Bitcoin Forum
February 25, 2018, 01:05:59 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 [64] 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 ... 150 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Gateless Gate Sharp 1.2.17: Fastest AMD NeoScrypt Miner, ETH dual, CryptoNight  (Read 181622 times)
joepizuro
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 11, 2017, 05:35:35 AM
 #1261

Just got to use this with my r9 280x and love it!! Getting about 200 sol/s.
Old 280x cards with claymore's miner(and I think with optiminer's miner too) can show more better results - up to 325 sol/s with modded timings.
It's true. With 12.5 Claymore I have on my 280X 330-335 Sol/s with modded bios, overclocked memory and downvolted core.
Optiminer gives only 275-300 Sol/s.

For anyone still following this I did endup finishing with 1075core/1500mem and undervolting to 1.021v (Stock for 1030core is 1.2v). Averaging 320sol/s. Intensity 6!!! Intensity 7 requires more than 3gb ram on card. I cant complain about temp being 66c with fans on 30%. My r9 has Samsung memory and no matter what mem clock I tried the sol/s decreased. Cheers... maybe next I'll try excavator.
This card is PowerColor TurboDuo R9 280X OC
1519563959
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1519563959

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1519563959
Reply with quote  #2

1519563959
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1519563959
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1519563959

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1519563959
Reply with quote  #2

1519563959
Report to moderator
1519563959
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1519563959

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1519563959
Reply with quote  #2

1519563959
Report to moderator
75db
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 02, 2017, 03:04:03 PM
 #1262

hi guyz.
will 0.1.3-pre6b ggate work with RX 5xx?
Ethorsen
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 06, 2017, 03:04:35 PM
 #1263

hi guyz.
will 0.1.3-pre6b ggate work with RX 5xx?

This does work on RX 5xx (mining XMR at least)  You just need to find the right settings to optimize your cards.
Branko
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 105


Automated Crypto Trading


View Profile
September 12, 2017, 01:51:59 PM
 #1264

hi guyz.
will 0.1.3-pre6b ggate work with RX 5xx?

Its actually the best for XMR I think, but could not make it mine ethereum and other coins on same algo

cvsea
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 90
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 12, 2017, 03:07:58 PM
 #1265

XMR - Is anybody experiencing a high reject rate (1% - 3% per card) and stratum connection disruptions on nicehash with this miner?
FFI2013
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 568
Merit: 500


Gambling Investment Fund


View Profile
September 14, 2017, 12:49:28 PM
 #1266

XMR - Is anybody experiencing a high reject rate (1% - 3% per card) and stratum connection disruptions on nicehash with this miner?

I just tried switching from miningpoolhub to nicehash and having the same problem I even tried the nicehash sgminer-gm fork and the same thing it has to be nicehash


GIFcoin




.
Gambling
Investment Fund
  Invest in a working business  .......        ✔︎ 
  80% of the net profits are shared .....      ✔︎ 
  Profit share token     ✔︎ 
Follow us & check out the .      whitepaper     .
.
Website    Announcement    Twitter    Telegram    Facebook
Ursul0
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 253


View Profile
September 16, 2017, 10:37:01 PM
 #1267

XMR - Is anybody experiencing a high reject rate (1% - 3% per card) and stratum connection disruptions on nicehash with this miner?

I just tried switching from miningpoolhub to nicehash and having the same problem I even tried the nicehash sgminer-gm fork and the same thing it has to be nicehash

yep cryptonight seems to be the most sensitive in regard to rejects and hw errors.
all my polaris cards are steady at 1.5-2% rejects, here's the sample:




EDIT: latest sgminer-gm apparently produces slightly better rates (about 2% for me) than GG

EDIT2: you guys should try sgminer-gm 5.5.5 also does 0 rejects on the same pool where GG was having ~2% - not really, it actually makes more rejects, but maybe your cards would do better than mine...

           ▀██▄ ▄██▀
            ▐█████▌
           ▄███▀███▄
         ▄████▄  ▀███▄
       ▄███▀ ▀██▄  ▀███▄
     ▄███▀  ▄█████▄  ▀███▄
   ▄███▀  ▄███▀ ▀███▄  ▀███▄
  ███▀  ▄████▌   ▐████▄  ▀███
 ███   ██▀  ██▄ ▄██  ▀██   ███
███   ███  ███   ███  ███   ███
███   ███   ███████   ███   ███
 ███   ███▄▄       ▄▄███   ███
  ███▄   ▀▀█████████▀▀   ▄███
   ▀████▄▄           ▄▄████▀
      ▀▀███████████████▀▀
DeepOnion
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
   Anonymity Guaranteed
   Anonymous and Untraceable
   Guard Your Privacy
      ▄▄██████████▄▄
    ▄███▀▀      ▀▀█▀   ▄▄
   ███▀              ▄███
  ███              ▄███▀   ▄▄
 ███▌  ▄▄▄▄      ▄███▀   ▄███
▐███  ██████   ▄███▀   ▄███▀
███▌ ███  ███▄███▀   ▄███▀
███▌ ███   ████▀   ▄███▀
███▌  ███   █▀   ▄███▀  ███
▐███   ███     ▄███▀   ███
 ███▌   ███  ▄███▀     ███
  ███    ██████▀      ███
   ███▄             ▄███
    ▀███▄▄       ▄▄███▀
      ▀▀███████████▀▀
cvsea
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 90
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 17, 2017, 08:29:53 PM
 #1268

XMR - Is anybody experiencing a high reject rate (1% - 3% per card) and stratum connection disruptions on nicehash with this miner?

