What do you think in the future on DONALD TRUMP in his term of presidency ?

[Kibbbis]

i wanna know your thoughts ^^

[1715363901]

1715363901

[1715363901]

1715363901

[1715363901]

1715363901

[1715363901]

1715363901

[BCEmporium]

Nothing, he did nothing yet...
Still the actions of his so called opposition is speaking volumes... against themselves! Like those of an elder retreaded lip sync italian artist...

[ckieveswency]

i wanna know your thoughts ^^

hmm for now we cant tell cause he is just newly elected , but maybe in the near future oh his term we will know how he will manage the country

[joebrook]

He is going to focus solely on the interest of the US and the US alone. As should what the other President should have done especially Obama.

[Xester]

Donald Trump is a good businessman and probably his plans for America will anchor solely towards Americas boost in terms of economy. But Trumps decision of implementing the immigrants law is a very risky decision since on just a short time there will be a tremendous shrink in terms of labor force. If he succeeds  then America will be the most prosperous nation in the world but if he fails the collateral damage to this law will be in big range.

[RealBitcoin]

Here are my predictions

• He will probably bankrupt Mexico, the Peso is already tanking
• He will probably put a tariff on Chinese manufacturers, so China will just sell to Europe instead and US people will have to buy the products more expensively
• He will probably get back some jobs, but like dirty jobs like coal and other heavy industry which are dangerous to health
• He will probably send troops to Middle East to clean it up, which is another possible war there
• A lot of chaos will happen there as bunch of leftists are protesting, they will probably protest for a lot of time, the left is not a very peaceful political ideology (communism = 100 million dead), so I am not sympathizing with the left, nor with the right
• Europe migrant crisis will probably escalate as the Middle East wars could possibly erupt

It will be just a crazy 4 years. But even if the left had won, it had been crazy too.


So I dont support either sides. I just want peace on Earth, but we will probably not get that anytime soon 

[Hydrogen]

The future of america is bright with Donald Trump as President.

But we need americans who are educated & informed, who support the right policies for Trump to be effective.

 

[LTU_btc]

It will be just a crazy 4 years. But even if the left had won, it had been crazy too.

He already started two talk about 8 years, he have plans to be elected second time. If he won't screw up, I think he can be elected again. In first days being as president, he already started carry out what he promissed on election campaign.
So, it can be not 4 years, but whole 8 crazy years ahead us.

[maku]

Nothing, he did nothing yet...
Still the actions of his so called opposition is speaking volumes... against themselves! Like those of an elder retreaded lip sync italian artist...

I remember when Obama became a president of the United States he received Nobel Peace Prize, just like that. What happened next?
Our Peace Nobel winner dropped over 100,000 bombs on people. So don't judge Trump now, give him a chance to actually change and do something. Then, if he fails, bash him.

[HabBear]

If he keeps ignoring facts and purporting untruths week in and week out he's going to become the pariah of America. Not with his core supporters, of course, but he can't control independent thought.

The guy is such a contradiction. He shames the CIA then he says he loves them. He refuses to accept any fact base comment that sheds a negative favor about him and his first response when this happens is to literally make shit up.

The guy needs to stop talking. Stop whining and being defensive. And start writing policy that will improve what his supporters believe ails the country.

[RealBitcoin]

It will be just a crazy 4 years. But even if the left had won, it had been crazy too.

He already started two talk about 8 years, he have plans to be elected second time. If he won't screw up, I think he can be elected again. In first days being as president, he already started carry out what he promissed on election campaign.
So, it can be not 4 years, but whole 8 crazy years ahead us.

Well it will be interesting to watch nontheless, I am most interested to see this migrant crisis being solved above anything. It is destroying europe, and the west in general.

I hope no wars will happen, but i doubt it. And I hope no financial crisis will happen, but I also doubt that. It's a cyclical event and happens every now and then.

[Sithara007]

It is going to be a rocky ride. In the House, he will face few problems, as the GOP is having a solid majority. However, in the senate the Republicans only have a slight majority. If John McCain and Lindsey Graham defect to the Dem side, then it will be hard for him.

[t2yax]

i wanna know your thoughts ^^

Seeing that there's too bashers of Trump, they hate him so much.. All I can say that, lets see first what he can do before we react like that and If I am Trump I will use those "bad words,impression" for my motivation, that you can prove that everyone who dont believe in you that you can.

[darklus123]

As of now, i dont have any expectations from trump aside from he talks like our beloved president duterte and i am feeling the hype of russia and US and as well as china

[novemberwoah]

Maybe we should look ahead in order to find out the results for sure. But I am sure there will be many policies are very controversial and sparked the pros and cons of many people. As has just been done he raised his son-in-law became a senior adviser at the White House, and even some people argue that the cabinet Trump as the worst cabinet. I believe the future there will be more controversial policies.

[LonelyPrince]

I think he will be impeached, so many hatred towards him...

[bitbunnni]

I think he will be impeached, so many hatred towards him...

I think hate is not the reason for the removal of Trump from the government. To do this, he needs to do something very bad. He's a stupid man so it is quite possible that he would do such a stupid thing.

[Spendulus]

I think he will be impeached, so many hatred towards him...

the venomous hate of Soros is strong in this thread.

As are his lies and propaganda.

[turkandjaydee]

he has a good plan for america.
probably make a lot of questionable decision that will rock the boat.
and approval rate probably in the low side of things, because of the media.

[t3ChNo]

I would wait & see for the next 3-6 months on his actions & policies.

[Sithara007]

he has a good plan for america.
probably make a lot of questionable decision that will rock the boat.
and approval rate probably in the low side of things, because of the media.

His approval rating may remain in the 40s. He has strong support from the evangelicals, at least for now. But if they don't agree with his choice for the SCOTUS, then the ratings can plummet. Also, support from the blue collar whites is critical.

[grenade launcher]

he has a good plan for america.
probably make a lot of questionable decision that will rock the boat.
and approval rate probably in the low side of things, because of the media.

His approval rating may remain in the 40s. He has strong support from the evangelicals, at least for now. But if they don't agree with his choice for the SCOTUS, then the ratings can plummet. Also, support from the blue collar whites is critical.

Team US President Donald trump two days before his inauguration has registered a new slogan for its future election campaign 2020.
According to "the Washington times", trump decided to participate in the presidential elections under the motto to "keep America great!"
In the text of the application States that the slogan "can be used on shirts, t-shirts, children's clothing, and on printed materials, in particular brochures, which provide information about trump as a candidate." This motto will replace the slogan "let's make America great again," trump spent his campaign 2015-2016

[Malsetid]

i wanna know your thoughts ^^

Well definitely it didnt start that well as a lot of people already judged what he can do. For ne though, i think it's worth giving the guy a chance. He may not be the same as obama, but the guy was able to manage his businesses very well and i think he can do things economically that obama didn't. The focus mainly would be with americans and not bombing islamic countries

[Spendulus]

he has a good plan for america.
probably make a lot of questionable decision that will rock the boat.
and approval rate probably in the low side of things, because of the media.

