Bitcoin Forum
April 24, 2024, 07:52:57 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 [525] 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 ... 760 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)  (Read 3839037 times)
th00ber
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 789
Merit: 501


View Profile
January 11, 2017, 11:14:04 PM
 #10481

yeah fury doesnt work properly.  Can only do algo 1, and no asm, which results in slower speeds than v10.  any other options gets 0 h/s

Use "-asm 0", miner will select "-a 3" automatically. What drivers version do you use?
Same here R9 Fury don't hash with asm 1
driver 16.30.2511
The Bitcoin network protocol was designed to be extremely flexible. It can be used to create timed transactions, escrow transactions, multi-signature transactions, etc. The current features of the client only hint at what will be possible in the future.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325

Miners developer


View Profile
January 11, 2017, 11:16:58 PM
 #10482

ok clay, tried that, works.  I have 16.11.4.  guess its the drivers, I wont downgrade the drivers, maybe someone else can try, my only fury is on my main gaming computer.  rest of the cards work fine other than this fury.  works but speed = 360 vs 390 v10

That is definitely driver version issue, 15.12 is required currently. If you use different drivers version, miner will fail until you set "-asm 0" but in this case you will get performance of v10.

Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
List of my miners: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3019607
gaah
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 11, 2017, 11:17:55 PM
 #10483

ZEC - Total Speed: 704.949 H/s, Total Shares: 7, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00  This is what i get with 2x rx 470 4gig 1x rx 480 nitro 8gig bad or good?
ZEC: GPU0 254.609 H/s, GPU1 228.714 H/s, GPU2 221.626 H/s
tkredmond
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 68
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 11, 2017, 11:22:06 PM
 #10484

No difference for me.
6 RX 470 4 GB, same results with version 10
Stealth8368
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 347
Merit: 255


View Profile
January 11, 2017, 11:26:57 PM
 #10485

Fury running same speed for me as v10 as on latest drivers and all my other cards are Rx400 series, with v11 same speeds as previous v10 miner so Claymore where is the speed increases you posted of with RX series? Seems like I should have used Optiminer days ago but waited for this reported speed increases, big let down same with v10
jstefanop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2088
Merit: 1393


View Profile
January 11, 2017, 11:27:43 PM
 #10486

No difference for me.
6 RX 470 4 GB, same results with version 10

You guys read anything? He clearly mentioned increasing speed with an ASM kernel for Hawaii, Fury, Tahiti and Pitcairn cards. There was no speedup for polaris, and sounds like he's working on Polaris ASM next.

Project Apollo: A Pod Miner Designed for the Home https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4974036
FutureBit Moonlander 2 USB Scrypt Stick Miner: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2125643.0
mamboOo
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 76
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 11, 2017, 11:28:04 PM
 #10487

ASM is good for 390x. 20-30 h/s more..
hhdllhflower
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 11, 2017, 11:31:11 PM
 #10488

  fury x 410+
  nano  497+
  both overclock
  nice job Grin
Lucky - Luciano
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 711
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 11, 2017, 11:33:55 PM
 #10489

Wow! That's it for v11? Those new numbers still aren't even close to Optiminer v1.3. I'm getting over 400 Sols/s on my Nanos, stock clocks, with optiminer - after the devfee.
What do you say? With Optiminer on Windows 10 I have only 262 Sol / s with  SAPPHIRE RX480  8 Gb OC+  (1342 MHz GPU and 2100 MHz RAM). With Claymore 10 I have 275 Sol / s.
PPOC
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 575
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 11, 2017, 11:41:13 PM
 #10490

Tested v11 on 295x2, v10 had 300 per GPU, so 600-605 on the card which has 2 GPU's. V11 is getting me get 310 per GPU, so 620-625 per card. I'd say 4-5% improvement. But I had to downgrade driver to 15.12. Was running 16.11 before.

BTC: 1Bo6YsPeHCrVRygHLJg9BwHeaLSQpppcJi
"Lost coins only make everyone else’s coins worth slightly more. Think of it as a donation to everyone."
zzzzzzzzzz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 150
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 11, 2017, 11:48:07 PM
 #10491

Wow! That's it for v11? Those new numbers still aren't even close to Optiminer v1.3. I'm getting over 400 Sols/s on my Nanos, stock clocks, with optiminer - after the devfee.
What do you say? With Optiminer on Windows 10 I have only 262 Sol / s with  SAPPHIRE RX480  8 Gb OC+  (1342 MHz GPU and 2100 MHz RAM). With Claymore 10 I have 275 Sol / s.

