Bitcoin Forum
December 14, 2017, 08:28:00 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 [50] 51 52 »
  Print  
Author Topic: NiceHash EQM Zcash NVIDIA optimized miner [Maxwell/Pascal] + CPU mining v1.0.4c  (Read 230140 times)
th00ber
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 625


View Profile
January 23, 2017, 11:24:56 PM
 #981

Hi guys,

I just add this miner on my monitoring tool.
Take a look Smiley

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1448855.0
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
DarkIlluminatus
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 48


View Profile
January 31, 2017, 11:06:41 AM
 #982

Can you add support for CUDA Compute 3.0 please?
StormerJack
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3


View Profile
February 05, 2017, 02:30:52 PM
 #983

Guys im confused.  i added my coinbase bitcoin address to the Start.bat and it says im getting 681 sols/s but where are these going to? nothing is showing in coinbase and i dont know how to view anything on nicehash.
StormerJack
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3


View Profile
February 05, 2017, 05:55:03 PM
 #984

Guys im confused.  i added my coinbase bitcoin address to the Start.bat and it says im getting 681 sols/s but where are these going to? nothing is showing in coinbase and i dont know how to view anything on nicehash.

Visit this page:
https://www.nicehash.com/index.jsp?p=myminer

And enter your BTC address there.
You will see how much are you making with NiceHash and when you will get the payout.


Thankds for that, is there a way to limit it to only 80% of my gpu power? i would still like to be able to use my computer at the same time for browsing.
Flunder707
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 433


View Profile
February 19, 2017, 09:50:38 PM
 #985

Trying to zero in on the perfect settings for my Strix 980ti.  Trying all kinds different combos but I'm trying to find the sweet spot for the lowest TDP and highest Sol output.

Anyone have any luck with these cards?   Huh
sp_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246

Ccminer developer


View Profile
February 20, 2017, 10:10:24 AM
 #986

Code:
code for sm_52
Function : _Z14digit_5_pascalILj9ELj1248ELi12E13packer_cantorLj2048ELj640EEvP4equiIXT_EXT0_ET2_E
.headerflags    @"EF_CUDA_SM52 EF_CUDA_PTX_SM(EF_CUDA_SM52)"
                                                                                        /* 0x001cc400e22007f6 */
        /*0008*/                   MOV R1, c[0x0][0x20];                                /* 0x4c98078000870001 */
        /*0010*/                   S2R R16, SR_TID.X;                                   /* 0xf0c8000002170010 */
        /*0018*/                   S2R R0, SR_CTAID.X;                                  /* 0xf0c8000002570000 */

There is a mismatch between the sourcecode you published and the EQM miner.

EQMminer:

#define CONFIG_MODE_1   9, 1248, 13, 640, packer_cantor

Nheqminer Opensource:

#define CONFIG_MODE_1   9, 1248, 12, 640, packer_cantor

Can you publish the complete EQM config please. I am working on a faster kernel.
NiceHashSupport
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588



View Profile WWW
February 20, 2017, 10:38:33 AM
 #987

The config is identical, there are only some code cleanups in nheqminer.

From EQM source:

Code:
#define CONFIG_MODE_1 9, 1248, 12, 2, 100, 640, packer_cantor

I am not sure where you are getting that number 13 from...

NiceHash.com - Largest Crypto-Mining Marketplace
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722



View Profile
February 28, 2017, 12:57:15 PM
 #988

so the last version of this compatible with suprnova pool is the 5a version? there are too many version and fork is getting confused here

which is anyway slower than the EWBF version
NiceHashSupport
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588



View Profile WWW
February 28, 2017, 01:21:35 PM
 #989

so the last version of this compatible with suprnova pool is the 5a version? there are too many version and fork is gettign confused here

which is anyway slower than the EWBF version

This is EQM, not nheqminer.

NiceHash.com - Largest Crypto-Mining Marketplace
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722



View Profile
February 28, 2017, 08:42:33 PM
 #990

so the last version of this compatible with suprnova pool is the 5a version? there are too many version and fork is gettign confused here

which is anyway slower than the EWBF version

This is EQM, not nheqminer.

right, that's what i mean with confusing the two, but no other version are in plan for that? they are both slower than the private miner
NiceHashSupport
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588



View Profile WWW
February 28, 2017, 08:44:52 PM
 #991

so the last version of this compatible with suprnova pool is the 5a version? there are too many version and fork is gettign confused here

which is anyway slower than the EWBF version

This is EQM, not nheqminer.

right, that's what i mean with confusing the two, but no other version are in plan for that? they are both slower than the private miner

I am not sure, on my devices, EQM is equally fast, besides you need to consider devfee and the fact that ideas were copied out of EQM.

