🔶 YOLOdice.com 🔶 suspended on 16st Mar 2021

[Reministus]

@Ethan_nx,I have send you a reply again about my account....looks like there's a problem still.

[1713251549]

1713251549

[1713251549]

1713251549

[1713251549]

1713251549

[1713251549]

1713251549

[1713251549]

1713251549

[Victorycoin]

Quite interesting to see all those improvements at YOLOdice! The integration of ETH payment option is going to further increase the ease of playing at the site, unlike when it used to be until LTC came on board. However the possibility to have an internal exchange system will go a long way in bring out the beauty of having a number of payment options. RGB-Exchange was obviously doing a good job in the exchange to and fro of BTC and LTC, was however disappointed to see it has been put on hold. Please have it working again!

There is a HUGE demand for an exchange indeed. RGBKey decided to stop his exchange bot because the market prices were so volatile that providing exchange service with 1% fee was too risky for him.

RGBKey, if you are reading this - maybe you could re-launch the exchange with a higher fee until we complete the on-site exchange?

Cheers,
Ethan

Until now, I was thinking RGBKey was in-house and I didn't get it, when Mod Dustin said he incurred some lost, but now I agree the 1% fee can so easily be eclipsed by the volatility of the market, a slight adjustment is necessary. Since we're about to have ETH on board, can one apply to render similar service for BTC --->ETH, in the meantime before on-site exchange comes through?

[veleten]

Quite interesting to see all those improvements at YOLOdice! The integration of ETH payment option is going to further increase the ease of playing at the site, unlike when it used to be until LTC came on board. However the possibility to have an internal exchange system will go a long way in bring out the beauty of having a number of payment options. RGB-Exchange was obviously doing a good job in the exchange to and fro of BTC and LTC, was however disappointed to see it has been put on hold. Please have it working again!

There is a HUGE demand for an exchange indeed. RGBKey decided to stop his exchange bot because the market prices were so volatile that providing exchange service with 1% fee was too risky for him.

RGBKey, if you are reading this - maybe you could re-launch the exchange with a higher fee until we complete the on-site exchange?

Cheers,
Ethan

maybe you can have a look at Bitsler's exchange and the way they implemented it
it has a very high fee from what I can tell,maybe even as high as 3%+
the rates are fixed for a set period of time,30 seconds  and then they are updated to reflect changes
exchange itself should be very profitable since many gamblers would want to deposit in one cryptocurrency
and wager in a different one and the exchange % would not matter much (unless it is outrageously high)

[ravenyvolle]

Okay, my account is finally fixed:) Thank you ethan for yohr patience and more power to Yolodice.!:)

[GreenLucky]

I cant acess my ancount answer me in my email: paulotuga98@gmail.com

[houseworx]

Question for Ethan.

I want to know, why LTC betting speed is not equivalent to BTC speed, if we compare both coin to coin value?!

like sample:

if i bet on BTC 10satoshi i was getting ~5bets per second, if im bet 100+ satoshi i was get ~10 bets per second.

now with LTC, if i bet even 10 000 litoshi, i get only 4 bets per second...

[Lionidas]

Quite interesting to see all those improvements at YOLOdice! The integration of ETH payment option is going to further increase the ease of playing at the site, unlike when it used to be until LTC came on board. However the possibility to have an internal exchange system will go a long way in bring out the beauty of having a number of payment options. RGB-Exchange was obviously doing a good job in the exchange to and fro of BTC and LTC, was however disappointed to see it has been put on hold. Please have it working again!

There is a HUGE demand for an exchange indeed. RGBKey decided to stop his exchange bot because the market prices were so volatile that providing exchange service with 1% fee was too risky for him.

RGBKey, if you are reading this - maybe you could re-launch the exchange with a higher fee until we complete the on-site exchange?

Cheers,
Ethan

maybe you can have a look at Bitsler's exchange and the way they implemented it
it has a very high fee from what I can tell,maybe even as high as 3%+
the rates are fixed for a set period of time,30 seconds  and then they are updated to reflect changes
exchange itself should be very profitable since many gamblers would want to deposit in one cryptocurrency
and wager in a different one and the exchange % would not matter much (unless it is outrageously high)

I used their site about a year and a half ago and it was seemless to use their exchange. So for them this way of exchanging between all those different alt coins do work.
But they charge 3% in fees to exchange on the site? I would have never have guessed it because with doge and litecoin at the time I was there, it was such a minute amount the player doesn't really know it was even applied at this rate.
But with ethereum you will notice the fee amount taken off. But 3% isn't that much if you think about it.
Yolodice could even charge 5% if they wanted too because it is up to the player if they are in need of it right away to do their wagers or if they want to do it off site and get charged less by the method of exchange they choose to use.
That would be totally up to them.
But it is good to atleast allow the choices to be available to the player.
As variety is what everybody are really seeking at the end of it all.

[Rocket Racoon]

Hello YoloDicers,

iam registered now since over 6 months and i "really" love the site so far, a bit disappointing is for me that not even a single comment how far the progress is on adding LTC investment..

but instead speaking of adding new coins or builtiin exchanges..