Is that 275 S/s after deducting CM's devfee? Did you read optiminer's README that says pointedly that the best performance for RX GPUs is on linux, for now? Anyway, we each make our own choices. For me, with all Nanos, opti-v1.3 is much faster, at this point, than CM v11.
kotarius
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 340
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 11, 2017, 11:48:34 PM
 #10492

No linux version?
MCWey8
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 81
Merit: 10

[ Poor Miner ]


View Profile
January 11, 2017, 11:53:52 PM
 #10493

maybe i have something configured wrong, but I am seeing a slight DECREASE on my rx470s .. only like 1-2 sol/s less .. but a little less


again .. might be my bad.
FFI2013
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 906
Merit: 507


View Profile
January 11, 2017, 11:55:04 PM
 #10494

Someone who can explain whats wrong? Driver is 15.12
Quote
20:47:24:310   ab4   GPU #0: Tahiti, 3072 MB available, 28 compute units
20:47:24:312   ab4   GPU #1: Pitcairn, 2048 MB available, 16 compute units
20:47:24:315   ab4   POOL version
20:47:24:315   ab4   b331
20:47:24:316   ab4   Platform: Windows
20:47:24:438   ab4   start building OpenCL program for GPU 0...
20:47:24:443   ab4   done
20:47:24:544   ab4   Frontend phase failed compilation.
Error: Compilation from LLVMIR binary to IL text failed!
20:47:24:545   ab4   16x binary failed, try 15x
20:47:24:567   ab4   start building OpenCL program for GPU 0...
20:47:29:620   ab4   done
20:47:29:864   ab4   start building OpenCL program for GPU 1...
20:47:29:871   ab4   done
20:47:29:972   ab4   Frontend phase failed compilation.
Error: Compilation from LLVMIR binary to IL text failed!
20:47:29:974   ab4   16x binary failed, try 15x
20:47:30:005   ab4   start building OpenCL program for GPU 1...
20:47:35:032   ab4   done
20:47:35:287   ab4   GPU #0 algorithm 2, intensity 6
20:47:35:322   ab4   GPU #1 algorithm 1, intensity 6
I have the same errors and asked twice about them I never got a response so if you figure them out could you post it please thank you

What motherboard? Do you have 16GB of virtual memory set?

I think this is a memory or driver issue.
Asus m5a97 I have virtual memory set 18gb win 10 pro 16.9.2 drivers but I have trouble installing drivers everytime I think asus has a bios update maybe I'll try that also I think Im going to reinstall fresh copy of win than put in one card install drivers than each card one by one
V_I_T_A_L_Y
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 47
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 11, 2017, 11:55:59 PM
 #10495

Miner 11.0 Claymore exactly 8% slower Optiminer / zcash for version 1.3.2 . Fly to Pula my speed fell by 8% when moving from Optiminer on a Claymore
Le_Bleu
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 11, 2017, 11:56:53 PM
 #10496

Thank you Claymore, algo ASM works great on 290x, 335sol/s with modded BIOS.
Edit : driver 16.10.1 whql
TR8888
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 525
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 12, 2017, 12:02:07 AM
Last edit: January 12, 2017, 12:16:44 AM by TR8888
 #10497

Edit: nevermind, fixed it, I was being stupid lol doh.
miropp
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 810
Merit: 101



View Profile
January 12, 2017, 12:03:34 AM
 #10498

GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1   (before in V10 was 0)
is it necessary?

Brewins
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000



View Profile
January 12, 2017, 12:04:24 AM
 #10499

I support you Claymore on most of your releases but Version 11 is about as worthless as tits on a boar for most of us hobbyist. If I lived under a rock, used 15.12 AND had a bunch of old ass GPU'S that sucks up more electricity than my home air conditioner I would use it, otherwise I will stick with Version 10
trinityfl
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 12, 2017, 12:04:34 AM
 #10500

Thank you Claymore, algo ASM works great on 290x, 335sol/s with modded BIOS.
Edit : driver 16.10.1 whql
what mod u use?
Pages: « 1 ... 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 [525] 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 ... 760 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!