His approval rating may remain in the 40s. He has strong support from the evangelicals, at least for now. But if they don't agree with his choice for the SCOTUS, then the ratings can plummet. Also, support from the blue collar whites is critical.

You may be surprised who moves to the Trump side.  Going forward, there's no reason why blacks, hispanics, blue collar workers, or women necessarily lean Democratic.  The definitions and appeal of the parties are changing.

Another example is big banks, and wall street firms.  They have no particular reason to lean Demo.  That's just where they'd wound up.  Same with the Silicon Valley types.

[European Central Bank]

well, so far his money is going where his mouth is. at some point his ideas are gonna bog down in reality but he's doing more than just spouting off the usual bullshit.

[bryant.coleman]

You may be surprised who moves to the Trump side.  Going forward, there's no reason why blacks, hispanics, blue collar workers, or women necessarily lean Democratic.  The definitions and appeal of the parties are changing.

A majority of the white women voted for Trump during the POTUS elections in 2016 (53% against 43% for Hillary). Among the Hispanics, there is a split between the mostly-English speaking native born Hispanics and the Spanish-speaking Latin American-born Hispanics. Both the groups are Democrat-leaning, but a large part of the former group is voting Republican. Among the blacks, I am less optimistic.

[audaciousbeing]

The future of the Donald I say is a long way because when one is really in that posts you get a wider picture of things and miggh have to take decisions that even negate your own personal belief and your campaign promises. The outcome of that will be that the same people that hail you yesterday might turn around to stone you if they have their way so I say lets wait till the next 4 years if the future will still be bright for Trump or not.

[DooMAD]

Dunno about his future, but these guys just took an enormous steaming shit on his present:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-state-department-senior-management-team-quit-resign-rex-tillerson-secretary-donald-trump-cabinet-a7547916.html

On the one hand, I can't help but think "Hah!", but then if everyone who disagrees with the guy is simply going to move out of the way, I start to wonder if anyone will be left to oppose him when (not if, when) he does something phenomenally stupid (or more-so than usual, at least).

[Sithara007]

On the one hand, I can't help but think "Hah!", but then if everyone who disagrees with the guy is simply going to move out of the way, I start to wonder if anyone will be left to oppose him when (not if, when) he does something phenomenally stupid (or more-so than usual, at least).

As of now, the establishment republicans have fallen in line, and they are supporting him (perhaps with the exception of John McCain and Lindsey Graham). Unless he does something monumentally stupid, the Republican party is going to solidly back him.

[hexitor]

I think that American being wrong to elected Trump because I think, he won't apply this program.  In deed how do you want to obligate Mexicans to built a wall ?   

[Spendulus]

You may be surprised who moves to the Trump side.  Going forward, there's no reason why blacks, hispanics, blue collar workers, or women necessarily lean Democratic.  The definitions and appeal of the parties are changing.

A majority of the white women voted for Trump during the POTUS elections in 2016 (53% against 43% for Hillary). Among the Hispanics, there is a split between the mostly-English speaking native born Hispanics and the Spanish-speaking Latin American-born Hispanics. Both the groups are Democrat-leaning, but a large part of the former group is voting Republican. Among the blacks, I am less optimistic.

What I'm referring to is the way the voters view parties moving forward, as those parties change, which is happening.

I am not referring to the past so your cites are not relevant.  As an example, Trump has said he would do things for inner cities.  Expect him to keep that promise.  When he does, inner city blacks will see that a "Republican" is actually doing things for them and the Democrats never did.

What happens then?

[JC btc]

What I can see that he just wanted is for the USA to consistently become the number 1 country in the world. But, I don't see any action yet or maybe I am not just aware since I am not from USA, but based on the news I've heard still nothing action yet. But, I think he would just focus more on the interest of the business sector since he is into business.

[Docnaster]

I do feel that Trump will hurt a lot of Americans through his words, when he speak in the public it seems that he doesn't even care what the people would think of him. He thinks that because of the power that is bestowed on him he could say anything that he wants. He may contribute economic progess but I think a true leader cares and also listens to his people.

[00hash01]

I do feel that Trump will hurt a lot of Americans through his words, when he speak in the public it seems that he doesn't even care what the people would think of him. He thinks that because of the power that is bestowed on him he could say anything that he wants. He may contribute economic progess but I think a true leader cares and also listens to his people.

Error Trump is that he does not hear the voice of the people. He's a narcissist. This selfishness can lead to very bad consequences. Now California and spoke of secession from the United States. How many more will tolerate this clown?

[Xester]

he has a good plan for america.
probably make a lot of questionable decision that will rock the boat.
and approval rate probably in the low side of things, because of the media.

His approval rating may remain in the 40s. He has strong support from the evangelicals, at least for now. But if they don't agree with his choice for the SCOTUS, then the ratings can plummet. Also, support from the blue collar whites is critical.

For me Trump doesnt really need approval ratings, what he need is to make America economically great again while promoting morality in the family and society. His move against abortion and LGBT right is the first step that clearly Trump has really the heart in doing services to the citizens. He has seen probably that many people will go against his policies but he will still continue to create policies that is economically and morally best for the people.

[fasdorcas]

i think he is just a bussinessman presidency is different kind of thing and i think he is just a good speaker......
barking dogs seldom bites..........

[Spendulus]

I do feel that Trump will hurt a lot of Americans through his words, when he speak in the public it seems that he doesn't even care what the people would think of him. He thinks that because of the power that is bestowed on him he could say anything that he wants. He may contribute economic progess but I think a true leader cares and also listens to his people.

Error Trump is that he does not hear the voice of the people.....

Fascinating comment since he was the candidate that exactly, perfectly did hear the voice of the people, and they understood that and voted him in.

So which "people" are you referring to?

[popcorn1]

His move against abortion and LGBT right is the first step that clearly Trump has really the heart in doing services to the citizens.

I thinks he will not last 4 years..
Oh boy it's going to be great entertainment to see what type of country trump will lead ..

abortion and LGBT rights..Your finished. Out in 4 years if you attack those 2 subjects..

[popcorn1]

I do feel that Trump will hurt a lot of Americans through his words, when he speak in the public it seems that he doesn't even care what the people would think of him. He thinks that because of the power that is bestowed on him he could say anything that he wants. He may contribute economic progess but I think a true leader cares and also listens to his people.

