[User Generated] - Known alts of anyone

[Chris!]

I appreciate Timelord2067 giving me a neutral and not a neg for the Huge Black Stereotype account.  That would sting.

Personally, I found that account to be pretty funny! I guess you were just goofing around there, but practice what you preach right!?  

Indeed.  Except I'm not farming that account, not selling it, and I'm not scamming with it.  Nor am I breaking any rules by having HER enrolled in the Secondstrade campaign.  Plus Timelord2067 is on my modified trust list, so I'd be staring at a red trust score every time I logged in.

Lol I don't see any reason for a negative. I guess a little bit of stereotyping but hey, it doesn't seem to be hurting anyone. Now if there's a Big White Bigot account with a lot of hate speech going on that would be a neg (if not a ban lol). Keep up the fight against account sellers and I'll keep up the fight against alts. Sometimes they're one in the same and sometimes they're not.

[1713928490]

1713928490

[1713928490]

1713928490

[1713928490]

1713928490

[Timelord2067]

I appreciate Timelord2067 giving me a neutral and not a neg for the Huge Black Stereotype account.  That would sting.

Personally, I found that account to be pretty funny! I guess you were just goofing around there, but practice what you preach right!?  

Indeed.  Except I'm not farming that account, not selling it, and I'm not scamming with it.  Nor am I breaking any rules by having HER enrolled in the Secondstrade campaign.  Plus Timelord2067 is on my modified trust list, so I'd be staring at a red trust score every time I logged in.

Originally I was giving all alt accounts negative trust, however, I fairly quickly came to understand that not all alts are used for nefarious purposes.  If one alt has negative trust, they all get negative trust which has seen some stinging Butt Hurt ^TM by some scammers.

I personally don't like the use of the "N" word and that's all I'm going to say on that matter.

[rizzlarolla]

I appreciate Timelord2067 giving me a neutral and not a neg for the Huge Black Stereotype account.  That would sting.

Personally, I found that account to be pretty funny! I guess you were just goofing around there, but practice what you preach right!?  

Indeed.  Except I'm not farming that account, not selling it, and I'm not scamming with it.  Nor am I breaking any rules by having HER enrolled in the Secondstrade campaign.  Plus Timelord2067 is on my modified trust list, so I'd be staring at a red trust score every time I logged in.

Originally I was giving all alt accounts negative trust, however, I fairly quickly came to understand that not all alts are used for nefarious purposes.  If one alt has negative trust, they all get negative trust which has seen some stinging Butt Hurt ^TM by some scammers.

I personally don't like the use of the "N" word and that's all I'm going to say on that matter.

I agree.
Also i thought the Pharmacist always complained about others shitposting?
Fair enough maybe in off topic, but this racial(ist) sterotype posting in more serious discussion is BS.

Kids eh?

Quoted for my reference. Thanks for the info.

Can't you send yourself an email?

[defcon23]

accounts connected : Lutpin and mexxer-2   ( yeah ... quite funny ... but true !  )


brituspol - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=186696 has 17ztTAE3Zhw8GmnmvwSuMb28oJUPB3oh2e in his profile

843acd5ce3faa5aa25c35c531f1fd04781bbf33dbfbcaefd39fd85f0e1316743 sent BTC to Lutpin’s deposit address (123erv3MTJrLf5QTaabUgjuEGXeM7zHzwn) and had change sent to 1CXWqwer84YYjVtdfXtVXgh8J6vZryG9WC ([456db1765b] - https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/456db1765bd99249)

mexxer-2 posted 1ESbCEsm7BTcTBDbQrXuwCZHspEKE24A4n as an escrow address here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1429440.msg14461622#msg14461622) (http://archive.is/h1o7F#selection-5391.99-5391.133). No release address/txid was ever posted, however it was posted here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1429440.msg14627473#msg14627473) (http://archive.is/h1o7F#selection-44867.0-44876.1) that funds will be released shortly, and a transaction releasing BTC from the escrow address was released within 60 minutes of that post.


