[ANN]ROUND - CS:GO Competitive platform! ROUND IS WORKING! CHECK IT NOW!

[raphma]

Hello, guys. Nice project) I am gamer in blood)) Devs please give more information about the games that your platform will support?

League of Legends, Dota 2, Counter-Strike and others popular will be added

wow,
That's good! i'm a dota2 and CSGO player, always used DGB but apparently it's dying... i'd love to move to another coin.

When will you release the whitepaper?

[1713852773]

1713852773

[NJRiot]

I like your approach)  Specifically, I think that you need to launch ICO which will ensure a huge interest from crypto community and take care of investment  and initial distribution of coins.

Frankly, initially we didn’t want to launch ICO because, firstly, we already have investors and we don’t need a lot for development, secondly, ICO is a time-consuming process.  So we decided to focus on technical part instead of spreading ourselves thin on crowdfunding.

If you don’t need a lot of funds then you definitely should launch ICO and then you won’t depend on investors. Develop your project as you please and no one will ever restrict you while interested users will be able to invest and even profit, of course, if it’s a really good project.

Yes, all true, there’s quite a lot of traders who want to trade) and no one cares about the technical side. Let everyone mind their own business LOL. Let them trade!

[Kale99]

Hello, guys. Nice project) I am gamer in blood)) Devs please give more information about the games that your platform will support?

League of Legends, Dota 2, Counter-Strike and others popular will be added

wow,
That's good! i'm a dota2 and CSGO player, always used DGB but apparently it's dying... i'd love to move to another coin.

When will you release the whitepaper?

Devs said white paper will be availlable on this week.

[bitcoinsrus]

I like your approach) Specifically, I think that you need to launch ICO which will ensure a huge interest from crypto community and take care of investment  and initial distribution of coins.

Frankly, initially we didn’t want to launch ICO because, firstly, we already have investors and we don’t need a lot for development, secondly, ICO is a time-consuming process.  So we decided to focus on technical part instead of spreading ourselves thin on crowdfunding.

If you don’t need a lot of funds then you definitely should launch ICO and then you won’t depend on investors. Develop your project as you please and no one will ever restrict you while interested users will be able to invest and even profit, of course, if it’s a really good project.

We are not concerned with trading and price, what we really want now is to create a successful project. But there’s a bit of truth in that statement, if we won’t depend on investors then no one will pressure us. In addition, coin price will be stabilized by the time the platform is up and running.

[Bavaria]

I like your approach) Specifically, I think that you need to launch ICO which will ensure a huge interest from crypto community and take care of investment
and initial distribution of coins.

Frankly, initially we didn’t want to launch ICO because, firstly, we already have investors and we don’t need a lot for development, secondly, ICO is a time-consuming process.  So we decided to focus on technical part instead of spreading ourselves thin on crowdfunding.

If you don’t need a lot of funds then you definitely should launch ICO and then you won’t depend on investors. Develop your project as you please and no one will ever restrict you while interested users will be able to invest and even profit, of course, if it’s a really good project.

We are not concerned with trading and price, what we really want now is to create a successful project. But there’s a bit of truth in that statement, if we won’t depend on investors then no one will pressure us. In addition, coin price will be stabilized by the time the platform is up and running.

Very much so. You better do everything openly instead of going into hiding and developing the project all by yourselves. Work publicly and if people want to invest, and according to forum there are some – it would be stupid if you don’t give them such option. I suggest that you tell a minimum amount you need for development and then announce ICO. If you get it – everyone benefits, if not – you don’t lose anything. On top of that we’ll see how strongly you believe in the project and want it working and decentralized.

[Dsdyourfull]

project looks good, i am a LOL player. wish can use your serve to bet LPL winner next year

[mrgreen88]

биткoинPУC?))  пoнaблюдaю)

[bitcoinsrus]

I like your approach) Specifically, I think that you need to launch ICO which will ensure a huge interest from crypto community and take care of investment
and initial distribution of coins.

Frankly, initially we didn’t want to launch ICO because, firstly, we already have investors and we don’t need a lot for development, secondly, ICO is a time-consuming process.  So we decided to focus on technical part instead of spreading ourselves thin on crowdfunding.

If you don’t need a lot of funds then you definitely should launch ICO and then you won’t depend on investors. Develop your project as you please and no one will ever restrict you while interested users will be able to invest and even profit, of course, if it’s a really good project.

We are not concerned with trading and price, what we really want now is to create a successful project. But there’s a bit of truth in that statement, if we won’t depend on investors then no one will pressure us. In addition, coin price will be stabilized by the time the platform is up and running.

Very much so. You better do everything openly instead of going into hiding and developing the project all by yourselves. Work publicly and if people want to invest, and according to forum there are some – it would be stupid if you don’t give them such option. I suggest that you tell a minimum amount you need for development and then announce ICO. If you get it – everyone benefits, if not – you don’t lose anything. On top of that we’ll see how strongly you believe in the project and want it working and decentralized.