Error Trump is that he does not hear the voice of the people.....

Fascinating comment since he was the candidate that exactly, perfectly did hear the voice of the people, and they understood that and voted him in.

So which "people" are you referring to?

You moan about sending AMERICAN Tax funds to fund other countries?..

Spendy why should you fund other countries?..

Oh that doesn't count because it's spendy family

Well stop sending this amount to these people then you might have some money left for your own NATION..

According to the report, the United States gave Israel $3.1 billion for Fiscal Year 2016 in direct bilateral military aid (also referred to as Foreign Military Financing or FMF). Congress also gave $487.6 million to "joint" U.S.-Israel missile defense programs (designed to protect Israeli territory from potential outside threats), bringing total military aid to Israel to $3.6 billion per year.

Put another way, American taxpayers give Israel $9.8 million per day (in 2016).


“Since the October War in 1973, Washington has provided Israel with a level of support dwarfing the amounts provided to any other state. It has been the largest annual recipient of direct U.S. economic and military assistance since 1976 and the largest total recipient since World War ll. Total direct U.S. aid to Israel amounts to well over $140 billion in 2003 dollars. Israel receives about $3 billion in direct foreign assistance each year, which is roughly one-fifth of America's entire foreign aid budget. In per capita terms, the United States gives each Israeli a direct subsidy worth about $500 per year. This largesse is especially striking when one realizes that Israel is now a wealthy industrial state with a per capita income roughly equal to South Korea or Spain.”

And you got the FUCKING CHEEK to moan about the money for family planning  ..

WHAT A FUCKING JOKER..

Sorry spendy but you deserve a telling OFF ..

[Sithara007]

His move against abortion and LGBT right is the first step that clearly Trump has really the heart in doing services to the citizens.

I thinks he will not last 4 years..
Oh boy it's going to be great entertainment to see what type of country trump will lead ..

abortion and LGBT rights..Your finished. Out in 4 years if you attack those 2 subjects..

Right now the SCOTUS is having a liberal majority, as some of the Republican appointees have moved to the left. So unless Trump manages to appoint two or more conservative judges to the SCOTUS, he is going to face a tough time.

[olushakes]

Americans have made their choice and they have to live with that for the next 4 years. Whether that will turn out to be a good decision or not, time will tell. For me I don't see anything  changing from the status quo all the executive orders he has been issuing will not last long until when he understand that longterm effect decisions deserve proper thinking then he will know that he is no better than those he has been castigating.

[Sithara007]

Americans have made their choice and they have to live with that for the next 4 years. Whether that will turn out to be a good decision or not, time will tell. For me I don't see anything  changing from the status quo all the executive orders he has been issuing will not last long until when he understand that longterm effect decisions deserve proper thinking then he will know that he is no better than those he has been castigating.

You don't see any change from the status quo? That is strange, because the entire nation of Mexico is agitating after Trump proposed the import tariff on their products. If you still don't get it, then just wait for the SCOTUS appointment. Hell is going to break loose.....

[rexxarofmoknathal]

He's far too egotistic. He simply cannot handle the fact that he lost the popular vote. I mean look at him, he's even launching an investigation into "illegal", voters and what not. He also hasn't stopped talking about the crowds of his innauguration, how the media isn't portraying it correctly. Let's not even get into his "alternative facts" now...

Everything he's done so far is a joke, and unfortunately it looks like he's going to keep that trend up for however long he lasts before being the first ever president to be impeached.

[DooMAD]

He's far too egotistic. He simply cannot handle the fact that he lost the popular vote. I mean look at him, he's even launching an investigation into "illegal", voters and what not. He also hasn't stopped talking about the crowds of his innauguration, how the media isn't portraying it correctly. Let's not even get into his "alternative facts" now...

Everything he's done so far is a joke, and unfortunately it looks like he's going to keep that trend up for however long he lasts before being the first ever president to be impeached.

I was under the impression that two presidents had already been impeached and it likely would have been three if Nixon hadn't resigned.  Everything else in your post is spot on, though.  

Some are wondering if the plan all along wasn't to get Pence in via shady means.  The guy could never have won an election in his own right.  But if Trump's song and dance routine gets the election job done, they can use Trump as a puppet to pass some of the more radical and populist crap, then get impeached and make way for Pence to reign with his archaic and dogmatic outlook.  

Best of luck, America.  

[jonnybravo0411]

Americans have made their choice and they have to live with that for the next 4 years. Whether that will turn out to be a good decision or not, time will tell. For me I don't see anything  changing from the status quo all the executive orders he has been issuing will not last long until when he understand that longterm effect decisions deserve proper thinking then he will know that he is no better than those he has been castigating.

You don't see any change from the status quo? That is strange, because the entire nation of Mexico is agitating after Trump proposed the import tariff on their products. If you still don't get it, then just wait for the SCOTUS appointment. Hell is going to break loose.....

For some reason I think that Trump will hold the presidency until the end of his term. Or he will fall under the procedure of impeachment or waiting for the fate of Kennedy. You cannot go into politics with such "dirty hands" like Trump.

[DooMAD]

You cannot go into politics with such "dirty hands".

I wish that were the case, but sadly the opposite is likely true.  Politics in its present guise is rife with corruption and there are exceptionally few involved who do have clean hands.  If you crawl around in a cesspit, dirty hands ensue, whether they were clean at the start or not.  It seems like a natural arena for him to enter.  I'm certainly not defending the guy, but it's honestly difficult to gauge whether he really is an order of magnitude more sleazy than his contemporaries, or if it just seems that way because there's a brighter spotlight shining on him.  Either way, people are looking closely, so he's probably (or hopefully, at least) not going to get away with much.

[DrVaribo]

You cannot go into politics with such "dirty hands".

I wish that were the case, but sadly the opposite is likely true.  Politics in its present guise is rife with corruption and there are exceptionally few involved who do have clean hands.  If you crawl around in a cesspit, dirty hands ensue, whether they were clean at the start or not.  It seems like a natural arena for him to enter.  I'm certainly not defending the guy, but it's honestly difficult to gauge whether he really is an order of magnitude more sleazy than his contemporaries, or if it just seems that way because there's a brighter spotlight shining on him.  Either way, people are looking closely, so he's probably (or hopefully, at least) not going to get away with much.

The problem is that until Trump will have to answer for their crimes, and ill-considered decrees of the President the Americans will deal with the consequences for many years. In addition, America may lose many allies in the world.

[Sithara007]

For some reason I think that Trump will hold the presidency until the end of his term. Or he will fall under the procedure of impeachment or waiting for the fate of Kennedy. You cannot go into politics with such "dirty hands" like Trump.

