Bitcoin Forum
December 17, 2018, 01:57:36 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.0 [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 [77] 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 ... 298 »
  Print  
Author Topic: EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner  (Read 2144117 times)
bensam1231
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1011


View Profile
January 25, 2017, 03:29:48 PM
 #1521

I have never believed the story that ewbf has copied someone or other miners, I'm sure that if he wants he can improve his miner without help from others.

I don't think anything will ever be proven, but correlations and inferences are your friend bro. EWBFs speed increases closely matched EQM to the T and now that EQM doesn't exist anymore there aren't any more speed increases, which is super suspicious. The last speed upgrade was right on par with the small speed upgrade EQM left before going open source. EWBF has offered no speed increases over EQM... ever, besides mining outside their service. The one time EWBF released first EQM was offering preview versions to their clients and I'm sure it got leaked as it was the same speed increase EQM offered a couple days later.

This isn't uncommon outside of cryptos or from the chinese who are great at ripping things off, you can believe what you want as always though.

I respect any opinion.
But, my first version was faster than their. then i start improve platform (miner code not solver). After a couple of day they make his miner faster, of cource i stop my work and start solver optimization to achieve more speed. And then this simply start to be a race, untill they not "finish" this race. Now we are close to hardware limits, here each a little step is incredibly complicated. Technically ~10% of improvements is still possibly, but algorithm not allow make this. This "hardware limits" is a memory speed and latency and at this moment they not allow gain more speed. Of course, the full story longer, but I hope that I have replied to this accusation.
Thank you for attention

Only version that was faster was .3b and that lasted a couple days before being replaced. As I mentioned, when they released it they had a pre-release version they were distributing to their VIPs I'm sure got leaked (I found a leaked copy so it wasn't that hard). EQM definitely released before EWBF with their first versions back in Nov.

Yup I understand you have to do rewrites time and again as you can't keep optimizing. It's definitely too much of a coincidence that your rewrites and speed increases closely matched theirs down to a couple %.

As far as speed increases go... pretty sure everyone would rather have more speed over features to further separate ourselves from AMD. You as a developer also make more the more speed we have.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, I have always respected that.  It does seem though that this is just an attack by 1 on another when no evidence is presented or the other side is making a claim.  I think it should be dropped here.  People benefit from speeds, he may charge a dev fee and we all have that right to use it or not.  If someone creates something and wants to own it, they should create it in the right way that it cant be taken (not making any accusations here).

I don't really expect much from the average miner, you're no exception. 3/4 of what you said doesn't even make sense nor has any relation to what we were talking about.

Besam is like this.. he always was. Let nicehash buy the miners and devs he always said and wrote to devs posting a miner for equhash..then he complained after they bought djezo code that their miner is not open.
Even tho my argument earlier was it will be like this (closed source and miner stick to their pool) he said he doesn't care just to cry then the very next moment.

In 99% of cases we can ignore his posts..also this stupid accusation since EWBF is much faster than EQM was since version 0.0.6 EWBF performed much better than anything what nicehash throw out.

Maybe he has some sort schizophrenia never able to reflect and realize what he wrote and arguing about one minute ago. Looks like this.

And we're two for two. There is no entry level for mining. How I make money tree?!!? I'm just going to assume what both of you said would make sense in your original language.

I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
1545011856
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1545011856

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1545011856
Reply with quote  #2

1545011856
Report to moderator
1545011856
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1545011856

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1545011856
Reply with quote  #2

1545011856
Report to moderator
1545011856
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1545011856

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1545011856
Reply with quote  #2

1545011856
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1545011856
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1545011856

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1545011856
Reply with quote  #2

1545011856
Report to moderator
1545011856
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1545011856

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1545011856
Reply with quote  #2

1545011856
Report to moderator
1545011856
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1545011856

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1545011856
Reply with quote  #2

1545011856
Report to moderator
defrozen
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 25, 2017, 03:31:11 PM
 #1522

hi! I have 1060. I have 225 Sol / 265 in boost. what could be wrong?
bughatti
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 25, 2017, 03:59:29 PM
 #1523

I have never believed the story that ewbf has copied someone or other miners, I'm sure that if he wants he can improve his miner without help from others.

