Bitcoin Forum
March 19, 2024, 07:51:56 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 ... 259 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ▂▃▅▆▇⫷[ 🆉🅿🅾🅾🅻.🅲🅰 ]⫸⫷[!10 FLUX PA's!]⫸⫷[ the miners multipool ]⫸ ▇▆▅▃▂  (Read 279057 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
Storx
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 233


View Profile
June 13, 2017, 02:22:27 AM
 #581

is anyone else getting low earnings on zpool today? my 4xGTX1080tis have been doing like 95% blake2s since the nist5 issue this morning.. ive only make around $6.50 worth of btc since restarting the miner with nist5 disabled at 8am this morning...so $6.50 on 4 cards over 13 hour period....

Same problem for me with 2x 1080Ti's. I switched to MPH in the meantime, until the blake2s issue gets resolved (or whatever is going on). I avereged 15 USD for the last 24 hours ending at 18:00 EST today.

15 on zpool or MPH?

- GPUs Mining : 128 (Updated 3/7/18) // CPUs Mining : 19 (Updated 2/23/18)
1710834716
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710834716

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710834716
Reply with quote  #2

1710834716
Report to moderator
1710834716
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710834716

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710834716
Reply with quote  #2

1710834716
Report to moderator
1710834716
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710834716

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710834716
Reply with quote  #2

1710834716
Report to moderator
"Your bitcoin is secured in a way that is physically impossible for others to access, no matter for what reason, no matter how good the excuse, no matter a majority of miners, no matter what." -- Greg Maxwell
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1710834716
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710834716

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710834716
Reply with quote  #2

1710834716
Report to moderator
1710834716
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710834716

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710834716
Reply with quote  #2

1710834716
Report to moderator
1710834716
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710834716

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710834716
Reply with quote  #2

1710834716
Report to moderator
sypher9
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 13, 2017, 02:32:08 AM
 #582

is anyone else getting low earnings on zpool today? my 4xGTX1080tis have been doing like 95% blake2s since the nist5 issue this morning.. ive only make around $6.50 worth of btc since restarting the miner with nist5 disabled at 8am this morning...so $6.50 on 4 cards over 13 hour period....

Same problem for me with 2x 1080Ti's. I switched to MPH in the meantime, until the blake2s issue gets resolved (or whatever is going on). I avereged 15 USD for the last 24 hours ending at 18:00 EST today.

15 on zpool or MPH?

15 USD on Zpool over the last 24h ending at 18h00 EST. I got sucked into the nist5 mining as well for approx 6 of those hours.
from 6h00 to 18h00 EST, I made ~ 7USD/~0.00284 BTC.

However, I'm not sure how to interpret the immature mBTC values. https://i.imgur.com/J5ps9D9.jpg
cashen
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 251


View Profile
June 13, 2017, 03:11:36 AM
 #583

I don't know, I think something odd is going on. I don't how my graph can look so upward and straight for 10 hours and then when a payment goes out it is flat.






kopija
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 13, 2017, 03:46:08 AM
 #584

I don't know, I think something odd is going on. I don't how my graph can look so upward and straight for 10 hours and then when a payment goes out it is flat.




There is nothing odd going on. Zpool has been having those issues with payments graph for WEEKS.
ATM my payments graph has been totally flat for almost whole day. It looks like in need of Viagra.
http://zpool.ca/?address=1PjoqGuqbvB6GVjv8bZmSMxSDRF3nzRmJa
Come on crackfoo, fix this already, this issue has been the bane of many a noob mining on zpool for too long.

we are nothing but a smart contracts on a cosmic blockchain
zer0k
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 349
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
June 13, 2017, 03:49:37 AM
 #585

I don't know, I think something odd is going on. I don't how my graph can look so upward and straight for 10 hours and then when a payment goes out it is flat.




There is nothing odd going on. Zpool has been having those issues with payments graph for WEEKS.
ATM my payments graph has been totally flat for almost whole day. It looks like in need of Viagra.
http://zpool.ca/?address=1PjoqGuqbvB6GVjv8bZmSMxSDRF3nzRmJa
Come on crackfoo, fix this already, this issue has been the bane of many a noob mining on zpool for too long.

