Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2024, 07:59:34 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Network size (power) of Ethereum is 65.6% of Bitcoin!  (Read 558 times)
drhus (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 24, 2017, 12:36:35 PM
 #1

While network hashrate of BTC (8000 PH/s currently) about 10k of ETH (0.105 PH/s) and while you will spend about 4400000 GH/s to generate one BTC in a day, compared to 88 GH/s to generate 13.5ETH the equivalent of one BTC per day,

Is it safe to say will need to multiply ETH network hashrate by 50000 (the equivalent of 4400000/88) to be able to compare it with BTC network (size) hashpower? in another word if BTC network size in hashing power is 8000 PH/s then ETH network size using hashing power to compare should be 0.105 PH/s * 50000 = 5250! which means the Ethereum network size is 65.6% of Bitcoin network size?
1714766374
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714766374

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714766374
Reply with quote  #2

1714766374
Report to moderator
1714766374
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714766374

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714766374
Reply with quote  #2

1714766374
Report to moderator
1714766374
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714766374

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714766374
Reply with quote  #2

1714766374
Report to moderator
"There should not be any signed int. If you've found a signed int somewhere, please tell me (within the next 25 years please) and I'll change it to unsigned int." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714766374
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714766374

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714766374
Reply with quote  #2

1714766374
Report to moderator
1714766374
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714766374

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714766374
Reply with quote  #2

1714766374
Report to moderator
QuintLeo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030


View Profile
September 24, 2017, 04:26:49 PM
 #2

There is no point in comparing the hashrates - the algorithms used have a LOT different "amount and type of work needed to generate one hash" that makes such a comparison worthless.


I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
universalresonance
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 24, 2017, 05:14:48 PM
 #3

There is no point in comparing the hashrates - the algorithms used have a LOT different "amount and type of work needed to generate one hash" that makes such a comparison worthless.



Oh thanks , I was just kicking myself for not being able to understand anything OP posted lol. It's good to know it isn't helpful to know that (no sarcasm intended)
alani123
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2394
Merit: 1412


Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform


View Profile
September 24, 2017, 05:16:59 PM
 #4

OP here is confusing the algirithms. Ethereum's mining is running on Dagger Hashimoto while bitcoin runs on SHA256. Very different algorithms, with Dagger currently being efficient in GPUs while SHA256 has ASIC chips just for mining bitcoin.

..Stake.com..   ▄████████████████████████████████████▄
   ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄            ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██  ▄████▄
   ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██  ██████
   ██ ██████████ ██      ██ ██████████ ██   ▀██▀
   ██ ██      ██ ██████  ██ ██      ██ ██    ██
   ██ ██████  ██ █████  ███ ██████  ██ ████▄ ██
   ██ █████  ███ ████  ████ █████  ███ ████████
   ██ ████  ████ ██████████ ████  ████ ████▀
   ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██
   ██            ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀            ██ 
   ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀
  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███  ██  ██  ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
 ██████████████████████████████████████████
▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
█  ▄▀▄             █▀▀█▀▄▄
█  █▀█             █  ▐  ▐▌
█       ▄██▄       █  ▌  █
█     ▄██████▄     █  ▌ ▐▌
█    ██████████    █ ▐  █
█   ▐██████████▌   █ ▐ ▐▌
█    ▀▀██████▀▀    █ ▌ █
█     ▄▄▄██▄▄▄     █ ▌▐▌
█                  █▐ █
█                  █▐▐▌
█                  █▐█
▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄
▄█▀       ▐█▌       ▀█▄
██         ▐█▌         ██
████▄     ▄█████▄     ▄████
████████▄███████████▄████████
███▀    █████████████    ▀███
██       ███████████       ██
▀█▄       █████████       ▄█▀
▀█▄    ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄  ▄▄▄█▀
▀███████         ███████▀
▀█████▄       ▄█████▀
▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀
..PLAY NOW..
drhus (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 24, 2017, 10:32:13 PM
 #5

agree with you on all points, further, I'm trying to measure the size the network here! how would you compare Bitcoin network size to Ethereum network size (not node quantity) but collective computing power?

I understand the absolute hashrate can't be factored to compare as standalone by itself, and that why I hypothetically multiplied it on ETH 0.105 PH/s * 50000 = 5250! 50000 (the equivalent of 4400000/88) 4400000 GH/s needed to generate one BTC in SHA-256, compared to 88 GH/s to generate 13.5ETH the equivalent of one BTC per day in Ethash

The proposed model above is tentative of measuring the computing size/power of crypto network in comparison to other networks!
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!