[CLOSED] | 🔥 Bitmixer.io Signature Campaign 🔥 |

[jamalaezaz]

Bump.

LOL...
already fucked whole users and still bumping it.. You are a Monster. hehehe.
why don't you reserve this campaign only for you and your ACE team? blacklist whole forum and earn alone.. because only you have the qualify poster's team. how's this Idea?

[1714029765]

1714029765

[1714029765]

1714029765

[1714029765]

1714029765

[1714029765]

1714029765

[1714029765]

1714029765

[Lutpin]

already fucked whole users and still bumping it.. You are a Monster. hehehe.
why don't you reserve this campaign only for you and your ACE team? blacklist whole forum and earn alone.. because only you have the qualify poster's team. how's this Idea?

Don't you have your own problems to take care of?

Yes I do.. same situation like Opair.

Last time I checked, Opair fully covered all signature campaign payments.

[BAGOBO]

Bump.

LOL...
already fucked whole users and still bumping it.. You are a Monster. hehehe.
why don't you reserve this campaign only for you and your ACE team? blacklist whole forum and earn alone.. because only you have the qualify poster's team. how's this Idea?

Well bitmixer rate's may not interest for their (ACE TEAM) desire, that's why I suggest bitmixer raising their rate

[Lutpin]

Well bitmixer rate's may not interest for their (ACE TEAM) desire, that's why I suggest bitmixer raising their rate

ACE is booked for the next month, and even if not, ACE doesn't operate under the flag of a regular signature campaign.
Why are we discussing this here even? Because Lauda is a part of ACE and manages Bitmixer.io? Both things can run seperate and they do.

[Lauda]

why don't you reserve this campaign only for you and your ACE team? blacklist whole forum and earn alone.. because only you have the qualify poster's team. how's this Idea?

I highly doubt that Bitmixer is interested in such a deal, so no. Also the ACE team is not mine ("your"), I'm a participant of it as much as anyone else is (consensus based decisions).

that's why I suggest bitmixer raising their rate

I said this already, and I'll say it again: Talk to Bitmixer, not me.
One more time: PSA: Do not join this campaign, if you intent to have >95% of your posts in your local sections. This is against the rules.

[rizzlarolla]

i will ask if you would reconsider "gentlemand".

Although generally short, posts are unique and witty.
I feel gentlemand to be an genuine person, old hand, bit jaded, bit lazy.

I'd rather that than any farmed account.
Maybe a kick up the butt for gentlemand?

i wont make a fuss, your decision.

[Lauda]

i will ask if you would reconsider "gentlemand".
Although generally short, posts are unique and witty.
I feel gentlemand to be an genuine person, old hand, bit jaded, bit lazy.

Due to the situation on the forum, it is sometimes very tough to distinguish between a genuine person who just posts in a specific way (generally average quality) and spammers of similar caliber. After evaluating a few pages of their posts, and discussing it with another party I have decided to remove them from the list.

i wont make a fuss, your decision.

Any suggestions regarding potential re-evaluation is welcome, either by PM or in here.

[pawel7777]

i will ask if you would reconsider "gentlemand".

Although generally short, posts are unique and witty.
I feel gentlemand to be an genuine person, old hand, bit jaded, bit lazy.

I'd rather that than any farmed account.
Maybe a kick up the butt for gentlemand?

i wont make a fuss, your decision.

Seconded.

He's a genuine guy. He was posting in the same manner even without wearing any sig. Pretty sure he's not "only here to earn some btc" type of poster

[Timelord2067]

Claiming from the same signature campaign:

Accounts connected: ajrah u=458219, Viyamore u=670726, Zooplus u=671046, Hatuferu u=676080, quintiilieo u=715575, SilverPunk u=734504, --YUki-- u=822564

Ref: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1206112.msg16788524#msg16788524

[Lauda]

Seconded.
He's a genuine guy. He was posting in the same manner even without wearing any sig. Pretty sure he's not "only here to earn some btc" type of poster

I've handled this already, i.e. removed him from the blacklist.

Claiming from the same signature campaign:

Accounts connected: ajrah u=458219, Viyamore u=670726, Zooplus u=671046, Hatuferu u=676080, quintiilieo u=715575, SilverPunk u=734504, --YUki-- u=822564

Ajrah is currently banned, and hatuferu got banned in the last round of bans. I have put all of these in the permanent blacklist with your reference. Thank you.

