ZCASH / ZEC Suprnova Pool Stratum enabled: https://zec.suprnova.cc [PPLNS]

[ocminer]

It's funny how fast a new function in a miner generates requests for features which were sleeping for years :-)

I've opened an SSL port as well:

ssl://zec.suprnova.cc:2242

can be used for Claymore 9 and you'll have a fully encrypted mining connection to suprnova as well.

[1713243266]

1713243266

[1713243266]

1713243266

[1713243266]

1713243266

[1713243266]

1713243266

[ocminer]

As there were some questions: No, the SSL port is not faster or slower, it's just secured by SSL/TLS.. So it's like you're switching from http:// to https://

[dmwardjr]

Hi OCminer,

I recently navigated to your website [Without reading directions].  I did try to mine to my ZEC address t1XAaQnvjwf8JhkwB3ZSBt76oPJE6WspPG4 on your pool at first like other ZEC pools.  I determined I could not monitor my rigs like other pools if done in this fashion.  It took a while to figure out I needed to create an account.

Once I created an account "ProudClown" and logged in, I got all my miners up and running without issue.  I entered in a wallet address in the field provided for auto payout and it was set to 3.0 ZEC.

My balance is now over 3.9 ZEC but no payout.

When I try to do an "On Demand Payout" it will not allow me to enter an address into the field provided.  It has a circle with a horizontal line drawn through it to symbolize "no entry."  No address is in that field at all.  When I look in the auto payout address field, no address is there either.  When I try to enter my address [The one I first tried to mine to without an account t1XAaQnvjwf8JhkwB3ZSBt76oPJE6WspPG4] in the auto payment field, it tells me, "... the address is in use."

Any ideas on what to do?  Did I create a conflict within your system when I first tried mining to my address without an account?  Am I forced now to use a different address?  If so, no big deal.

Thank you kindly,

David

[ocminer]

Hi !

Yes, you've created a conflict by using the address in an anonymous account first and now trying to use it in your private account.

You can either use a new address for your private account or message me again if it's not possible and I can delete the anonymous account.

[dmwardjr]

Hi !

Yes, you've created a conflict by using the address in an anonymous account first and now trying to use it in your private account.

You can either use a new address for your private account or message me again if it's not possible and I can delete the anonymous account.

Okay, thanks!

I'll give a different address a try.

[ocminer]

https://zec.suprnova.cc  will switch to PPLNS payout scheme within the next hours - stay tuned !

[ocminer]

Payout scheme has been switched from Prop to PPLNS - more steady and higher payouts for long term miners now.

[nanona]

Payout scheme has been switched from Prop to PPLNS - more steady and higher payouts for long term miners now.

Great. I guess you saw https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1656299.msg17114326#msg17114326 in the coinmine thread since this can't be coincidence (less than 24h after coinmine switched). Your pool was one of the pools where the multi-MSol/s miners jumped to when the round on coinmine approached 100%. That pool-hopping took away quite a few percent from loyal miners. Amazing how people cry because of 2.5% Claymore fee but don't realize a monster pool-hopper taking away 10x as much from them.

BTW, I think Claymore could be negatively affected with PPLNS if not many of his users mine on a particular pool, so his worker is active rather intermittent than pseudo-continuous. He could fix it by changing the intervals at which his DEV FEE kicks in.

[ocminer]

Payout scheme has been switched from Prop to PPLNS - more steady and higher payouts for long term miners now.

Great. I guess you saw https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1656299.msg17114326#msg17114326 in the coinmine thread since this can't be coincidence (less than 24h after coinmine switched). Your pool was one of the pools where the multi-MSol/s miners jumped to when the round on coinmine approached 100%. That pool-hopping took away quite a few percent from loyal miners. Amazing how people cry because of 2.5% Claymore fee but don't realize a monster pool-hopper taking away 10x as much from them.

BTW, I think Claymore could be negatively affected with PPLNS if not many of his users mine on a particular pool, so his worker is active rather intermittent than pseudo-continuous. He could fix it by changing the intervals at which his DEV FEE kicks in.

Yes, I was notified by feeleep as well as from some of my loyal miners, thanks a lot.

I will be doing 0% fee and bonuses very soon, currently mining the coins for the bonuses so people will get some compensation for that.

Claymore is no problem as the miner is mining the devfee also on suprnova and its not switching away.

[gross]

Rent cost hign over 30-40% normal ZEC mining cost with luck =100%, miners can dump for electric cost and go to another coins, but renters have to accept to lose by ZEC/BTC crash 10-20% rate(up to 30%/day). PPLNS is gameover for renter

[Ingramtg]

Rent cost hign over 30-40% normal ZEC mining cost with luck =100%, miners can dump for electric cost and go to another coins, but renters have to accept to lose by ZEC/BTC crash 10-20% rate(up to 30%/day). PPLNS is gameover for renter

clearly.now lend hash mining zec is  losing money with the low price ,but i am still mining , i believe the price will rise again

[gross]

suprnova pay wrong with PPLNS  you need coinmine setup again 

[ocminer]

You have to wait until you have shares in the last 10 blocks before you have full payout, it's PPLNS - not Prop anymore.

