nico12321
Member
 Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 16
|
 |
June 06, 2017, 02:05:56 PM |
|
SCAM AVOID! You will invest and they will trap you between two spots infinitely,do not lose your money to these tards.
You sold at a price of 2 Satoshi?  Scammy scam scam scam Do not worry, you can buy on 10 Satoshi  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to get the maximum amount of activity points possible, you just need to post once per day on average. Skipping days is OK as long as you maintain the average.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
captcha01
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
June 06, 2017, 02:13:30 PM |
|
Mooncoin is trading with the 3 famous cryptocurrencies |
|
|
|
|
nico12321
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 16
|
|
June 06, 2017, 02:16:40 PM |
|
Mooncoin is trading with the 3 famous cryptocurrencies Looking forward to a response from the support team YObit.net. There was an application for a Premium-placement. Now MOON has long been in line with the level of the Bittrex. |
|
|
|
|
agswinner
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1375
Merit: 1010
|
|
June 06, 2017, 02:54:32 PM |
|
Mooncoin is trading with the 3 famous cryptocurrencies Looking forward to a response from the support team YObit.net. There was an application for a Premium-placement. Now MOON has long been in line with the level of the Bittrex. Me too... About the new logo, i prefer the original in coinmktcap 😠 |
|
|
|
nico12321
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 16
|
|
June 06, 2017, 03:11:01 PM
Last edit: June 06, 2017, 03:26:14 PM by nico12321 |
|
Me too...
About the new logo, i prefer the original in coinmktcap 😠
Genuine great logos should be simple, look at Nike. Most of the Crypto-logos look like they were bought at a bazaar in the suburbs of Istanbul (I do not want to offend anyone ). We must drop the superfluous and leave the main thing. Do not be afraid of simple images. Often the designer adds extra details in order to convince the client that the client has something to pay for. But this is a mistake. One must have the impudence to offer simple things, not all can. And They can not, because they are not sure of themselves. |
|
|
|
|
luckyguy2807
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 266
Merit: 100
Crypto Enthusiast
|
|
June 06, 2017, 03:22:04 PM |
|
I think if we the coin will be settling at 5-6 satoshi, or support for the 5 it will be a great day.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mooncoin_Foundation (OP)
|
|
June 06, 2017, 03:37:41 PM
Last edit: June 06, 2017, 08:36:05 PM by mprep |
|
Not a large volume. The market will now buy much more. If you do some little research, you'll see there is no activity except someone sent 2450 Mooncoins to each of top addresses, that's why now in the Rich list all top addresses (even with coins which were not touched since 2014) indicate that last activity was today.
Of course, the new difficulty readjustment algo is priority, it goes without saying. As said, then it should have been added already. I have mentioned this for years already, as you know. As nice as web-wallet and the such are, I'll repeat: the heart of any crypto is its algo and it needs to work flawlessly as advertised (in case of Mooncoin: 90 sec. block-time). But as also said, good, that James has now set it on top of his list. You did suggest DigiShield as a new algo in the past and it was implemented by barrysty1e in the current wallet and works since March, 2017. However, the idea was not great. Current pauses between blocks happen due to DigiShield. We definitely need another algo, people agree. But it's not so easy to change the algo each time, because it requires a fork and a mandatory update of wallet. Anyway it's true that it's better to do a mandatory update than to leave a current algo which doesn't match a 90 sec block time. |
|
|
|
agswinner
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1375
Merit: 1010
|
|
June 06, 2017, 03:51:10 PM |
|
Not a large volume. The market will now buy much more. If you do some little research, you'll see there is no activity except someone sent 2450 Mooncoins to each of top addresses, that's why now in the Rich list all top addresses (even with coins which were not touched since 2014) indicate that last activity was today. Yes someone sent 2450 to each of top addresses, maybe a way to decipher the private key through public hash, but if you did not make outbound transfers you're safe 😀 |
|
|
|
|
Mooncoin_Foundation (OP)
|
|
June 06, 2017, 04:01:39 PM |
|
Don't forget that some top addresses with a lot of coins belong to 5 exchanges where MOON is listed currently (C-cex, Bleutrade, Nova, Coingather, Coinexchange),
top 2 addresses are unspendable, also 2 other smaller addresses with stolen coins,
if you hear rumours that any other address is unspendable, don't believe them, you can ask any independent expert who is able to read a Mooncoin code.
re: agswinner,
private keys are safe if they were generated in a safe way and if you keep them in a safe place and don't disclosure to anyone.
That's the fundamental thing behind crypto at all.