I just tried switching from miningpoolhub to nicehash and having the same problem I even tried the nicehash sgminer-gm fork and the same thing it has to be nicehash

yep cryptonight seems to be the most sensitive in regard to rejects and hw errors.
all my polaris cards are steady at 1.5-2% rejects, here's the sample:




EDIT: latest sgminer-gm apparently produces slightly better rates (about 2% for me) than GG

EDIT2: you guys should try sgminer-gm 5.5.5 also does 0 rejects on the same pool where GG was having ~2% - not really, it actually makes more rejects, but maybe your cards would do better than mine...

Seems like the rejects are normal as nicehash doesn't accept stales (i've seen some go through though).
A solution would be 
Code:
"no-submit-stale": true
to rule out any problems with the rig.
Bolchevickos
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 23, 2017, 05:52:02 PM
 #1269

Hi, Would you know where I can get information on how to read all the interface data. I see two hashrates close to each other, a HW, a WU... is there some more info somewhere?? many tks
Ursul0
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 253


View Profile
September 25, 2017, 04:49:07 AM
 #1270


Seems like the rejects are normal as nicehash doesn't accept stales (i've seen some go through though).
A solution would be 
Code:
"no-submit-stale": true
to rule out any problems with the rig.

I'm not talking about nicehash.
There're very high rejects rates (3-5%) on SGminer-GM running both XMR and SUMO on different pools. And slightly lower (about 3%) on GG.
There is a major update to Claymore's cryptonight miner coming - so we'll see how it differs soon...

           ▀██▄ ▄██▀
            ▐█████▌
           ▄███▀███▄
         ▄████▄  ▀███▄
       ▄███▀ ▀██▄  ▀███▄
     ▄███▀  ▄█████▄  ▀███▄
   ▄███▀  ▄███▀ ▀███▄  ▀███▄
  ███▀  ▄████▌   ▐████▄  ▀███
 ███   ██▀  ██▄ ▄██  ▀██   ███
███   ███  ███   ███  ███   ███
███   ███   ███████   ███   ███
 ███   ███▄▄       ▄▄███   ███
  ███▄   ▀▀█████████▀▀   ▄███
   ▀████▄▄           ▄▄████▀
      ▀▀███████████████▀▀
DeepOnion
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
   Anonymity Guaranteed
   Anonymous and Untraceable
   Guard Your Privacy
      ▄▄██████████▄▄
    ▄███▀▀      ▀▀█▀   ▄▄
   ███▀              ▄███
  ███              ▄███▀   ▄▄
 ███▌  ▄▄▄▄      ▄███▀   ▄███
▐███  ██████   ▄███▀   ▄███▀
███▌ ███  ███▄███▀   ▄███▀
███▌ ███   ████▀   ▄███▀
███▌  ███   █▀   ▄███▀  ███
▐███   ███     ▄███▀   ███
 ███▌   ███  ▄███▀     ███
  ███    ██████▀      ███
   ███▄             ▄███
    ▀███▄▄       ▄▄███▀
      ▀▀███████████▀▀
sundownz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 502


View Profile WWW
September 27, 2017, 02:52:06 PM
 #1271

Is ~500 kh/S pretty decent for an RX480 @ stock speed on this miner on NeoScrypt ?

Thanks!

- Jacob Fuller
- President, Sundown Audio LLC
- GPUs Mining : 226 (Updated 2/23/18) // CPUs Mining : 133 (Updated 2/23/18)
zawawa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 251


Miner Developer


View Profile
October 10, 2017, 11:11:39 AM
 #1272

Is ~500 kh/S pretty decent for an RX480 @ stock speed on this miner on NeoScrypt ?

Thanks!

No, you should get at least 700 KH/s.

Gateless Gate Sharp, an open-source ETH/XMR miner: http://bit.ly/2rJ2x4V
BTC: 1BHwDWVerUTiKxhHPf2ubqKKiBMiKQGomZ
UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 251


View Profile
October 10, 2017, 02:54:21 PM
 #1273

zawawa, can't you say how in gg (or sgminer) force to not initialize 1 of cards? F.e. if i have 2 cards even with option --devices miner initializes both of cards and load kernels for them but on 1 cards just stay OFF.
I want to mine though gg miner 1 algo on 1st card and 2nd algo via other miner on 2nd card. But gg initialize 2nd card and reduce speed on other miner.
zawawa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 251


Miner Developer


View Profile
October 10, 2017, 04:48:03 PM
 #1274

zawawa, can't you say how in gg (or sgminer) force to not initialize 1 of cards? F.e. if i have 2 cards even with option --devices miner initializes both of cards and load kernels for them but on 1 cards just stay OFF.
I want to mine though gg miner 1 algo on 1st card and 2nd algo via other miner on 2nd card. But gg initialize 2nd card and reduce speed on other miner.