I don't think anything will ever be proven, but correlations and inferences are your friend bro. EWBFs speed increases closely matched EQM to the T and now that EQM doesn't exist anymore there aren't any more speed increases, which is super suspicious. The last speed upgrade was right on par with the small speed upgrade EQM left before going open source. EWBF has offered no speed increases over EQM... ever, besides mining outside their service. The one time EWBF released first EQM was offering preview versions to their clients and I'm sure it got leaked as it was the same speed increase EQM offered a couple days later.

This isn't uncommon outside of cryptos or from the chinese who are great at ripping things off, you can believe what you want as always though.

I respect any opinion.
But, my first version was faster than their. then i start improve platform (miner code not solver). After a couple of day they make his miner faster, of cource i stop my work and start solver optimization to achieve more speed. And then this simply start to be a race, untill they not "finish" this race. Now we are close to hardware limits, here each a little step is incredibly complicated. Technically ~10% of improvements is still possibly, but algorithm not allow make this. This "hardware limits" is a memory speed and latency and at this moment they not allow gain more speed. Of course, the full story longer, but I hope that I have replied to this accusation.
Thank you for attention

Only version that was faster was .3b and that lasted a couple days before being replaced. As I mentioned, when they released it they had a pre-release version they were distributing to their VIPs I'm sure got leaked (I found a leaked copy so it wasn't that hard). EQM definitely released before EWBF with their first versions back in Nov.

Yup I understand you have to do rewrites time and again as you can't keep optimizing. It's definitely too much of a coincidence that your rewrites and speed increases closely matched theirs down to a couple %.

As far as speed increases go... pretty sure everyone would rather have more speed over features to further separate ourselves from AMD. You as a developer also make more the more speed we have.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, I have always respected that.  It does seem though that this is just an attack by 1 on another when no evidence is presented or the other side is making a claim.  I think it should be dropped here.  People benefit from speeds, he may charge a dev fee and we all have that right to use it or not.  If someone creates something and wants to own it, they should create it in the right way that it cant be taken (not making any accusations here).


I don't really expect much from the average miner, you're no exception. 3/4 of what you said doesn't even make sense nor has any relation to what we were talking


It's actually pretty simple, most 8th graders could understand that you are making accusations and your story behind it.  If you didn't have a concern for us "average miners" then why did you post it on here, pretty childish.  No need to troll, if you have a legal concern do something legal about it.
bensam1231
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1011


View Profile
January 25, 2017, 05:35:53 PM
 #1524

I have never believed the story that ewbf has copied someone or other miners, I'm sure that if he wants he can improve his miner without help from others.

I don't think anything will ever be proven, but correlations and inferences are your friend bro. EWBFs speed increases closely matched EQM to the T and now that EQM doesn't exist anymore there aren't any more speed increases, which is super suspicious. The last speed upgrade was right on par with the small speed upgrade EQM left before going open source. EWBF has offered no speed increases over EQM... ever, besides mining outside their service. The one time EWBF released first EQM was offering preview versions to their clients and I'm sure it got leaked as it was the same speed increase EQM offered a couple days later.

This isn't uncommon outside of cryptos or from the chinese who are great at ripping things off, you can believe what you want as always though.

I respect any opinion.
But, my first version was faster than their. then i start improve platform (miner code not solver). After a couple of day they make his miner faster, of cource i stop my work and start solver optimization to achieve more speed. And then this simply start to be a race, untill they not "finish" this race. Now we are close to hardware limits, here each a little step is incredibly complicated. Technically ~10% of improvements is still possibly, but algorithm not allow make this. This "hardware limits" is a memory speed and latency and at this moment they not allow gain more speed. Of course, the full story longer, but I hope that I have replied to this accusation.
Thank you for attention

Only version that was faster was .3b and that lasted a couple days before being replaced. As I mentioned, when they released it they had a pre-release version they were distributing to their VIPs I'm sure got leaked (I found a leaked copy so it wasn't that hard). EQM definitely released before EWBF with their first versions back in Nov.

