Bitcoin Forum
April 19, 2024, 07:31:02 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Do you want to see improvements in Ethash dual-mining with GGS?
I desperately need it. - 8 (15.1%)
It would be nice. - 12 (22.6%)
It's not worth it anymore. - 33 (62.3%)
Total Voters: 53

Pages: « 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 [55] 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 ... 197 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Gateless Gate Sharp 1.3.8: 30Mh/s (Ethash) on RX 480!  (Read 214332 times)
UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 253


View Profile
April 06, 2017, 02:09:42 AM
 #1081

Claymore made a choise in his miner and fee can be disabled via -nofee 1 option. Can you make in gg miner this choise too?

So, you're happy to use the result of his hard work, which is open source, but you begrudge him 1%? Do you mine solo just to avoid the 1% pool fee, too? Do you steal rolls of toilet paper out of public rest rooms, while you're at it?

At this moment I use Claymore miners - they are give more speed on my Tahiti and Pitcairn cards. I told about possibility to disable fee. Even Claymore make this possibility on his miners.
And you're right - I allready paying too much fees (pools, etc.) and I don't want to add another 1%.
1713511862
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713511862

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713511862
Reply with quote  #2

1713511862
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713511862
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713511862

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713511862
Reply with quote  #2

1713511862
Report to moderator
1713511862
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713511862

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713511862
Reply with quote  #2

1713511862
Report to moderator
1713511862
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713511862

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713511862
Reply with quote  #2

1713511862
Report to moderator
zzzzzzzzzz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 150
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 06, 2017, 02:39:07 AM
 #1082

Claymore made a choise in his miner and fee can be disabled via -nofee 1 option. Can you make in gg miner this choise too?

So, you're happy to use the result of his hard work, which is open source, but you begrudge him 1%? Do you mine solo just to avoid the 1% pool fee, too? Do you steal rolls of toilet paper out of public rest rooms, while you're at it?

At this moment I use Claymore miners - they are give more speed on my Tahiti and Pitcairn cards. I told about possibility to disable fee. Even Claymore make this possibility on his miners.
And you're right - I allready paying too much fees (pools, etc.) and I don't want to add another 1%.

OK, so you *do* realize that Claymore's -nofee option reduces the hash rate you get by a bit more than his devfee, right? He says so in his README.
xeridea
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 449
Merit: 251


View Profile WWW
April 06, 2017, 03:51:38 AM
 #1083

Claymore made a choise in his miner and fee can be disabled via -nofee 1 option. Can you make in gg miner this choise too?

So, you're happy to use the result of his hard work, which is open source, but you begrudge him 1%? Do you mine solo just to avoid the 1% pool fee, too? Do you steal rolls of toilet paper out of public rest rooms, while you're at it?

At this moment I use Claymore miners - they are give more speed on my Tahiti and Pitcairn cards. I told about possibility to disable fee. Even Claymore make this possibility on his miners.
And you're right - I allready paying too much fees (pools, etc.) and I don't want to add another 1%.
He clearly stated he added a VOLUNTARY fee, and you are whining for how to disable it?

Profitability over time charts for many GPUs - http://xeridea.us/charts

BTC:  bc1qr2xwjwfmjn43zhrlp6pn7vwdjrjnv5z0anhjhn LTC:  LXDm6sR4dkyqtEWfUbPumMnVEiUFQvxSbZ Eth:  0x44cCe2cf90C8FEE4C9e4338Ae7049913D4F6fC24
zawawa (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 304


Miner Developer


View Profile
April 06, 2017, 05:20:56 AM
 #1084

Hey, zawawa, we are looking for mining sw developers, full time job. If you are interested, let us know.

I really don't know what to say, but thanks for considering me for the position. I mean it.