No matter how many coins someone sends to any of addresses.
|
|
|
|
nunkasi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
June 06, 2017, 04:03:07 PM |
|
about to jump on the moon train at 5 satoshis
good call?
|
|
|
|
|
finnovatie.nl
Member
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
|
|
June 06, 2017, 04:07:30 PM |
|
about to jump on the moon train at 5 satoshis
good call?
I'm still buying but who am i |
|
|
|
nunkasi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
June 06, 2017, 04:15:58 PM |
|
about to jump on the moon train at 5 satoshis
good call?
I'm still buying but who am i ok man is goed |
|
|
|
|
|
Mooncoin_Foundation (OP)
|
|
June 06, 2017, 04:19:58 PM
Last edit: June 06, 2017, 04:30:11 PM by Mooncoin_Foundation |
|
Mooncoin is an open source project, exchanges read the code, analyze the source before listing MOON just like before listing any coin to use it with no worry.
So even a dev who codes a wallet doesn't control decentralized things.
It's a community that decides. With no consensus, there is no network.
Make sure you understand the nature of decentralized open source projects before posting.
In a ponzi scheme the price is only rising, while newcomers pay to founders.
In a decentralized Mooncoin project a founder probably has less coins than you.
There was no premine and no crowdsale.
People have equal opportunities, but the market price varies, like a Bitcoin/Dogecoin/Digibyte price.
Someone who bought at 1 Sat sells at 5 Sat, someone who sold at 2 Sat, rebuys at 5 Sat (fomo as coinflow said),
someone sold at 6 Sat hoping to rebuy at 4-5 etc etc etc.
With a free market the price is a balance of supply and demand and there are lots of players currently at the Mooncoin market. The $1 million volume yesterday indicated that very well. The price can be very volatile, MOON is still an emerging market and no one is able to predict it, a price can go to 1 Sat and then to 30, or to 30 Sat and then to 1 Sat, or to 30 Sat and then to 50 Sat, now the price varies between 4 and 7.
|
|
|
|
nunkasi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
June 06, 2017, 04:30:20 PM |
|
Mooncoin is an open source project, exchange read the code, analyze the source before listing MOON just like any coin to use it with no worry.
So even a dev who codes a wallet doesn't control decentralized things.
It's a community that decides. With no consensus, there is no network.
Make sure you understand the nature of decentralized open source projects before posting.
In a ponzi scheme the price is only rising, while newcomers pay to founders.
In a decentralized Mooncoin project a founder probably has less coins than you.
There was no premine and no crowdsale.
People have equal opportunities, but the market price varies, like a Bitcoin or Dogecoin, or a Digibyte price.
Someone who bought at 1 Sat sells at 5 Sat, someone who sold at 2 Sat, rebuys at 5 Sat (fomo as coinflow said),
someone sold at 6 Sat hoping to rebuy at 4-5 etc etc etc.
With a free market the price is a balance of supply and demand and there are lots of players currently at the Mooncoin market. The $1 million volume yesterday indicated that very well. The price can be very volatile, MOON is still an emerging market and no one is able to predict it, a price can go to 1 Sat and then to 30, or to 30 Sat and then to 1 Sat, or to 30 Sat and then to 50 Sat, now the price varies between 4 and 7.
What is MOON's dev target per coin? Since you mentioned Digibyte, i know they have a target of $1-$10 , anything above that is bonus. What would a logical target be for MOON ? |
|
|
|
|
agswinner
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1375
Merit: 1010
|
|
June 06, 2017, 04:39:12 PM
Last edit: June 06, 2017, 08:36:36 PM by mprep |
|
Mooncoin is an open source project, exchanges read the code, analyze the source before listing MOON just like any coin to use it with no worry.
So even a dev who codes a wallet doesn't control decentralized things.
It's a community that decides. With no consensus, there is no network.
Make sure you understand the nature of decentralized open source projects before posting.
In a ponzi scheme the price is only rising, while newcomers pay to founders.
In a decentralized Mooncoin project a founder probably has less coins than you.
There was no premine and no crowdsale.
People have equal opportunities, but the market price varies, like a Bitcoin or Dogecoin, or a Digibyte price.
Someone who bought at 1 Sat sells at 5 Sat, someone who sold at 2 Sat, rebuys at 5 Sat (fomo as coinflow said),
someone sold at 6 Sat hoping to rebuy at 4-5 etc etc etc.
With a free market the price is a balance of supply and demand and there are lots of players currently at the Mooncoin market. The $1 million volume yesterday indicated that very well. The price can be very volatile, MOON is still an emerging market and no one is able to predict it, a price can go to 1 Sat and then to 30, or to 30 Sat and then to 1 Sat, or to 30 Sat and then to 50 Sat, now the price varies between 4 and 7.
