NiceHash EQM Zcash NVIDIA optimized miner [Maxwell/Pascal] + CPU mining v1.0.4c

[Amph]

so the last version of this compatible with suprnova pool is the 5a version? there are too many version and fork is getting confused here

which is anyway slower than the EWBF version

[NiceHashSupport]

so the last version of this compatible with suprnova pool is the 5a version? there are too many version and fork is gettign confused here

which is anyway slower than the EWBF version

This is EQM, not nheqminer.

[Amph]

so the last version of this compatible with suprnova pool is the 5a version? there are too many version and fork is gettign confused here

which is anyway slower than the EWBF version

This is EQM, not nheqminer.

right, that's what i mean with confusing the two, but no other version are in plan for that? they are both slower than the private miner

[NiceHashSupport]

so the last version of this compatible with suprnova pool is the 5a version? there are too many version and fork is gettign confused here

which is anyway slower than the EWBF version

This is EQM, not nheqminer.

right, that's what i mean with confusing the two, but no other version are in plan for that? they are both slower than the private miner

I am not sure, on my devices, EQM is equally fast, besides you need to consider devfee and the fact that ideas were copied out of EQM.

[Amph]

so the last version of this compatible with suprnova pool is the 5a version? there are too many version and fork is gettign confused here

which is anyway slower than the EWBF version

This is EQM, not nheqminer.

right, that's what i mean with confusing the two, but no other version are in plan for that? they are both slower than the private miner

I am not sure, on my devices, EQM is equally fast, besides you need to consider devfee and the fact that ideas were copied out of EQM.

ah yeah but the fact that you earn less because it's locked make it less appealing

[NiceHashSupport]

so the last version of this compatible with suprnova pool is the 5a version? there are too many version and fork is gettign confused here

which is anyway slower than the EWBF version

This is EQM, not nheqminer.

right, that's what i mean with confusing the two, but no other version are in plan for that? they are both slower than the private miner

I am not sure, on my devices, EQM is equally fast, besides you need to consider devfee and the fact that ideas were copied out of EQM.

ah yeah but the fact that you earn less because it's locked make it less appealing

We open sourced kernel (which is equal). We even said what has to be done on base code to make it same speed, but sadly, no "open source" coder took 1h of job to do it. Maybe if you collect together some bounty or something, you may find someone like sp maybe that will fix it.

[BitMan94]

for some reason i cant run my start batch file when trying to mine zcash through nicehash can someone link what the start batch file must look like incase i am putting in something wrong =/

[m1n1ngP4d4w4n]

for some reason i cant run my start batch file when trying to mine zcash through nicehash can someone link what the start batch file must look like incase i am putting in something wrong =/

Link yours so that we could analyze what's wrong. (omit your wallet)

[jhenrikb]

Hi.
Is this the same application that is running through Nicehash miner v1.7.5.9?
Im getting 260MH/s on the Nicehashminer, and 255 on the EQM miner.

What is strange is that, when I run the nicehash miner, it starts on 260 mh, then over the night drops down to 1 MH/s(asus strixx 970). While my other computer which have msi gtx 970, stays at 262 stable.

Testing EQM miner now on my asus card to see if the same happends.


John

[SS2006]

New to this. I know there is a 0% fee, but since this is locked to nicehash, basically im supplying mining power for buyers on nicehash correct?
So my question is, am I making the BTC equivalent of zcash, that I'd be making if I were mining zcash directly through some pool? Or am I losing a chunk by using this service locked to nice hash
Thanks in advanced

[Vetal_inside]

New to this. I know there is a 0% fee, but since this is locked to nicehash, basically im supplying mining power for buyers on nicehash correct?
So my question is, am I making the BTC equivalent of zcash, that I'd be making if I were mining zcash directly through some pool? Or am I losing a chunk by using this service locked to nice hash
Thanks in advanced

For your question - look at http://whattomine.com/ and compare profit beetwen mining on zcash pool and nicehash. There are some difference, but no much.
Btw, EQM it "old" miner. Use Excavator