Look at the scale on the graph...you're not going to see your "normal" curved one until the mess from nist5 drops off in ~4 hours

pindis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 187
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 13, 2017, 09:22:53 AM
 #586


I realise this might just be me, but is there a reason why we're mining mobilecash, since it doesn't even pay anything (at least not for me). I realise some people have more hashrate and that they receieve some coins. but yeah.. I dont know
miliard
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 13, 2017, 09:53:22 AM
 #587

https://i.imgur.com/sr9TWSM.png
I realise this might just be me, but is there a reason why we're mining mobilecash, since it doesn't even pay anything (at least not for me). I realise some people have more hashrate and that they receieve some coins. but yeah.. I dont know

Same problem here, and the overall earnings last 24h are terrible. Dunno what is going on..
https://i.imgur.com/VcyDz1k.png
zer0k
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 349
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
June 13, 2017, 01:23:01 PM
 #588


I realise this might just be me, but is there a reason why we're mining mobilecash, since it doesn't even pay anything (at least not for me). I realise some people have more hashrate and that they receieve some coins. but yeah.. I dont know

It's just your share is so low it's not shown because of the decimal places are limited to four.
For example...the coin paid 0.02391 and your share was 0.118% which equals 0.0000282138

You can see there are 2,3 and sometimes 4 or more per minute so they are adding up at the end of the day Smiley

pindis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 187
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 13, 2017, 02:43:29 PM
 #589


I realise this might just be me, but is there a reason why we're mining mobilecash, since it doesn't even pay anything (at least not for me). I realise some people have more hashrate and that they receieve some coins. but yeah.. I dont know

It's just your share is so low it's not shown because of the decimal places are limited to four.
For example...the coin paid 0.02391 and your share was 0.118% which equals 0.0000282138

You can see there are 2,3 and sometimes 4 or more per minute so they are adding up at the end of the day Smiley
Looks like they changed the decimals now! Smiley I hope this is still profitable over ETH.
guytechie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 677
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 13, 2017, 04:10:26 PM
 #590

So is the checkbox that shows you the earnings by each individual altcoins coming back?  It was nice to have that kind of data.

Put something in my tip jar if I made your day. Smiley
BTC:
1MkmBHDjonAFXui6JEx9ZmEemfMtUo9Cmu
Jaerin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 13, 2017, 04:24:19 PM
 #591

Seems like the d=xxx diff setting doesn't work when combined with the multialgos method of mining.

Tried the following and it never seems to pick up the fixed diff:

ccminer -r 0 -a blake2s -o stratum+tcp://blake2s.mine.zpool.ca:5766 -u %ADDY% -p -c=BTC,myr-gr=95,lyra2v2=50,decred=3.55,blakecoin=6.75,c11=22.5,groestl=50,blake2s=5.45,x17=12,nist5=60,skein=720,sib=16.5,lbry=380,timetravel=36,veltor=29,bitcore=18.9,hmq1725=5.6,stats,d=64

Yet when it kicked off it used the stratum difficulty which starts out much too low.

Do I need to set a diff for each coin or something?  At this point I've just  been adding a -m 8 for blake2s so it ramps up the difficult quicker.  If I use the following it picks up the difficulty just fine:

ccminer -r 0 -a blake2s -o stratum+tcp://blake2s.mine.zpool.ca:5766 -u %ADDY% -p -c=BTC,stats,d=64

This is just the one line I have from Nemo's miner batch script.
guytechie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 677
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 13, 2017, 04:32:33 PM
 #592

Seems like the d=xxx diff setting doesn't work when combined with the multialgos method of mining.