Gateless Gate Sharp, an open-source ETH/XMR miner: http://bit.ly/2rJ2x4V
BTC: 1BHwDWVerUTiKxhHPf2ubqKKiBMiKQGomZ
zawawa (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 304


Miner Developer


View Profile
April 06, 2017, 05:26:53 AM
 #1085

I just tried out pre-6 on my Linux 4.10/AMDGPU-Pro 16.6 rig.
Looks like nobody added detection of AMDGPU-Pro to the autoconf, so I had to set
Code:
LDFLAGS="-L/opt/amdgpu-pro/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu"
for for configure.

The binary kernels seem to be loaded:
Code:
[21:06:17] Loaded binary image ./binary-kernel/ethash-newEllesmeregw192l8.bin
[21:06:17] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024
[21:06:17] Loaded binary image ./binary-kernel/ethash-newEllesmeregw192l8.bin
[21:06:17] Initialising kernel ethash-new.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024

However performance is slightly less than sgminer-gm 5.5.5 with my Rx 470 @1169/2100.  gg gives me ~29.0 vs 29.35 for sgminer-gm.  I also tried with the core clock unlocked, and get
~28.85.


It may be the case that the most recent optimization may not work for RX 470 due to timing issues.
I am out of country right now, but I brought an RX 470 with me.
Let me see what I can do with it.

Gateless Gate Sharp, an open-source ETH/XMR miner: http://bit.ly/2rJ2x4V
BTC: 1BHwDWVerUTiKxhHPf2ubqKKiBMiKQGomZ
zloyneo
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 40
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 06, 2017, 08:35:34 AM
 #1086

Your miner consumes more electricity! with each video card 10w
bytewise
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 06, 2017, 10:55:20 AM
Last edit: April 06, 2017, 12:20:23 PM by bytewise
 #1087

Hello zawawa,

I've been following this thread since your early ZEC mining goals, hoping that one day the titan that is Claymore would be beat (or at least matched considering his ZEC history) by an open source implementation. All of these bottom feeders asking for how to disable a voluntary mining fee without even looking finally got me to register and contribute.

Benchmarked gateless-0.1.3-pre6 against Claymore v8.1 and v9.0 and took power readings.

My system with 3 XFX RX480 runs at 117W idle. One of the cards won the bad ASIC quality lottery and runs at a much lower rate.

These numbers are at the wall usage on an 80 plus platinum efficiency EVGA 750P2 power supply:

483W mining v8.1
ETH - Total Speed: 86.514 Mh/s, Total Shares: 1, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
ETH: GPU0 29.697 Mh/s, GPU1 27.157 Mh/s, GPU2 29.659 Mh/s

483W mining v9.0
ETH - Total Speed: 86.282 Mh/s, Total Shares: 1, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
ETH: GPU0 29.612 Mh/s, GPU1 27.052 Mh/s, GPU2 29.618 Mh/s

504W mining gateless-0.1.3-pre6 1 thread xI 2304
[06:05:25] GPU0                | (5s):29.40M (avg):27.30Mh/s | A:4000000000 R:0 HW:2 WU:30.089/m
[06:05:25] GPU1                | (5s):27.11M (avg):25.27Mh/s | A:4000000000 R:0 HW:0 WU:23.524/m
[06:05:25] GPU2                | (5s):29.42M (avg):27.30Mh/s | A:8000000000 R:0 HW:3 WU:22.977/m

509W mining gateless-0.1.3-pre6 2 thread xI 4608
[06:13:33] GPU0                | (5s):29.69M (avg):26.50Mh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:7 WU:26.056/m
[06:13:33] GPU1                | (5s):27.32M (avg):24.91Mh/s | A:12000000000 R:0 HW:5 WU:21.564/m
[06:13:33] GPU2                | (5s):29.69M (avg):26.87Mh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:9 WU:23.360/m

Edit:
After 1hr 20mins:
GPU 0:                | 29.57M/29.46Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:165 WU:27.588/m xI:3204
GPU 1:                | 27.23M/27.15Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:116 WU:24.575/m xI:3204
GPU 2:                | 29.54M/29.43Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:125 WU:27.935/m xI:3204

About 5 HW errors every minute across 3 cards on xI 3204 with 1 gpu thread. They're all undervolted with custom straps so it could be my problem.