I don't think that he will be impeached. Even if the senate tries to impeach him (it is difficult, with a 52 vs 48 Republican majority), the U.S. House of Representatives will block the measure. Even the serial rapist Bill Clinton's impeachment failed in the Congress.

[BADecker]

For some reason I think that Trump will hold the presidency until the end of his term. Or he will fall under the procedure of impeachment or waiting for the fate of Kennedy. You cannot go into politics with such "dirty hands" like Trump.

I don't think that he will be impeached. Even if the senate tries to impeach him (it is difficult, with a 52 vs 48 Republican majority), the U.S. House of Representatives will block the measure. Even the serial rapist Bill Clinton's impeachment failed in the Congress.

The Clinton impeachment failed because rape doesn't have anything to do with the presidency. If some individual had succeeded in getting a conviction of harm or damage against Clinton because of rape, and the jury had awarded imprisonment for Clinton as part of the "punishment," then an impeachment could have been brought successfully, because Clinton could not carry out his presidential duties from prison.

[CroIsBest]

He will be a really great president I see that because he is fighting vs that mexican pupil which are coming with ilegall way,he is really concetrated to religion,he is really smart guy which have big amounts of money so he isnt some kind of politician without any school.But I will hate him if he create a war together with Putin in Balkan because we dont war here but America is creating wars too much what is not a really good and other countries dont support that and they will never want to support that because America and Russia are using us for own purposes like a toys and we hate that and we dont like America anymore but maybe Donald Trump can fix that we will see.

[rexxarofmoknathal]

He's far too egotistic. He simply cannot handle the fact that he lost the popular vote. I mean look at him, he's even launching an investigation into "illegal", voters and what not. He also hasn't stopped talking about the crowds of his innauguration, how the media isn't portraying it correctly. Let's not even get into his "alternative facts" now...

Everything he's done so far is a joke, and unfortunately it looks like he's going to keep that trend up for however long he lasts before being the first ever president to be impeached.

I was under the impression that two presidents had already been impeached and it likely would have been three if Nixon hadn't resigned.  Everything else in your post is spot on, though.  

Some are wondering if the plan all along wasn't to get Pence in via shady means.  The guy could never have won an election in his own right.  But if Trump's song and dance routine gets the election job done, they can use Trump as a puppet to pass some of the more radical and populist crap, then get impeached and make way for Pence to reign with his archaic and dogmatic outlook.  

Best of luck, America.  

Sorry, impeached and removed is what I should have said. Clinton and Johnson were acquitted by the Senate

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

i see Trump doing more harm than good in the name of making united states great again....
and when his term of office ends no one will vote him in for a second term...out he goes

[Sithara007]

For some reason I think that Trump will hold the presidency until the end of his term. Or he will fall under the procedure of impeachment or waiting for the fate of Kennedy. You cannot go into politics with such "dirty hands" like Trump.

I don't think that he will be impeached. Even if the senate tries to impeach him (it is difficult, with a 52 vs 48 Republican majority), the U.S. House of Representatives will block the measure. Even the serial rapist Bill Clinton's impeachment failed in the Congress.

The Clinton impeachment failed because rape doesn't have anything to do with the presidency.

Whoa!

That guy used the white house like a brothel, and he raped every women who ever visited that place during his term (perhaps with the exception of Hillary and her lesbian partner Huma Abedin). And still, he couldn't be impeached?   

[darklus123]

i see Trump doing more harm than good in the name of making united states great again....
and when his term of office ends no one will vote him in for a second term...out he goes

Hmm, I guess it is still to early for us to tell if what will going to happen to US because trump was been in the position for short awhile. Although I do not totally agree to what all trump do during his terms for the past few weeks. Good thing about him is even if he is only in the position quite a while he decides and act quickly and not like the other previous US presidents.

[BADecker]

Here's The Real Deal In A Nutshell, Fellow Americans...

Agencies within the United States Government will begin withholding federal grant funds from those cities, and additional actions to enforce federal immigration law will be taken soon.

Unlike Obama, President Trump is not trying to making new laws by executive decree. In his Executive Order, the president is only reminding mayors and governors of existing federal law dating to 1996:

U.S. Code › Title 8 › Chapter 12 › Subchapter II › Part IX › § 1373

8 U.S. Code § 1373 – Communication between government agencies and the Immigration and Naturalization Service:

Notwithstanding any other provision of Federal, State, or local law, a Federal, State, or local government entity or official may not prohibit, or in any way restrict, any government entity or official from sending to, or receiving from, the Immigration and Naturalization Service information regarding the citizenship or immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of any individual.

Read more at http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=67766.

[Sithara007]

Hmm, I guess it is still to early for us to tell if what will going to happen to US because trump was been in the position for short awhile. Although I do not totally agree to what all trump do during his terms for the past few weeks. Good thing about him is even if he is only in the position quite a while he decides and act quickly and not like the other previous US presidents.

Have you checked the latest news? Trump has appointed Neil Gorsuch to the SCOTUS, to fill the vacancy left by Scalia. Ruth Ginsberg may die soon, and Trump is going to appoint her replacement as well. He may remain as a president for only 4 years. But he will change the future of the United States forever.

[noel2123]

Well I think its too early to criticize him now, though I'm not living in USA but my other relatives are there but I really hope Trump will do good in his term, because if he failed he just give the people who criticizing him from the first time to have a chance to put him down, super down. 

[pseexh]

For some reason I think that Trump will hold the presidency until the end of his term. Or he will fall under the procedure of impeachment or waiting for the fate of Kennedy. You cannot go into politics with such "dirty hands" like Trump.

I don't think that he will be impeached. Even if the senate tries to impeach him (it is difficult, with a 52 vs 48 Republican majority), the U.S. House of Representatives will block the measure. Even the serial rapist Bill Clinton's impeachment failed in the Congress.

Do not forget that in the Congress and Senate a lot of people who do not share the optimism about policy Trump. The Republican majority may well agree with the Democrats. In addition, it can be a Vice President.

[darklus123]

Hmm, I guess it is still to early for us to tell if what will going to happen to US because trump was been in the position for short awhile. Although I do not totally agree to what all trump do during his terms for the past few weeks. Good thing about him is even if he is only in the position quite a while he decides and act quickly and not like the other previous US presidents.

Have you checked the latest news? Trump has appointed Neil Gorsuch to the SCOTUS, to fill the vacancy left by Scalia. Ruth Ginsberg may die soon, and Trump is going to appoint her replacement as well. He may remain as a president for only 4 years. But he will change the future of the United States forever.

Actually no haven't hear it and not familiar with neil either. I agree he is something altho sometimes i doubt his intentions with all his laws.

But he will change the future of the United States forever. In your point of view is it for good? or for worse?

