Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)

[fr4nkthetank]

Anyone have problems with blockchain drivers (tried both versions) giving 0h with cards (R9 Nanos) ? The problem is with ASM mode ON it seems because when i disable it miner works, and ASM work with older drivers just fine + On ETH miner ASM works just fine...

So actually i am the one and only one with this problem? Claymore any tip?

you need older drivers, it is written in the first page of this thread.  either 16.12 or 16.3 or something.  nano is pretty much the same as the fury line.  So you cant really mix and match a nano and a 480

[r3lentleSs]

Can somebody help me OC my
Six RX570 Red Dragon rig.
Running 270-280 h/s. Stock.

But don't know how to OC properly.

what os and driver do you use ?

Windows 10 + blockchain amd drivers

[n01]

Anyone have problems with blockchain drivers (tried both versions) giving 0h with cards (R9 Nanos) ? The problem is with ASM mode ON it seems because when i disable it miner works, and ASM work with older drivers just fine + On ETH miner ASM works just fine...

So actually i am the one and only one with this problem? Claymore any tip?

you need older drivers, it is written in the first page of this thread.  either 16.12 or 16.3 or something.  nano is pretty much the same as the fury line.  So you cant really mix and match a nano and a 480

i dont understand what you mean by mixing and matching nano and 480, but as i have said i will repeat myself:

Nanos + blockchain drivers works in ASM mode for ethereum but dont work for zcash
Nanos + older drivers works both ways

And since you metioned 480

480 + blockchain drivers dont work on eth with ASM on but on older drivers it works fine..

I have machines with both types of cards (and cards are not mixed they are separated)

[Ossidalm]

Anyone have problems with blockchain drivers (tried both versions) giving 0h with cards (R9 Nanos) ? The problem is with ASM mode ON it seems because when i disable it miner works, and ASM work with older drivers just fine + On ETH miner ASM works just fine...

So actually i am the one and only one with this problem? Claymore any tip?

you need older drivers, it is written in the first page of this thread.  either 16.12 or 16.3 or something.  nano is pretty much the same as the fury line.  So you cant really mix and match a nano and a 480

i dont understand what you mean by mixing and matching nano and 480, but as i have said i will repeat myself:

Nanos + blockchain drivers works in ASM mode for ethereum but dont work for zcash
Nanos + older drivers works both ways

And since you metioned 480

480 + blockchain drivers dont work on eth with ASM on but on older drivers it works fine..

I have machines with both types of cards (and cards are not mixed they are separated)

That is right. I only run the Nano on ZEC.

[IojkinKot]

Dear Mr. Claymore, will you fix -cvddc option in you ZCash miner on AMD Blockchain drivers? (like in Cryptonote and Dual miners)

[r3lentleSs]

**Specifictations**

Windows 10 PRO 64 bit with  17.10.1 Crimson AMD drivers and Sapphire trixx.

- Intel Pentium CPU G4400 @ 3.3GHz
- 2 x 4 GB DDR4 Crucial
- GA-H110-D3A
- 1000w 80+
- 6 x RX570 Red Draong (elpida)

I'm getting around ~1800 H/s. Powerconsumption at the wall is around ~885w
I just followed the settings of somebody else who's actually getting 318 per card.
CoreClock = 1325 - MemoryClock 2000 - GPU Voltage -96 and -15% Power Limit
What can i do more to higher my hashrate without highering my PSU consumption.
ERROR:I'm getting GPU#4 returned incorrect data ---> Solution?

[AnViGo]

Hi, someone already tried to mine Bitcoin Gold? Is there any information about the pools?

[fredeq]

Hi, someone already tried to mine Bitcoin Gold? Is there any information about the pools?

Word on the street is the first pool will open at the beginning of november.

[AnViGo]

Hi, someone already tried to mine Bitcoin Gold? Is there any information about the pools?

Word on the street is the first pool will open at the beginning of november.

LOL!
Private Joker, I admire your honesty.)

[Call_Me_Bambi]

Hi, someone already tried to mine Bitcoin Gold? Is there any information about the pools?

There are some pools getting ready for mining Bitcoin Gold but, as yet, I've not found any who have started mining. It looks like mining won't ready until 1st November, or there abouts.
List of pools here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2284289.0

[Zealotki11er]

Has anyone tried the new Compute Drivers?

