Phoenix1969
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
LIR DEV
|
 |
November 15, 2013, 06:17:09 PM |
|
this firmware blows. back to 98.1 beta....
It hasn't ran 5 minutes...how can you make that assumption? although I like the beta best so far as well... but need to give this a chance...lol trust me, 5 minutes is all i need. hw errors way higher, lots of rejected etc. ok... Your machines..... But I must say that if you'd been reading & keeping up with this thread (which I think you have), You should know that some dies need the chip to warm up before they activate... I too noticed the new FW started out a bit slower, but is now ramping up to speed that they are back up to temp.... 5 or 10 mins isn't nearly enough to make such a judgement imho.. But if it doesn't pan out... I'll be the first third to say so....lol and go back to 0.98.1 beta as well....  I'm at least going to give it a few hours.... before going back... but not before trying enablecores, and trying again.... also... remember to clear browser cache |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The network tries to produce one block per 10 minutes. It does this by automatically adjusting how difficult it is to produce blocks.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
ASIC-K
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Hell?
|
|
November 15, 2013, 06:24:23 PM |
|
this firmware blows. back to 98.1 beta....
It hasn't ran 5 minutes...how can you make that assumption? although I like the beta best so far as well... but need to give this a chance...lol trust me, 5 minutes is all i need. hw errors way higher, lots of rejected etc. ok... Your machines..... But I must say that if you'd been reading & keeping up with this thread (which I think you have), You should know that some dies need the chip to warm up before they activate... I too noticed the new FW started out a bit slower, but is now ramping up to speed that they are back up to temp.... 5 or 10 mins isn't nearly enough to make such a judgement imho.. But if it doesn't pan out... I'll be the first third to say so....lol and go back to 0.98.1 beta as well.... I'm at least going to give it a few hours.... before going back... but not before trying enablecores, and trying again.... also... remember to clear browser cache yeah the die warm up stuff doesn't make a difference to my machine. mine is very firmware dependent. every other firmware other than beta, i was getting 7 percent hw error and 3 percent rejected. beta i get 1.5 and .3 percent. my machine is running at optimum so yeah not much improving what is already perfect. |
|
|
|
|
Phoenix1969
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
LIR DEV
|
|
November 15, 2013, 06:27:08 PM |
|
this firmware blows. back to 98.1 beta....
It hasn't ran 5 minutes...how can you make that assumption? although I like the beta best so far as well... but need to give this a chance...lol trust me, 5 minutes is all i need. hw errors way higher, lots of rejected etc. ok... Your machines..... But I must say that if you'd been reading & keeping up with this thread (which I think you have), You should know that some dies need the chip to warm up before they activate... I too noticed the new FW started out a bit slower, but is now ramping up to speed that they are back up to temp.... 5 or 10 mins isn't nearly enough to make such a judgement imho.. But if it doesn't pan out... I'll be the first third to say so....lol and go back to 0.98.1 beta as well.... I'm at least going to give it a few hours.... before going back... but not before trying enablecores, and trying again.... also... remember to clear browser cache yeah the die warm up stuff doesn't make a difference to my machine. mine is very firmware dependent. every other firmware other than beta, i was getting 7 percent hw error and 3 percent rejected. beta i get 1.5 and .3 percent. my machine is running at optimum so yeah not much improving what is already perfect. I think whenever the "Tuning Suite" comes out, you will be a happy camper then...  |
|
|
|
soy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1013
|
|
November 15, 2013, 06:31:03 PM
Last edit: November 15, 2013, 08:55:27 PM by soy |
|
Cheers bro, but so you know they're on top of shiz i will post a pic of what i.m currently surrounded by in two secs.   WELL DONE SIR!!! We can still complain, but as a former BFL customer, you guys are still at the top of my list! I wish you a restful weekend!!!  My hair 45 years ago. Correction, 40 years ago. I suspect he would test in the top percentile for sonar skills, hearing acuity.
|
|
|
|
|
ASIC-K
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Hell?
|
|
November 15, 2013, 06:32:30 PM |
|
this firmware blows. back to 98.1 beta....
