Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)

[Master-Peter]

Dear folks,

after killing the mobo of my old XW8600 when squeezing to much Sols out of my 2 290x cards I'm in need of a new system.

For the ready made systems there are 2 Options right now to be optained "cheap" (around 600,-- €). Both come with ~1100W PSU.

Dell T7500 - 2x Xeon X5650 SSD 128GB HDD 1TB Ram 48GB - 1100 watt 85PLUS Power Factor Correcting (PFC) power supply
HP Z800 -        2x Xeon L5640 SSD 128GB              Ram 24GB - 1110 watts 89% efficient power supply

Any preferences ?

Shall be used for working and mining in the background or when idle.

Thanks
Peter

i don't think this miner kills your motherboard it use less power than other miner

how can poeple buy so expensive hardware ? for mining
it s already hard to pay back cheap one

better buy all the piece separately and build you a cheaper miner computer
you can use 2 psu   lot cheaper than 1, use a asrock motherboard,  4gig of ram is enough and you probably alredy have a hard drive


and using a computer you need for work and mining is not a good idea

Anyway, it's toasted. :-( I shutdown the miner after playing exzessive with the clock/memory speeds, got a blackscreen and cannot go higher than std. res. with 4 different cards. The cards work in other PC's. So it's quite sure the PCI Slot is toast.

I need a new WS for work now anyway ...

Using a computer at all is never a good idea.  

[1713520109]

1713520109

[1713520109]

1713520109

[1713520109]

1713520109

[1713520109]

1713520109

[pwpwpw]

Help!!!   GPU returned incorrect data

Same thing here, with 280x cards i=2, now I'm trying i=1, r9 390 cards are fine. (v2.1)

[kiffner]

for some reason, first time i used 2.1 with "-i 2" on my 270x cards, now im having all sorts of problems.

2.1 wont mine (no text past the [CLAYMORE] header), and nicehashminer crashes the system when initializing devices.

-i 2 is to high  for 270.... Use 1

[xelbyb]

- пpивязкa к  питoнy, вepcиям и eгo кocтылям
этo нe caмoe лyчшee чтo мoжeт быть для быcтpoдeйcтвия, и кoнкpeтнoгo диcтpa

- нeт yдaлeннoй диaгнocтики и yпpaвлeния тeмпepaтypaми кaк клacca

кopoчe, cплoшнaя poдoвaя тpaвмa
нo нa пoигpaтьcя и для фaнoв этo caмoe тo ))

Could you keep your shitty gibberish to yourself please??

This Russian, always climb a fucking termites

[CoRpO]

Help!!!   GPU returned incorrect data

stop using -i 2 with 280(x) / 79x0, this is the root cause

[Ursul0]

@Claymore
there's some weird behavior with -cclock & -mclock
On a rig of four I'm running zec miner on a single card, like this:

Code:

-di 2

Yet I need to specify that the other clocks should not be touched:

Code:

-cclock 0,0,0,1080
-mclock 0,0,0,1500

Otherwise all cards get these settings.

Is this because you don't know the proper enum order, or you can fix it?

[Claymore]

v3.0:

- improved speed by 20-30% (depends on card model). Up to 80H/s on stock 390X on "-i 2" mode.

PS. For those haters who think that I'm a thief and steal someone's code: don't use my miners, my efforts are not for you!

[xelbyb]

Help!!!   GPU returned incorrect data

I cut off one by one gpu
I disabled the gpu one by one and found a video card problem.
I increased the power to 1.2 volts per core.
This high. But there is no data error

I do not use -i x

[bardacuda]

v3.0:

- improved speed by 20-30% (depends on card model). Up to 80H/s on stock 390X on "-i 2" mode.

PS. For those haters who think that I'm a thief and steal someone's code: don't use my miners, my efforts are not for you!

Noice! I think those haters were mostly ppl who were butthurt that they were the only ones getting good speeds because they were on linux, and you levelled the playing field, so they decided to start some FUD. You punched em right in the profits!

[Arsenay]

- пpивязкa к  питoнy, вepcиям и eгo кocтылям
этo нe caмoe лyчшee чтo мoжeт быть для быcтpoдeйcтвия, и кoнкpeтнoгo диcтpa

- нeт yдaлeннoй диaгнocтики и yпpaвлeния тeмпepaтypaми кaк клacca

кopoчe, cплoшнaя poдoвaя тpaвмa
нo нa пoигpaтьcя и для фaнoв этo caмoe тo ))

Could you keep your shitty gibberish to yourself please??

This Russian, always climb a fucking termites

do not be rude, I'm not Russian ))

[carlo_0000]

V 3.0  i m getting

73 on r9 390
42 r9 380
36 r9 270
49 rx 470 4g

[mikewetminer88]

v3.0:

- improved speed by 20-30% (depends on card model). Up to 80H/s on stock 390X on "-i 2" mode.

PS. For those haters who think that I'm a thief and steal someone's code: don't use my miners, my efforts are not for you!

Noice! I think those haters were mostly ppl who were butthurt that they were the only ones getting good speeds because they were on linux, and you levelled the playing field, so they decided to start some FUD. You punched em right in the profits!

Well said... 

[CoRpO]

v3.0:

- improved speed by 20-30% (depends on card model). Up to 80H/s on stock 390X on "-i 2" mode.

PS. For those haters who think that I'm a thief and steal someone's code: don't use my miners, my efforts are not for you!

Nice work

[xelbyb]

- пpивязкa к  питoнy, вepcиям и eгo кocтылям
этo нe caмoe лyчшee чтo мoжeт быть для быcтpoдeйcтвия, и кoнкpeтнoгo диcтpa

- нeт yдaлeннoй диaгнocтики и yпpaвлeния тeмпepaтypaми кaк клacca

кopoчe, cплoшнaя poдoвaя тpaвмa
нo нa пoигpaтьcя и для фaнoв этo caмoe тo ))

Could you keep your shitty gibberish to yourself please??

This Russian, always climb a fucking termites

do not be rude, I'm not Russian ))

Senya, protect your hand!

[arielbit]

v3.0:

- improved speed by 20-30% (depends on card model). Up to 80H/s on stock 390X on "-i 2" mode.

PS. For those haters who think that I'm a thief and steal someone's code: don't use my miners, my efforts are not for you!

YEAH!  

280x    55-60 h/s
390      74-80 h/s
290x    75-81 h/s
rx 480  59-61.x h/s
fury      up to 86.x h/s


rx 480 seems to beat 280x now..

[rascabily]

With the new v3.0 version, without anything of oc. Crashes the pc

[CoRpO]

With the new v3.0 version, without anything of oc. Crashes the pc

Had to restart one of my rigs before v3 worked, try it

[bardacuda]

For the first time I am actually getting less than advertised for a stock 390X, though I am using 290(non-X) with 2560 cores, so perhaps the cores are finally starting to get to where they are being fully utilized?
That said, I am seeing ~15% increase going from 2.1 to 3.0. Only slightly higher CPU usage.

v2.1 (Stable for over 40 hours)



v3.0



CPU Usage before and after

[pwpwpw]

V 3.0  i m getting

73 on r9 390
42 r9 380
36 r9 270
49 rx 470 4g

I'm getting 50-55 on r9 390, what drivers and i setting you use?

[lamouser]

Help!!!   GPU returned incorrect data
http://savepic.ru/12141547.png

Same thing here, with 280x cards i=2, now I'm trying i=1, r9 390 cards are fine. (v2.1)

Saphire R9 390  GPU returned incorrect data!!!