Tried the following and it never seems to pick up the fixed diff:

ccminer -r 0 -a blake2s -o stratum+tcp://blake2s.mine.zpool.ca:5766 -u %ADDY% -p -c=BTC,myr-gr=95,lyra2v2=50,decred=3.55,blakecoin=6.75,c11=22.5,groestl=50,blake2s=5.45,x17=12,nist5=60,skein=720,sib=16.5,lbry=380,timetravel=36,veltor=29,bitcore=18.9,hmq1725=5.6,stats,d=64

Yet when it kicked off it used the stratum difficulty which starts out much too low.

Do I need to set a diff for each coin or something?  At this point I've just  been adding a -m 8 for blake2s so it ramps up the difficult quicker.  If I use the following it picks up the difficulty just fine:

ccminer -r 0 -a blake2s -o stratum+tcp://blake2s.mine.zpool.ca:5766 -u %ADDY% -p -c=BTC,stats,d=64

This is just the one line I have from Nemo's miner batch script.


Have you tried putting the d=64 at the beginning of the password?

ccminer -r 0 -a blake2s -o stratum+tcp://blake2s.mine.zpool.ca:5766 -u %ADDY% -p -d=64,c=BTC,myr-gr=95,lyra2v2=50,decred=3.55,blakecoin=6.75,c11=22.5,groestl=50,blake2s=5.45,x17=12,nist5=60,skein=720,sib=16.5,lbry=380,timetravel=36,veltor=29,bitcore=18.9,hmq1725=5.6,stats

Also, do you need c=BTC?  I don't have that, and zpool already pays me in BTC.

What GPU do you have?  Just wondering how that profitability factor works.  I kept mine blank (default factor of 1).

I'd like to learn how to d calculate the factor based on my rig.

Put something in my tip jar if I made your day. Smiley
BTC:
1MkmBHDjonAFXui6JEx9ZmEemfMtUo9Cmu
zer0k
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 349
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
June 13, 2017, 04:39:59 PM
 #593

Seems like the d=xxx diff setting doesn't work when combined with the multialgos method of mining.

Tried the following and it never seems to pick up the fixed diff:

ccminer -r 0 -a blake2s -o stratum+tcp://blake2s.mine.zpool.ca:5766 -u %ADDY% -p -c=BTC,myr-gr=95,lyra2v2=50,decred=3.55,blakecoin=6.75,c11=22.5,groestl=50,blake2s=5.45,x17=12,nist5=60,skein=720,sib=16.5,lbry=380,timetravel=36,veltor=29,bitcore=18.9,hmq1725=5.6,stats,d=64

Yet when it kicked off it used the stratum difficulty which starts out much too low.

Do I need to set a diff for each coin or something?  At this point I've just  been adding a -m 8 for blake2s so it ramps up the difficult quicker.  If I use the following it picks up the difficulty just fine:

ccminer -r 0 -a blake2s -o stratum+tcp://blake2s.mine.zpool.ca:5766 -u %ADDY% -p -c=BTC,stats,d=64

This is just the one line I have from Nemo's miner batch script.


All of the numbers after each mining algorithm are your hashrates so that the pool can decide which coin is most profitable.
They are not setting the difficulty at all and you need to use d=X as you have in your last command.

If you're not getting tons of rejects at super low difficulty you can just leave it and let the pool adjust for you.
Or try adding d=2 or something right at the beggining, but that may actually be a little high for some coins.
It's obviously better, but more work to split them all up and have custom difficulty for each one.

guytechie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 677
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 13, 2017, 04:51:43 PM
 #594

All of the numbers after each mining algorithm are your hashrates so that the pool can decide which coin is most profitable.
They are not setting the difficulty at all and you need to use d=X as you have in your last command.

So if my rig is getting a total of 1.2ksol/s for Equihash, my factor would be -p equihash=1200?

BTW, I noticed you have a -p -c=BTC,etc,etc,etc.  I think the dash before the c=BTC is your problem.

Put something in my tip jar if I made your day. Smiley
BTC:
1MkmBHDjonAFXui6JEx9ZmEemfMtUo9Cmu
Jaerin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 13, 2017, 04:58:08 PM
 #595

All of the numbers after each mining algorithm are your hashrates so that the pool can decide which coin is most profitable.
They are not setting the difficulty at all and you need to use d=X as you have in your last command.