[yuiyuga]

Hmm, I guess it is still to early for us to tell if what will going to happen to US because trump was been in the position for short awhile. Although I do not totally agree to what all trump do during his terms for the past few weeks. Good thing about him is even if he is only in the position quite a while he decides and act quickly and not like the other previous US presidents.

Have you checked the latest news? Trump has appointed Neil Gorsuch to the SCOTUS, to fill the vacancy left by Scalia. Ruth Ginsberg may die soon, and Trump is going to appoint her replacement as well. He may remain as a president for only 4 years. But he will change the future of the United States forever.

Actually no haven't hear it and not familiar with neil either. I agree he is something altho sometimes i doubt his intentions with all his laws.

But he will change the future of the United States forever. In your point of view is it for good? or for worse?

It seems to me that Trump will not be President of the United States all 4 years. No one is interested in it. Trump broke all tradition in American politics. In its best case, he will be declared the impeachment, and at worst it is waiting for the fate of Kennedy.

[gabmen]

i wanna know your thoughts ^^

Well one thing I can say about the first few days of trump's administration, it not boring. His decisions are pretty much controversial in all aspects and I think most people are not at ease with how he plans to run the government. I'm a little bit uneasy with how he's going to handle the issue with china and Russia and also how he plans to take on climate change, which I don't think he's really taking seriously

[sergeyzol]

i wanna know your thoughts ^^

Well one thing I can say about the first few days of trump's administration, it not boring. His decisions are pretty much controversial in all aspects and I think most people are not at ease with how he plans to run the government. I'm a little bit uneasy with how he's going to handle the issue with china and Russia and also how he plans to take on climate change, which I don't think he's really taking seriously

Trump is the disgrace of America! He says that make America great. It is a lie! He's too stupid to to do something. His brain enough to destroy everything. Nobody cares what will happen to Americans then.

[mikehersh2]

   Personally, I do not like Donald Trump, however there are some things that he is doing that I believe can benefit the country if executed correctly. Do I believe he is equipped for the job, no, but we have to give him a

chance. One thing that he does bring to the table is his patriotism. I believe his speeches and his "America First" attitude, patriotism and unity will greatly increase in the country. He says frequently that he wants

to fly jets over New York City for example to promote the military, which I think is great.

    However, as for his entire term as President, he will do no good for this country, and in the end, harm us as a nation. This is simply because of the conflict he creates with other countries around the world. Trump

now represents us in everything he says and does, and for someone who is constantly putting down other countries, it will cause long term conflict.

[Spendulus]

i wanna know your thoughts ^^

Well one thing I can say about the first few days of trump's administration, it not boring. His decisions are pretty much controversial in all aspects and I think most people are not at ease with how he plans to run the government. I'm a little bit uneasy with how he's going to handle the issue with china and Russia and also how he plans to take on climate change, which I don't think he's really taking seriously

Trump is the disgrace of America! He says that make America great. It is a lie! He's too stupid to to do something. His brain enough to destroy everything. Nobody cares what will happen to Americans then.

Looks like we are going to have to get used to years of rather interesting comments from our international friends about the new Monster-in-Chief.  What makes me laugh is how sadly quiet they were when the Bamster's train wreck was ongoing.

The propaganda and lies is really, really thick.

[BADecker]

Trump Continues Obama's Inane, Immoral, Unconstitutional Drone Policy

Instead of lamenting all the lives needlessly destroyed, we praise a US soldier who died in an illegal, immoral, and unconstitutional action.

In the following video, Ron Paul discusses US action in Yemen.

President Trump ordered a second US attack on Yemen in his still-short presidency. Over the weekend a commando-style raid was said to have killed 14 al-Qaeda operatives. Also killed were at least ten civilians including children. Is this just a continuation of Obama's disastrous Yemen policy?

Droning On: More US Bombs On Yemen

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KURd2NjwASE


Read more at https://mishtalk.com/2017/01/31/trump-continues-obama-drone-policy/.

[HarringtonStark]

I think he will be assassinated like Kenedy.

[Spendulus]

I think he will be assassinated like Kenedy.

Were that to happen, would you like to take a guess how the American people would react?

Making a martyr of someone is not a smart move.

[Silberman]

i wanna know your thoughts ^^

I think the best policy right now is to wait and see his actions, while I don't particularly like Trump, I hope he does well for the people living in the united states.

[Sithara007]

Were that to happen, would you like to take a guess how the American people would react?

Making a martyr of someone is not a smart move.

LOL... that will be a nightmare for the lefties. They will gain nothing from the assassination of a 70-year old. What if he is replaced by someone even more conservative and younger, like Rand Paul or Donald Trump Jr?

[Aleister Crowley]

i wanna know your thoughts ^^

Well one thing I can say about the first few days of trump's administration, it not boring. His decisions are pretty much controversial in all aspects and I think most people are not at ease with how he plans to run the government. I'm a little bit uneasy with how he's going to handle the issue with china and Russia and also how he plans to take on climate change, which I don't think he's really taking seriously

Trump is the disgrace of America! He says that make America great. It is a lie! He's too stupid to to do something. His brain enough to destroy everything. Nobody cares what will happen to Americans then.

Looks like we are going to have to get used to years of rather interesting comments from our international friends about the new Monster-in-Chief.  What makes me laugh is how sadly quiet they were when the Bamster's train wreck was ongoing.

The propaganda and lies is really, really thick.

thats right, trump close everything, his very ambitious,He wants to make america like she expected without receiving advice from others. certainly he will not be thinking about the opposition of the people of america are not one idea with him, This will give the effect is not good,I am very worried about this, it might be many countries that worry and make them unhappy, balance with other countries will deteriorate,not just another country, many American citizens who disagree with policies that will do trump. I just hope the American relationship, with other countries will be fine and the American people can make this situation be fine. hope everyone will support more trump the interests of many people and better cooperation with other countries.

[freedomno1]

Strategic and commanding
http://www.salon.com/2017/02/01/payback-to-the-christian-right-donald-trump-owes-a-huge-debt-and-neil-gorsuch-is-the-first-installment/

[Leprikon]

Were that to happen, would you like to take a guess how the American people would react?

Making a martyr of someone is not a smart move.

LOL... that will be a nightmare for the lefties. They will gain nothing from the assassination of a 70-year old. What if he is replaced by someone even more conservative and younger, like Rand Paul or Donald Trump Jr?

What are you laughing at? Only Russian you can always vote for tyrants and thieves. Trump for America will be a good inoculation against such idiots in the future. I do wonder when the Russians teach the Americans how to live!

