Bitcoin Forum
May 28, 2024, 06:16:59 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Is it bad form to be stingy on tansaction fees?
Yes - 3 (25%)
No - 9 (75%)
Total Voters: 12

Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Is it bad form to be stingy on tansaction fees?  (Read 1159 times)
7788bitcoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2282
Merit: 1023


View Profile
November 15, 2016, 01:29:15 PM
 #21

With the small block size, you are very lucky to have your transaction included with only 10 bits of transaction fee... I myself is stingy on transaction fee but I will at least include a 100 bits fee to be safe.
yayayo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1024



View Profile
November 15, 2016, 03:18:13 PM
 #22

I chose "Yes", because I strongly dislike the kind of people that is constantly complaining about alleged high transaction fees. Bitcoin's transaction fees are perfectly adequate for the service provided, especially if you consider that you can transact worldwide without interference of third parties.

Of course it's up to the user, if he/she wants to be stingy regarding transaction fees. After all, the sender of a transaction bears the risk of delay / non-confirmation. However I consider it totally unacceptable to be stingy and complain about slow confirmation times. As Bitcoin matures, block rewards are dropping and miners' income will increasingly depend on transaction fees. Therefore it's immature to be stingy and expect the same level of service.

ya.ya.yo!

.
..1xBit.com   Super Six..
▄█████████████▄
████████████▀▀▀
█████████████▄
█████████▌▀████
██████████  ▀██
██████████▌   ▀
████████████▄▄
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
▀██████████████
███████████████
█████████████▀
█████▀▀       
███▀ ▄███     ▄
██▄▄████▌    ▄█
████████       
████████▌     
█████████    ▐█
██████████   ▐█
███████▀▀   ▄██
███▀   ▄▄▄█████
███ ▄██████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████▀▀▀█
██████████     
███████████▄▄▄█
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
         ▄█████
        ▄██████
       ▄███████
      ▄████████
     ▄█████████
    ▄███████
   ▄███████████
  ▄████████████
 ▄█████████████
▄██████████████
  ▀▀███████████
      ▀▀███
████
          ▀▀
          ▄▄██▌
      ▄▄███████
     █████████▀

 ▄██▄▄▀▀██▀▀
▄██████     ▄▄▄
███████   ▄█▄ ▄
▀██████   █  ▀█
 ▀▀▀
    ▀▄▄█▀
▄▄█████▄    ▀▀▀
 ▀████████
   ▀█████▀ ████
      ▀▀▀ █████
          █████
       ▄  █▄▄ █ ▄
     ▀▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
      ▀ ▄▄█████▄█▄▄
    ▄ ▄███▀    ▀▀ ▀▀▄
  ▄██▄███▄ ▀▀▀▀▄  ▄▄
  ▄████████▄▄▄▄▄█▄▄▄██
 ████████████▀▀    █ ▐█
██████████████▄ ▄▄▀██▄██
 ▐██████████████    ▄███
  ████▀████████████▄███▀
  ▀█▀  ▐█████████████▀
       ▐████████████▀
       ▀█████▀▀▀ █▀
.
Premier League
LaLiga
Serie A
.
Bundesliga
Ligue 1
Primeira Liga
.
..TAKE PART..
BitHodler
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1179


View Profile
November 15, 2016, 03:31:15 PM
 #23

Not at all. However, you have to accept and understand that mining pools will ignore your transaction for quite a number of hours if you really try to save on fees.

I have done this as well, but stopped including low transaction fees because I got annoyed of having to wait hours before my transaction gets even 1 confirmation.

Right now I add 0.00025-0.0007BTC in fees per transaction, depending on how soon I need my transaction to confirm.

BSV is not the real Bcash. Bcash is the real Bcash.
Catmony
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 15, 2016, 03:37:07 PM
 #24

Most of the time i use atleast 10000 satoshi or 0.0001BTC in every transaction which i found enough to make my transaction get confirmed within hour but better to go with suggested fee by web wallets, blockchain for me.

You have only paid 0.00001BTC which is very low than required so be happy that you get confirmation within so less time than expected.
Doamader
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 501


View Profile
November 15, 2016, 04:58:12 PM
 #25

No one can complain if does put low fees into their transactions, while we all know the fees should grow over the time to give the same service as now, my fee is usually around 20-50k but some services i do use make transactions with 10k as well, lower them makes no sense.
Wind_FURY
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2926
Merit: 1834



View Profile
November 15, 2016, 05:17:54 PM
 #26

To answer OP's question, no it is not "bad form". The real concern is having your transaction confirmed at the shortest possible time. It would be a pain to wait for your transaction to be confirmed sometimes.

I have another question. Have anyone here have had unconfirmed transactions by using the standard BTC.0001 fee amount? I have never had any problems before when I am sending $50 to $100 worth of Bitcoins. But I have started paying higher fees after reading that there were some users here who had encountered problems with their transactions.

██████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
██████████████████████
.SHUFFLE.COM..███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████████
████████████████████
██████████████████████
████████████████████
██████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
██████████████████████
██████████████████████
██████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
███████████████████████
.
...Next Generation Crypto Casino...
Junko
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000


View Profile
November 15, 2016, 05:33:25 PM
 #27

I don't think it is "bad form" at all. It's a matter of which option you want - faster or slower confirmation. I doubt miners take it personally or get offended if you choose the slow option.
crairezx20
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638
Merit: 1046



View Profile
November 15, 2016, 05:57:19 PM
 #28

To answer OP's question, no it is not "bad form". The real concern is having your transaction confirmed at the shortest possible time. It would be a pain to wait for your transaction to be confirmed sometimes.

I have another question. Have anyone here have had unconfirmed transactions by using the standard BTC.0001 fee amount? I have never had any problems before when I am sending $50 to $100 worth of Bitcoins. But I have started paying higher fees after reading that there were some users here who had encountered problems with their transactions.
As of now never experience any problem in my transactions i am using 10k sat too just for experiment the speed few weeks ago.. sometimes there is a different speed or there is no assurance that you can get the exact speed if you are paying in default fee.
Right now it  is just a small amount of fee even you are paying the maximum fee in recommended fee in electrum..  the speed for me is fine and it takes few minutes and you will get confirm.. unlike you are paying small fee it needs to mine a block before it confirms..
krishna1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 15, 2016, 06:01:23 PM
 #29

i have payed transaction fees as low as 4000satoshi it does not matter how low you pay the fees the lower you the the more time it will take for the confirmations and if you didnt payed any fees then it can either take upto 3-4days to confirmed or else it will be rejected by the network after some days

Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!