Yup I understand you have to do rewrites time and again as you can't keep optimizing. It's definitely too much of a coincidence that your rewrites and speed increases closely matched theirs down to a couple %.

As far as speed increases go... pretty sure everyone would rather have more speed over features to further separate ourselves from AMD. You as a developer also make more the more speed we have.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, I have always respected that.  It does seem though that this is just an attack by 1 on another when no evidence is presented or the other side is making a claim.  I think it should be dropped here.  People benefit from speeds, he may charge a dev fee and we all have that right to use it or not.  If someone creates something and wants to own it, they should create it in the right way that it cant be taken (not making any accusations here).


I don't really expect much from the average miner, you're no exception. 3/4 of what you said doesn't even make sense nor has any relation to what we were talking


It's actually pretty simple, most 8th graders could understand that you are making accusations and your story behind it.  If you didn't have a concern for us "average miners" then why did you post it on here, pretty childish.  No need to troll, if you have a legal concern do something legal about it.

It has nothing to do with legality, everything to do with reputation. People will continue using EWBFs miner and side with whoever gives them the most money, regardless of evidence. Even if the code was copied verbatim, it wouldn't matter to most people. However people should know when something is copied.

If you've been around the forums you should get the drift that copying other peoples work is frowned upon... Nothing childish about pointing out when someone copies someone elses work, especially when someone else dumps a lot of time, money, and effort into what they create. You're a dumbass.

"...and your story behind it."

Yup struggle to make a point. Next time at least make the effort to finish your line of thought before hitting period. If you think I randomly made up EWBFs and EQMs release dates in addition to improvements in their miners, you can easily check both threads. It's so easy even a 8th grader could understand it... hue hue hue. -_-

I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
sublimus
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 240
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 25, 2017, 07:42:27 PM
 #1525

I have never believed the story that ewbf has copied someone or other miners, I'm sure that if he wants he can improve his miner without help from others.

I don't think anything will ever be proven, but correlations and inferences are your friend bro. EWBFs speed increases closely matched EQM to the T and now that EQM doesn't exist anymore there aren't any more speed increases, which is super suspicious. The last speed upgrade was right on par with the small speed upgrade EQM left before going open source. EWBF has offered no speed increases over EQM... ever, besides mining outside their service. The one time EWBF released first EQM was offering preview versions to their clients and I'm sure it got leaked as it was the same speed increase EQM offered a couple days later.

This isn't uncommon outside of cryptos or from the chinese who are great at ripping things off, you can believe what you want as always though.

I respect any opinion.
But, my first version was faster than their. then i start improve platform (miner code not solver). After a couple of day they make his miner faster, of cource i stop my work and start solver optimization to achieve more speed. And then this simply start to be a race, untill they not "finish" this race. Now we are close to hardware limits, here each a little step is incredibly complicated. Technically ~10% of improvements is still possibly, but algorithm not allow make this. This "hardware limits" is a memory speed and latency and at this moment they not allow gain more speed. Of course, the full story longer, but I hope that I have replied to this accusation.
Thank you for attention

Only version that was faster was .3b and that lasted a couple days before being replaced. As I mentioned, when they released it they had a pre-release version they were distributing to their VIPs I'm sure got leaked (I found a leaked copy so it wasn't that hard). EQM definitely released before EWBF with their first versions back in Nov.

Yup I understand you have to do rewrites time and again as you can't keep optimizing. It's definitely too much of a coincidence that your rewrites and speed increases closely matched theirs down to a couple %.

As far as speed increases go... pretty sure everyone would rather have more speed over features to further separate ourselves from AMD. You as a developer also make more the more speed we have.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, I have always respected that.  It does seem though that this is just an attack by 1 on another when no evidence is presented or the other side is making a claim.  I think it should be dropped here.  People benefit from speeds, he may charge a dev fee and we all have that right to use it or not.  If someone creates something and wants to own it, they should create it in the right way that it cant be taken (not making any accusations here).