[Spendulus]

Strategic and commanding
http://www.salon.com/2017/02/01/payback-to-the-christian-right-donald-trump-owes-a-huge-debt-and-neil-gorsuch-is-the-first-installment/

SALON??

Gee whiz, they forget to tell us that last time Neil Gorsuch was confirmed 45 Democrats voted for him.

Salon wouldn't just be a propaganda drone, would it? 

Made up news, fake story, spun a certain way, blah blah blah.

http://freebeacon.com/politics/democrats-voted-neil-gorsuch-circuit-court-judge/

[Sithara007]

Strategic and commanding
http://www.salon.com/2017/02/01/payback-to-the-christian-right-donald-trump-owes-a-huge-debt-and-neil-gorsuch-is-the-first-installment/

SALON??

Gee whiz, they forget to tell us that last time Neil Gorsuch was confirmed 45 Democrats voted for him.

Salon wouldn't just be a propaganda drone, would it? 

Made up news, fake story, spun a certain way, blah blah blah.

http://freebeacon.com/politics/democrats-voted-neil-gorsuch-circuit-court-judge/

Also, did you saw this?

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2017/02/02/fellow-dems-target-chris-coons-urging-him-fight-neil-gorsuchs-nomination/97400964/

Even some of the Democrat senators are openly supporting the nomination. I doubt whether the Dems will have the support of 41 members, needed for the filibuster crap.

[Spendulus]

Strategic and commanding
http://www.salon.com/2017/02/01/payback-to-the-christian-right-donald-trump-owes-a-huge-debt-and-neil-gorsuch-is-the-first-installment/

SALON??

Gee whiz, they forget to tell us that last time Neil Gorsuch was confirmed 45 Democrats voted for him.

Salon wouldn't just be a propaganda drone, would it? 

Made up news, fake story, spun a certain way, blah blah blah.

http://freebeacon.com/politics/democrats-voted-neil-gorsuch-circuit-court-judge/

Also, did you saw this?

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2017/02/02/fellow-dems-target-chris-coons-urging-him-fight-neil-gorsuchs-nomination/97400964/

Even some of the Democrat senators are openly supporting the nomination. I doubt whether the Dems will have the support of 41 members, needed for the filibuster crap.

What is literally comedy is this:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/02/01/schumer-makes-clear-democrats-filibuster-gorsuch-nomination/97340692/

The Democrats are the ones that started the "nuclear option" of 50 not 60 votes.  Now that the tables are turned and the other side's in power, they are showing such virtuous fake outrage at their own policy being used by the other side.

[ovvidiy]

Strategic and commanding
http://www.salon.com/2017/02/01/payback-to-the-christian-right-donald-trump-owes-a-huge-debt-and-neil-gorsuch-is-the-first-installment/

SALON??

Gee whiz, they forget to tell us that last time Neil Gorsuch was confirmed 45 Democrats voted for him.

Salon wouldn't just be a propaganda drone, would it? 

Made up news, fake story, spun a certain way, blah blah blah.

http://freebeacon.com/politics/democrats-voted-neil-gorsuch-circuit-court-judge/

Also, did you saw this?

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2017/02/02/fellow-dems-target-chris-coons-urging-him-fight-neil-gorsuchs-nomination/97400964/

Even some of the Democrat senators are openly supporting the nomination. I doubt whether the Dems will have the support of 41 members, needed for the filibuster crap.

What is literally comedy is this:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/02/01/schumer-makes-clear-democrats-filibuster-gorsuch-nomination/97340692/

The Democrats are the ones that started the "nuclear option" of 50 not 60 votes.  Now that the tables are turned and the other side's in power, they are showing such virtuous fake outrage at their own policy being used by the other side.

What have the Democrats? The nuclear option is no less exploited by the Republicans. Trump himself talked about that will strengthen America's military strength. If Americans lose their allies that the entire economy of America will work on the army.

[Spendulus]

Strategic and commanding
http://www.salon.com/2017/02/01/payback-to-the-christian-right-donald-trump-owes-a-huge-debt-and-neil-gorsuch-is-the-first-installment/

SALON??

Gee whiz, they forget to tell us that last time Neil Gorsuch was confirmed 45 Democrats voted for him.

Salon wouldn't just be a propaganda drone, would it? 

Made up news, fake story, spun a certain way, blah blah blah.

http://freebeacon.com/politics/democrats-voted-neil-gorsuch-circuit-court-judge/

Also, did you saw this?

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2017/02/02/fellow-dems-target-chris-coons-urging-him-fight-neil-gorsuchs-nomination/97400964/

Even some of the Democrat senators are openly supporting the nomination. I doubt whether the Dems will have the support of 41 members, needed for the filibuster crap.

What is literally comedy is this:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/02/01/schumer-makes-clear-democrats-filibuster-gorsuch-nomination/97340692/

The Democrats are the ones that started the "nuclear option" of 50 not 60 votes.  Now that the tables are turned and the other side's in power, they are showing such virtuous fake outrage at their own policy being used by the other side.

What have the Democrats? The nuclear option is no less exploited by the Republicans. Trump himself talked about that will strengthen America's military strength. If Americans lose their allies that the entire economy of America will work on the army.

Um, no, I think you misunderstand.  It has nothing to do with weapons, just a Senate rule that 60 votes is required.  The slang "nuclear option" refers to the Democrats changing the rule to 50.....now the Repubs are in power, this backfires on them.

[dirokkl]

Strategic and commanding
http://www.salon.com/2017/02/01/payback-to-the-christian-right-donald-trump-owes-a-huge-debt-and-neil-gorsuch-is-the-first-installment/

SALON??

Gee whiz, they forget to tell us that last time Neil Gorsuch was confirmed 45 Democrats voted for him.

Salon wouldn't just be a propaganda drone, would it? 

Made up news, fake story, spun a certain way, blah blah blah.

http://freebeacon.com/politics/democrats-voted-neil-gorsuch-circuit-court-judge/

Also, did you saw this?

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2017/02/02/fellow-dems-target-chris-coons-urging-him-fight-neil-gorsuchs-nomination/97400964/

Even some of the Democrat senators are openly supporting the nomination. I doubt whether the Dems will have the support of 41 members, needed for the filibuster crap.

What is literally comedy is this:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/02/01/schumer-makes-clear-democrats-filibuster-gorsuch-nomination/97340692/

The Democrats are the ones that started the "nuclear option" of 50 not 60 votes.  Now that the tables are turned and the other side's in power, they are showing such virtuous fake outrage at their own policy being used by the other side.

What have the Democrats? The nuclear option is no less exploited by the Republicans. Trump himself talked about that will strengthen America's military strength. If Americans lose their allies that the entire economy of America will work on the army.

