[Buddybay]

Skill based game are still the most risky than trading because you can get any if you lose in gambling but if you are trader you know trading is much wise choice because you can gain a good profit and it is easy to make profit also you can not lose all if the price is going down you can be still sell them..

[1714957397]

1714957397

[1714957397]

1714957397

[Granxis]

I used to be afraid of investing in the past, but if you make the right investment you can get a risk-free gain, you can double your money. I like investment.

[MinerHQ]

Skill based game are still the most risky than trading because you can get any if you lose in gambling but if you are trader you know trading is much wise choice because you can gain a good profit and it is easy to make profit also you can not lose all if the price is going down you can be still sell them..

According to me, trading means it's business, only for profit we will do trading. No one will do trading for fun. Yes, it is profitable to compare skill-based gambling. But skill based games will give us fun and profit both. We will enjoy the games, and also we will make a profit if we are a pro in skill games. So for fun side, i choose skill gambling and for just profit wise its Trading.

[Whosdaddy]

I often see that people prefer skill-based gambling such as poker or sportsbook because they think it's more profitable than trading.
But, people say that sports can be manipulated by mafia/casino for their own good.

So, which one is more risky? Skill-based gambling or trading? I think both of them have same risks because both of them could be manipulated, unexpected things could happen and many more.

I always agree gambling is riskier than trading, because if I talk about gambling, I should talk about luck more than skills, on the other hand, Trading can be a business, which is good for good traders, I mean you should have skills and experience to be good in trading. without doubts, trading is more realized on skills than luck.

[passwordnow]

I used to be afraid of investing in the past, but if you make the right investment you can get a risk-free gain, you can double your money. I like investment.

In fact, there is no risk-free investment. All of the investments throughout the world whether it is with bitcoin or not, the risk are always there. And maybe you should take some investments seriously because it is your money that you are going to put and you need to manage it properly especially in trading, so that your afraid will somehow be removed.

[hurain]

I often see that people prefer skill-based gambling such as poker or sportsbook because they think it's more profitable than trading.
But, people say that sports can be manipulated by mafia/casino for their own good.

So, which one is more risky? Skill-based gambling or trading? I think both of them have same risks because both of them could be manipulated, unexpected things could happen and many more.

I always agree gambling is riskier than trading, because if I talk about gambling, I should talk about luck more than skills, on the other hand, Trading can be a business, which is good for good traders, I mean you should have skills and experience to be good in trading. without doubts, trading is more realized on skills than luck.

risk is also involve in trading, although we mostly speak about risk in gambling but to me if you have no experience and skill in trading then it is more risky than gambling. to me i both play gambling and do trading, i mostly play gambling for refreshment although the intention is to make money but still there also a lot of fun when making money in gambling.

[maydna]

I often see that people prefer skill-based gambling such as poker or sportsbook because they think it's more profitable than trading.
But, people say that sports can be manipulated by mafia/casino for their own good.

So, which one is more risky? Skill-based gambling or trading? I think both of them have same risks because both of them could be manipulated, unexpected things could happen and many more.

I always agree gambling is riskier than trading, because if I talk about gambling, I should talk about luck more than skills, on the other hand, Trading can be a business, which is good for good traders, I mean you should have skills and experience to be good in trading. without doubts, trading is more realized on skills than luck.

risk is also involve in trading, although we mostly speak about risk in gambling but to me if you have no experience and skill in trading then it is more risky than gambling. to me i both play gambling and do trading, i mostly play gambling for refreshment although the intention is to make money but still there also a lot of fun when making money in gambling.

even if we have skill in trading its still have a risk too like gambling because for me, every activity that we are doing have the risk and i think before we doing a work, we should thinking about the risk. for me, skill-based gambling and trading have risk but its different, the risk of gambling is we can get loss our money but in trading, we have loss if the coins getting down but we make profit if the price is up.

[gabmen]

I often see that people prefer skill-based gambling such as poker or sportsbook because they think it's more profitable than trading.
But, people say that sports can be manipulated by mafia/casino for their own good.

So, which one is more risky? Skill-based gambling or trading? I think both of them have same risks because both of them could be manipulated, unexpected things could happen and many more.

I always agree gambling is riskier than trading, because if I talk about gambling, I should talk about luck more than skills, on the other hand, Trading can be a business, which is good for good traders, I mean you should have skills and experience to be good in trading. without doubts, trading is more realized on skills than luck.

Well you're talking about gambling in general here dude. Of course i agree with you that trading is less riskier than traditional gambling because as you've said, luck plays the major part in it. But for gambling based on skill, you don't just rely on luck. Why do you think the same people find themselves playing with each other in international poker leagues? It's because they've honed their skills to be able to be at that level pretty much thr same as how you do trading right?

[FlightyPouch]

Skill based game are still the most risky than trading because you can get any if you lose in gambling but if you are trader you know trading is much wise choice because you can gain a good profit and it is easy to make profit also you can not lose all if the price is going down you can be still sell them..