NiceHash.com - Largest Crypto-Mining Marketplace
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722



View Profile
February 28, 2017, 08:56:13 PM
 #992

so the last version of this compatible with suprnova pool is the 5a version? there are too many version and fork is gettign confused here

which is anyway slower than the EWBF version

This is EQM, not nheqminer.

right, that's what i mean with confusing the two, but no other version are in plan for that? they are both slower than the private miner

I am not sure, on my devices, EQM is equally fast, besides you need to consider devfee and the fact that ideas were copied out of EQM.

ah yeah but the fact that you earn less because it's locked make it less appealing
NiceHashSupport
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588



View Profile WWW
February 28, 2017, 09:03:07 PM
 #993

so the last version of this compatible with suprnova pool is the 5a version? there are too many version and fork is gettign confused here

which is anyway slower than the EWBF version

This is EQM, not nheqminer.

right, that's what i mean with confusing the two, but no other version are in plan for that? they are both slower than the private miner

I am not sure, on my devices, EQM is equally fast, besides you need to consider devfee and the fact that ideas were copied out of EQM.

ah yeah but the fact that you earn less because it's locked make it less appealing

We open sourced kernel (which is equal). We even said what has to be done on base code to make it same speed, but sadly, no "open source" coder took 1h of job to do it. Maybe if you collect together some bounty or something, you may find someone like sp maybe that will fix it.

NiceHash.com - Largest Crypto-Mining Marketplace
BitMan94
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6


View Profile
March 01, 2017, 06:37:23 AM
 #994

for some reason i cant run my start batch file when trying to mine zcash through nicehash can someone link what the start batch file must look like incase i am putting in something wrong =/
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154

CryptoLearner


View Profile
March 01, 2017, 10:04:48 AM
 #995

for some reason i cant run my start batch file when trying to mine zcash through nicehash can someone link what the start batch file must look like incase i am putting in something wrong =/

Link yours so that we could analyze what's wrong. (omit your wallet)

BTC - 1B1RBYkzxiTmrbnFe2vj8EaNPSYftW8186 for tips Wink
jhenrikb
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9


View Profile
April 14, 2017, 11:18:06 AM
 #996

Hi.
Is this the same application that is running through Nicehash miner v1.7.5.9?
Im getting 260MH/s on the Nicehashminer, and 255 on the EQM miner.

What is strange is that, when I run the nicehash miner, it starts on 260 mh, then over the night drops down to 1 MH/s(asus strixx 970). While my other computer which have msi gtx 970, stays at 262 stable.

Testing EQM miner now on my asus card to see if the same happends.


John
SS2006
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 288


View Profile
April 28, 2017, 06:22:32 AM
 #997

New to this. I know there is a 0% fee, but since this is locked to nicehash, basically im supplying mining power for buyers on nicehash correct?
So my question is, am I making the BTC equivalent of zcash, that I'd be making if I were mining zcash directly through some pool? Or am I losing a chunk by using this service locked to nice hash
Thanks in advanced Smiley
Vetal_inside
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 78


View Profile
April 29, 2017, 01:23:47 AM
 #998

New to this. I know there is a 0% fee, but since this is locked to nicehash, basically im supplying mining power for buyers on nicehash correct?
So my question is, am I making the BTC equivalent of zcash, that I'd be making if I were mining zcash directly through some pool? Or am I losing a chunk by using this service locked to nice hash
Thanks in advanced Smiley
For your question - look at http://whattomine.com/ and compare profit beetwen mining on zcash pool and nicehash. There are some difference, but no much.
Btw, EQM it "old" miner. Use Excavator
SS2006
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 288


View Profile
April 29, 2017, 03:48:50 AM
 #999

New to this. I know there is a 0% fee, but since this is locked to nicehash, basically im supplying mining power for buyers on nicehash correct?
So my question is, am I making the BTC equivalent of zcash, that I'd be making if I were mining zcash directly through some pool? Or am I losing a chunk by using this service locked to nice hash
Thanks in advanced Smiley
For your question - look at http://whattomine.com/ and compare profit beetwen mining on zcash pool and nicehash. There are some difference, but no much.
Btw, EQM it "old" miner. Use Excavator
thanks, intrestingly enough i tried it, im getting 432 h/s with excavator on zcash mining. with the EQM i'm getting 460 sol/s, and with EWBF getting 505 sols/s so seems EQM is better for my GTX 1080, and EWBF is the best. Am I reading these numbers correctly?
NiceHashSupport
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588



View Profile WWW
April 29, 2017, 08:57:47 AM
 #1000

New to this. I know there is a 0% fee, but since this is locked to nicehash, basically im supplying mining power for buyers on nicehash correct?
So my question is, am I making the BTC equivalent of zcash, that I'd be making if I were mining zcash directly through some pool? Or am I losing a chunk by using this service locked to nice hash
Thanks in advanced Smiley
For your question - look at http://whattomine.com/ and compare profit beetwen mining on zcash pool and nicehash. There are some difference, but no much.
Btw, EQM it "old" miner. Use Excavator
thanks, intrestingly enough i tried it, im getting 432 h/s with excavator on zcash mining. with the EQM i'm getting 460 sol/s, and with EWBF getting 505 sols/s so seems EQM is better for my GTX 1080, and EWBF is the best. Am I reading these numbers correctly?

If you launch in low intensity mode (one thread) then yes, you get lower hashing speed. And yes, use excavator, it will give more speed (with high intensity of 2+ threads).

NiceHash.com - Largest Crypto-Mining Marketplace
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 [50] 51 52 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!