We are tech geeks, we can’t do ICO. We are not strong when it comes to marketing and it’s easier for us to develope the platform then take profit of selling. And when the project kicks off – then we’ll be able to get some profit. I.e. people will use it and pay us.

[NJRiot]

I like your approach) Specifically, I think that you need to launch ICO which will ensure a huge interest from crypto community and take care of investment
and initial distribution of coins.

Frankly, initially we didn’t want to launch ICO because, firstly, we already have investors and we don’t need a lot for development, secondly, ICO is a time-consuming process.  So we decided to focus on technical part instead of spreading ourselves thin on crowdfunding.

If you don’t need a lot of funds then you definitely should launch ICO and then you won’t depend on investors. Develop your project as you please and no one will ever restrict you while interested users will be able to invest and even profit, of course, if it’s a really good project.

We are not concerned with trading and price, what we really want now is to create a successful project. But there’s a bit of truth in that statement, if we won’t depend on investors then no one will pressure us. In addition, coin price will be stabilized by the time the platform is up and running.

Very much so. You better do everything openly instead of going into hiding and developing the project all by yourselves. Work publicly and if people want to invest, and according to forum there are some – it would be stupid if you don’t give them such option. I suggest that you tell a minimum amount you need for development and then announce ICO. If you get it – everyone benefits, if not – you don’t lose anything. On top of that we’ll see how strongly you believe in the project and want it working and decentralized.

We are tech geeks, we can’t do ICO. We are not strong when it comes to marketing and it’s easier for us to develope the platform then take profit of selling. And when the project kicks off – then we’ll be able to get some profit. I.e. people will use it and pay us.

Guys don't be stupid, announce ICO and give us opportunity to trade. 

[Bavaria]

I like your approach) Specifically, I think that you need to launch ICO which will ensure a huge interest from crypto community and take care of investment
and initial distribution of coins.

Frankly, initially we didn’t want to launch ICO because, firstly, we already have investors and we don’t need a lot for development, secondly, ICO is a time-consuming process.  So we decided to focus on technical part instead of spreading ourselves thin on crowdfunding.

If you don’t need a lot of funds then you definitely should launch ICO and then you won’t depend on investors. Develop your project as you please and no one will ever restrict you while interested users will be able to invest and even profit, of course, if it’s a really good project.

We are not concerned with trading and price, what we really want now is to create a successful project. But there’s a bit of truth in that statement, if we won’t depend on investors then no one will pressure us. In addition, coin price will be stabilized by the time the platform is up and running.

Very much so. You better do everything openly instead of going into hiding and developing the project all by yourselves. Work publicly and if people want to invest, and according to forum there are some – it would be stupid if you don’t give them such option. I suggest that you tell a minimum amount you need for development and then announce ICO. If you get it – everyone benefits, if not – you don’t lose anything. On top of that we’ll see how strongly you believe in the project and want it working and decentralized.

We are tech geeks, we can’t do ICO. We are not strong when it comes to marketing and it’s easier for us to develope the platform then take profit of selling. And when the project kicks off – then we’ll be able to get some profit. I.e. people will use it and pay us.

Seriously bro, you have no idea how to get this thing going. For God’s sake, launch ICO )

[bitcoinsrus]

I like your approach) Specifically, I think that you need to launch ICO which will ensure a huge interest from crypto community and take care of investment
and initial distribution of coins.

Frankly, initially we didn’t want to launch ICO because, firstly, we already have investors and we don’t need a lot for development, secondly, ICO is a time-consuming process.  So we decided to focus on technical part instead of spreading ourselves thin on crowdfunding.

If you don’t need a lot of funds then you definitely should launch ICO and then you won’t depend on investors. Develop your project as you please and no one will ever restrict you while interested users will be able to invest and even profit, of course, if it’s a really good project.

We are not concerned with trading and price, what we really want now is to create a successful project. But there’s a bit of truth in that statement, if we won’t depend on investors then no one will pressure us. In addition, coin price will be stabilized by the time the platform is up and running.

Very much so. You better do everything openly instead of going into hiding and developing the project all by yourselves. Work publicly and if people want to invest, and according to forum there are some – it would be stupid if you don’t give them such option. I suggest that you tell a minimum amount you need for development and then announce ICO. If you get it – everyone benefits, if not – you don’t lose anything. On top of that we’ll see how strongly you believe in the project and want it working and decentralized.

We are tech geeks, we can’t do ICO. We are not strong when it comes to marketing and it’s easier for us to develope the platform then take profit of selling. And when the project kicks off – then we’ll be able to get some profit. I.e. people will use it and pay us.

Seriously bro, you have no idea how to get this thing going. For God’s sake, launch ICO )

To launch ICO we need, marketing aside, to have a technical side ready – ico cabinet, etc. which takes a lot of time. We understand that we better spend this time developing. At the end of the day what’s more important, ICO or a perfect product?

[Kale99]

WTF?? Give us ICO! Its crypto LOL. You need a normal coin distributing, whith out this your market will be faild!

[Bavaria]

I like your approach) Specifically, I think that you need to launch ICO which will ensure a huge interest from crypto community and take care of investment
and initial distribution of coins.