It hasn't ran 5 minutes...how can you make that assumption? although I like the beta best so far as well... but need to give this a chance...lol trust me, 5 minutes is all i need. hw errors way higher, lots of rejected etc. ok... Your machines..... But I must say that if you'd been reading & keeping up with this thread (which I think you have), You should know that some dies need the chip to warm up before they activate... I too noticed the new FW started out a bit slower, but is now ramping up to speed that they are back up to temp.... 5 or 10 mins isn't nearly enough to make such a judgement imho.. But if it doesn't pan out... I'll be the first third to say so....lol and go back to 0.98.1 beta as well.... I'm at least going to give it a few hours.... before going back... but not before trying enablecores, and trying again.... also... remember to clear browser cache yeah the die warm up stuff doesn't make a difference to my machine. mine is very firmware dependent. every other firmware other than beta, i was getting 7 percent hw error and 3 percent rejected. beta i get 1.5 and .3 percent. my machine is running at optimum so yeah not much improving what is already perfect. I think whenever the "Tuning Suite" comes out, you will be a happy camper then... i don't know....i feel like i shouldn't mess with it... this tuning software seems like it will push already sketchy hardware beyond the limit. pop some capacitors, burn some stuff. lol i also wish november hardware was compatible with october stuff.....that would make too much sense though. lol |
|
|
|
|
Phoenix1969
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
LIR DEV
|
|
November 15, 2013, 06:33:34 PM |
|
this fw seems to enable/disable cores with greater frequency... cool
|
|
|
|
|
joeventura
|
|
November 15, 2013, 06:34:23 PM |
|
I just noticed that my module order has gone from 'paid' to 'in progess' That's gotta be a good sign... ME TOO YAY! |
|
|
|
|
ASIC-K
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Hell?
|
|
November 15, 2013, 06:34:51 PM |
|
I just noticed that my module order has gone from 'paid' to 'in progess' That's gotta be a good sign... ME TOO YAY! ME TOO! wait.....no mine says cancelled..... |
|
|
|
|
soy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1013
|
|
November 15, 2013, 06:40:08 PM |
|
why the hell choose any brand for a psu, any good psu will do
i personally buy anything with good stats corsair, ocz, antec you just need to check how the psu is build and how much they actually can deliver on the lanes they have
I have my small antec quattro here which delivers 6 rails with each capable of feeding 30 amp max and 170 max on the 3.3=5 volts rail.
This psu has one major drawback however because it has no power on/off switch.
But in general this monster has no had no problem feeding my 4 gpu system at all.
It got a robot psu switch and i am very happy with that solution
My question is what is going to happen with the upgrade modules are they now also on hold
And what does this it mean for the delivery of the upgrade modules effectively
As i read that it seems the building of the november orders miners seem to go first and as i understood it the upgrade modules are being send when the orders are finished on the miners.
Would that mean another month of waiting or ?
I have posted alot of questions towards knc but the time it takes to get an answer is insane long, i think the communication towards the community has to pick up some pace.
Its easy for them to prevent many emails and phone calls if they communicate onto the forums.
but as of yet on non of the actual communcations i see any of the knc people actually post at all besides the initial posts from sam cole.
Its so simple to add some information when you are going to sell a product, so people do not NEED to ask whats included
I do not wanna see a post from some forum member and to be honest alot of them are on my ignore list.
I want to see relevant information which make us clear what is going on.
Everytime they post something instant many questions pop up which should not be needed if the info was more clear towards us customers.
Again this is not a rant but a real concern, knc would have less a problem with people calling and sending emails if the info was not all the time in crypto language.
I took almost 3 weeks to get an answer from knc and what was said as a answer was not even an answer at all on my questions
Mark my words....... a six rail psu will not work! Use single rail only! Guessing but you might have to find a way to tie the grounds together if it doesn't work out of the box. I was surprised when I found that the 12v and ground was not common with the 12v and ground on the controller/BBB even tho there is the ribbon cable. That's within the machine. I had tried just bringing 12v from the module power to the 4 pin molex along with 5v and ground from a BBB wall wart - you see the assumption the ground as common via the ribbon. Sure wasn't. Now if your supply has separate grounds for the separate rails you could find the module not communicating as it doesn't have common ground. |
|
|
|
|
|
Tehfiend
|
|
November 15, 2013, 06:40:41 PM |
|
this firmware blows. back to 98.1 beta....