I don't think that's possible with GG or sgminer.
I am rewriting GG in C# now, and I will make sure to fix the problem.

Gateless Gate Sharp, an open-source ETH/XMR miner: http://bit.ly/2rJ2x4V
BTC: 1BHwDWVerUTiKxhHPf2ubqKKiBMiKQGomZ
panosarp
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 10, 2017, 05:59:03 PM
 #1275

Hello everyone.
I am having a problem with GG and cryptonight mining.
On every pool that has variable difficulty, eventually your miner will be assigned a high diff and if GG will not find a share for 90 seconds
it will disconnect, upon reconnect diff will be at whatever starting diff port you have chosen and the whole cycle repeats.
Overall hashing speed takes a hit from all the disconnects.
I think the following code is responsible for the disconnect (gatelessgate.c):

Code:
        /* The protocol specifies that notify messages should be sent
         * every minute so if we fail to receive any for 90 seconds we
         * assume the connection has been dropped and treat this pool
         * as dead */
        if (!sock_full(pool) && (sel_ret = select(pool->sock + 1, &rd, NULL, NULL, &timeout)) < 1) {
            applog(LOG_DEBUG, "Stratum select failed on %s with value %d", get_pool_name(pool), sel_ret);
            s = NULL;
        } else
            s = recv_line(pool);

        if (!s) {
            applog(LOG_NOTICE, "Stratum connection to %s interrupted", get_pool_name(pool));
            pool->getfail_occasions++;
            total_go++;

And the  static initialization of the timeout a few lines above:

Code:
        timeout.tv_sec = 90;
        timeout.tv_usec = 0;

This disconnect does not occur on xmr_stak miners.

A workaround is setting a low enough fixed diff to ensure max share time < 90 sec, unfortunately most pools do not support fixed diff.

UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 251


View Profile
October 10, 2017, 08:05:08 PM
 #1276

zawawa, can't you say how in gg (or sgminer) force to not initialize 1 of cards? F.e. if i have 2 cards even with option --devices miner initializes both of cards and load kernels for them but on 1 cards just stay OFF.
I want to mine though gg miner 1 algo on 1st card and 2nd algo via other miner on 2nd card. But gg initialize 2nd card and reduce speed on other miner.

I don't think that's possible with GG or sgminer.
I am rewriting GG in C# now, and I will make sure to fix the problem.
Thanks! I'll wait. And some time ago you promised to add optimiztions for GCN1.0 cards...

Anyway, great work! Keep going...
dosermen
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 13, 2017, 04:44:16 PM
 #1277

GG in C#  .exe for windows Huh
FFI2013
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 568
Merit: 500


Gambling Investment Fund


View Profile
October 13, 2017, 05:16:57 PM
 #1278

zawawa, can't you say how in gg (or sgminer) force to not initialize 1 of cards? F.e. if i have 2 cards even with option --devices miner initializes both of cards and load kernels for them but on 1 cards just stay OFF.
I want to mine though gg miner 1 algo on 1st card and 2nd algo via other miner on 2nd card. But gg initialize 2nd card and reduce speed on other miner.

I don't think that's possible with GG or sgminer.
I am rewriting GG in C# now, and I will make sure to fix the problem.
great to see you back been using GG for xmr and getting better rates than Claymore also I tried  mining eth on miningpoolhub but the pool side is reporting half of my hashrate on all my miners it's weird GG is reporting the correct rate I don't know if it's something with their stratum


GIFcoin




.
Gambling
Investment Fund
  Invest in a working business  .......        ✔︎ 
  80% of the net profits are shared .....      ✔︎ 
  Profit share token     ✔︎ 
Follow us & check out the .      whitepaper     .
.
Website    Announcement    Twitter    Telegram    Facebook
zawawa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 251


Miner Developer


View Profile
October 16, 2017, 07:42:49 AM
 #1279

Just to be clear, the new version of GG is still under development.
I will reuse the original OpenCL kernels, but everything else will be rewritten from scratch.
The code base of sgminer is just so messy that I just do not want to deal with it any more.
I just want to keep the new GG clean, lean, and mean.
I will come back when I have a usable miner.

Gateless Gate Sharp, an open-source ETH/XMR miner: http://bit.ly/2rJ2x4V
BTC: 1BHwDWVerUTiKxhHPf2ubqKKiBMiKQGomZ
4ward
Member
**
Online Online

Activity: 134
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 16, 2017, 07:50:23 AM
 #1280

Just to be clear, the new version of GG is still under development.
I will reuse the original OpenCL kernels, but everything else will be rewritten from scratch.
The code base of sgminer is just so messy that I just do not want to deal with it any more.
I just want to keep the new GG clean, lean, and mean.
I will come back when I have a usable miner.

Just hope it wont be as buggy as excavator on AMD. I just couldn't get to work because of the phymem, just hang my pc every time

CoinLend - Earn interest on your Crypto (supports Poloniex, Bitfinex, Quoinie)
Pages: « 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 [64] 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 ... 150 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!