OK, THIS IS FUCKING INSANE

[Zangelbert Bingledack]

Basically the curling up from the standard exponential we're seeing now is either froth being introduced or a second exponential factor being introduced (the advent of double exponential growth - that is, exponentially higher and higher percentage increases). It could just be a outlying whale buying in in tracts, but that's outside the purview of this kind of trend analysis.

Merely the fact that the line is straight on a log chart of course does not mean there is no bubble, but as I mentioned we are seeing exponential growth in almost all other indicators as well. I don't think that was the case in 2011.

Note also: /r/Bitcoin is seeing increasingly high percentage growth in new subscribers right now. That might even be double exponential growth.

There are many things to take into account, though, and until I see sustained double-exponential growth for at least a month* and/or some reason to think that a second exponential factor has been introduced, I'm going to read this upward curling on the log chart as mild bubbling action entering the mix, albeit alongside much real growth.

One can abuse a log chart or any chart, but it remains the better tool for analyzing phenomena that - if they are to legitimately grow - will grow at exponential rates. For example, right now if there is an overreaction in response to some fairly moderate bad news, it won't be a mystery why. The log chart gives a ready explanation: anytime we float above the exponential trend line we are "cruising for a bruising" and any little problem can spook the market. That is a working hypothesis based on historical trends and the fact that other indicators appear to be "merely exponential" (not double exponential).

*This would of course be insane-level growth that would thwart all attempts at analysis, from weekly doubling to eventually daily doubling...either ending in mainstream adoption completely or release of one or both exponential factors as "shit starts to break."

[1715070038]

1715070038

[1715070038]

1715070038

[1715070038]

1715070038

[1715070038]

1715070038

[Grouver (BtcBalance)]

If you ask me, this big growth is good for getting Bitcoin in the picture.
But it's not good for the Bitcoin economy itself.

1) Cause of value growing this fast its making people to not purchase anything with Bitcoin right now.
Why buy that 2 gram of weed or memory module of 2GB with 0.15 Bitcoin if i can but it tommorow for 0.10 Bitcoin?
This is counts also for the oposite direction; why buy 5 bitcoins today if maybe tommorow the so called 'bubble' pops and I can buy it 25% cheaper then today.

2) No company wants to step in with Bitcoin either.
"Cafe Awesome Joe" earns 5 Bitcoins in a day. Today thats worth ~700 bucks.
But maybe tommorow when the so called 'bubble' pops it would be worth 550 bucks.
What are they gonna do then? I mean, there profit of that day just vaporized in a couple of hours.
This is to big of a risk for a small company to accept a currency that fluctuates this hard right now.

You can say things about the above statements.
But thats just how people unfamiliar with bitcoin are thinking about this. (Its' true I asked alot of people and companies.)
The value is just to unreliable right now.
A stable Bitcoin value, thats what we need now.

(the growing value is good for my fiat wallet though. ^_^)

[Zangelbert Bingledack]

I'm actually starting to doubt the importance of Bitcoin being used for a wide range of transactions at this point.

Look at gold! It's got just a few interesting non-store-of-value uses where no substitute is feasible, and the rest of the market price is all accounted for by its store-of-value functionality. Well, so does Bitcoin. Gold shows that only a tiny fraction of use value is needed to back the store-of-value value. Right now the world may need the latter far more than the former, and bitcoins have some huge advantages over gold as a store of value, especially in these times.

[lebing]

I'm actually starting to doubt the importance of Bitcoin being used for a wide range of transactions at this point.

Look at gold! It's got just a few interesting non-store-of-value uses where no substitute is feasible, and the rest of the market price is all accounted for by its store-of-value functionality. Well, so does Bitcoin. Gold shows that only a tiny fraction of use value is needed to back the store-of-value value. Right now the world may need the latter far more than the former, and bitcoins have some huge advantages over gold as a store of value, especially in these times.

bingo.

Stage 1: store of value
Stage 2: value exchange

Some are trying to force it now (bitcoinstore) and I personally dont think its ready for such a thing. I sure hope I'm wrong, but we will see I suppose. It doesnt need to be a perfect value exchange mechanism yet... It has so much functionality left under the hood that we havent even scratched the surface yet really.

[oakpacific]

I'm actually starting to doubt the importance of Bitcoin being used for a wide range of transactions at this point.

Look at gold! It's got just a few interesting non-store-of-value uses where no substitute is feasible, and the rest of the market price is all accounted for by its store-of-value functionality. Well, so does Bitcoin. Gold shows that only a tiny fraction of use value is needed to back the store-of-value value. Right now the world may need the latter far more than the former, and bitcoins have some huge advantages over gold as a store of value, especially in these times.

bingo.

Stage 1: store of value
Stage 2: value exchange

Some are trying to force it now (bitcoinstore) and I personally dont think its ready for such a thing. I sure hope I'm wrong, but we will see I suppose. It doesnt need to be a perfect value exchange mechanism yet... It has so much functionality left under the hood that we havent even scratched the surface yet really.

Another use: third-party-less escrow.

[ErisDiscordia]

I see running a business accepting BTC as a similar speculative investment atm as buying and holding BTC. Yes the price is fluctuating widely and bound to continue doing so in the near future methinks. Accepting BTC for products/services/work seems like a speculation that while the value of the payment received may fluctuate and go down, ultimately it's probable that it will go up. I think the owner of Bitcoinstore gets this, when he keeps all the BTC he earns through his business.

I think BTC will become more and more feasible as a medium of exchange, when the price gets more stable (this might include a steady predictable rise in price, not just a level price), which imo will happen when the market cap is growing, which happens not so much due to Bitcoin being used as a medium of exchange, but Bitcoin being used as a store of value. Thus people screaming "bubble" and no way to tell if it is or not.

[Zangelbert Bingledack]

Just to be clear, I do think people will spend their BTC as the price rises. The higher it goes the more digital millionaires appear who in fiat terms are only middle class, nervous as hell that any glitch or hack could dash their chances at financial freedom forever. They will progressively sell and also spend more and more as their wealth grows, even if that's only 10% off the top. The more spending options they have the less they will need to sell off directly.

So the more merchant adoptiont the better. I only mean to say that it may be a mistake to look for transactional value to increase in lockstep with the price. Store of value is HUGE right now. Any billionaire in the know (about Bitcoin) would be insane not to convert at least a small portion of their assets into bitcoins. Gold, Swiss bank accounts, property, offshore holdings - none are completely safe anymore, and neither are secrets held by others. With Bitcoin you can have your own secret stash that NO ONE will ever know about if you simply know what you're doing.

[lebing]

Just to be clear, I do think people will spend their BTC as the price rises. The higher it goes the more digital millionaires appear who in fiat terms are only middle class, nervous as hell that any glitch or hack could dash their chances at financial freedom forever. They will progressively sell and also spend more and more as their wealth grows, even if that's only 10% off the top. The more spending options they have the less they will need to sell off directly.

So the more merchant adoptiont the better. I only mean to say that it may be a mistake to look for transactional value to increase in lockstep with the price. Store of value is HUGE right now. Any billionaire in the know (about Bitcoin) would be insane not to convert at least a small portion of their assets into bitcoins. Gold, Swiss bank accounts, property, offshore holdings - none are completely safe anymore, and neither are secrets held by others. With Bitcoin you can have your own secret stash that NO ONE will ever know about if you simply know what you're doing.

Yep, I also am spending my coins. I used bitspend to buy a memory card and a guitar and will use 9flats to make my way around europe this summer.