EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner

[m1n1ngP4d4w4n]

Are you aware this is a CUDA miner ? EWBF work only with NVIDIA cards, if you want AMD you have to use claymore GPU miner

[1714038705]

1714038705

[1714038705]

1714038705

[1714038705]

1714038705

[Heguli97]

Good job with the new 0.1.0 version. I'm Getting 300 Sol/s with my GTX 970 G1 Gaming. Stability has also improved by quite a lot, I could even run my GPU with a Core of 1600Mhz for a few hours before becoming unstable.

[lokko]

nice work. ewbf !!!!

[gegstore]

Good job with the new 0.1.0 version. I'm Getting 300 Sol/s with my GTX 970 G1 Gaming. Stability has also improved by quite a lot, I could even run my GPU with a Core of 1600Mhz for a few hours before becoming unstable.

but 300 sol in stock???

[KL0nLutiy]

What is the hash rate on gtx 1060 3G on last version? Does it affect on speed 3G and 6G card version?

[oldisoft]

Are you aware this is a CUDA miner ? EWBF work only with NVIDIA cards, if you want AMD you have to use claymore GPU miner

I see... Thank you for help!

Have a nice weekend!

[Heguli97]

Good job with the new 0.1.0 version. I'm Getting 300 Sol/s with my GTX 970 G1 Gaming. Stability has also improved by quite a lot, I could even run my GPU with a Core of 1600Mhz for a few hours before becoming unstable.

but 300 sol in stock???

That's With an Overclock. 

[induktor]

Finally working also with the GTX 970 G1 Gaming, migrated lubuntu 14.04 to cuda8

GTX 970 G1 GAMING, stock clock 120W TPL: 239 Sol/s version 010b, cpu usage is a lot lower than the 1070.

[m1n1ngP4d4w4n]

Finally working also with the GTX 970 G1 Gaming, migrated lubuntu 14.04 to cuda8

GTX 970 G1 GAMING, stock clock 120W TPL: 239 Sol/s version 010b, cpu usage is a low lower than with the 1070.

good work

[induktor]

What is the hash rate on gtx 1060 3G on last version? Does it affect on speed 3G and 6G card version?

I just tested a (borrowed) Gigabyte GTX 1060 G1 Gaming 6GB version 1 (no coil whine btw)

at 80W TPL i get 262 Sol/s Stock (no OC)
at 90W TPL i get 248 Sol/s Stock (WTF?? more power consumption less hashrate? ,crazy!)

i cannot test below 80W TPL because my driver is a little old, but i wouldn't be surprise that at 70W TPL the card will perform better and hash more

What i didn't like it's the temperature, 64 C (core) at 80W TPL, WHAT??, My GTX 1070 G1 Gaming barely gets over 57 C at 90W TPL.
Also the backplane is so hot that you can barely touch it.

I don't have a 3GB version but it should be 10% less hashrate, not less. (because of less cuda cores).

Test done on Lubuntu 1404, Cuda 8, driver 367.44.

[induktor]

Finally working also with the GTX 970 G1 Gaming, migrated lubuntu 14.04 to cuda8

GTX 970 G1 GAMING, stock clock 120W TPL: 239 Sol/s version 010b, cpu usage is a low lower than with the 1070.

good work

Thanks 
make work zcash was not difficult, EWBF here make it easy for us, but be able to convince genoil's ethereum miner to compile, or at least link, with cuda 8 and a maxwell card, that was difficult hehe.

so far i haven't seen proof that mining ZEC is better than ETH (with nvidia cards)

calculators says that at 5800 Sol/s you should get 0.56 ZEC per day, but i am not even making 0.3 ZEC per day so.... i will give it one more day before change pool or go back to ETH 

[jiggytom]

Finally working also with the GTX 970 G1 Gaming, migrated lubuntu 14.04 to cuda8

GTX 970 G1 GAMING, stock clock 120W TPL: 239 Sol/s version 010b, cpu usage is a low lower than with the 1070.

good work

Thanks 
make work zcash was not difficult, EWBF here make it easy for us, but be able to convince genoil's ethereum miner to compile, or at least link, with cuda 8 and a maxwell card, that was difficult hehe.

so far i haven't seen proof that mining ZEC is better than ETH (with nvidia cards)

calculators says that at 5800 Sol/s you should get 0.56 ZEC per day, but i am not even making 0.3 ZEC per day so.... i will give it one more day before change pool or go back to ETH 

which pool? I'm on flypool and get very close what I am calculated to.

[m1n1ngP4d4w4n]

Finally working also with the GTX 970 G1 Gaming, migrated lubuntu 14.04 to cuda8

GTX 970 G1 GAMING, stock clock 120W TPL: 239 Sol/s version 010b, cpu usage is a low lower than with the 1070.

good work

Thanks  
make work zcash was not difficult, EWBF here make it easy for us, but be able to convince genoil's ethereum miner to compile, or at least link, with cuda 8 and a maxwell card, that was difficult hehe.

so far i haven't seen proof that mining ZEC is better than ETH (with nvidia cards)

calculators says that at 5800 Sol/s you should get 0.56 ZEC per day, but i am not even making 0.3 ZEC per day so.... i will give it one more day before change pool or go back to ETH  

try suprnova (my new prefered pool) or flypool, you should get what you mine

[induktor]

try suprnova or flypool, you should get what you mine

thanks, i might try suprnova, it has been around for ages and has very good rep.

I'm on miningpoolhub right now
maybe it's variance, i will give it another day then will decide

[BeneQ]

Zec miner 0.1.0b.

EVGA GTX 1080  FTW  2100MHz/5500MHz  511 Sol/s

[_ZET_]

500 H/s from single graphic card hitted!

Looking for that for a while.

Anyway Claymore has updated his miner, up to 6-8%. In fact it's time to update EWBF.

[skillface]

Getting 500 sol/s on my Gigabyte GTX 1080 (Windforce OC) with 0.1.0b @ 75% power limit, +175mhz Core and +400mhz Mem (~1847mhz Core and 10800mhz Mem)

Running at maximum power (which is 108%) only increases hashrate to ~520 sol/s but the heat generated is ridiculous, to the point where I need to keep the fan running at 100% to keep the card at or below 60C and you could feel the heat in the room, while running at 75% allows me to keep the card at or below 60C easily at around 60% fan).

0.0.8b only got me around 470 sol/s and 0.0.9b pretty much ran the same as 0.0.8b, so pretty happy so far with 0.1.0b.

[wll1rah]

500 H/s from single graphic card hitted!

Looking for that for a while.

Anyway Claymore has updated his miner, up to 6-8%. In fact it's time to update EWBF.

Our cards are  already faster than AMD at less power, but I'll always take more speed
- improved speed for most cards, up to 8% (depends on card model). About 340H/s on stock 390X, 255H/s on stock RX480, 320H/Fury x on stock Nano.

[Amph]

500 H/s from single graphic card hitted!

Looking for that for a while.

Anyway Claymore has updated his miner, up to 6-8%. In fact it's time to update EWBF.

Our cards are  already faster than AMD at less power, but I'll always take more speed
- improved speed for most cards, up to 8% (depends on card model). About 340H/s on stock 390X, 255H/s on stock RX480, 320H/Fury x on stock Nano.

seems that the 1060 is the new king here, $200 for 300 sol at 70watt, not even the 1070 is better

[giagge]

My gtx 1070 EWBF 0.1.0b :

Power Limit : 50%
GPU clock: +150
MEM clock: +550

385 sol for 95 watt ( price 420 € in my country )

Nvidia much better than Amd

.