And the depth at bleutrade now is 5,3 billions in bid vs 3,5 in ask price 
Mooncoin is an open source project, exchange read the code, analyze the source before listing MOON just like any coin to use it with no worry.
So even a dev who codes a wallet doesn't control decentralized things.
It's a community that decides. With no consensus, there is no network.
Make sure you understand the nature of decentralized open source projects before posting.
In a ponzi scheme the price is only rising, while newcomers pay to founders.
In a decentralized Mooncoin project a founder probably has less coins than you.
There was no premine and no crowdsale.
People have equal opportunities, but the market price varies, like a Bitcoin or Dogecoin, or a Digibyte price.
Someone who bought at 1 Sat sells at 5 Sat, someone who sold at 2 Sat, rebuys at 5 Sat (fomo as coinflow said),
someone sold at 6 Sat hoping to rebuy at 4-5 etc etc etc.
With a free market the price is a balance of supply and demand and there are lots of players currently at the Mooncoin market. The $1 million volume yesterday indicated that very well. The price can be very volatile, MOON is still an emerging market and no one is able to predict it, a price can go to 1 Sat and then to 30, or to 30 Sat and then to 1 Sat, or to 30 Sat and then to 50 Sat, now the price varies between 4 and 7.
What is MOON's dev target per coin? Since you mentioned Digibyte, i know they have a target of $1-$10 , anything above that is bonus. What would a logical target be for MOON ? I look Dogecoin Dogecoin comunity said this http://www.muchdogenews.com/not-being-a-marketer-but-mooncoin-is-like-what-dogecoin-was-3-years-back-can-someone-take-a-look-at-this-coin-and-tell-if-its-worth-it/MOON 5 sat vs Dogecoin 128 sat |
|
|
|
coinflow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 06, 2017, 04:47:25 PM |
|
Of course, the new difficulty readjustment algo is priority, it goes without saying. As said, then it should have been added already. I have mentioned this for years already, as you know. As nice as web-wallet and the such are, I'll repeat: the heart of any crypto is its algo and it needs to work flawlessly as advertised (in case of Mooncoin: 90 sec. block-time). But as also said, good, that James has now set it on top of his list. You did suggest DigiShield as a new algo in the past and it was implemented by barrysty1e in the current wallet and works since March, 2017. However, the idea was not great. Current pauses between blocks happen due to DigiShield. We definitely need another algo, you will agree with it. But it's not so easy to change the algo each time, because it requires a fork and a mandatory update of wallet. Anyway it's true that it's better to do a mandatory update than to leave a current algo which doesn't match a 90 sec block time. Only to make everything clearer for the gentle reader: Long ago I suggested using DigiShield, because the original dev deaconboogie talked about it, when he realized that the newly implemented KGW did not work well under all conditions. Back then DigiShield (invented by DigiByte-devs, btw., for those who don't know it, see https://www.reddit.com/r/Digibyte/comments/1yn6t1/digibyte_v_20_code_name_digishield/) seemed to be a better solution, but it is only to a small extent, as we all know now. With PoS surfacing more and more (RDD etc.) I suggested to switch over to it several times and we had serious discussions about that, as you know (which most probably led to the text about PoS vs. PoW in the first posting of this thread). Now - literally years later - we have the outdated DigiShield and we realize again, that PoS is most probably the better solution, because it is much easier to get a decentralized critical mass of users together, than with mining. It has drawbacks, for sure, but so has PoW, as we all can see. And we could also develop an improved PoS-algorithm, as I said before. Why would one try to explain how to mine over and over again? It is not that easy to set up a miner correctly, as one could think, especially if you are a newbie. Moreover mining a Scrypt-coin like Mooncoin without specialized ASIC will most probably never get you a coin, except you are extremely lucky, at least it is extremely unprofitable to waste GPU- or even CPU-energy on that, whereas with PoS everybody and their neighbor can contribute to the network stability easily, and you don't pull that much energy which always comes along with the pollution of the environment, if the electricity isn't produced from renewables). If coins like Stratis and RDD exist well with PoS (and for Ethereum PoS is planned too, after the Ice Age, let's see what happens, it's all a big experiment), then Moon could also do very well with it. We definitely need another algo, you will agree with it. But it's not so easy to change the algo each time, because it requires a fork and a mandatory update of wallet. That's why it would have been good to have PoS implemented already, instead of dealing with DigiShield when developing an updated wallet not in 2014, but in 2016. Times change and if there are better options, then one can use those, too. DigiShield was a better thing back in the days and deaconboogie thought about implementing it, but the time moved on. |
|
|
|
|
ma_da_o
|
|
June 06, 2017, 04:47:36 PM |
|
There's been good movements with this coin lately.
|
|
|
|
|
coinflow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 06, 2017, 04:54:43 PM |
|
Mooncoin is an open source project, exchange read the code, analyze the source before listing MOON just like any coin to use it with no worry.