So if my rig is getting a total of 1.2ksol/s for Equihash, my factor would be -p equihash=1200?

BTW, I noticed you have a -p -c=BTC,etc,etc,etc.  I think the dash before the c=BTC is your problem.

Nope the dash was a typo in the post when I tried to reconstruct the whole string from the batch file. I've tried with the d=xxx at the beginning or the end and it doesn't seem to take effect unless I take out the multialgo factors.

Not sure about equihash, but all the other difficulties seem to be measured in MH/s with the exception of blake2s, decred, blakecoin which since seem to be measured in GH the pool does the proper comparison at least it seems too.

So what I did was actually use Multipoolminer on zpool and just let it benchmark all the algos that I wanted to use and then filled in the numbers that I got.  You could do the same with anything else and just run each algo for a bit and change the number to be what you averaged.  As I said not sure if you would do 1.2 for equihash or 1200, but for blake2s it seems you put the number in GH/s.
Jaerin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 13, 2017, 05:15:21 PM
 #596

So it appears if you include decred in your multialgo it doesn't pick up the difficulty.

Tried this (decred at the end):
Code:
ccminerAlexis78.exe -r 0 -a blake2s -o stratum+tcp://blake2s.mine.zpool.ca:5766 -u 1B5NVnLrXRjzEsmBkSZiXpLbdmVn6qC5q -p d=32,myr-gr=95,lyra2v2=50,blakecoin=6.75,c11=22.5,groestl=50,blake2s=5.45,x17=12,nist5=60,skein=720,sib=16.5,lbry=380,timetravel=36,veltor=29,bitcore=18.9,hmq1725=5.6,decred=3.55,stats

or this (decred at the beginning):

Code:
ccminerAlexis78.exe -r 0 -a blake2s -o stratum+tcp://blake2s.mine.zpool.ca:5766 -u 1B5NVnLrXRjzEsmBkSZiXpLbdmVn6qC5q -p d=32,decred=3.55,myr-gr=95,lyra2v2=50,blakecoin=6.75,c11=22.5,groestl=50,blake2s=5.45,x17=12,nist5=60,skein=720,sib=16.5,lbry=380,timetravel=36,veltor=29,bitcore=18.9,hmq1725=5.6,stats

And it didn't pick up the difficulty from the d=32

Tried this:
Code:
ccminerAlexis78.exe -r 0 -a blake2s -o stratum+tcp://blake2s.mine.zpool.ca:5766 -u 1B5NVnLrXRjzEsmBkSZiXpLbdmVn6qC5q -p d=32,myr-gr=95,lyra2v2=50,blakecoin=6.75,c11=22.5,groestl=50,blake2s=5.45,x17=12,nist5=60,skein=720,sib=16.5,lbry=380,timetravel=36,veltor=29,bitcore=18.9,hmq1725=5.6,stats

And it does pick up the 32 difficulty.
guytechie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 677
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 13, 2017, 05:40:54 PM
 #597

So it appears if you include decred in your multialgo it doesn't pick up the difficulty.

Tried this (decred at the end):
Code:
ccminerAlexis78.exe -r 0 -a blake2s -o stratum+tcp://blake2s.mine.zpool.ca:5766 -u 1B5NVnLrXRjzEsmBkSZiXpLbdmVn6qC5q -p d=32,myr-gr=95,lyra2v2=50,blakecoin=6.75,c11=22.5,groestl=50,blake2s=5.45,x17=12,nist5=60,skein=720,sib=16.5,lbry=380,timetravel=36,veltor=29,bitcore=18.9,hmq1725=5.6,decred=3.55,stats

or this (decred at the beginning):

Code:
ccminerAlexis78.exe -r 0 -a blake2s -o stratum+tcp://blake2s.mine.zpool.ca:5766 -u 1B5NVnLrXRjzEsmBkSZiXpLbdmVn6qC5q -p d=32,decred=3.55,myr-gr=95,lyra2v2=50,blakecoin=6.75,c11=22.5,groestl=50,blake2s=5.45,x17=12,nist5=60,skein=720,sib=16.5,lbry=380,timetravel=36,veltor=29,bitcore=18.9,hmq1725=5.6,stats