[Orielres]

Hi, someone already tried to mine Bitcoin Gold? Is there any information about the pools?

Word on the street is the first pool will open at the beginning of november.

Do we know when exactly. there is no time of arrival of the walle.t

[mirny]

We have great results with DSTM miner. Our new Zcash pool (https://zpool.guru) found its first 3 blocks with 75% luck. We connected 750 kH/s to it.

Others have good results with DSTM?

Hmm, are you able to run dstm miner on AMD cards?
If so, what is your configuration?

[aclymer]

Has anyone tried the new Compute Drivers?

I'm trying them currently. So far it doesn't look great. I'm running an XFX RX480 GTR Water Cooled with RX580 Bios @ 1350MHz Core 2000MHz Mem +50% power.
When I use "Compute Mode" I get about 300 H/s.

Previous driver (17.7.2) I was getting about 310 H/s.

[Nekor]

I can't get this to work on my PC.  It crashes after about 10-15 seconds on startup

[__tr__]

If anyone wants to remove fess from the current version PM me.

[Wewisk]

I can't get this to work on my PC.  It crashes after about 10-15 seconds on startup

Under clock. Or change the riser.

[Nekor]

I can't get this to work on my PC.  It crashes after about 10-15 seconds on startup

Under clock. Or change the riser.

The miner actually doesn't start.  CMD closes after that amount of time.  Can't even get logging to work to figure out what's wrong.

[rawnoise]

Hi guys, newb here.

I got a 480 8gb and a Vega64 running on 17.10.3
I am keeping my tests as safe as possible, so no bios mods.
I am really baffled by the behavior of my setup over time.
It starts up pretty good for stock and slowly creeps down to a grind.
Also I can't notice a significant difference in hash rate with HBCC on or off, and I have repeated these results with blockchain drivers.

This image is taken at startup:
https://imgur.com/IRb3iZQ

And this after some minutes:
https://imgur.com/GpmCVeQ

Meanwhile the log goes crazy with buffer overflows, and can't seem to find a way around it, besides restarting the driver.

Code:

16:32:05:409 2e5c ZEC: put share nonce 5b06
16:32:05:417 2e5c ZEC round found 1 shares
16:32:05:425 2734 ZEC: 10/28/17-16:32:05 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
16:32:05:430 2734 send share: {"id": 4, "method": "mining.submit", "params": xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
16:32:05:529 2734 got 83 bytes
16:32:05:536 2734 buf: {"id":4,"result":null,"error":[23,"low difficulty share of 0.062499046325683594"]}

16:32:05:543 2734 parse packet: 78
16:32:05:547 2734 ZEC: Share rejected (110 ms)!

16:32:05:552 2734 new buf size: 0
16:32:05:576 21e4 warning: solutions buf overflow, 69 > 28
16:32:06:255 21e4 warning: solutions buf overflow, 48 > 28
16:32:06:410 270c warning: solutions buf overflow, 354 > 28
16:32:06:579 2d24 warning: solutions buf overflow, 404 > 28
16:32:06:588 2d24 warning: solutions buf overflow, 79 > 28
16:32:06:596 2d24 warning: solutions buf overflow, 200 > 28
16:32:06:919 21e4 warning: solutions buf overflow, 186 > 28
16:32:06:930 21e4 warning: solutions buf overflow, 153 > 28
16:32:06:977 11c0 GPU 0 temp = 68, old fan speed = 37, new fan speed = 41

16:32:06:984 11c0 GPU 1 temp = 66, old fan speed = 86, new fan speed = 83

16:32:07:089 270c warning: solutions buf overflow, 135 > 28
16:32:07:414 2e5c warning: solutions buf overflow, 186 > 28
16:32:07:923 2d24 warning: solutions buf overflow, 299 > 28

Command line I use:

Code:

@echo off
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
ZecMiner64.exe -zpool ssl://zec.suprnova.cc:2242 -zwal xxxxxxxxx -zpsw yyyyyyyyy -allpools 1 -tt 70,68 -i 5

I've searched the thread for a repeat incident, and there has been one, but don't see a reply.
Can anyone shed some light to this freaky behaviour, and a possible workaround?

[Acguy]

Is this still better than mining ethereum now?