The change address from the above escrow release transaction was 1FuT7yYxg3cbtf79qVvNNn1A83cx5dXgLH which is part of [17a6c0fbac] (https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/17a6c0fbacb01575). This wallet sent 0.098 BTC to Lutpin’s deposit address, and the change to 1CXWqwer84YYjVtdfXtVXgh8J6vZryG9WC which is part of [456db1765b] (https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/456db1765bd99249)

The wallet that sent 4 transactions to [17a6c0fbac] was [0fe6ed7d35] (https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/0fe6ed7d353f5c46) and an examination of the transactions between these wallets, makes me believe that for each of these transactions, the change address was part of [17a6c0fbac]. [0fe6ed7d35] sent two transactions (1ee3a1b1619bb94a004c66e4c427e5b762d64b24d4e1b7ead858bb533a96b9fc and 5d264b2a639157acfc6de4ece221d1016b4fb4a79ebca2d2e18f52cf0211dc10 0.13 and 0.12 to Lutpin’s deposit address, 123erv..Hzwn)
accounts connected : Lutpin and mexxer-2   ( yeah ... quite funny ... but true !  )
Going back to [456db1765b]. This wallet send 0.005 BTC to crypto-games.net via ee719cffc2a50d0a0c2d72d4bf03fbdb5d78856a97b7c8cfc64a3eda737cbf55 the deposit address was 1PGVfoUCUPxPisBPTJXoEhhK2eZJNAqrX9 and according to this (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=950982.msg17136867#msg17136867) (archive - http://archive.is/1tScD#selection-7805.9-7805.43) the deposit address belongs to mexxer-2. This wallet also received what is clearly change from [8ac29a8752] which contains 1HYjrm8uaR4Kdon2oSiwJUnBj6tLyXUpTc which belongs to mexxer-2 according to this (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.msg13904924#msg13904924) (archive - http://archive.is/CfZca#selection-4829.93-4829.127)


To summarize, addresses closely connected to mexxer-2 sent three transactions to Lutpin’s deposit address, all in different amounts (0.098, 0.13, and 0.12), Different dates (19 July 2016, 25 April 2016, and 11 May 2016), and different days of the week (Tuesday, Monday, and Wednesday). These were made to an address that Lutpin keeps generally private as the only place it has been posted on the forum is here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1545527.msg15535220#msg15535220) (archive- http://archive.is/Blsrf#selection-6025.3-6025.37), which was posted by him and then deleted - Lutpin has sent many transactions to that deposit address from addresses that are closely associated with him.

[Lutpin]

123erv is my address (my payment from every campaign goes there, you can check transactions from eg BitVest or BitBlender to see that),
mexxer owes me money. No surprise he does repay it, bit by bit.

yeah ..  sure dear ..     people are not all stupid... they will make their own opinion / analyse of that

Make a solid connection or STFU, deffy.
You're not the first to try connecting me to mexxer, hell, even QS believes that shit.
Yet, nobody was abled to make that connection, as we are not one and the same. Have fun trying.

archive.is got each edit 

You're wasting your time.

[defcon23]

123erv is my address, mexxer owes me money. No surprise he does repay it, bit by bit.

yeah ..    sure dear ..     people are not all stupid... they will make their own opinion / analyse of that  


i love the way you edit your post above

mexxer owes me money. No surprise he does repay it, bit by bit.

archive.is got each edit 

[Timelord2067]

I haven't had a chance to sit down and study defcon23's post in detail, however their last paragraph

To summarize, addresses closely connected to mexxer-2 sent three transactions to Lutpin’s deposit address, all in different amounts (0.098, 0.13, and 0.12), Different dates (19 July 2016, 25 April 2016, and 11 May 2016), and different days of the week (Tuesday, Monday, and Wednesday). These were made to an address that Lutpin keeps generally private as the only place it has been posted on the forum is here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1545527.msg15535220#msg15535220) (archive- http://archive.is/Blsrf#selection-6025.3-6025.37), which was posted by him and then deleted - Lutpin has sent many transactions to that deposit address from addresses that are closely associated with him.

Has left me scratching my head, (I've taken the liberty of highlighting the sentence that has me puzzled) the post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1545527.msg15535220#msg15535220 is still there - *unedited* including Lutpin's wallet address:

Re: Giveaway - 0.001 for the first 10 who post their adress.
10 July 2016, 22:02:24
 

#15

Thanks for participating Smiley

Paid out to:

Isildur (official) - 1Y9gAuxMBQ3nYG97H6miffTTsaqpm8gEh
stiffbud - 1AuGJkTPU63VkywXLrmMZ6MAboqDScxaeU
hahay - 1Pmi6ZdaZcDr8rcMkA76tVmJLrcrJLb6Bw
OpenTalkLab - 1HXPsg8gZJDashUtbgbpMBNSLYEfWg44Eq
Holdaaja - 1jcdc3D2tHJe1fsXTzvqi2jwQgg64AacM
ndnhc - 1HT4Kh8n2wocRucCcguSDReWDMJpYbVndh
death69 - 1PUgUi95e5eWWNz4oRzCWYvex3BG2pW3GS
mishra1994 - 3ERdYHYyUjTQ8jae6NBck2ncvN2KD65Fdq
eP - 1MabCwWu41JcRaRugChcaTSs6y42CZLdq
Lutpin - 123erv3MTJrLf5QTaabUgjuEGXeM7zHzwn

https://blockchain.info/nl/tx/4e6e439869c9cdde52305f371f46b9629201d943c3ab7cf02c93902968e81523

[Timelord2067]

Am cross posting this here, it's very slim connections, but am posting in case any of the UIDs come alive.

There are 23 UID with bone in their name...

and 43 UID with fanatic in their profile name...

while 6/23 (about one quarter) that have bone in the name have a corresponding UID with fanatic created some three days either side of their creation date...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1793039.msg17881608#msg17881608 http://archive.is/IqksK#selection-3193.0-4742.23

[Timelord2067]

Am cross posting this here, it's very slim connections, but am posting in case any of the UIDs come alive.

There are 23 UID with tbone in their name...

and 43 UID with fanatic in their profile name...

while 6/23 (about one quarter) that have tbone in the name have a corresponding UID with fanatic created some three days either side of their creation date...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1793039.msg17881608#msg17881608 http://archive.is/IqksK#selection-3193.0-4742.23

Might be onto something:

Code:

Name: 	bitcoinfanatic u=33542 http://archive.is/qGJI6
Posts: 	0
Activity: 	0
Position: 	Brand new
Date Registered: 	12 July 2011, 16:58:39
Last Active: 	24 November 2016, 22:20:55

Last active some 40 hours apart.

Code:

Name: 	flexfanatic u=135831 http://archive.is/WGoZi
Posts: 	2
Activity: 	2
Position: 	Newbie
Date Registered: 	06 July 2013, 22:32:11
Last Active: 	23 November 2016, 07:32:13

Code:

Name: 	dogefanatic u=184973 http://archive.is/zLXKZ
Posts: 	12
Activity: 	12
Position: 	Newbie
Date Registered: 	09 December 2013, 22:59:04
Last Active: 	31 March 2014, 16:53:22

Name: 	BitFanatic u=132175 http://archive.is/z4GPl
Posts: 	17
Activity: 	17
Position: 	Newbie
Date Registered: 	24 June 2013, 00:25:04
Last Active: 	04 April 2014, 23:48:40

Last active five days apart above and within two days of date registered.

Code:

Name: 	crypto_fanatic u=308059 http://archive.is/tWQ0X
Posts: 	0
Activity: 	0
Position: 	Brand new
Date Registered: 	05 April 2014, 15:21:16
Last Active: 	06 April 2014, 11:59:43

Name: 	Bitfanatic88 u=308942 http://archive.is/LeTkL
Posts: 	2
Activity: 	2
Position: 	Newbie
Date Registered: 	07 April 2014, 09:05:27
Last Active: 	27 October 2014, 01:54:25

Code:

Name: 	techfanatic9 u=289733 http://archive.is/MhTTj
Posts: 	1
Activity: 	1
Position: 	Newbie
Date Registered: 	14 March 2014, 08:17:36
Last Active: 	28 July 2014, 00:45:49

Last active same day as date registered.

Code:

Name: 	BitcoinsFanatic u=360162 http://archive.is/TPI6k
Posts: 	0
Activity: 	0
Position: 	Brand new
Date Registered: 	28 July 2014, 22:16:40
Last Active: 	28 July 2014, 22:16:41

which makes 6/23 tbone and 10/43 fanatic have a connection...

[LoyceV]

Accounts disconnected: GreenBits, dawnasor

Earlier proof:

Accounts connected: dawnasor, Greenbits (bought acc)

Current proof:

Green here, I can confirm that I have control of my account back.

I can confirm

archived

You did cheat! What you plan to do in the future doesn't change that.

Correct. In the case of the account being returned, I would probably just neg. rate the original account of the user in question (dawnasor).