I'll keep it mining with you as 1% so you can hopefully keep moving forward. At only a few cents loss every 24hr compared to Claymore it's worth it to support a competitor who isn't afraid to release their code!
bytewise
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 06, 2017, 01:07:29 PM
 #1088

Not sure if this is common, but you may see less donated shares because of it:
[08:33:05] Stratum connection to ethermine.org interrupted
[08:33:06] Rejected untracked stratum share from ethermine.org
[08:33:09] Stratum connection to ethermine.org interrupted
[08:33:10] ethermine.org not responding!
[08:33:10] Switching to ethermine.org (donation)
[08:33:12] ethermine.org alive, testing stability
[08:34:20] ethermine.org stable for 60 seconds
[08:34:20] Switching to ethermine.org

I also think it would be best to move away from sgminer. It's great that it supports a ton of currencies, but you're going to end up burdened supporting this massive codebase that comes with a lot of quirks.

What mbevand did by moving all the sensitive code to C and using Python for communication was brilliant imo. It's simple, readable, and testable.

One last thing is that the Core folder may be more neat organizationally, but it also adds another level of complexity for the less technologically inclined (to put it nicely) users. Perhaps a separate project for each optimized coin, like Claymore's miners, with all the guts in the root folder would do you well.
lexele
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 190
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 06, 2017, 03:57:41 PM
 #1089

I too noticed connection pb with ethermine and devFee.

@Zawawa: there must be something not working well with devfee, because if you look at your adress on ethermine you can clearly see some people are/try mining but there's to few share's.
anatolikostis
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2026
Merit: 1005



View Profile
April 06, 2017, 07:30:26 PM
 #1090

Gigabyte RX480 (Hynix) custom timing-mode @1100/1970
claymore 9.0 - 29.05mh/s -asm 1 -dcri 6
zawawa pre6 - 27.60mh/s -Ix 4620 -g 1 +more power/+more system impact&freezes/there are memory HW (due to hwinfo output)
there is still a huge room for optimizations  Roll Eyes
zawawa (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 304


Miner Developer


View Profile
April 06, 2017, 07:36:55 PM
 #1091

Gigabyte RX480 (Hynix) custom timing-mode @1100/1970

I really have to emphasize somewhere that software/bios configurations for Claymore's DO NO TRANSFER to GG.
If you want to get the most out of GG, you have to customize the timing mode not for Claymore's but for GG.
Simple, no?

Gateless Gate Sharp, an open-source ETH/XMR miner: http://bit.ly/2rJ2x4V
BTC: 1BHwDWVerUTiKxhHPf2ubqKKiBMiKQGomZ
joaocha
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 254
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 06, 2017, 08:39:29 PM
 #1092

Gigabyte RX480 (Hynix) custom timing-mode @1100/1970
claymore 9.0 - 29.05mh/s -asm 1 -dcri 6
zawawa pre6 - 27.60mh/s -Ix 4620 -g 1 +more power/+more system impact&freezes/there are memory HW (due to hwinfo output)
there is still a huge room for optimizations  Roll Eyes

Aways use dual thread if you want to get the maximum of it, even claymore miner uses dual thread on Gpu
anatolikostis
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2026
Merit: 1005



View Profile
April 06, 2017, 09:32:26 PM
 #1093

Aways use dual thread if you want to get ...
unstable system with a lot of MemHWs - yes I know it  Grin
0,00 HW-rate of claymore vs 100,000 HW-rate of zawawa - which one should I prefer?
bytewise
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 06, 2017, 09:40:24 PM
 #1094

Gigabyte RX480 (Hynix) custom timing-mode @1100/1970
claymore 9.0 - 29.05mh/s -asm 1 -dcri 6
zawawa pre6 - 27.60mh/s -Ix 4620 -g 1 +more power/+more system impact&freezes/there are memory HW (due to hwinfo output)
there is still a huge room for optimizations  Roll Eyes

