bmtrader
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
November 29, 2016, 02:49:17 PM |
|
Go mine on Dwarfpool!!! No stealing shares like other pools..... I switched from flypool to dwarfpool, and I have 15% more shares!!!(my real shares)
@bitbit017 .. are you sure about it? what speed you have ? idk, but something is wrong there today... and im not much impressed about shares... my increase is just in the rejected ones, as i moved from 0,15%/0,25% to actual 0,76%/1,31% of rejected shares... also my income is not impressive atm.. after 13h have just 0,072 ZEC with 2,7kh/s lets see what will be the result after 24h..... does anyone else have some experience ?? Yes I'm right about that... My real power is about 11200Sol/s with v8!! I mined in flypool from begining. I never saw a peak power greater than 10700sol/s in flypool. My average effective hashrate was about 10200sol/s in flypool. In dwarfpool my average hashrate it's about 11200sol/s or greater and it's exactly my power. The only thing that dwarfpool needs it's more users, to have more power to find more blocks....... Flypool is PPLNS, dwarfpool is HBPPS I can confirm it. Dwarfpool reports exactly the true hashrate and variable diff works also fine. It adjusts your worker diff to have ~200 shares per hour. I too can confirm Dwarfpool actually reports my Claymore speeds, it seemed all other pools were always 5-10% lower, so leaving my hash on Dwarfpool. Confirm from here too - dwarfpool best hash rate report, I hope to be the same with earnings
|
|
|
|
|
Marnem2.0
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
November 29, 2016, 02:57:01 PM |
|
good hash with rx 480....i do an average of 200 h/s
|
|
|
|
|
dudutti
|
|
November 29, 2016, 03:02:02 PM |
|
Yes it's true i have you right take rx it's a better choice thanks for your advice ( c'est vrai que il faut parler englais dans les forum en tout cas sa fait plaisir de voir des français dans ce milieu il sont rare )
Bonjouuuuur les Frenchies So Hello French friends
|
|
|
|
Demarsac
|
|
November 29, 2016, 03:10:25 PM |
|
Tried to submit mine but doesn't let me save changes for some reason Wanted to add this line: Sapphire RX 480 8GB Nitro(mod) 206 1350 2100 5 Claymore 8.0 16.11.4 Demarsac If you want you can add it.
|
|
|
|
dudutti
|
|
November 29, 2016, 03:17:31 PM |
|
I've just submitted this : Sapphire R9 Fury X 292 1050 500 6 Claymore 8.0 16.11.3 Sapphire R9 390X nitro 288 1040 1500 6 Claymore 8.0 16.11 Sapphire R9 390 nitro 271 1050 1500 6 Claymore 8.0 16.11
|
|
|
|
Kimax
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
November 29, 2016, 03:21:58 PM |
|
Tried to submit mine but doesn't let me save changes for some reason Wanted to add this line: Sapphire RX 480 8GB Nitro(mod) 206 1350 2100 5 Claymore 8.0 16.11.4 Demarsac If you want you can add it. I have add you to the comparison table.
|
|
|
|
Kimax
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
November 29, 2016, 03:24:52 PM |
|
I've just submitted this : Sapphire R9 Fury X 292 1050 500 6 Claymore 8.0 16.11.3 Sapphire R9 390X nitro 288 1040 1500 6 Claymore 8.0 16.11 Sapphire R9 390 nitro 271 1050 1500 6 Claymore 8.0 16.11 Thank you so much. The more cards we get in that table, the more we can help each other and ourself, toward better and more efficient mining.