I took GreenBits off my personal blacklist. I'll leave dawnasor blacklisted for trying to cheat my giveaway.

[BlackMambaPH]

accounts connected : Lutpin and mexxer-2   ( yeah ... quite funny ... but true !  )


brituspol - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=186696 has 17ztTAE3Zhw8GmnmvwSuMb28oJUPB3oh2e in his profile

843acd5ce3faa5aa25c35c531f1fd04781bbf33dbfbcaefd39fd85f0e1316743 sent BTC to Lutpin’s deposit address (123erv3MTJrLf5QTaabUgjuEGXeM7zHzwn) and had change sent to 1CXWqwer84YYjVtdfXtVXgh8J6vZryG9WC ([456db1765b] - https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/456db1765bd99249)

mexxer-2 posted 1ESbCEsm7BTcTBDbQrXuwCZHspEKE24A4n as an escrow address here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1429440.msg14461622#msg14461622) (http://archive.is/h1o7F#selection-5391.99-5391.133). No release address/txid was ever posted, however it was posted here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1429440.msg14627473#msg14627473) (http://archive.is/h1o7F#selection-44867.0-44876.1) that funds will be released shortly, and a transaction releasing BTC from the escrow address was released within 60 minutes of that post.


The change address from the above escrow release transaction was 1FuT7yYxg3cbtf79qVvNNn1A83cx5dXgLH which is part of [17a6c0fbac] (https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/17a6c0fbacb01575). This wallet sent 0.098 BTC to Lutpin’s deposit address, and the change to 1CXWqwer84YYjVtdfXtVXgh8J6vZryG9WC which is part of [456db1765b] (https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/456db1765bd99249)

The wallet that sent 4 transactions to [17a6c0fbac] was [0fe6ed7d35] (https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/0fe6ed7d353f5c46) and an examination of the transactions between these wallets, makes me believe that for each of these transactions, the change address was part of [17a6c0fbac]. [0fe6ed7d35] sent two transactions (1ee3a1b1619bb94a004c66e4c427e5b762d64b24d4e1b7ead858bb533a96b9fc and 5d264b2a639157acfc6de4ece221d1016b4fb4a79ebca2d2e18f52cf0211dc10 0.13 and 0.12 to Lutpin’s deposit address, 123erv..Hzwn)
accounts connected : Lutpin and mexxer-2   ( yeah ... quite funny ... but true !  )
Going back to [456db1765b]. This wallet send 0.005 BTC to crypto-games.net via ee719cffc2a50d0a0c2d72d4bf03fbdb5d78856a97b7c8cfc64a3eda737cbf55 the deposit address was 1PGVfoUCUPxPisBPTJXoEhhK2eZJNAqrX9 and according to this (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=950982.msg17136867#msg17136867) (archive - http://archive.is/1tScD#selection-7805.9-7805.43) the deposit address belongs to mexxer-2. This wallet also received what is clearly change from [8ac29a8752] which contains 1HYjrm8uaR4Kdon2oSiwJUnBj6tLyXUpTc which belongs to mexxer-2 according to this (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.msg13904924#msg13904924) (archive - http://archive.is/CfZca#selection-4829.93-4829.127)


To summarize, addresses closely connected to mexxer-2 sent three transactions to Lutpin’s deposit address, all in different amounts (0.098, 0.13, and 0.12), Different dates (19 July 2016, 25 April 2016, and 11 May 2016), and different days of the week (Tuesday, Monday, and Wednesday). These were made to an address that Lutpin keeps generally private as the only place it has been posted on the forum is here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1545527.msg15535220#msg15535220) (archive- http://archive.is/Blsrf#selection-6025.3-6025.37), which was posted by him and then deleted - Lutpin has sent many transactions to that deposit address from addresses that are closely associated with him.

Just want to quote for my personal reference. LOL Thanks Defcon for this.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I personally don't like the use of the "N" word and that's all I'm going to say on that matter.

I agree.
Also i thought the Pharmacist always complained about others shitposting?
Fair enough maybe in off topic, but this racial(ist) sterotype posting in more serious discussion is BS.

Kids eh?

Serious discussions?  Pretty much every thread on this forum has been infected with shitpostococculous aureus, methicillin-resistant no less, and there's very little worth reading.  If you think HBW's posts are offensive, that's fine, but shitposting?  Really?  Take the stick out of your asses, both of you.  Words can't hurt you, and at least the posts aren't generic "I use bitcoin because it good currency to make profit from trading and gambling...blah, blah, blah." that you see coming from sig shitposters all the time.  Tell me you aren't sick of those.

