i want ark launch and booming at the end of this year!
yes, if you don't refund you will still get the bonus. |
|
|
|
|
bangomatic
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
ARK Team likes to ban and delete posts in reddit.
|
|
December 11, 2016, 04:23:38 AM |
|
I've been running an Ark testnet forging node for several days now and have NO Forks and NO missed block. the Ark core is ultra stable!
Also, no ancillary scripts (bandaids) needed to keep this node forging. It just works.
|
|
|
|
|
MoveCrypto
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
move that crypto
|
|
December 11, 2016, 04:49:23 AM |
|
I've been running an Ark testnet forging node for several days now and have NO Forks and NO missed block. the Ark core is ultra stable!
Also, no ancillary scripts (bandaids) needed to keep this node forging. It just works.
 |
|
|
|
|
cannabanana
|
|
December 11, 2016, 05:02:16 AM |
|
I've been running an Ark testnet forging node for several days now and have NO Forks and NO missed block. the Ark core is ultra stable!
Also, no ancillary scripts (bandaids) needed to keep this node forging. It just works.
 |
|
|
|
|
djselery
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1001
|
|
December 11, 2016, 05:27:21 AM |
|
I've been running an Ark testnet forging node for several days now and have NO Forks and NO missed block. the Ark core is ultra stable!
Also, no ancillary scripts (bandaids) needed to keep this node forging. It just works.
I can't figure out if this guy is flying across a blank spreadsheet or a black and white game of brick breaker  |
|
|
|
|
frozenking
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 686
Merit: 250
The first solution in the World for cardiovascular
|
|
December 11, 2016, 05:29:43 AM |
|
hi guys, wanna deposit now, but i see there no bonus in LISK now? but there are bonus in btc if only i deposit more than 1 btc? im asking because i will deposit less than 1 btc, so i cant get bonus? anyway, gl and thanks for anwers  |
|
|
|
|
cannabanana
|
|
December 11, 2016, 05:47:10 AM |
|
hi guys, wanna deposit now, but i see there no bonus in LISK now? but there are bonus in btc if only i deposit more than 1 btc? im asking because i will deposit less than 1 btc, so i cant get bonus? anyway, gl and thanks for anwers yes it's only for 1 btc and above. |
|
|
|
|
|
cannabanana
|
|
December 11, 2016, 05:58:24 AM |
|
Lisk is a scam? What explains $ 0.13? What a disappointment! I am entirely with Team Ark !! The current financing is at 75%, will there be launch?
yes and we will still be on schedule. But the danger is that we will per our terms of service allow participants to get a refund which may take more time. If we are very lucky, some big whale will come and save the day but probably not  |
|
|
|
|
djselery
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1001
|
|
December 11, 2016, 06:06:08 AM |
|
ya, currently lisk is below their ico price... crazyness, if it went up to what it was worth, or even to 1/3 of it's actual worth we would be way over our threshold
|
|
|
|
|
|
cannabanana
|
|
December 11, 2016, 06:28:00 AM |
|
12h left until we end this exchange |
|
|
|
|
|
bitcoinsforall
|
|
December 11, 2016, 07:11:41 AM |
|
I see that the project may not reach threshold..if people are to stay here..
Do they receive all the bonus as stated earlier, i mean who all joined for 120% bonus??
|
|
|
|
|
|
kalpit
|
|
December 11, 2016, 07:19:44 AM |
|
ya, currently lisk is below their ico price... crazyness, if it went up to what it was worth, or even to 1/3 of it's actual worth we would be way over our threshold
I think you did some mistake in calculations. Lisk ico price was 0.00018 Bitcoin/Lisk Which means ark has about 1000 Bitcoin with Lisk according to its ico price. So total collection of around 1300 Bitcoins worth crypto. Which is lower than the threshold. Lisk is just below the ico price. Sion we can see an increase. But chances of crossing threshold with increased price is very unlikely. |
|
|
|
|
|
cannabanana
|
|
December 11, 2016, 07:24:24 AM |
|
ya, currently lisk is below their ico price... crazyness, if it went up to what it was worth, or even to 1/3 of it's actual worth we would be way over our threshold
I think you did some mistake in calculations. Lisk ico price was 0.00018 Bitcoin/Lisk Which means ark has about 1000 Bitcoin with Lisk according to its ico price. So total collection of around 1300 Bitcoins worth crypto. Which is lower than the threshold. Lisk is just below the ico price. Sion we can see an increase. But chances of crossing threshold with increased price is very unlikely. lol nah, you put some number is there subjectively. How you took "what it was worth" or "even to 1/3 of its actual worth" and got some number from it is beyond me. |
|
|
|
|
djselery
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1001
|
|
December 11, 2016, 07:30:42 AM |
|
ya, currently lisk is below their ico price... crazyness, if it went up to what it was worth, or even to 1/3 of it's actual worth we would be way over our threshold
I think you did some mistake in calculations. Lisk ico price was 0.00018 Bitcoin/Lisk Which means ark has about 1000 Bitcoin with Lisk according to its ico price. So total collection of around 1300 Bitcoins worth crypto. Which is lower than the threshold. Lisk is just below the ico price. Sion we can see an increase. But chances of crossing threshold with increased price is very unlikely. lol nah, you put some number is there subjectively. How you took "what it was worth" or "even to 1/3 of its actual worth" and got some number from it is beyond me. agreed canna, what is he trying to say? i said lisk is below ico price, 17 is lower than 18. soooo, none of the rest of that post really makes sense to me... maybe he can re-explain his point |
|
|
|
|
mamamae
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1188
Merit: 1001
|
|
December 11, 2016, 07:47:40 AM |
|
so every lisk and BTC will be sent to the people buying ARK ? and the project will continue ? was really worth the lisk bonus risk ?