Frankly, initially we didn’t want to launch ICO because, firstly, we already have investors and we don’t need a lot for development, secondly, ICO is a time-consuming process.  So we decided to focus on technical part instead of spreading ourselves thin on crowdfunding.

If you don’t need a lot of funds then you definitely should launch ICO and then you won’t depend on investors. Develop your project as you please and no one will ever restrict you while interested users will be able to invest and even profit, of course, if it’s a really good project.

We are not concerned with trading and price, what we really want now is to create a successful project. But there’s a bit of truth in that statement, if we won’t depend on investors then no one will pressure us. In addition, coin price will be stabilized by the time the platform is up and running.

Very much so. You better do everything openly instead of going into hiding and developing the project all by yourselves. Work publicly and if people want to invest, and according to forum there are some – it would be stupid if you don’t give them such option. I suggest that you tell a minimum amount you need for development and then announce ICO. If you get it – everyone benefits, if not – you don’t lose anything. On top of that we’ll see how strongly you believe in the project and want it working and decentralized.

We are tech geeks, we can’t do ICO. We are not strong when it comes to marketing and it’s easier for us to develope the platform then take profit of selling. And when the project kicks off – then we’ll be able to get some profit. I.e. people will use it and pay us.

Seriously bro, you have no idea how to get this thing going. For God’s sake, launch ICO )

To launch ICO we need, marketing aside, to have a technical side ready – ico cabinet, etc. which takes a lot of time. We understand that we better spend this time developing. At the end of the day what’s more important, ICO or a perfect product?

Well, both are equally important, you just don’t get it

[NJRiot]

I like your approach) Specifically, I think that you need to launch ICO which will ensure a huge interest from crypto community and take care of investment
and initial distribution of coins.

Frankly, initially we didn’t want to launch ICO because, firstly, we already have investors and we don’t need a lot for development, secondly, ICO is a time-consuming process.  So we decided to focus on technical part instead of spreading ourselves thin on crowdfunding.

If you don’t need a lot of funds then you definitely should launch ICO and then you won’t depend on investors. Develop your project as you please and no one will ever restrict you while interested users will be able to invest and even profit, of course, if it’s a really good project.

We are not concerned with trading and price, what we really want now is to create a successful project. But there’s a bit of truth in that statement, if we won’t depend on investors then no one will pressure us. In addition, coin price will be stabilized by the time the platform is up and running.

Very much so. You better do everything openly instead of going into hiding and developing the project all by yourselves. Work publicly and if people want to invest, and according to forum there are some – it would be stupid if you don’t give them such option. I suggest that you tell a minimum amount you need for development and then announce ICO. If you get it – everyone benefits, if not – you don’t lose anything. On top of that we’ll see how strongly you believe in the project and want it working and decentralized.

We are tech geeks, we can’t do ICO. We are not strong when it comes to marketing and it’s easier for us to develope the platform then take profit of selling. And when the project kicks off – then we’ll be able to get some profit. I.e. people will use it and pay us.

Seriously bro, you have no idea how to get this thing going. For God’s sake, launch ICO )

To launch ICO we need, marketing aside, to have a technical side ready – ico cabinet, etc. which takes a lot of time. We understand that we better spend this time developing. At the end of the day what’s more important, ICO or a perfect product?

Ok, then launch ICO via exchange, many do it this way. All you need is to talk an exchange into it. They can do it through buy wall, easy.

[Bavaria]

Yes you can do it like that, nice one.

[bitcoinsrus]

To launch ICO we need, marketing aside, to have a technical side ready – ico cabinet, etc. which takes a lot of time. We understand that we better spend this time developing. At the end of the day what’s more important, ICO or a perfect product?

Ok, then launch ICO via exchange, many do it this way. All you need is to talk an exchange into it. They can do it through buy wall, easy.

Sure, that is a valid option, but what’s the point for people to invest and wait another half a year until project is finally released?

[NJRiot]

To launch ICO we need, marketing aside, to have a technical side ready – ico cabinet, etc. which takes a lot of time. We understand that we better spend this time developing. At the end of the day what’s more important, ICO or a perfect product?

Ok, then launch ICO via exchange, many do it this way. All you need is to talk an exchange into it. They can do it through buy wall, easy.

Sure, that is a valid option, but what’s the point for people to invest and wait another half a year until project is finally released?

You can distribute tokens just like Singular did (and it’s still being developed while their coin is already being traded hot). In this case you won’t have the pressure of traders asking you to speed up.

[bitcoinsrus]

Round team decided to distribute tokens via ICO. Maximum ICO amount - 100 BTC. All additional information will be available tomorrow. We already sent requests for some exchanges asking to manage ICO for our project, waiting answers from them.

[NJRiot]

Round team decided to distribute tokens via ICO. Maximum ICO amount - 100 BTC. All additional information will be available tomorrow. We already sent requests for some exchanges asking to manage ICO for our project, waiting answers from them.

Oh at least you decide!) Cool I'm sure this is the right move.

[Kale99]

Nice! Will be watching for updates.