At least you read HBW's posts.  That's more than most people do, so I'll give you that.

[botany]

marcoman22, ekoice, farhaan

|

here

|

botany

|

Address

|

12-02-2017

|

Marcoman22 is perma-banned. So we can change the colour to purple.
The ban took place around 8-Feb-2017.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1735965.0

[kaykawa]

godzerosonic, kovaa, kaykawa, kenshi222, hosumfu, williamho,
retes12345, banklunjo, diodio1, summer11, scatttt, sorlunjo, qp123asd

I am not connected to these people, though I am not saying remove the -ve on my account but I bought this account from someone and hence you might be mistaken, thanks.

[Patatas]

I am not connected to these people, though I am not saying remove the -ve on my account but I bought this account from someone and hence you might be mistaken, thanks.

So you're saying you agree that you're indeed an alt of Engg.Chakks ? And you're still active on the forum? Great.People have a reason to find the related alt's now! Also I'm very sure couple of those listed accounts belong to you and you're trying to save them from getting tagged.I thought you left the forum long time back with your account FriendlyChemist.

[Lauda]

Just want to quote for my personal reference. LOL Thanks Defcon for this.

The "proof" is invalid, therefore there is no reason to quote it.

At least you read HBW's posts.  That's more than most people do, so I'll give you that.

HBW's posts are awesome. Abandon this account please.

Marcoman22 is perma-banned. So we can change the colour to purple.

Will do.

I am not connected to these people, though I am not saying remove the -ve on my account but I bought this account from someone and hence you might be mistaken, thanks.

I'm not going to remove a negative just because the account was apparently sold/bought or whatever. It was/is related to the others at one point in time, and it should be marked as such.

[Timelord2067]

Take the stick out of your asses, both of you.  Words can't hurt you, and at least the posts aren't generic "I use bitcoin because it good currency to make profit from trading and gambling...blah, blah, blah." that you see coming from sig shitposters all the time.  Tell me you aren't sick of those.

At least you read HBW's posts.  That's more than most people do, so I'll give you that.

Actually no, I don't read your alt's posts - one of the joys of the ignore button.

[kaykawa]

I am not connected to these people, though I am not saying remove the -ve on my account but I bought this account from someone and hence you might be mistaken, thanks.

So you're saying you agree that you're indeed an alt of Engg.Chakks ? And you're still active on the forum? Great.People have a reason to find the related alt's now! Also I'm very sure couple of those listed accounts belong to you and you're trying to save them from getting tagged.I thought you left the forum long time back with your account FriendlyChemist.

I don't know him either .. you can check this account bought and sold too many times, anyways I have this account to test signs

[Baron12]

Accounts conected: Randal9, Zupdawg
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=815389
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=822165

Code:

Proof:
https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/000001e522b362b7?from_address=19NUS8Edn4VKkuETn7pBKm3WwcmwTQCMqB<br>
https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/000001e522b362b7?from_address=1MHay9osMCS1c7181gGCEJKtCPBsAjV7fH
[b]Addresses:[/b] They use same unique address based on walletexplorer
19NUS8Edn4VKkuETn7pBKm3WwcmwTQCMqB
1MHay9osMCS1c7181gGCEJKtCPBsAjV7fH

[zupdawg]

Accounts conected: Randal9, Zupdawg
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=815389
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=822165

Code:

Proof:
https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/000001e522b362b7?from_address=19NUS8Edn4VKkuETn7pBKm3WwcmwTQCMqB<br>
https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/000001e522b362b7?from_address=1MHay9osMCS1c7181gGCEJKtCPBsAjV7fH
[b]Addresses:[/b] They use same unique address based on walletexplorer
19NUS8Edn4VKkuETn7pBKm3WwcmwTQCMqB
1MHay9osMCS1c7181gGCEJKtCPBsAjV7fH

yeah right, all 3,634,219 addresses connected our addresses is only owned by a single person, noob defective (detective)

https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/000001e522b362b7?from_address=19NUS8Edn4VKkuETn7pBKm3WwcmwTQCMqB

click show wallet addresses and you will see the link below, 3,634,219 addresses LMAO

https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/000001e522b362b7/addresses

you just proven yourself that you are such a dick