Um, no, I think you misunderstand.  It has nothing to do with weapons, just a Senate rule that 60 votes is required.  The slang "nuclear option" refers to the Democrats changing the rule to 50.....now the Repubs are in power, this backfires on them.

I think that in General it is not possible to work in a situation when the majority of citizens and other governments of the world do not support the policy of Trump. I think you need to fight for his resignation.

[Spendulus]

Strategic and commanding
http://www.salon.com/2017/02/01/payback-to-the-christian-right-donald-trump-owes-a-huge-debt-and-neil-gorsuch-is-the-first-installment/

SALON??

Gee whiz, they forget to tell us that last time Neil Gorsuch was confirmed 45 Democrats voted for him.

Salon wouldn't just be a propaganda drone, would it? 

Made up news, fake story, spun a certain way, blah blah blah.

http://freebeacon.com/politics/democrats-voted-neil-gorsuch-circuit-court-judge/

Also, did you saw this?

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2017/02/02/fellow-dems-target-chris-coons-urging-him-fight-neil-gorsuchs-nomination/97400964/

Even some of the Democrat senators are openly supporting the nomination. I doubt whether the Dems will have the support of 41 members, needed for the filibuster crap.

What is literally comedy is this:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/02/01/schumer-makes-clear-democrats-filibuster-gorsuch-nomination/97340692/

The Democrats are the ones that started the "nuclear option" of 50 not 60 votes.  Now that the tables are turned and the other side's in power, they are showing such virtuous fake outrage at their own policy being used by the other side.

What have the Democrats? The nuclear option is no less exploited by the Republicans. Trump himself talked about that will strengthen America's military strength. If Americans lose their allies that the entire economy of America will work on the army.

Um, no, I think you misunderstand.  It has nothing to do with weapons, just a Senate rule that 60 votes is required.  The slang "nuclear option" refers to the Democrats changing the rule to 50.....now the Repubs are in power, this backfires on them.

I think that in General it is not possible to work in a situation when the majority of citizens and other governments of the world do not support the policy of Trump. I think you need to fight for his resignation.

So citizens of a nation in electing a leader should be sensitive as to whether other nations want that choice to be made?

I believe most US citizens if they had been asked, "would the world like Trump to be elected?"
...they would have said "Absolutely not!"

[wowanstrong]

Strategic and commanding
http://www.salon.com/2017/02/01/payback-to-the-christian-right-donald-trump-owes-a-huge-debt-and-neil-gorsuch-is-the-first-installment/

SALON??

Gee whiz, they forget to tell us that last time Neil Gorsuch was confirmed 45 Democrats voted for him.

Salon wouldn't just be a propaganda drone, would it? 

Made up news, fake story, spun a certain way, blah blah blah.

http://freebeacon.com/politics/democrats-voted-neil-gorsuch-circuit-court-judge/

Also, did you saw this?

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2017/02/02/fellow-dems-target-chris-coons-urging-him-fight-neil-gorsuchs-nomination/97400964/

Even some of the Democrat senators are openly supporting the nomination. I doubt whether the Dems will have the support of 41 members, needed for the filibuster crap.

What is literally comedy is this:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/02/01/schumer-makes-clear-democrats-filibuster-gorsuch-nomination/97340692/

The Democrats are the ones that started the "nuclear option" of 50 not 60 votes.  Now that the tables are turned and the other side's in power, they are showing such virtuous fake outrage at their own policy being used by the other side.

What have the Democrats? The nuclear option is no less exploited by the Republicans. Trump himself talked about that will strengthen America's military strength. If Americans lose their allies that the entire economy of America will work on the army.

Um, no, I think you misunderstand.  It has nothing to do with weapons, just a Senate rule that 60 votes is required.  The slang "nuclear option" refers to the Democrats changing the rule to 50.....now the Repubs are in power, this backfires on them.

I think that in General it is not possible to work in a situation when the majority of citizens and other governments of the world do not support the policy of Trump. I think you need to fight for his resignation.

So citizens of a nation in electing a leader should be sensitive as to whether other nations want that choice to be made?

I believe most US citizens if they had been asked, "would the world like Trump to be elected?"
...they would have said "Absolutely not!"

No, of course not. Only things change if Americans want to see America as a country a world leader. Now who will listen to Americans? Now the whole world will seek the possibility of convergence around a more predictable partner.

[Spendulus]

Strategic and commanding
http://www.salon.com/2017/02/01/payback-to-the-christian-right-donald-trump-owes-a-huge-debt-and-neil-gorsuch-is-the-first-installment/

SALON??

Gee whiz, they forget to tell us that last time Neil Gorsuch was confirmed 45 Democrats voted for him.

Salon wouldn't just be a propaganda drone, would it? 

Made up news, fake story, spun a certain way, blah blah blah.

http://freebeacon.com/politics/democrats-voted-neil-gorsuch-circuit-court-judge/

Also, did you saw this?

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2017/02/02/fellow-dems-target-chris-coons-urging-him-fight-neil-gorsuchs-nomination/97400964/

Even some of the Democrat senators are openly supporting the nomination. I doubt whether the Dems will have the support of 41 members, needed for the filibuster crap.

What is literally comedy is this:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/02/01/schumer-makes-clear-democrats-filibuster-gorsuch-nomination/97340692/

The Democrats are the ones that started the "nuclear option" of 50 not 60 votes.  Now that the tables are turned and the other side's in power, they are showing such virtuous fake outrage at their own policy being used by the other side.

What have the Democrats? The nuclear option is no less exploited by the Republicans. Trump himself talked about that will strengthen America's military strength. If Americans lose their allies that the entire economy of America will work on the army.

Um, no, I think you misunderstand.  It has nothing to do with weapons, just a Senate rule that 60 votes is required.  The slang "nuclear option" refers to the Democrats changing the rule to 50.....now the Repubs are in power, this backfires on them.

I think that in General it is not possible to work in a situation when the majority of citizens and other governments of the world do not support the policy of Trump. I think you need to fight for his resignation.

So citizens of a nation in electing a leader should be sensitive as to whether other nations want that choice to be made?

I believe most US citizens if they had been asked, "would the world like Trump to be elected?"
...they would have said "Absolutely not!"

No, of course not. Only things change if Americans want to see America as a country a world leader. Now who will listen to Americans? Now the whole world will seek the possibility of convergence around a more predictable partner.

And what would such a person act like?

Not like Merkel, with her silly fantasies of world utopias, at the direct expense and suffering of the people of her nation.

[DooMAD]

More batshit mental executive orders.  Trump opens the floodgates for the next financial crisis and round of bank bailouts because, like most politicians, he only cares about the banks and his other rich friends.  If the countless idiots who voted for him get thrown under the bus and ripped off again, he isn't going to care in the slightest.  As long as the money flows to the top of the pyramid, all is well in Mr Trump's world (Hint: you aren't a part of his world, you're just collateral damage waiting to happen).


