|
robix
|
 |
October 29, 2013, 03:05:13 PM |
|
anyone has a meter for his Jupiter, only ?
seems like higher electricity consumption, but I can't tell exactly as I have several other devices connected to my one
+80 Watts at the wall. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you want to be a moderator, report many posts with accuracy. You will be noticed.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FiatKiller
|
|
October 29, 2013, 03:05:26 PM
Last edit: October 29, 2013, 03:31:26 PM by FiatKiller |
|
Installed 9.8 FM. So far hashrate is a record high and HW errors are a record low BUT WU dropped by 300. Not sure if this is better or not. Too early to say. Running a bit warmer also.  |
|
|
|
Crypto_Cumbrian
Member
 Offline
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
|
|
October 29, 2013, 03:08:35 PM |
|
Jupiter Wall Stats.
738 Watts to 747.4 Watts
76.18 Kw/h
248.8 v
2.9-3.0 A
|
|
|
|
|
ASIC-K
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Hell?
|
|
October 29, 2013, 03:12:52 PM |
|
steady at 145ghs mercury. very very low hw errors. most stable and fastest performance yet.
|
|
|
|
|
edgar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 29, 2013, 03:13:33 PM
Last edit: October 29, 2013, 03:33:05 PM by edgar |
|
seen twice now - when upgrading, clock resets to 01.01.2000
when it refreshes to todays date and time - Avg. HR & WU both drop to zero & cgminer shows avg HR as 1.683Mh/s
Restarting the PSU after date/time refresh seems to sort it
Now its stabilizing around 570 Gh/s
WU has risen from 7700 to 7986
582W with 100% cores enabled
so far so good
|
|
|
|
|
realtime
Member
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
|
|
October 29, 2013, 03:14:24 PM |
|
Quick update 0.97 - 500-508GH/s for all 3 Jupiter (with the Cgminer updates applied) 0.98 - 560-570GH/s for all 3  |
|
|
|
|
|
Ytterbium
|
|
October 29, 2013, 03:14:43 PM |
|
Just upgraded. I'm getting about a 1-1.5% increase in hashrate, but my unit was at the top of the performance range anyway, 280 for a Saturn, equivalent to 560 for a Jupiter. Now I'm getting 282-283.
|
|
|
|
Turdit
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
October 29, 2013, 03:18:30 PM |
|
This is the ONE. Have 2 jupiters. One used to hash at 534 with HW+R 3.2% and the other at 544 with HW+R 2.8%. Now both of them stabled at 569 with HW+R at 1.3% and 1.5%. Wattage is indeed higher from 472 and 482 to 537 and 539W. I have 4 cores off on both machine. Now I am waiting to see the 3 hours average increase on Eligius before congratulating KNC. |
|
|
|
|
Altomesi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
October 29, 2013, 03:24:18 PM |
|
Mercury upgraded from .97 (138GH/s) to .98 after 2 hours (141GH/s). Temps are 1-2 degrees hotter but nothing alarming. Seems like they are moving in the right direction with this one for sure! Couldn't be more pleased with KNC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
rolling
|
|
October 29, 2013, 03:25:02 PM |
|
Jupiter upgrade from .97 to .98.
Watts at the wall increase from 597 at the wall to 674 at the wall.
Performance increased from ~545 GH/s to ~565 GH/s.
Hardware errors decreased from 4.7% to 1.2%.
No real change in temps.
Great upgrade!
|
|
|
|
|
Rampion
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018
|
|
October 29, 2013, 03:27:19 PM |
|
OMG my Jupiters are flying with 0.98, the ones that struggled to reach 500GH/s at the pool are now well above 550GH/s after aprox. 30 minutes
|
|
|
|
handytxg
Member
Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
|
|
October 29, 2013, 03:27:32 PM |
|
My ASIC run better with casing, but the temp is quite high with casing on.
Is 70C Safe for my ASIC?
Thank You
|
|
|
|
|
|
FiatKiller
|
|
October 29, 2013, 03:32:50 PM |
|
My ASIC run better with casing, but the temp is quite high with casing on.
Is 70C Safe for my ASIC?
Thank You
Probably - 105 is upper limit |
|
|
|
|
soapmodem
|
|
October 29, 2013, 03:33:26 PM |
|
Been doing some testing and still torn between 0.97 and 0.98.. need some advice.
All else aside.. I have a higher hashrate in 0.98, but WU is lower by about 250 compared to 0.97. I always believed the two to be directly correlated, but that doesn't appear to be the case here.
Which is more important in the long-term for overall earnings, hashrate or WU?
|
|
|
|
|
|
sbfree
|
|
October 29, 2013, 03:35:13 PM |
|
.98 Have only been running it 10 Minutes, def. improvement compared to any other first 10 minutes, especially HW error rate.....temps look good.
Will report back in a few....Now I have a Saturn at its full potential. Thanks KNC and Ckolivas.....if this continues, ckolivas deserves a btc token of our appreciation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FiatKiller
|
|
October 29, 2013, 03:36:05 PM |
|
Please post any changes in WU, that is really all that matters because that is what we are paid for.
|
|
|
|
sickpig
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1008
|
|
October 29, 2013, 03:36:40 PM |
|
Been doing some testing and still torn between 0.97 and 0.98.. need some advice.
All else aside.. I have a higher hashrate in 0.98, but WU is lower by about 250 compared to 0.97. I always believed the two to be directly correlated, but that doesn't appear to be the case here.
Which is more important in the long-term for overall earnings, hashrate or WU?
Hashrate at the pool. |
Bitcoin is a participatory system which ought to respect the right of self determinism of all of its users - Gregory Maxwell.
|
|
|
Tigggger
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1098
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 29, 2013, 03:39:19 PM |
|
Please post any changes in WU, that is really all that matters because that is what we are paid for.
WU previously included HW errors, so a drop doesn't automatically mean worse. |
|
|
|
|
sbfree
|
|
October 29, 2013, 03:42:53 PM |
|
wow, also just noticed that after around 115 Million submitted shares I can finally say I am official and found a BLOCK for the BTC community. I was starting to feel left out....1 less on the bucket list.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CYPER
|
|
October 29, 2013, 03:43:03 PM |
|
Does anyone know if my miners have been collected/shipped today or yesterday?  |
|
|
|
|
|
