Oh, I freely admit that it was a fluke (the one I saw was not the ASIC miner thing, I do remember that.)
If the block you saw is not related to the ASICMiner refund, then show me where you saw a block which generated 200 BTC in transactions fees. I want see with my own eyes if such block even exist...
But to say it's unreachable to have 600+ transactions in a ten minute period? I must severely disagree! How many dollar transactions do you think happen in ten minutes? Personally, I have no idea, but I do know that it's several orders of magnitude higher than that.
No one said that the Bitcoin Network cannot have 600 or more transaction in 10 minutes. I could care less for how many fiat transactions happens in ten minutes. It has nothing to do with the present discussion, which is about the Bitcoin network transaction fees.
This is what I'm trying to say. If we can find a way to take BTC mainstream, that 200 BTC/block would be a LOW average.
I will repeat once more: there is not direct correlation between the number of users and the volume of transactions. How many times I have to repeat that to you understand? Do not really matter if more and more people start to use the Bitcoin Network, because that could result either in increase or decrease of transactions.
You are also assuming that an increase in the volume of transactions will result in an increase of collected fees. That is an incorrect assumption. There is no way to ensure that every transaction will result in a collected fee. Moreover, even if the Bitcoin protocol turns the transaction fees compulsory, each block would have at least 400,000 transactions of 0.0005 BTC to generate 200 BTC. As I had already demonstrated, this is absurd. At the present moment the Bitcoin Network is not generating more than an average of 372 transactions per block.
Well let's just throwing this out there.
VisaNet authorizes, clears and settles an average of 150 million transactions per day in 200 countries and territories.
~104,000 transactions/second
Isn't one of the points of BTC to replace these companies? (Remember this is just Visa, you can imagine how many transactions happen across all of these merchants and physical dollar transactions)
The minimum fee would be lowered at this point anyways because if BTC was adopted this widespread, the price per BTC would be much much higher.
No, it is not the point and it never was. Did you even read the paper released by Satoshi Nakamoto? The Bitcoin protocol was created to serve as alternative method to transfer monetary value without rely on a central authority to validate the transactions.
You are comparing apples and oranges.
By the way, widespread adoption of the Bitcoin Network do not means the price of BTC against fiat currency will rise. As number of users of the Bitcoin Network has no direct correlation with the volume of transactions, the number of users of the Bitcoin Network has also no direct correlation with the price of BTC against fiat currencies.
Bargraphics, bought a dozen of SHA-256 hash generators from KnCminer and is clueless about the Bitcoin Network structure...