I don't really expect much from the average miner, you're no exception. 3/4 of what you said doesn't even make sense nor has any relation to what we were talking


It's actually pretty simple, most 8th graders could understand that you are making accusations and your story behind it.  If you didn't have a concern for us "average miners" then why did you post it on here, pretty childish.  No need to troll, if you have a legal concern do something legal about it.

It has nothing to do with legality, everything to do with reputation. People will continue using EWBFs miner and side with whoever gives them the most money, regardless of evidence. Even if the code was copied verbatim, it wouldn't matter to most people. However people should know when something is copied.

If you've been around the forums you should get the drift that copying other peoples work is frowned upon... Nothing childish about pointing out when someone copies someone elses work, especially when someone else dumps a lot of time, money, and effort into what they create. You're a dumbass.

"...and your story behind it."

Yup struggle to make a point. Next time at least make the effort to finish your line of thought before hitting period. If you think I randomly made up EWBFs and EQMs release dates in addition to improvements in their miners, you can easily check both threads. It's so easy even a 8th grader could understand it... hue hue hue. -_-

Where is the moderator?
This a tech thread.
Pls start your own whining thread.

sublimus
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 240
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 25, 2017, 07:45:01 PM
 #1526

hi! I have 1060. I have 225 Sol / 265 in boost. what could be wrong?

How much do you get from your 1060 with other miners?

anorganix
Copper Member
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 258



View Profile
January 25, 2017, 07:52:14 PM
 #1527

hi! I have 1060. I have 225 Sol / 265 in boost. what could be wrong?

How much do you get from your 1060 with other miners?

I've already posted this before, but on average you should see 285-295 sol/sec @ 90W.

Settings:
  • Power Limit: 75
  • Core: +185
  • Memory: + 550

LUX æterna
defrozen
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 25, 2017, 08:26:28 PM
 #1528

i don't try other miners yet. now AVG 250(((
EWBF_
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 198
Merit: 158


View Profile
January 25, 2017, 08:29:01 PM
 #1529

i don't try other miners yet. now AVG 250(((
Hello! Which version of miner do you use. and if it last version which version of solver?
thephill97
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 25, 2017, 08:40:02 PM
 #1530

coinmine and suprnova are fine.
bensam1231
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1011


View Profile
January 25, 2017, 08:53:21 PM
 #1531

I have never believed the story that ewbf has copied someone or other miners, I'm sure that if he wants he can improve his miner without help from others.

I don't think anything will ever be proven, but correlations and inferences are your friend bro. EWBFs speed increases closely matched EQM to the T and now that EQM doesn't exist anymore there aren't any more speed increases, which is super suspicious. The last speed upgrade was right on par with the small speed upgrade EQM left before going open source. EWBF has offered no speed increases over EQM... ever, besides mining outside their service. The one time EWBF released first EQM was offering preview versions to their clients and I'm sure it got leaked as it was the same speed increase EQM offered a couple days later.

This isn't uncommon outside of cryptos or from the chinese who are great at ripping things off, you can believe what you want as always though.

I respect any opinion.
But, my first version was faster than their. then i start improve platform (miner code not solver). After a couple of day they make his miner faster, of cource i stop my work and start solver optimization to achieve more speed. And then this simply start to be a race, untill they not "finish" this race. Now we are close to hardware limits, here each a little step is incredibly complicated. Technically ~10% of improvements is still possibly, but algorithm not allow make this. This "hardware limits" is a memory speed and latency and at this moment they not allow gain more speed. Of course, the full story longer, but I hope that I have replied to this accusation.
Thank you for attention

Only version that was faster was .3b and that lasted a couple days before being replaced. As I mentioned, when they released it they had a pre-release version they were distributing to their VIPs I'm sure got leaked (I found a leaked copy so it wasn't that hard). EQM definitely released before EWBF with their first versions back in Nov.