Try --gpu-threads 2 --xintensity 4608 . I got equivalent rates to Claymore with that setting. 4608 is a multiple of the amount of stream processors on an rx480. Not sure what 4620 could be a multiple of.
joaocha
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 254
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 06, 2017, 10:17:55 PM
 #1095

Gigabyte RX480 (Hynix) custom timing-mode @1100/1970
claymore 9.0 - 29.05mh/s -asm 1 -dcri 6
zawawa pre6 - 27.60mh/s -Ix 4620 -g 1 +more power/+more system impact&freezes/there are memory HW (due to hwinfo output)
there is still a huge room for optimizations  Roll Eyes

Try --gpu-threads 2 --xintensity 4608 . I got equivalent rates to Claymore with that setting. 4608 is a multiple of the amount of stream processors on an rx480. Not sure what 4620 could be a multiple of.
Xi dont have a huge impact on mining, use 256 , you get same hashrate and less hardware errors
UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 253


View Profile
April 06, 2017, 10:47:45 PM
 #1096

Oh, the fee realized through bat-files... I thought that the fee is hardcoded into miners code... I'm sorry for stupid questions about disabling the fee. Now I can disable it in any moment. But i proceed some time mining with fee. You work must be rewarded.
Thanks for your hard work.

P.S. Please add nicehash compatibility.
zawawa (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 304


Miner Developer


View Profile
April 07, 2017, 12:38:57 AM
 #1097

All the pool stability issues aside, I think the technical side of the new fee system is working.
The low numbers of valid shares and active computers are as expected.                                   .
I just need more people to mine with the fee on.
At the current pace, I would be making an impressive $3/month. LOL

https://ethermine.org/miners/91fa32e00b0f365d629fb625182a83fed61f0642/payouts

Gateless Gate Sharp, an open-source ETH/XMR miner: http://bit.ly/2rJ2x4V
BTC: 1BHwDWVerUTiKxhHPf2ubqKKiBMiKQGomZ
cryptominer420
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 450
Merit: 255


View Profile
April 07, 2017, 03:20:31 AM
 #1098

Going to do a 24 hr test with my full farm here shortly, Just finalizing the configs. Should throw about 30MH/s as dev fee.
Edit: Sending the command out now to switch to GG

   ╖   ╓╖╖                         ╖╖╖ ,
  ▒   ╢▒,@▒▒▒║ ╓╣╝║║*╢  ╢▒╣ ],`]░╢▒▒╖ ▒ ╥╢▒▒▒╢  @╝╢▒
  Ñ▒▒]▒▒` ]`╢║▒╣▒╢▒▒  ╢▒╝▒▒▒  ╢▒╜║▒▒▒╢▒╜  ╢╢║N
 ║╢   ▒▒╜ ║▒▒╢▒▒@@╢▒║  ╢▒╜ ▒ ╙▒▒,║░▒╣ ▒║ ╢▒▒╢▒▒▒»@╢@@╢╜



.















▬▬  A Miner Built Mining Platform  ▬▬[/url]
Powered by Our Mining Community













nimy
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 07, 2017, 04:55:40 AM
 #1099

All the pool stability issues aside, I think the technical side of the new fee system is working.
The low numbers of valid shares and active computers are as expected.                                   .
I just need more people to mine with the fee on.
At the current pace, I would be making an impressive $3/month. LOL

https://ethermine.org/miners/91fa32e00b0f365d629fb625182a83fed61f0642/payouts
Can i change to asia pool for the donation part? coz i'm from asia side..
zawawa (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 304


Miner Developer


View Profile
April 07, 2017, 04:58:15 AM
 #1100

Going to do a 24 hr test with my full farm here shortly, Just finalizing the configs. Should throw about 30MH/s as dev fee.
Edit: Sending the command out now to switch to GG

Looking pretty good so far. Thanks a lot!

Gateless Gate Sharp, an open-source ETH/XMR miner: http://bit.ly/2rJ2x4V
BTC: 1BHwDWVerUTiKxhHPf2ubqKKiBMiKQGomZ
Pages: « 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 [55] 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 ... 197 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!