Well i really liked trading because it will really get back your money and it will make your money a profit, though i have a hard tine believing in people that wants to trade with me so I really dont trade, unless I really know that person and I am meeting him in personal. Trading is a best choice though i like skill based gambling.

[mirakal]

Skill based game are still the most risky than trading because you can get any if you lose in gambling but if you are trader you know trading is much wise choice because you can gain a good profit and it is easy to make profit also you can not lose all if the price is going down you can be still sell them..

Well i really liked trading because it will really get back your money and it will make your money a profit, though i have a hard tine believing in people that wants to trade with me so I really dont trade, unless I really know that person and I am meeting him in personal. Trading is a best choice though i like skill based gambling.

Evaluating ourselves is very important, we must know where we are good at, both are risky and will be riskier if we do not have the skills and knowledge required. One can be good in skilled based gambling but not good in trading, it really depends on your interest as both requires skills for us to be effective.

[pinkpanther03]

I often see that people prefer skill-based gambling such as poker or sportsbook because they think it's more profitable than trading.
But, people say that sports can be manipulated by mafia/casino for their own good.

So, which one is more risky? Skill-based gambling or trading? I think both of them have same risks because both of them could be manipulated, unexpected things could happen and many more.

This true and correct, everything in this world whether gambling or trading can be manipulated by the whales investors. Which is up to now it is still happening in any aspect of business like this. And gambling is the one more risky than trading, because gambling is just a game of luck only.

[Ayers]

trading of course, still based game are very low in randomness because they are based more on skill, the chance that you win just by luck is very low, on the other hand trading is the opposite, the luck invovled is very high, and the long run success is still based on luck

[Winner]

Gambling is more profitable than trading if the Gambler knows how to manage his money and results. The people that trade stuff like Altcoins usually have to put in a huge amount of money inside a trade just so that they could get satisfied with the amount of money that they'll make. The Gambler only needs a small portion of the money that is used inside the trade just so that they could get more money than what a person trading would make within 30 days (Usually). Gambling is more risky because they Gambler could lose their money with a very bad bet.

[cryp24x]

I think skill based game is more risky.  The main reason is that skill-based game still rely on the chance of having a good cards in hands like poker and black jack.  Even sports betting needs to depend on the chance of scoring due to odds being placed, and not only on who is to win.  While trading, if ever the market gets dangerous, we can always cut our loses by simply selling our holidngs.

[dothebeats]

Luck-based gambling games are no doubt the most riskiest thing to do compared to trading or other stuff. In trading you can use some kinds of leverages however in luck-based games, you only rely to the power of luck to give you some awesome rolls to get in the greens.

[FasTroy]

I think Skill-based gambling is more risky than trading, The reason is clear, because gambling still gambling, we talked about chance, Mostly in game based only in luck.
Even in sports betting, there is a percent of luck too. You can be so great and have a lot of good predictions, but you can lose. When we talk about trading, we talk about skills and a low percent of luck. But good and skilled traders, they usally succeed.

[Finestream]

I think Skill-based gambling is more risky than trading, The reason is clear, because gambling still gambling, we talked about chance, Mostly in game based only in luck.
Even in sports betting, there is a percent of luck too. You can be so great and have a lot of good predictions, but you can lose. When we talk about trading, we talk about skills and a low percent of luck. But good and skilled traders, they usally succeed.

Choose the one that you can used your skills, if you have the skills in everything then good for you. In reality, our chances in gambling is lower even if it is skilled based or luck based, the fun in gambling is sometimes giving us the distraction for us not to follow our game plan strictly. Our emotion is heavily used when in gambling unlike in trading where everything should be done seriously.

[swogerino]

Trading is more risky because you cannot know everything happening in the market. Skill gambling like poker you know everything before taking a decision and this is less risky. They are both risky and they are not recommended. Usually people who play skill gambling have less losses than the other ones.

[serjent05]

Trading is more risky because you cannot know everything happening in the market. Skill gambling like poker you know everything before taking a decision and this is less risky. They are both risky and they are not recommended. Usually people who play skill gambling have less losses than the other ones.

How could something that depend on the next card will be less risky?  Skill and strategy is just a part of poker but at the end of the day it is the card that is drawn next that decide who will win.  It is still not your skill that makes you win rather the card that was drawn next.  Unlike trading, if you watch the market and it crashes you have the option to cut loses, in poker, you will never have that option.

[RealPhotoshoper]

Trading is more risky because you cannot know everything happening in the market. Skill gambling like poker you know everything before taking a decision and this is less risky. They are both risky and they are not recommended. Usually people who play skill gambling have less losses than the other ones.

How could something that depend on the next card will be less risky?  Skill and strategy is just a part of poker but at the end of the day it is the card that is drawn next that decide who will win.  It is still not your skill that makes you win rather the card that was drawn next.  Unlike trading, if you watch the market and it crashes you have the option to cut loses, in poker, you will never have that option.

Lol you are thinking too far away , then how could something that depend on the next buy sell like tradimg less risk?
For me it is just the matter on our different point of views.
I can say and agree that poker have less risky rather than any other games as long as you  experienced enough.