So even a dev who codes a wallet doesn't control decentralized things.
It's a community that decides. With no consensus, there is no network.
Make sure you understand the nature of decentralized open source projects before posting.
In a ponzi scheme the price is only rising, while newcomers pay to founders.
In a decentralized Mooncoin project a founder probably has less coins than you.
There was no premine and no crowdsale.
People have equal opportunities, but the market price varies, like a Bitcoin or Dogecoin, or a Digibyte price.
Someone who bought at 1 Sat sells at 5 Sat, someone who sold at 2 Sat, rebuys at 5 Sat (fomo as coinflow said),
someone sold at 6 Sat hoping to rebuy at 4-5 etc etc etc.
With a free market the price is a balance of supply and demand and there are lots of players currently at the Mooncoin market. The $1 million volume yesterday indicated that very well. The price can be very volatile, MOON is still an emerging market and no one is able to predict it, a price can go to 1 Sat and then to 30, or to 30 Sat and then to 1 Sat, or to 30 Sat and then to 50 Sat, now the price varies between 4 and 7.
What is MOON's dev target per coin? Since you mentioned Digibyte, i know they have a target of $1-$10 , anything above that is bonus. What would a logical target be for MOON ? I look Dogecoin Dogecoin comunity said this http://www.muchdogenews.com/not-being-a-marketer-but-mooncoin-is-like-what-dogecoin-was-3-years-back-can-someone-take-a-look-at-this-coin-and-tell-if-its-worth-it/MOON 5 sat vs Dogecoin 128 sat Plenty of room for growth. Just see RDD. Was 1-3 satoshi. Now over 100 satoshi. |
|
|
|
|
Mooncoin_Foundation (OP)
|
|
June 06, 2017, 05:20:13 PM |
|
What would a logical target be for MOON ?
MOON is beyond any logic. Theoretically it's designed to be better than BTC and LTC as a payment solution used on a daily basis by common people. Also MOON has less inflation than DOGE, BTC, LTC and a lot of other coins. DOGE is fun, MOON is serious and it's good for money. LTC, BTC are not great for micropayments and tipping, MOON is great for that and there is enough coins for everyone. If a price of goods and services is denominated in MOON, it will never look like 0.00000000001 MOON. The long term potential of MOON definitely exists, but you need some patience. Better keep some MOON (even small quantities) over long term than try to make a quick buck with it. Some people tried to play with MOON before and it looks like they just sold their coins low, they are off now and don't participate in this move. No one can predict that, you risk. But the risk/reward ratio is not bad with MOON and it looks like liquidity risks now are disappearing. People who were buying MOON in 2016 or in 2017 for 1 Sat, were accepting liquidity risks also, these people are rewarded now, they risked and won, no one can predict your own story though. If large exchanges (Bittrex and Polo first of all) list MOON, a big rise can happen immediately, anyway we see that it's not an exchange which makes MOON successful, it's MOON that can make even a small exchange successful (the recent story of Bleutrade, small, but good innovative startup, launched in 2014, they generated yesterday almost the $1 million volume with MOON and received good fees from trading, and that's great). |
|
|
|
coinflow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 06, 2017, 05:23:01 PM |
|
Don't forget that some top addresses with a lot of coins belong to 5 exchanges where MOON is listed currently (C-cex, Bleutrade, Nova, Coingather, Coinexchange),
top 2 addresses are unspendable, also 2 other smaller addresses with stolen coins,
if you hear rumours that any other address is unspendable, don't believe them, you can ask any independent expert who is able to read a Mooncoin code.
re: agswinner,
private keys are safe if they were generated in a safe way and if you keep them in a safe place and don't disclosure to anyone.
That's the fundamental thing behind crypto at all.
No matter how many coins someone sends to any of addresses.
Only for the readers education to get the full picture, not to necessarily speak against you: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Address_reuseagswinner, could you elaborate on your theory? barrysty1e? One of those addresses where stolen coins went, is the one mentioned here: Not a large volume. The market will now buy much more. If you do some little research, you'll see there is no activity except someone sent 2450 Mooncoins to each of top addresses, that's why now in the Rich list all top addresses (even with coins which were not touched since 2014) indicate that last activity was today. And because it is monitored, every activity, even only sending micro-amounts to it, should be closely watched and investigated, that's why agswinner's previous post is interesting. Maybe a hint to something ...? |
|
|
|
|