[SS2006]

New to this. I know there is a 0% fee, but since this is locked to nicehash, basically im supplying mining power for buyers on nicehash correct?
So my question is, am I making the BTC equivalent of zcash, that I'd be making if I were mining zcash directly through some pool? Or am I losing a chunk by using this service locked to nice hash
Thanks in advanced

For your question - look at http://whattomine.com/ and compare profit beetwen mining on zcash pool and nicehash. There are some difference, but no much.
Btw, EQM it "old" miner. Use Excavator

thanks, intrestingly enough i tried it, im getting 432 h/s with excavator on zcash mining. with the EQM i'm getting 460 sol/s, and with EWBF getting 505 sols/s so seems EQM is better for my GTX 1080, and EWBF is the best. Am I reading these numbers correctly?

[NiceHashSupport]

New to this. I know there is a 0% fee, but since this is locked to nicehash, basically im supplying mining power for buyers on nicehash correct?
So my question is, am I making the BTC equivalent of zcash, that I'd be making if I were mining zcash directly through some pool? Or am I losing a chunk by using this service locked to nice hash
Thanks in advanced

For your question - look at http://whattomine.com/ and compare profit beetwen mining on zcash pool and nicehash. There are some difference, but no much.
Btw, EQM it "old" miner. Use Excavator

thanks, intrestingly enough i tried it, im getting 432 h/s with excavator on zcash mining. with the EQM i'm getting 460 sol/s, and with EWBF getting 505 sols/s so seems EQM is better for my GTX 1080, and EWBF is the best. Am I reading these numbers correctly?

If you launch in low intensity mode (one thread) then yes, you get lower hashing speed. And yes, use excavator, it will give more speed (with high intensity of 2+ threads).

[SS2006]

Ok how do I launch high intensity and two threads? It launches automatically from nicehash miner so I can't control much. Also I do see thst two threads are active. I notice it also down clocks my cards memory by around 400"mhz. So I've since found out if I Oc my memory clock by +800 I get similar speeds to ewbf, but not stable obvously. Somethings wrong..

[azioprismm]

Hi.
Is this the same application that is running through Nicehash miner v1.7.5.9?
Im getting 260MH/s on the Nicehashminer, and 255 on the EQM miner.

What is strange is that, when I run the nicehash miner, it starts on 260 mh, then over the night drops down to 1 MH/s(asus strixx 970). While my other computer which have msi gtx 970, stays at 262 stable.

Testing EQM miner now on my asus card to see if the same happends.


John

I am having a very similar problem with my evga 970sc , i am mining at 260 mh and then it gradually drops to 90 mh AND STILL USES AS MUCH MINING POWER AS IT WAS FOR 260 mh. i also made a thread about this problem.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1896335.msg18825303#msg18825303


using v1.0.4c


EDIT: As of 02/05/2017 seems back to normal, i will try to edit this when drops start to happen.

[Tesla_miner]

i got error only cuda devices with sm 5.0 and higher are supported

eqm -l eu -t 16 -u 1B8hT9E6oY6WE6ehQFC6RiPSVHHjYQ4kLg -w tesla786 -cd 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7

i have 8 GPU

[Whynot8282]

Hi there

I have a 1060 3g based 6 way miner and now mining with EQM.

All together it shows about 1522.92 Sols/s.

However, when I use the other mining programs such as Claymore and silentarmy, its mining capability is only 240 Sols/s.

Is it a real data? EQM looks way too high compared to the others.

Could anyone tell me about it?

Thanks!

[djeZo]

Use NiceHash Miner and you will get even more speed: https://www.nicehash.com/?p=nhmintro

[pallas]

Use NiceHash Miner and you will get even more speed: https://www.nicehash.com/?p=nhmintro

When will it be available on linux? Been waiting for it forever :-)

[th3.r00t]

Use NiceHash Miner and you will get even more speed: https://www.nicehash.com/?p=nhmintro

When will it be available on linux? Been waiting for it forever :-)

Me too... 
As I read the thread, there are a lot of people asking for linux binary.