Hoping it will be actived on March -.-

so long , - RocketRacoon

[Bitfort]

Hello YoloDicers,

iam registered now since over 6 months and i "really" love the site so far, a bit disappointing is for me that not even a single comment how far the progress is on adding LTC investment..

but instead speaking of adding new coins or builtiin exchanges..

Hoping it will be actived on March -.-

so long , - RocketRacoon

Also eagerly waiting to put in my spare LTC. The profit chart looks great.

But it seems Ethan and Scott can provide enough funds on their own and don't need ours    ... though max single bet win 10 LTC is not much (compared to max possible win 14 BTC).

[Lionidas]

Hello YoloDicers,

iam registered now since over 6 months and i "really" love the site so far, a bit disappointing is for me that not even a single comment how far the progress is on adding LTC investment..

but instead speaking of adding new coins or builtiin exchanges..

Hoping it will be actived on March -.-

so long , - RocketRacoon

The Ltc investment option hasn't been discussed about for a while now so maybe best to put that on hold for now and concentrate on ethereum being added as a option for another alt coin to use on the site instead.
They have been talking about a possibility of having an eth exchange but only if it is viable to operate as it was in trial for ltc but it did not work out so it was scraped.
Just hope they will be able to modify this exchange to work with ethereum and put an acceptable amount to charge as a fee to complete these trades for both parties involved.

[dooglus]

I was just able to close two separate investments using a single 2FA code. Is that the intended behavior? I would expect 2FA codes to each be for a single use so that someone with keylogger access to my machine doesn't get to pretend to be me using a code after I've used it.

[MinerHQ]

I was just able to close two separate investments using a single 2FA code. Is that the intended behavior? I would expect 2FA codes to each be for a single use so that someone with keylogger access to my machine doesn't get to pretend to be me using a code after I've used it.

I think this issue needs to be fixed soon even though it is intended behaviour as of now.

They should ask for new 2FA code for each of those actions and can't be done just based one code.

[Samarkand]

I was just able to close two separate investments using a single 2FA code. Is that the intended behavior? I would expect 2FA codes to each be for a single use so that someone with keylogger access to my machine doesn't get to pretend to be me using a code after I've used it.

This is obviously dangerous and should be fixed.
However, I think that the danger for you personally is rather hypothetical, because I don´t think
that you are using a Windows-based system for online activities.

Therefore I think it is highly unlikely that you are running a keylogger-infested
computer.

[Lionidas]

I was just able to close two separate investments using a single 2FA code. Is that the intended behavior? I would expect 2FA codes to each be for a single use so that someone with keylogger access to my machine doesn't get to pretend to be me using a code after I've used it.

I think this issue needs to be fixed soon even though it is intended behaviour as of now.

They should ask for new 2FA code for each of those actions and can't be done just based one code.

Yeah. That is not how that security protocol should work.
It should be giving you a brand new code for each and every request you are doing.

That is not what 2FA authenticity should be doing.

Just hope admin has been notified as this is a bug in the system.

[@ltra]

Congrats on being number 3 on the top wager list of DiceSites.
Its just been over a year. I am imagining what would be the position when site reaches its 2nd anniversary

[JL421]

Congrats on being number 3 on the top wager list of DiceSites.
Its just been over a year. I am imagining what would be the position when site reaches its 2nd anniversary

The road was never easy the reason why they are at that position is because they were fair to all users , they listened to any negative feedback and made sure that error is rectified
I would also like to thank and congratulate ethan and the whole yolodice team hope one day you will be the best dice site

[ethan_nx]

I was just able to close two separate investments using a single 2FA code. Is that the intended behavior? I would expect 2FA codes to each be for a single use so that someone with keylogger access to my machine doesn't get to pretend to be me using a code after I've used it.

Thanks. You are right, the specs say it pretty clearly: "The verifier MUST NOT accept the second attempt of the OTP after the successful validation has been issued for the first OTP, which ensures one-time only use of an OTP." - https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6238#section-5.2

Thanks for pointing this out.

Cheers,
Ethan

[ethan_nx]

We have also lowered the BTC withdrawal fee by 50%, I hope the network fees will stay low. I am thinking about introducing dynamic fees that would reflect the current mempool status.

Cheers,
Ethan

[RGBKey]

We have also lowered the BTC withdrawal fee by 50%, I hope the network fees will stay low. I am thinking about introducing dynamic fees that would reflect the current mempool status.

Cheers,
Ethan

Dynamic fees would be fantastic. Maybe you could talk to RHavar about that, I know he's done some amazing things with busta's withdraw system.

But in the meantime, lowering fees is still good

[bias]

Sence that you mention investments,can we have a date or a time schedule for LTC investments?
Maybe you already say something about this in a previous post but i wasn't follow for some days now...

We have also lowered the BTC withdrawal fee by 50%, I hope the network fees will stay low.

That's great news indeed. If BTC though rise up fast,again,then the fees will be up again...
Until then,let's enjoy this reduce!