Yup I understand you have to do rewrites time and again as you can't keep optimizing. It's definitely too much of a coincidence that your rewrites and speed increases closely matched theirs down to a couple %.

As far as speed increases go... pretty sure everyone would rather have more speed over features to further separate ourselves from AMD. You as a developer also make more the more speed we have.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, I have always respected that.  It does seem though that this is just an attack by 1 on another when no evidence is presented or the other side is making a claim.  I think it should be dropped here.  People benefit from speeds, he may charge a dev fee and we all have that right to use it or not.  If someone creates something and wants to own it, they should create it in the right way that it cant be taken (not making any accusations here).


I don't really expect much from the average miner, you're no exception. 3/4 of what you said doesn't even make sense nor has any relation to what we were talking


It's actually pretty simple, most 8th graders could understand that you are making accusations and your story behind it.  If you didn't have a concern for us "average miners" then why did you post it on here, pretty childish.  No need to troll, if you have a legal concern do something legal about it.

It has nothing to do with legality, everything to do with reputation. People will continue using EWBFs miner and side with whoever gives them the most money, regardless of evidence. Even if the code was copied verbatim, it wouldn't matter to most people. However people should know when something is copied.

If you've been around the forums you should get the drift that copying other peoples work is frowned upon... Nothing childish about pointing out when someone copies someone elses work, especially when someone else dumps a lot of time, money, and effort into what they create. You're a dumbass.

"...and your story behind it."

Yup struggle to make a point. Next time at least make the effort to finish your line of thought before hitting period. If you think I randomly made up EWBFs and EQMs release dates in addition to improvements in their miners, you can easily check both threads. It's so easy even a 8th grader could understand it... hue hue hue. -_-

Where is the moderator?
This a tech thread.
Pls start your own whining thread.

This is BCT. Thread includes information on where the miner came from and contributions. Wink

I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
defrozen
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 25, 2017, 09:12:23 PM
 #1532

i don't try other miners yet. now AVG 250(((
Hello! Which version of miner do you use. and if it last version which version of solver?
use 0.2.0b miner
EWBF_
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 198
Merit: 158


View Profile
January 25, 2017, 09:17:55 PM
 #1533

i don't try other miners yet. now AVG 250(((
Hello! Which version of miner do you use. and if it last version which version of solver?
use 0.2.0b miner

Try options --solver 0, --solver 1 or --solver 2
defrozen
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 25, 2017, 09:20:52 PM
 #1534

hi! I have 1060. I have 225 Sol / 265 in boost. what could be wrong?

How much do you get from your 1060 with other miners?

I've already posted this before, but on average you should see 285-295 sol/sec @ 90W.

Settings:
  • Power Limit: 75
  • Core: +185
  • Memory: + 550

look! 1060 base frequency is 1500 MHz, but under heavy load, the graphics card itself changes the frequency at 1860 (boost). +175 MHz should be beyond 1860?
defrozen
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 25, 2017, 09:28:38 PM
 #1535

i don't try other miners yet. now AVG 250(((
Hello! Which version of miner do you use. and if it last version which version of solver?
use 0.2.0b miner

Try options --solver 0, --solver 1 or --solver 2
solver 0 best - 225 sol/s
solver 1 - 210 sol/s
solver 2 - 200 sol/s
dtawom
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 20
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 25, 2017, 10:25:03 PM
 #1536

hi! I have 1060. I have 225 Sol / 265 in boost. what could be wrong?
Have you upgraded to windows 10 anniversary edition?  I was not getting the speeds others were out of my 1060 and 1070, after upgrading to anniversary edition I was on par with everyone else.
jthor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 268
Merit: 250



View Profile
January 25, 2017, 11:01:25 PM
 #1537

This is a great miner for me, nice and stable especially the latest one 0.2.0b. Really worth much to keep my zec at the wallet for a long term since i only mine it using my son's pc  Smiley



Great work dev, thank you.
sublimus
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 240
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 26, 2017, 12:19:17 AM
 #1538

I have never believed the story that ewbf has copied someone or other miners, I'm sure that if he wants he can improve his miner without help from others.

