Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)

[Etherion]

So what is regular speed with 280x with 1100/1500 clocks ?

Im getting 211-221 H/s on ver.10

Is it ok ?

I have HD7990's which are two HD7970's. Thet run at 255-261 SOL/S per GPU

Claymore detect them as 280x which is incorrect but I don't think it matters.

Problem is that the reported sol/s and the pool differs by about 16%.

Not sure why

[1713952533]

1713952533

[1713952533]

1713952533

[1713952533]

1713952533

[1713952533]

1713952533

[BenCodie]

For the last couple of weeks, I have noticed that my 8 GPUs rig is submitting about 300 less sol/s than what it is reporting.



the rig detials
Claymore 10v for the lats 16h but 9.3 before for several days ect
windows 10
amd driver 16.11.3. I don't overclock at all

AMD Cards available: 8
GPU #0: Tahiti, 3072 MB available, 32 compute units
GPU #0 recognized as Radeon 280X/380X
GPU #1: Tahiti, 3072 MB available, 32 compute units
GPU #1 recognized as Radeon 280X/380X
GPU #2: Tahiti, 3072 MB available, 32 compute units
GPU #2 recognized as Radeon 280X/380X
GPU #3: Tahiti, 3072 MB available, 32 compute units
GPU #3 recognized as Radeon 280X/380X
GPU #4: Tahiti, 3072 MB available, 32 compute units
GPU #4 recognized as Radeon 280X/380X
GPU #5: Hawaii, 8192 MB available, 44 compute units
GPU #5 recognized as Radeon 390X
GPU #6: Hawaii, 8192 MB available, 44 compute units
GPU #6 recognized as Radeon 390X
GPU #7: Hawaii, 8192 MB available, 40 compute units
GPU #7 recognized as Radeon 390

The 280x/380x are hd7970 but it does not seems to have any negative effect.

Bro, how did you manage to connect 8 AMD GPU's on Windows 10?

Thank you in advance for your response.

Have a great day.

He have dual GPUs in one card
used one pcie slot for one card = 2GPUs

not true u can install 8 separate cards if u have 8 slots

I am talking about his(Etherion) scenario to clear other guy's(apolousm) confusion

[golden0707]

So what is regular speed with 280x with 1100/1500 clocks ?

Im getting 211-221 H/s on ver.10

Is it ok ?

I have HD7990's which are two HD7970's. Thet run at 255-261 SOL/S per GPU

Claymore detect them as 280x which is incorrect but I don't think it matters.

Problem is that the reported sol/s and the pool differs by about 16%.

Not sure why

Doing >255 sols per GPU is really great. Whats your invironment (driver ver. settings) ?

Im thinking to go back to 15.12 drivers.

Cheers.

[BenCodie]

So what is regular speed with 280x with 1100/1500 clocks ?

Im getting 211-221 H/s on ver.10

Is it ok ?

I have HD7990's which are two HD7970's. Thet run at 255-261 SOL/S per GPU

Claymore detect them as 280x which is incorrect but I don't think it matters.

Problem is that the reported sol/s and the pool differs by about 16%.

Not sure why

Same here mine Sapphire HD 7990's detects as two 280x by CM but it doesn't matter

[naeme18720]

V 10 ...rx 470 4gb

243h/s

what are your setting? I only get 233 h/s for sapphire rx 470 4gb

Gpu clock

1250

memory clock

1750

-75mv

245h/s

MY mined zcash in this pool...best pool in my idea

This link SING IN in pool

https://minergate.com/a/e172e848728edd0d2b97b9b5

what does -75mv do? do cards save power or the heat they produce is lower?

Yes ...power or the heat they produce is lower

[QuintLeo]

I tried to run 7990s and 480x on the same rig, and it will "work" but its not very stable. Id use two rigs if possible. The older 79xx cards like the 15.12 drivers, but these drivers wont detect my 480's ( and probably the 470's).

JJ

when u run cards like that in same rig u have to try diff configurations in card order also try 15.x drivers my case drivers dont make much difference i been running 1 rig with 7970 with a 290x with 14.12 7970 is at 267 v10 290 is at 335 v9.3 as 9.3 is better 4 290/390 atm

with your type i just set a guys r480 with 2 290x's it didnt like the rx480 in 2nd or last but 1st pcie slot just depends on the rig(mobo)as this was on a rig that wasnt cross x compatible was a old q9550 rig

 ANY RX series card requires 16.x series drivers (I am not sure on the specific version, I *believe* somewhere around 16.4 is when support for the RX series was first added), as the 15.12 drivers predate the release of the RX series by a few months.

[QuintLeo]

Any place / documentation on which are the supported graphics card for using Claymore's GPU Miner ?

I have an AMD Radeon HD 6450 it does not seem to be supported. It only using the CPU .
I had tried with v9.3 and also with 7.x
I have the latest drivers installed  ( Crimson ReLive Edition 16.12.2 ) installed . But it does not seem to be working .  This is the message on the console it gives :

ZEC - Total Speed: 0.000 H/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:01
ZEC: GPU0 0.000 H/s

with niceminer (nheqminer_v0.4b_suprnova) for windows and using suprnova pool, am getting around 7.69 to 8 Sols/s. Is this quite low for this configuration or is it just about the speed that one can get with this config ?

Any pointers are appreciated.

install driver version 15.12 and upgrade from there.

 No version 16 drivers AFAIK support pre-GCN cards at all.
 15.12 should work with the HD 6450 - it works with my AMD A10-5700 APUs that are same-generation GPU units.

[golden0707]

So what is regular speed with 280x with 1100/1500 clocks ?

Im getting 211-221 H/s on ver.10

Is it ok ?

So for single r9 280x hashspeed is okey ? Can i do more with it ?

