Bitcoin Forum
November 22, 2017, 05:00:03 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 [949] 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 ... 2138 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com  (Read 3011659 times)
FiatKiller
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378


View Profile
October 29, 2013, 03:32:50 PM
 #18961

My ASIC run better with casing, but the temp is quite high with casing on.
Is 70C Safe for my ASIC?
Thank You

Probably - 105 is upper limit

LTC: LdxgJQLUdr8hZ79BV5AYbxkBUdaXctXAPi
MoonCoin Gambling: https://coin-horse.com/MON/
Join ICO Now Coinlancer is Disrupting the Freelance marketplace!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1511370003
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511370003

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511370003
Reply with quote  #2

1511370003
Report to moderator
soapmodem
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 157


View Profile
October 29, 2013, 03:33:26 PM
 #18962

Been doing some testing and still torn between 0.97 and 0.98.. need some advice.

All else aside.. I have a higher hashrate in 0.98, but WU is lower by about 250 compared to 0.97. I always believed the two to be directly correlated, but that doesn't appear to be the case here.

Which is more important in the long-term for overall earnings, hashrate or WU?
sbfree
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336



View Profile
October 29, 2013, 03:35:13 PM
 #18963

.98  Have only been running it 10 Minutes, def. improvement compared to any other first 10 minutes, especially HW error rate.....temps look good.

Will report back in a few....Now I have a Saturn at its full potential. Thanks KNC and Ckolivas.....if this continues, ckolivas deserves a btc token of our appreciation.
FiatKiller
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378


View Profile
October 29, 2013, 03:36:05 PM
 #18964

Please post any changes in WU, that is really all that matters because that is what we are paid for.

LTC: LdxgJQLUdr8hZ79BV5AYbxkBUdaXctXAPi
MoonCoin Gambling: https://coin-horse.com/MON/
sickpig
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218


View Profile
October 29, 2013, 03:36:40 PM
 #18965

Been doing some testing and still torn between 0.97 and 0.98.. need some advice.

All else aside.. I have a higher hashrate in 0.98, but WU is lower by about 250 compared to 0.97. I always believed the two to be directly correlated, but that doesn't appear to be the case here.

Which is more important in the long-term for overall earnings, hashrate or WU?

Hashrate at the pool.

Bitcoin is a participatory system which ought to respect the right of self determinism of all of its users - Gregory Maxwell.
Tigggger
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1051



View Profile
October 29, 2013, 03:39:19 PM
 #18966

Please post any changes in WU, that is really all that matters because that is what we are paid for.

WU previously included HW errors, so a drop doesn't automatically mean worse.

sbfree
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336



View Profile
October 29, 2013, 03:42:53 PM
 #18967

wow, also just noticed that after around 115 Million submitted shares I can finally say I am official and found a BLOCK for the BTC community. I was starting to feel left out....1 less on the bucket list.
CYPER
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714



View Profile
October 29, 2013, 03:43:03 PM
 #18968

Does anyone know if my miners have been collected/shipped today or yesterday?


If this post helped you and you feel generous you know what to do: 1P9tXFy9bVgzrfPGeV7F8np26ZtFdCCWvz
FiatKiller
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378


View Profile
October 29, 2013, 03:49:20 PM
 #18969

I ran enablecores on top of FM98 and seems to have fixed WU quite a bit.

Edit: Actually over 300 here and there!


LTC: LdxgJQLUdr8hZ79BV5AYbxkBUdaXctXAPi
MoonCoin Gambling: https://coin-horse.com/MON/
DPoS
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462



View Profile
October 29, 2013, 03:55:37 PM
 #18970

.98 is 'overclocking' a small amount which was expected

check the VRM amps and you will see 5-8% more amps out  (from 40 --> 43.2, etc)

if anyone wants to run bfgminer on .98 let us know if most cores are running over 750 now



also, 8 VRM boards go up only a little, so not clear how much hashing increase unless I run bfgminer and look at everything core by core

~~BTC~~GAMBIT~~BTC~~Play Boardgames for Bitcoins!!~~BTC~~GAMBIT~~BTC~~ Something I say help? Donate BTC! 1KN1K1xStzsgfYxdArSX4PEjFfcLEuYhid
dwdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966