I don't think anything will ever be proven, but correlations and inferences are your friend bro. EWBFs speed increases closely matched EQM to the T and now that EQM doesn't exist anymore there aren't any more speed increases, which is super suspicious. The last speed upgrade was right on par with the small speed upgrade EQM left before going open source. EWBF has offered no speed increases over EQM... ever, besides mining outside their service. The one time EWBF released first EQM was offering preview versions to their clients and I'm sure it got leaked as it was the same speed increase EQM offered a couple days later.

This isn't uncommon outside of cryptos or from the chinese who are great at ripping things off, you can believe what you want as always though.

I respect any opinion.
But, my first version was faster than their. then i start improve platform (miner code not solver). After a couple of day they make his miner faster, of cource i stop my work and start solver optimization to achieve more speed. And then this simply start to be a race, untill they not "finish" this race. Now we are close to hardware limits, here each a little step is incredibly complicated. Technically ~10% of improvements is still possibly, but algorithm not allow make this. This "hardware limits" is a memory speed and latency and at this moment they not allow gain more speed. Of course, the full story longer, but I hope that I have replied to this accusation.
Thank you for attention

Only version that was faster was .3b and that lasted a couple days before being replaced. As I mentioned, when they released it they had a pre-release version they were distributing to their VIPs I'm sure got leaked (I found a leaked copy so it wasn't that hard). EQM definitely released before EWBF with their first versions back in Nov.

Yup I understand you have to do rewrites time and again as you can't keep optimizing. It's definitely too much of a coincidence that your rewrites and speed increases closely matched theirs down to a couple %.

As far as speed increases go... pretty sure everyone would rather have more speed over features to further separate ourselves from AMD. You as a developer also make more the more speed we have.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, I have always respected that.  It does seem though that this is just an attack by 1 on another when no evidence is presented or the other side is making a claim.  I think it should be dropped here.  People benefit from speeds, he may charge a dev fee and we all have that right to use it or not.  If someone creates something and wants to own it, they should create it in the right way that it cant be taken (not making any accusations here).


I don't really expect much from the average miner, you're no exception. 3/4 of what you said doesn't even make sense nor has any relation to what we were talking


It's actually pretty simple, most 8th graders could understand that you are making accusations and your story behind it.  If you didn't have a concern for us "average miners" then why did you post it on here, pretty childish.  No need to troll, if you have a legal concern do something legal about it.

It has nothing to do with legality, everything to do with reputation. People will continue using EWBFs miner and side with whoever gives them the most money, regardless of evidence. Even if the code was copied verbatim, it wouldn't matter to most people. However people should know when something is copied.

If you've been around the forums you should get the drift that copying other peoples work is frowned upon... Nothing childish about pointing out when someone copies someone elses work, especially when someone else dumps a lot of time, money, and effort into what they create. You're a dumbass.

"...and your story behind it."

Yup struggle to make a point. Next time at least make the effort to finish your line of thought before hitting period. If you think I randomly made up EWBFs and EQMs release dates in addition to improvements in their miners, you can easily check both threads. It's so easy even a 8th grader could understand it... hue hue hue. -_-

Where is the moderator?
This a tech thread.
Pls start your own whining thread.

This is BCT. Thread includes information on where the miner came from and contributions. Wink


We dont f----ing care where it comes from...ok?

addin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 26, 2017, 09:28:22 AM
 #1539

my gtx 1060 3gb is 290 on last driver and oc
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100

CryptoLearner


View Profile
January 26, 2017, 10:14:55 AM
 #1540

my gtx 1060 3gb is 290 on last driver and oc

Nice addin, care to share

gpu model  & brand
OC ?
TDP ?
nvidia-smi watts ?

Thanks Smiley

BTC - 1B1RBYkzxiTmrbnFe2vj8EaNPSYftW8186 for tips Wink
Pages: « 1 ... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 [77] 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 ... 298 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!