It hasn't ran 5 minutes...how can you make that assumption? although I like the beta best so far as well... but need to give this a chance...lol trust me, 5 minutes is all i need. hw errors way higher, lots of rejected etc. ok... Your machines..... But I must say that if you'd been reading & keeping up with this thread (which I think you have), You should know that some dies need the chip to warm up before they activate... I too noticed the new FW started out a bit slower, but is now ramping up to speed that they are back up to temp.... 5 or 10 mins isn't nearly enough to make such a judgement imho.. But if it doesn't pan out... I'll be the first third to say so....lol and go back to 0.98.1 beta as well.... I'm at least going to give it a few hours.... before going back... but not before trying enablecores, and trying again.... also... remember to clear browser cache After warming up, new firmware is holding steady at 565GH/s up from 550... |
|
|
|
|
Phoenix1969
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
LIR DEV
|
|
November 15, 2013, 06:47:39 PM |
|
this firmware blows. back to 98.1 beta....
It hasn't ran 5 minutes...how can you make that assumption? although I like the beta best so far as well... but need to give this a chance...lol trust me, 5 minutes is all i need. hw errors way higher, lots of rejected etc. ok... Your machines..... But I must say that if you'd been reading & keeping up with this thread (which I think you have), You should know that some dies need the chip to warm up before they activate... I too noticed the new FW started out a bit slower, but is now ramping up to speed that they are back up to temp.... 5 or 10 mins isn't nearly enough to make such a judgement imho.. But if it doesn't pan out... I'll be the first third to say so....lol and go back to 0.98.1 beta as well.... I'm at least going to give it a few hours.... before going back... but not before trying enablecores, and trying again.... also... remember to clear browser cache After warming up, new firmware is holding steady at 565GH/s up from 550... Mine seems to be improving slightly too! (across 3 machines) time will tell... but lookin' good so far... |
|
|
|
|
ElGabo
|
|
November 15, 2013, 06:51:16 PM |
|
I'm stucked at 570. What a mess.... |
" I'm waiting for my punishment, I know it's on my way
So cut, cut, cut me up and fuck, fuck, fuck me up"
|
|
|
elasticband
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
Nighty Night Don't Let The Trolls Bite Nom Nom Nom
|
|
November 15, 2013, 06:57:49 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phoenix1969
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
LIR DEV
|
|
November 15, 2013, 07:15:04 PM |
|
Elgabo & ElasticBand.... OMG! Sweeeeeeeet!
|
|
|
|
|
ElGabo
|
|
November 15, 2013, 07:21:07 PM |
|
Sorry Phoenix, I was lying. It dropped to 569. LOL But I had a continous 568 before. So not much difference |
" I'm waiting for my punishment, I know it's on my way
So cut, cut, cut me up and fuck, fuck, fuck me up"
|
|
|
btc_uzr
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
let's have some fun
|
|
November 15, 2013, 07:21:20 PM |
|
 wow...fastest close to 600GH/s..slowest still over 550 *edit: I'm not getting more than 540 with WU ~7500, but after seeing those results I'll be more patient and wait another 20minutes How long did it take to climb above 550 ?
|
..and Thou shalt spread the coin in the name of cryptography for eternity
|
|
|
|
|
btc_uzr
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
let's have some fun
|
|
November 15, 2013, 07:34:43 PM |
|
|
..and Thou shalt spread the coin in the name of cryptography for eternity
|
|
|
|
The Avenger
|
|
November 15, 2013, 07:36:41 PM |
|
So the biggest outstanding issue, as far as I can see, if the die0 issues. It is for me. Partially addressed in 98.1, but still far from a satisfactory solution.
11 days after the last firmware release, knc release a new firmware today that does nothing to address the biggest outstanding issue - die0 problems.
Is this it then knc? Run out of ideas? You aren't going to bother with a fix for the die0 issues for customers? Too busy making money on new orders and fire-sale of ex-RMA boards to take care of current customers?
Then you need to make an announcement saying that. With a promise that anyone who RMA's bad die0 boards will get a new 140GH+ replacement - no quibbles. And stop this BS criminal practice of sending back faulty boards if they can jointly hash over 450GH, which is what you seem to be doing. This is only fair, considering how much most people with die0 issues have lost now.
Who the fuck paid for faulty boards? I didn't, but that's what I got. Where is my solution?? Where is the firmware that addresses the biggest outstanding issue your customers have knc?
Get one of your shills representatives over to this forum to address customer concerns and start coming up with solutions for people who gave you the money to exist.
|
"I am not The Avenger"
1AthxGvreWbkmtTXed6EQfjXMXXdSG7dD6
|
|
|
|
fractal02
|
|
November 15, 2013, 07:37:10 PM |
|
Yes i like it but MobaXterm is way better, it's a real Swiss knife, try it you don't regret (SysAdmin inside  ) |
|
|
|
|
|