[jddebug]

So what is regular speed with 280x with 1100/1500 clocks ?

Im getting 211-221 H/s on ver.10

Is it ok ?

So for single r9 280x hashspeed is okey ? Can i do more with it ?

Best I've gotten is 222 so far so I'd say your good.

[KrokoTill]

I noticed an ad on Coinotron:

ZCash: 0% True PPS mining. Just change worker type to PPS !!!!
( until 2017-01-15 or pool's hashrate > 3 MH/s )

Though right now this pool has only 76 miners and miserably low hashrate.
In past it had been a very good pool for me with other algos.

[QuintLeo]

Pair of Sapphire ref-style RX 470, no bios mod

1250/1750/-75mv

 -i 7

Went from a little under 200 sol/s each on v9.1 to 233ish each on v10

Nice improvement from 9.2 on my dual R9 280x too - 380ish total to 417 (unhappy card at -i4 happy card at -i6)

 1100/1500 no bios mod


 211-221 sol/s for a single R9 280x is in the range I'm seeing on my pair.

[QuintLeo]

Already began to reflect the replacement of the card at NVIDIA, took for the experiment were collected one rig 6*1070=2620-2700 sol give me Claymore v 10 really disappointed me. 390 I think AMD will not catch up with NVIDIA

 Do keep in mind that the 1070 is ballpark $400 card, while the RX 470 are sub-$200 and many RX 480 are also sub-$200 though the average for the 480 seems to be closer to $220.

 Why is it a shock that a high-end high cost card can outperform a "mainstream" much lower cost card?

 The REAL comparison should be to the NVidia card in the same price range, the GTX 1060.

[QuintLeo]

Still, market is stuck in 46usd...is there any problem, why didn't price just rocked to 60 ou maybe 100usd?

 What reason is there for a big price jump on ZEC?

 Have *ANY* major retailers started accepting it?

 I personally am shocked it's holding at double-digit dollars at all....


 Right now the only reason ZEC price ever "jumps" is whales doing pump-and-dump moves.

[cryptohunter]

I noticed an ad on Coinotron:

ZCash: 0% True PPS mining. Just change worker type to PPS !!!!
( until 2017-01-15 or pool's hashrate > 3 MH/s )

Though right now this pool has only 76 miners and miserably low hashrate.
In past it had been a very good pool for me with other algos.

they were too slow to add... got left behind.

[Densitymax]

Pair of Sapphire ref-style RX 470, no bios mod

1250/1750/-75mv

 -i 7

Went from a little under 200 sol/s each on v9.1 to 233ish each on v10

Nice improvement from 9.2 on my dual R9 280x too - 380ish total to 417 (unhappy card at -i4 happy card at -i6)

 1100/1500 no bios mod


 211-221 sol/s for a single R9 280x is in the range I'm seeing on my pair.

Also I notice that RX470 rate has rised by 10%

[adaseb]

what is wrong with my 280X?

seems 280x beats rx 480 again? LOL!

What miner do you use?

omg, I cry. I don't believe what I'm reading here...

Yeah no idea how you get 290H/s. I am guessing your timings might be modded and its incorrectly displaying the hashrate. I had this happen before with ETH mining.

For Tahiti, the most I can get is 245H/s and that's with a high end 7970 which is maxed out at 1100/1575 with memory straps hacked. The other 280x are all at 230h/s, which is still higher than my RX 470s.

[arielbit]

what is wrong with my 280X?

seems 280x beats rx 480 again? LOL!

What miner do you use?

omg, I cry. I don't believe what I'm reading here...

Yeah no idea how you get 290H/s. I am guessing your timings might be modded and its incorrectly displaying the hashrate. I had this happen before with ETH mining.

For Tahiti, the most I can get is 245H/s and that's with a high end 7970 which is maxed out at 1100/1575 with memory straps hacked. The other 280x are all at 230h/s, which is still higher than my RX 470s.

its stock rom, 1100 core 1500 mem

it started at about 230 h/s after mining for the dev fee it started to climb to 290 h/s

there is a problem because the rejects are pretty high.

as of now running time is 16:57, total shares 2054, rejects 242 ...i suppose it is still getting shares like a 230 h/s...and looking at dwafpool it is not far behind my 2x rx 480 rig in shares..

[wll1rah]

Already began to reflect the replacement of the card at NVIDIA, took for the experiment were collected one rig 6*1070=2620-2700 sol give me Claymore v 10 really disappointed me. 390 I think AMD will not catch up with NVIDIA

 Do keep in mind that the 1070 is ballpark $400 card, while the RX 470 are sub-$200 and many RX 480 are also sub-$200 though the average for the 480 seems to be closer to $220.

 Why is it a shock that a high-end high cost card can outperform a "mainstream" much lower cost card?

 The REAL comparison should be to the NVidia card in the same price range, the GTX 1060.

I'll take that challenge, GTX 1060 3GB 270ish per card.  Zotec GTX 1060 mini ZT-P10610A-10L

[batko]

v10.0:

- improved speed for most cards, up to 8% (depends on card model). About 340H/s on stock 390X, 255H/s on stock RX480, 320H/x on stock Nano.
- added "-a" option to select best algorithm implementation for your GPU.

PS. This is an intermediate version because I had no time to implement all optimizations I planned for this release, also I had no time for tests. In 1-3 days I will release another version with further speedup.

[/b]

Today new version 

[sorry2xs]

I noticed an ad on Coinotron:

ZCash: 0% True PPS mining. Just change worker type to PPS !!!!
( until 2017-01-15 or pool's hashrate > 3 MH/s )

Though right now this pool has only 76 miners and miserably low hashrate.
In past it had been a very good pool for me with other algos.

they were too slow to add... got left behind.

i tried it  it does not support zcash wallet mineer wont run yes iam cheap