[rizzlarolla]

I cannot argue with your decision because you have all the freedom to make it happen what you want. But saying that I am a farm account is too much and something that you need to prove.

i have proven you are farmed account.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1597201.0

Come and put your case, if you think you can prove different.

[rizzlarolla]

^^^ i answered anyway. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1597201.msg16791920#msg16791920

[Jemzx00]

Okay Lauda I'll be accepting that you've ban me for somehow spamming on Services since I've posted the same things like posting username, post count, rank, and bitcoin address. Since I've been applying to a lot of campaign. I'll be respecting your decision since I've saw that you somehow have a good reputation here on BCT. But I'll be asking for a reconsideration to be remove on that list next next week or next month. I'll post better than before so could you please review my account next next week or next month.

[Lauda]

But I'll be asking for a reconsideration to be remove on that list next next week or next month. I'll post better than before so could you please review my account next next week or next month.

Sure. If you do ask for one, and there have been little to no sign of required improvement then you're moving onto the permanent blacklist.

Why im banned again? my posts are way better than a lot of people posting in this campaing. This is nonsense.

You don't even know who is enrolled in the campaign. How could you possibly know whether your posts are better than a lot of people then? Note: Wearing this signature != enrolled. P.S. Your one liner nonsense is so obvious that I question why you're trying to refute it here.

[AtheistAKASaneBrain]

But I'll be asking for a reconsideration to be remove on that list next next week or next month. I'll post better than before so could you please review my account next next week or next month.

Sure. If you do ask for one, and there have been little to no sign of required improvement then you're moving onto the permanent blacklist.

Why im banned again? my posts are way better than a lot of people posting in this campaing. This is nonsense.

You don't even know who is enrolled in the campaign. How could you possibly know whether your posts are better than a lot of people then? Note: Wearing this signature != enrolled. P.S. Your one liner nonsense is so obvious that I question why you're trying to refute it here.

Huh, by entering their ID in the website?

Just by looking in this thread:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=735878;sa=showPosts

This is an actual oneliner poster.

https://bitmixer.io/signature.html

Enter the ID here:

Name:   apoorvlathey
Posts:   790
New posts:   0
Bitcoin address:   1APoorVr8yRZZSM9DP76VCgrmkd54jHdkR
Signature:   found
Status:   Active
Payments
November 7   0.0091000000
October 31   0.0000000000

So how does he deserve a spot while I don't? My posts are perfectly okay. Judging by your delusional standards get ready to ban a lot of people.

[Lauda]

Huh, by entering their ID in the website?

Again, you don't know who is enrolled. Manually checking everyone is very inefficient.

So how does he deserve a spot while I don't? My posts are perfectly okay. Judging by your delusional standards get ready to ban a lot of people.

This is a classic example of the relative privation fallacy ("not bad as"). Also, I've had enough of the ad hominem. Hereby I'm asking you not to post in this self-moderated thread again.

[AtheistAKASaneBrain]

Huh, by entering their ID in the website?

Again, you don't know who is enrolled. Manually checking everyone is very inefficient.

So how does he deserve a spot while I don't? My posts are perfectly okay. Judging by your delusional standards get ready to ban a lot of people.

I've had enough of the ad hominem. Do not post in here again.

How I don't know who is not enrolled? Again, just enter the ID of a poster on the website and I know who is enrolled. If he is "active" then he is enrolled and getting paid. That guy is getting paid and has objectively worse posting quality than me, yet you fail to tell me why im banned and he isn't.

This is a signature campaing, not a blog. My posting is natural posting, it's not spam and certainly not big walls of text just for the sake of it, that is what it should be about. Normal people posting, the link of the site gets promoted, the owner gets clicks. That's all.
But yeah you are the boss now here, I accept your ban and I'll leave, but the truth remains: There's people way worse posting quality than me getting paid, and my posts are good enough, specially for a 0.007 rate posting as an Hero Member.

[Lauda]

How I don't know who is not enrolled?

You don't have an overview. You would have to actively look for people with the signature and check.

There's people will worse posting quality than me getting paid

They will all eventually get banned. Checking is done only once per week, and mistakes can happen. Besides, this is the relative privation fallacy (as mentioned in prior post). This:

Hereby I'm asking you not to post in this self-moderated thread again.

If you have any other concerns PM me directly.

[babo]

very nice procedure for add people in campaign, and is simple to use.. i add myself in a couple of seconds.. good job dude

this procedure is selfmade? php?

[Lauda]

this procedure is selfmade? php?

This was made by Bitmixer's programmer a long time ago as the campaign has been running since 2014. I've only recently started managing it to combat spam.