And it didn't pick up the difficulty from the d=32

Tried this:
Code:
ccminerAlexis78.exe -r 0 -a blake2s -o stratum+tcp://blake2s.mine.zpool.ca:5766 -u 1B5NVnLrXRjzEsmBkSZiXpLbdmVn6qC5q -p d=32,myr-gr=95,lyra2v2=50,blakecoin=6.75,c11=22.5,groestl=50,blake2s=5.45,x17=12,nist5=60,skein=720,sib=16.5,lbry=380,timetravel=36,veltor=29,bitcore=18.9,hmq1725=5.6,stats

And it does pick up the 32 difficulty.


Sounds like it took a lot of trial and error.  You, sir, are more patient and persistent than I.

Put something in my tip jar if I made your day. Smiley
BTC:
1MkmBHDjonAFXui6JEx9ZmEemfMtUo9Cmu
crackfoo (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3430
Merit: 1126



View Profile WWW
June 13, 2017, 05:50:08 PM
 #598

yeah for some reason having decred in there will null your diff setting. It's been attempted to be fixed a couple times now but seems it still screws it up.

ZPOOL - the miners multipool! Support We pay 10 FLUX Parallel Assets (PA) directly to block rewards! Get paid more and faster. No PA fee's or waiting around for them, paid instantly on every block found!
Jaerin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 13, 2017, 05:54:45 PM
 #599

Well my first thought was just that it was too long.  So I started erasing a bunch of things and it wasn't until I started erasing the ones before blake2s that it started working.   I had a post half written thinking it was just too long until I decided to go back and make sure it wasn't just too far from the beginning or something like that.  I was adding things to the beginning until it failed again and noticed that when I added a long string without decred in it that it still worked.  That's when I realized my initial thought was wrong and that it was decred that was causing the issues.

I'm an IT support person so doing trial and error is pretty much in my nature.  Still working on stabilizing using Multipoolminer since that gives nice output and such, but I'm wondering if the pools multialgo method is still going to be more efficient since it cuts you off when it knows something else is more profitable.  Also not sure I like how Multipoolminer just kills the process when it switches to something else.  Not sure what that might do in the long run.


Also those numbers were basic averages for a single 1080 card.  I have a box with 5x1080, one with 1x1080, and one with 1x1080 and 1x1080Ti so the numbers all pretty much are the same ratios between the cards.  Haven't really had it stable enough to get a good feel for how much I'll earn in a day from zpool.  hmq1725 was causing bluescreens on my main miner until I realized I needed to set the intensity down to 17 from the default of 19 it was selecting.   Much more stable now.

crackfoo (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3430
Merit: 1126



View Profile WWW
June 13, 2017, 05:59:37 PM
Last edit: June 13, 2017, 06:46:28 PM by crackfoo
 #600

So is the checkbox that shows you the earnings by each individual altcoins coming back?  It was nice to have that kind of data.

Not yet, I haven't had time to look into it.  Been working on a new fee system (FlexFee™) and currently testing it on scrypt/lyra2v2 & sha256.

I'll soon be implementing this type of fee system across most algo's. The more hash the pool has, the lower the fee will be!

Current thresholds are:

        scrypt under 5Gh=2.25%, 5Gh-10Gh=2% & 10Gh+=1.75%

        sha256 under 500Gh=2.25%, 500Gh-1Ph=2%, 1Ph-5Ph=1.75 & 5Ph+=1.5%

        lyra2v2 under 5Gh=2.25%, 5Gh-10Gh=2%, 10Gh-25Gh=1.75 & 25Gh+=1.5%

Cheers

ZPOOL - the miners multipool! Support We pay 10 FLUX Parallel Assets (PA) directly to block rewards! Get paid more and faster. No PA fee's or waiting around for them, paid instantly on every block found!
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 ... 259 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!