Bitcoin Forum
May 11, 2024, 04:22:25 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Lesson to Learn from Alt-Coins? Disruption to Bitcoin?  (Read 4103 times)
CasinoBit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 30, 2013, 05:01:34 PM
 #21

MODS- I'm posting this hear because it's about bitcoin

Right now, TRC has ground to a halt because it's difficulty was taken sky-high thanks to some ASICS that hopped on the network and then hopped off, leaving the difficulty incredibly high, and it taking everyone else forever to solve the block required to bring it down. It's brought the network to a standstill (although there is a fix being released for this).

Although of course TRC difficulties are incredibly low, so it makes this sort of attack easy to do- it does make one wonder how the bitcoin network would react. As we grow and grow, eventually we will get to a size large enough  that we are threatening for various other interest groups (if we aren't already). Although ASICS have made it much more expensive to attack the network, they haven't yet become widespread enough to claim we are really 'safe'.

If a State actor (for example China) were to put some time and money into it, they as well could develop a line of ASICS (indeed the only functioning ASICS are out of china- the government need really only seize their already completed designs and pay the factory to seriously ramp up production). With a large ASIC farm one could take the Bitcoin difficulty so high that when they leave the network the remaining bitcoin miners are stuck for hours trying to solve one block. As TRC shows you need only to slow down block production by a couple hours to induce widescale panic.

Thoughts?

I have been saying this since TRC launched. That ASICs would point to TRC and break it by running the difficulty into the sky.

The algorithm for TRC is identical to Bitcoin's and this will continue to be a problem for the foreseeable future.

Namecoin suffered this but at the hands of GPU miners flocking to NMC then run away.

NMC had a difficulty that did not adjust for 3 months.

TRC devs put such little effort into their "new coin" that they did not even manage to remove one of the biggest issues there is when creating an alt-coin, changing the mining algorithm.

Namecoin is an utter failure, there isn't even a single person who developed a Chrome extension yet these people seem to think that if they sit on their namecoins for long enough someone will do the work for them.

What stops someone from copying Namecoin, purchasing all the names, then investing tens of thousands of dollars to make it widespread.

I think if a big enough batch of ASICs would crash someone would use the opportunity to replace them and get a profit in the meantime, especially with an economy which is relatively big like BTC.
"I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715444545
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715444545

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715444545
Reply with quote  #2

1715444545
Report to moderator
1715444545
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715444545

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715444545
Reply with quote  #2

1715444545
Report to moderator
crazy_rabbit (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1001


RUM AND CARROTS: A PIRATE LIFE FOR ME


View Profile
April 30, 2013, 11:12:23 PM
 #22

Right now there are 750 petaflops of total computing power on the network.

The worlds fastest known supercomputer is a $100 million monster with 17.59 petaflops.

So we can say $1bn will buy you 750 petaflops.

Is it worth $1bn to attack bitcoin? To what end?

And when ASICS come into play in the next few years it's going to require ever more resources to throw at it.

Also the source of such an attack would surely be leaked? That is a massive project....

I think the idea was more like an undersea cable was cut or some other disaster isolated hashing power in geographic areas cutting it off from the rest of the network. So imaging rather then the difficulty first increasing, it instead precipitously falls.

more or less retired.
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!