|
reality ? you fell to Scammers after being in an ICO , IPO
(more like any other stock and index in the world ICO or not got your portfolio down 25 % or 85 %)
Now SEC is helping you getting back up your lost money maybe....
|
|
|
|
kalpit
|
|
December 11, 2016, 08:17:50 AM |
|
ya, currently lisk is below their ico price... crazyness, if it went up to what it was worth, or even to 1/3 of it's actual worth we would be way over our threshold
I think you did some mistake in calculations. Lisk ico price was 0.00018 Bitcoin/Lisk Which means ark has about 1000 Bitcoin with Lisk according to its ico price. So total collection of around 1300 Bitcoins worth crypto. Which is lower than the threshold. Lisk is just below the ico price. Sion we can see an increase. But chances of crossing threshold with increased price is very unlikely. lol nah, you put some number is there subjectively. How you took "what it was worth" or "even to 1/3 of its actual worth" and got some number from it is beyond me. agreed canna, what is he trying to say? i said lisk is below ico price, 17 is lower than 18. soooo, none of the rest of that post really makes sense to me... maybe he can re-explain his point I assume the actual with of Lisk to be the ico price of Lisk. Maybe you took ' actual worth ' to be the peak price of Lisk. ' I was trying to say that you are wrong that ' if Lisk goes to even 1/3 rd of its actual worth' ark wouldn't be 'way over threshold'. |
|
|
|
|
|
cannabanana
|
|
December 11, 2016, 08:29:14 AM |
|
ya, currently lisk is below their ico price... crazyness, if it went up to what it was worth, or even to 1/3 of it's actual worth we would be way over our threshold
I think you did some mistake in calculations. Lisk ico price was 0.00018 Bitcoin/Lisk Which means ark has about 1000 Bitcoin with Lisk according to its ico price. So total collection of around 1300 Bitcoins worth crypto. Which is lower than the threshold. Lisk is just below the ico price. Sion we can see an increase. But chances of crossing threshold with increased price is very unlikely. lol nah, you put some number is there subjectively. How you took "what it was worth" or "even to 1/3 of its actual worth" and got some number from it is beyond me. agreed canna, what is he trying to say? i said lisk is below ico price, 17 is lower than 18. soooo, none of the rest of that post really makes sense to me... maybe he can re-explain his point I assume the actual with of Lisk to be the ico price of Lisk. Maybe you took ' actual worth ' to be the peak price of Lisk. ' I was trying to say that you are wrong that ' if Lisk goes to even 1/3 rd of its actual worth' ark wouldn't be 'way over threshold'. that's what we're saying, how can you say he's wrong if there's no actual number involved? your reply still has you putting in a variable into what actual worth is. So nothing is wrong until you put something in place of what actual worth is to you. |
|
|
|
|
|
kalpit
|
|
December 11, 2016, 08:53:59 AM |
|
that's what we're saying, how can you say he's wrong if there's no actual number involved?
your reply still has you putting in a variable into what actual worth is. So nothing is wrong until you put something in place of what actual worth is to you.
How can you think that it would rise up so much ? Anyhow, in that post djselery said that 'actual worth' just after writing 'below ico price'. Which made me think, actual price is related to the ico price. Okay , now leave that. I sorry if you think it was my mistake. |
|
|
|
|
|