[dmwardjr]

suprnova pay wrong with PPLNS   you need coinmine setup again  

I would much rather have PPLNS.  It's the way to go in my opinion.

Suprnova, is a GREAT pool with quick response from support.

You have to allow your shares to build up over several rounds as OCminer said.

EDIT:  

I'm happy to have a thread here on bitcointalk.org for supernova.

I used to be in the CK/Kano Pool thread all the time when I mined bitcoin.  They know how to run a pool as well.  

By the way, they too run PPLNS.

[gross]

suprnova pay wrong with PPLNS   you need coinmine setup again  

I would much rather have PPLNS.  It's the way to go in my opinion.

Suprnova, is a GREAT pool with quick response from support.

You have to allow your shares to build up over several rounds as OCminer said.

EDIT:  

I'm happy to have a thread here on bitcointalk.org for supernova.

I used to be in the CK/Kano Pool thread all the time when I mined bitcoin.  They know how to run a pool as well.  

By the way, they too run PPLNS.

No, i mine many pool coinmine, miningpoolhub ... with PPLNS :every site auto splits my shares to many rounds though i mine in only 1 round or many rounds, i don't need build up over several rounds as at suprnova. With this way at suprnova, there are more total user actual shares than total PPLNS so user will lost shares and low profit then i say wrong with PPLNS

[ocminer]

Read this:

http://give-me-coins.com/support/faq/what-is-pplns/

You're confusing PPS / Prop with PPLNS

[dmwardjr]

Read this:

http://give-me-coins.com/support/faq/what-is-pplns/

You're confusing PPS / Prop with PPLNS

EXACTLY!

Thanks

[gross]

Pool miss block 26258 to credit all user 
https://explorer.zcha.in/blocks/000000004572313dd1bb39a643b16dfcd395e78dd5b25ca7baf6835a7dccea3e

[ocminer]

Pool miss block 26258 to credit all user 
https://explorer.zcha.in/blocks/000000004572313dd1bb39a643b16dfcd395e78dd5b25ca7baf6835a7dccea3e

Orphan on my side:


zcash-cli getblock 000000004572313dd1bb39a643b16dfcd395e78dd5b25ca7baf6835a7dccea3e
{
    "hash" : "000000004572313dd1bb39a643b16dfcd395e78dd5b25ca7baf6835a7dccea3e",
    "confirmations" : -1,
    "size" : 8876,
    "height" : 26258,
    "version" : 4,
    "merkleroot" : "497daf58ff35e62f0cde0f8b7ba1e91a21a86b617352061d96c3aee69a798a6b",
    "tx" : [
        "c96824fe12365e218ddd10f08335bd84d2252d918b04f2e7e9374e63b940c160",
        "8cdaa5cfdc326b236d054228f3c0bf2bd46bea07f17eed9e19e011ee863c6317",
        "6066742c98abd4b29f5f189e7d1529b3df6e6d9e858be676b026efeeaec6ba3f",
        "6b060c94421e2237e4770956f998279c37f3abf8e8064bb2658039ddab45bf2a",
        "d4bf615055262082087e60f2f276a8c9e780010a01ddaf04cd1459a0c0c9d10d",
        "32e88e0b5a33955d3a85d22bd70e444caf4d26b66913a3ca1eae240e6b9e6d95"
    ],
    "time" : 1481545495,

[gross]

Pool miss block 26258 to credit all user 
https://explorer.zcha.in/blocks/000000004572313dd1bb39a643b16dfcd395e78dd5b25ca7baf6835a7dccea3e

Orphan on my side:


zcash-cli getblock 000000004572313dd1bb39a643b16dfcd395e78dd5b25ca7baf6835a7dccea3e
{
    "hash" : "000000004572313dd1bb39a643b16dfcd395e78dd5b25ca7baf6835a7dccea3e",
    "confirmations" : -1,
    "size" : 8876,
    "height" : 26258,
    "version" : 4,
    "merkleroot" : "497daf58ff35e62f0cde0f8b7ba1e91a21a86b617352061d96c3aee69a798a6b",
    "tx" : [
        "c96824fe12365e218ddd10f08335bd84d2252d918b04f2e7e9374e63b940c160",
        "8cdaa5cfdc326b236d054228f3c0bf2bd46bea07f17eed9e19e011ee863c6317",
        "6066742c98abd4b29f5f189e7d1529b3df6e6d9e858be676b026efeeaec6ba3f",
        "6b060c94421e2237e4770956f998279c37f3abf8e8064bb2658039ddab45bf2a",
        "d4bf615055262082087e60f2f276a8c9e780010a01ddaf04cd1459a0c0c9d10d",
        "32e88e0b5a33955d3a85d22bd70e444caf4d26b66913a3ca1eae240e6b9e6d95"
    ],
    "time" : 1481545495,

27 confirms in zcash explorer to t1SaATQbzURpG1qU3vz9Wfn3pwXoTqFtTq2 .Is zcash explorer wrong 
https://explorer.zcha.in/blocks/000000004572313dd1bb39a643b16dfcd395e78dd5b25ca7baf6835a7dccea3e