|
|
|
|
Demarsac
|
|
November 29, 2016, 03:26:52 PM |
|
Tried to submit mine but doesn't let me save changes for some reason Wanted to add this line: Sapphire RX 480 8GB Nitro(mod) 206 1350 2100 5 Claymore 8.0 16.11.4 Demarsac If you want you can add it. I have add you to the comparison table. Thanks
|
|
|
|
dragonchopper9
|
|
November 29, 2016, 03:31:45 PM |
|
Claymore look forward to your new version of miner. F5 button ready)))
|
|
|
|
lttsi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
November 29, 2016, 03:33:44 PM |
|
anybody can use Miner Manager for Send epool in Ver 8 ? i can't
|
|
|
|
choppy123
|
|
November 29, 2016, 03:36:43 PM |
|
Hey all, Wanting to build another mining rig using this older cpu, motherboard and RAM (below). I have this stuff kicking around, will Zcash mining work with 4GB of DDR2? This motherboard supports a maximum of 4GB DDR2 so I can't add any more sticks I was planning on buying an RX470 4GB for this rig. I have a decent 600 Watt power supply which will be plenty and planning to use Windows 7. thanks AMD ATHLON 64+ 3200 2.0 GHZ SOCKET AM2 CPU 2 X 2GB DDR RAM (4GB TOTAL) XMS2 CORSAIR 800 MHZ ASUS M2N68-AM SE2 SOCKET A MOTHERBOARD
|
|
|
|
Simon_Grape
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
November 29, 2016, 03:47:21 PM |
|
Hey all, Wanting to build another mining rig using this older cpu, motherboard and RAM (below). I have this stuff kicking around, will Zcash mining work with 4GB of DDR2? This motherboard supports a maximum of 4GB DDR2 so I can't add any more sticks I was planning on buying an RX470 4GB for this rig. I have a decent 600 Watt power supply which will be plenty and planning to use Windows 7. thanks AMD ATHLON 64+ 3200 2.0 GHZ SOCKET AM2 CPU 2 X 2GB DDR RAM (4GB TOTAL) XMS2 CORSAIR 800 MHZ ASUS M2N68-AM SE2 SOCKET A MOTHERBOARD If you're only going to have 1 or 2 cards - that should be fine.
|
|
|
|
CoRpO
|
|
November 29, 2016, 03:53:58 PM |
|
anybody can use Miner Manager for Send epool in Ver 8 ? i can't read OP ! since v8, managment port is read only by default. You'll have to specify -mport 3333 (or whatever port you use) to enable config change from miner manager Get used to read history.txt when you update the miner, you'll know what's new
|
|
|
|
gegebitlover
Member
Offline
Activity: 116
Merit: 10
|
|
November 29, 2016, 03:54:43 PM |
|
bonjour frenchiii dudutti you are welcome (j'aime bien voir des français ) and i confirm me too in dwarfpool More share than flypool is the hash never goes below what claymore miner displays is good
|
|
|
|
Flickspeed
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
November 29, 2016, 04:01:34 PM |
|
1. compute unit in CGN 1.3(RX 480) is more efficient the same in CGN 1.1 (R9 390) on 15% mostly because of the prefetch and cashing. 2. RX 480 has direct acces to ISA, but you should write you code on lower levels to take advantage from that 3. in games RX 480 is able to compensate brute force of the CGN1.1 by optimizations in geometry units like excluding the poligons of the zero sizes, because of the new index cash end etc.
So the question is can we get same +15% in math tasks if we use high level languages? I thinks its hard to achive if its possible at all. Cahes and prefecth are not able to give big advantage, and maybe only low level direct access can give something, but then you have to write special version just for RX470/480 cards.
But again, RX480 are very good from power point of view. I can take 190-195H/s with 0.95-0.975V voltages if i dont care about power costs, and 180H/s with 0.92V!,temps below 60C if I need power efficiency. Also you can use cheaper PSU for the rigs with RX480.
And again, I wouldn expect that RX480 will perfom close to 390X, till someone will start to develop special miner for RX480
The ethereum miner is not specifically developed for the RX series but the RX cores are performing as should over there. I do not think a separate miner is needed, only some more focus on the RX series cards.
|
|
|
|
ofpcarnage
Member
Offline
Activity: 76
Merit: 10
|
|
November 29, 2016, 04:19:02 PM |
|
Tried to submit mine but doesn't let me save changes for some reason Wanted to add this line: Sapphire RX 480 8GB Nitro(mod) 206 1350 2100 5 Claymore 8.0 What mod did you use for your RX480 please? I'm only getting 180 sol/s on my rx480's and even worse on my rx470's 16.11.4 Demarsac If you want you can add it.
|
|
|
|
marvykkio
|
|
November 29, 2016, 04:25:15 PM |
|
driver crimson 16.11.5 on line
|
|
|
|
Squall10
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
November 29, 2016, 04:29:00 PM |
|
So according to the table, a R9 280x (205 sol/s@130W) is more efficient than a RX 480 (205 sol/s@180W) ?
That's weird.
|
|
|
|
|