- - -Caveat Aleo- - -


View Profile
October 29, 2013, 03:58:08 PM
 #18971

I feel like we're in a tug-of-war between firmware updates and rising difficulty and difficulty is winning.  Sad
AussieHash
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 685



View Profile
October 29, 2013, 04:06:19 PM
 #18972

My "bad" jupiter which has gone from fw 095 > 096 > 097 > 0961 > 097 > 095 ---> 098

has improved by 100GH/s at the pool.  The previous 24hr average was around 450-460GH

Currently pool reports hashing at 550GH.
Code:
cgminer version 3.6.6 - Started: [2013-10-29 15:32:49]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):608.1G (avg):564.2Gh/s | A:389044  R:2518  HW:7761  WU:7825.6/m
 ST: 2  SS: 1  NB: 6  LW: 407116  GF: 0  RF: 0
 Connected to redacted diff 350 with stratum as user redacted
 Block: 0003c369b32684e8...  Diff:391M  Started: [16:02:20]  Best share: 1.56M
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 KnC 0:                | 574.7G/565.2Gh/s | A:389394 R:2518 HW:7773 WU: 7834.4/m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
chrono030
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 114


View Profile
October 29, 2013, 04:07:19 PM
 #18973

wow, also just noticed that after around 115 Million submitted shares I can finally say I am official and found a BLOCK for the BTC community. I was starting to feel left out....1 less on the bucket list.

I saw that on bitminter - Congrats man!
ASIC-K
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280


Hell?


View Profile
October 29, 2013, 04:08:57 PM
 #18974

stupid question, but i just switched to eligius, where can i see if i have solved a block or not? lol
reactor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406



View Profile
October 29, 2013, 04:09:59 PM
 #18975

I feel like we're in a tug-of-war between firmware updates and rising difficulty and difficulty is winning.  Sad

Difficulty is always winning. Sad  At any estimate I've seen the KNC October shipment basically made the KNC October shipment recipients in for a heap of pain, even when running under spec. Sad
vesperwillow
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616


View Profile
October 29, 2013, 04:11:44 PM
 #18976

wow, also just noticed that after around 115 Million submitted shares I can finally say I am official and found a BLOCK for the BTC community. I was starting to feel left out....1 less on the bucket list.

Solo mining or pool?

Phonikg
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5


View Profile
October 29, 2013, 04:13:36 PM
 #18977

.98 firmware helped! hashing at 144 ghs on my mercury. low hardware errors!

Congrats ASIC-K!!  I have been hesitant to play with my firmware at all, as my miner arrived with .95 and was hashing 540gh/s in cgminer right off the bat.

Of course now I want to apply .98 but I am out of town for work (Windsor) and do not want to attempt a remote fw upgrade:(

Have to wait till the weekend... Cheers!
ASIC-K
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280


Hell?


View Profile
October 29, 2013, 04:16:53 PM
 #18978

.98 firmware helped! hashing at 144 ghs on my mercury. low hardware errors!

Congrats ASIC-K!!  I have been hesitant to play with my firmware at all, as my miner arrived with .95 and was hashing 540gh/s in cgminer right off the bat.

Of course now I want to apply .98 but I am out of town for work (Windsor) and do not want to attempt a remote fw upgrade:(

Have to wait till the weekend... Cheers!

hey buddy! i forgot about you, we still have to do a meet up!

yeah man, .98 solved almost all problems. mercury is running at peak efficiency now, i honestly think you would get a bump in speed too.

sbfree
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336



View Profile
October 29, 2013, 04:22:37 PM
 #18979

wow, also just noticed that after around 115 Million submitted shares I can finally say I am official and found a BLOCK for the BTC community. I was starting to feel left out....1 less on the bucket list.

Solo mining or pool?

Would be a losing battle if I was solo mining. I started on bitminter but most of my mining has been on BTC Guild.
sbfree
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336



View Profile
October 29, 2013, 04:27:42 PM
 #18980

Please post any changes in WU, that is really all that matters because that is what we are paid for.

After 1hr on .98

errors would immediately start in the 20% range and average down to about 16% but with .98 I am currently at around 7% HW error and most importantly on BTCG

miner_knc   273.96 GH/s   54,336k (99.83%)

I have never seen it this high......will post more later.
Pages: « 1 ... 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 [949] 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 ... 2138 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!