Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 04:20:05 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 [773] 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 ... 1135 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]  (Read 3426868 times)
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
June 11, 2014, 10:16:45 PM
 #15441

I have tried to add another algo the the x11.cu, but all I get is
"result for nonce ... does not validate on cpu.

I tried to repeat the experience by adding a new layer of shavite (known to work) and again all I get is
"result for nonce ... does not validate (instead of boo... if for example I remove an algo)

Did I overlook something ? Is there a limit to the number of algo I can add up (and how can I change it ) ?

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714062005
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714062005

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714062005
Reply with quote  #2

1714062005
Report to moderator
1714062005
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714062005

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714062005
Reply with quote  #2

1714062005
Report to moderator
exemplaar
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 978
Merit: 506



View Profile
June 11, 2014, 10:29:47 PM
 #15442

Hi Christian.

I'm a small miner, just got a share of jackpot mining at hashharder pool.
Is your JPC address in read.me file still actual? Please confirm, and I will send you some coins. Thank you.

If this info can be of any help: Along with 750ti's I'm using MSI 750 non-ti 1gb series also. On jackpotcoin card gives me around 3300+ khs/s in win7 64 and around 3500khs/s with win xp
Using ccminer v0.9. Asrock btc81-pro with Intel Pentium G3220 and 4Gb ram. Classic unpowered risers. OC-ed GPU+170Mhz RAM+100Mhz with precisionX. Cards are cooler than ti's because of less cuda cores, generating less heat. Temp.48c with 48% fan speed. Ti's are hotter, 55c at 66% fan speed. I have mixed rig of 6 cards. Works like a charm, now almost a month.
Tried also solo with 4 cards and found 3 blocks in 48hours at diff around 300 last week.
Thank you again for your dedicated work.
AizenSou
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 10:32:21 PM
 #15443

I have tried to add another algo the the x11.cu, but all I get is
"result for nonce ... does not validate on cpu.

I tried to repeat the experience by adding a new layer of shavite (known to work) and again all I get is
"result for nonce ... does not validate (instead of boo... if for example I remove an algo)

Did I overlook something ? Is there a limit to the number of algo I can add up (and how can I change it ) ?


Djm34 wants to get us X13 before Christian. Hand clap to him. Bravo dude.  Grin
Btw X13 coins are almost craps now. The future is NIST5 Cheesy
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
June 11, 2014, 10:46:11 PM
 #15444

I have tried to add another algo the the x11.cu, but all I get is
"result for nonce ... does not validate on cpu.

I tried to repeat the experience by adding a new layer of shavite (known to work) and again all I get is
"result for nonce ... does not validate (instead of boo... if for example I remove an algo)

Did I overlook something ? Is there a limit to the number of algo I can add up (and how can I change it ) ?


Djm34 wants to get us X13 before Christian. Hand clap to him. Bravo dude.  Grin
Btw X13 coins are almost craps now. The future is NIST5 Cheesy
It is just for fun and since it does not work...  Undecided
(I don't really mine X13 either...)
I stopped mining nist5 (the payout is a bit small at the moment) today to go to jpc and get part of the jackpot (which I missed  Angry,
I had the perfect plan, half of the hashrate on miningpool the other hash@me  Angry
 Grin Difficult to be more unlucky as I usually mine on hashharder)

sold this morning another million at 64sat, and I am wondering if I should rebuy it at now 48  Grin (would still be a profit of 0.16btc) or just cash out the 0.64  Grin

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 11:17:58 PM
 #15445

I have tried to add another algo the the x11.cu, but all I get is
"result for nonce ... does not validate on cpu.

I tried to repeat the experience by adding a new layer of shavite (known to work) and again all I get is
"result for nonce ... does not validate (instead of boo... if for example I remove an algo)

Did I overlook something ? Is there a limit to the number of algo I can add up (and how can I change it ) ?


there is a CPU version of the hash, and a GPU version. Both have to agree of course,
otherwise you get the dreaded validation error.

Christian
primer10
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 249
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 11:59:40 PM
 #15446

Hi ppl,
   Managed to compile ccminer (linux) on a system without the nvidia card and ran the binary successfully on the rig with 750Ti. The speed is about 2110kh/s and seems to be similar to what others has posted here.

   My qn is that Windows binaries offered for download has various version for Compute 3, 3.5 and 5.0. I didn't see that option when I was compiling on Linux. How can we choose which compute to compile for? Does it solely depend on the CUDA toolkit version (was using v6)?
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
June 12, 2014, 12:10:06 AM
 #15447

Hi ppl,
   Managed to compile ccminer (linux) on a system without the nvidia card and ran the binary successfully on the rig with 750Ti. The speed is about 2110kh/s and seems to be similar to what others has posted here.

   My qn is that Windows binaries offered for download has various version for Compute 3, 3.5 and 5.0. I didn't see that option when I was compiling on Linux. How can we choose which compute to compile for? Does it solely depend on the CUDA toolkit version (was using v6)?

on Linux we build all Compute versions into one binary. Under Visual Studio the GUI doesn't have the flexibility to configure it in the same way.
gpuminer
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 12, 2014, 01:55:58 AM
 #15448


Translation: You'll be able to offer binary versions only in the future?


We don't yet have any codebase for binary only versions.

However the other Christian has dropped out of C&C hash factory (leaving in good terms) to concentrate
more on personal business. So I get to decide the strategy for code releases.

I feel inclined to release the Killer Groestl quad version which works best on Compute 3.0 and still decently
on Compute 3.5. This is nontrivial to port to AMD due to its use of warp shuffle instructions.

What will be the next step for ccminer going forward ? It seems that there is no news regarding new release or development. Can we expect to see anything new this month ?

Free SIGNs giving everyday. Be part, do not miss!. Sw4sYCL3h9NjLu1i9d6YSSsuQZQztFR7jW
noobminerd
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 61
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 12, 2014, 02:14:27 AM
 #15449

What is killer groestl quad? I mean what quad does?
tc61
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 494
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 12, 2014, 03:03:47 AM
 #15450

What makes the GTX780 so much faster than a 750ti, is it the core speed or the increase amount of memory...
peacefulmind
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 12, 2014, 03:28:53 AM
 #15451

Christian, I remember when you started this thread.

Any chance you would join over at Litecointalk.org ??

Congratulations on all your success.

Quote from: FrictionlessCoin
"I think you are to hung up on this notion about 'pre-mining' being a No-No."
- from journeys into the dark depths of the alt coin forum....
true-asset
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250

Uro: 1 URO = 1 metric tonne of Urea N46 fertilizer


View Profile WWW
June 12, 2014, 03:55:00 AM
 #15452

What makes the GTX780 so much faster than a 750ti, is it the core speed or the increase amount of memory...

Its got more than double the amount of GPU cores in the chip.

Uro: A Real Long Term Currency, 1 URO = 1 metric tonne of Urea N46 fertilizer[/url]
Urea N46 tracks gradual increases in energy and food prices over the long term.
genebart
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 12, 2014, 04:29:03 AM
 #15453

Is it normal for jackpotcoin mining to consistently show 1/3 my hashrate being reported on pools via their site?

My 660ti is hashing at a reported 3.5Mh, but the pool I mine on shows 1.5ish.

Also, have I correctly assumed that mining JPC on a pool is better than solo with my limited hashrate?
PVmining
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 330
Merit: 252



View Profile
June 12, 2014, 06:24:24 AM
 #15454

...and get part of the jackpot (which I missed  Angry,
I had the perfect plan, half of the hashrate on miningpool the other hash@me  Angry

I had exactly the same plan - with the exact same success Cool
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069



View Profile
June 12, 2014, 07:15:17 AM
 #15455

command-line for mining scrypt jane-n factor?

i can't see it on http://cudamining.cc/
myagui
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1154
Merit: 1001



View Profile
June 12, 2014, 07:24:47 AM
 #15456

Me and AizenSou exchanged some settings a few pages back. Shouldn't be too hard to locate if you search my post history.
If these are not helpful, let us know what exactly you're looking for (what card & what's the nfactor), so someone else might have the settings for you.

Cheers,
~ Myagui

jsamul
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 300
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 12, 2014, 08:21:14 AM
 #15457

What makes the GTX780 so much faster than a 750ti, is it the core speed or the increase amount of memory...

Huh
kepler vs maxwell
highend vs lowend

i think for lowend card the GTX750ti does pretty well thanks to the maxwell architecture.
sad the nvidia postponed the highend maxwell cards...
also sad no vendor did launch the dual GM107 card which could save some space for mining rigs.
just hope one day some vendor will create pure mining card with more GPUs, just like asrock did with motherboard.
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
June 12, 2014, 08:44:29 AM
 #15458

What is killer groestl quad? I mean what quad does?

quad spreads the state of one hash over 4 threads to save registers.
A necessity for Compute 3.0 devices that have a 63 registers per thread limit.

cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
June 12, 2014, 08:45:27 AM
 #15459

What will be the next step for ccminer going forward ? It seems that there is no news regarding new release or development. Can we expect to see anything new this month ?

I think even before the weekend. Adding that killer groestl should be an easy exercise.
leofur
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 117
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 12, 2014, 08:48:43 AM
 #15460

What will be the next step for ccminer going forward ? It seems that there is no news regarding new release or development. Can we expect to see anything new this month ?

I think even before the weekend. Adding that killer groestl should be an easy exercise.
Have you benchmarked nist5 with killer groestl? How much of an increase we could expect?
Pages: « 1 ... 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 [773] 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 ... 1135 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!