//EDIT:  Stolen from social media:

You voted for Trump because Clinton was going to be in Wall Street's pocket. Trump wants to repeal Dodd-Frank and eliminate the Fiduciary Rule, letting Wall Street return to its pre-2008 ways.
You voted for Trump because of Clinton's emails. The Trump administration is running its own private email server.
You voted for Trump because you thought the Clinton Foundation was "pay for play." Trump has refused to wall off his businesses from his administration, and personally profits from payments from foreign governments.
You voted for Trump because of Clinton's role in Benghazi. Trump ordered the Yemen raid without adequate intel, and tweeted about "FAKE NEWS" while Americans died as a result of his carelessness.
You voted for Trump because Clinton didn't care about "the little guy." Trump's cabinet is full of billionaires, and he took away your health insurance so he could give them a multi-million-dollar tax break.
You voted for Trump because he was going to build a wall and Mexico was going to pay for it. American consumers will pay for the wall via import tariffs.
You voted for Trump because Clinton was going to get us into a war. Trump has provoked our enemies, alienated our allies, and given ISIS a decade's worth of recruiting material.
You voted for Trump because Clinton didn't have the stamina to do the job. Trump hung up on the Australian Prime Minister during a 5pm phone call because "it was at the end of a long day and he was tired and fatigue was setting in."
You voted for Trump because foreign leaders wouldn't "respect" Clinton. Foreign leaders, both friendly and hostile, are openly mocking Trump.
You voted for Trump because Clinton lies and "he tells it like it is." Trump and his administration lie with a regularity and brazenness that can only be described as shocking.
Let's be honest about what really happened.
The reality is that you voted for Trump because you got conned. Trump is a grifter and the American people were the mark. Now that you know the score, quit insisting the con-man is on your side.

That, along with #TrumpRegrets means people are turning on him rather quickly.  The shortest ever Presidential term was just 32 days in 1841.  Starting to think this one might be shorter still.   

[Sithara007]

What is literally comedy is this:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/02/01/schumer-makes-clear-democrats-filibuster-gorsuch-nomination/97340692/

The Democrats are the ones that started the "nuclear option" of 50 not 60 votes.  Now that the tables are turned and the other side's in power, they are showing such virtuous fake outrage at their own policy being used by the other side.

I just hope that these Democrat idiots filibuster the appointment of Gorusch. Trump and the Republicans will repeal the filibuster option and the next time, it is going to be a cakewalk for the GOP. Remember that Gorusch is no more conservative than the justice whom he is replacing.

[wowanstrong]

More batshit mental executive orders.  Trump opens the floodgates for the next financial crisis and round of bank bailouts because, like most politicians, he only cares about the banks and his other rich friends.  If the countless idiots who voted for him get thrown under the bus and ripped off again, he isn't going to care in the slightest.  As long as the money flows to the top of the pyramid, all is well in Mr Trump's world (Hint: you aren't a part of his world, you're just collateral damage waiting to happen).

The worst thing that from the idiotic behavior and decrees Trump will suffer not only those who did not vote for him but those who voted for him. God take care of America. Trump is a fiend.

[Bjorn Ironside]

The future of america is bright with Donald Trump as President.

But we need americans who are educated & informed, who support the right policies for Trump to be effective.

 

Do you think educated & informed americans voted for Trump? I don't think so.

[v1ryspro]

The future of america is bright with Donald Trump as President.

But we need americans who are educated & informed, who support the right policies for Trump to be effective.

 

Do you think educated & informed americans voted for Trump? I don't think so.

I agree with you. Election of the President of America turned into a struggle of light forces with dark. This time the dark forces have won, but the fight is not yet over. I hope that there is still a chance to avenge.

[motodor]

I think the arrival of Donald Trump for president - will be big reforms ... In fact, Trump is not a politician, he is a businessman and that makes it not predictable ... I think correctly selected team will help him make the right decisions in his work as president .. .

[v1ryspro]

I think the arrival of Donald Trump for president - will be big reforms ... In fact, Trump is not a politician, he is a businessman and that makes it not predictable ... I think correctly selected team will help him make the right decisions in his work as president .. .

How is he a businessman? You know what is the status of his business? He may be a bankrupt businessman. If so, why do you think that he will not ruin America? Looking at his first Executive orders I'm not so sure.

[Mersedes]

Only during the first week of the action of idiotic decree Trump the United States cancelled about 100,000 visas. The decree is appealed in court, and its action is suspended during the pendency, but tell me Trump is not an idiot?

[Spendulus]

Only during the first week of the action of idiotic decree Trump the United States cancelled about 100,000 visas. The decree is appealed in court, and its action is suspended during the pendency, but tell me Trump is not an idiot?

Sure.  He's not an idiot.

Look at what you said.  It does nothing to support your beliefs.

[SirPol85]

Only during the first week of the action of idiotic decree Trump the United States cancelled about 100,000 visas. The decree is appealed in court, and its action is suspended during the pendency, but tell me Trump is not an idiot?

Sure.  He's not an idiot.

Look at what you said.  It does nothing to support your beliefs.

I wonder if it were possible to re-vote, Americans would vote again for Trump? I am shocked by American choice. Well I'm not American. I am ashamed of America. I believed that America is a perfect country, but I was wrong. Now I know how many Americans are idiots.

[Spendulus]

Only during the first week of the action of idiotic decree Trump the United States cancelled about 100,000 visas. The decree is appealed in court, and its action is suspended during the pendency, but tell me Trump is not an idiot?

Sure.  He's not an idiot.

Look at what you said.  It does nothing to support your beliefs.

I wonder if it were possible to re-vote, Americans would vote again for Trump? I am shocked by American choice. Well I'm not American. I am ashamed of America. I believed that America is a perfect country, but I was wrong. Now I know how many Americans are idiots.

a perfect country?

You never tried a mc Donald's hamburger

[Sithara007]

I wonder if it were possible to re-vote, Americans would vote again for Trump? I am shocked by American choice. Well I'm not American. I am ashamed of America. I believed that America is a perfect country, but I was wrong. Now I know how many Americans are idiots.

Half of your posts here are in the Russian language, and you seems to be either from Ukraine or Moldova. Trump won the democratically held elections in the United States, and you need to respect the choice of the people there. Why you are so bothered about something happening in the US?

[SuperVillain]

Trump's just big clown he will be impeached soon enough

[Dem-artini]

I wonder if it were possible to re-vote, Americans would vote again for Trump? I am shocked by American choice. Well I'm not American. I am ashamed of America. I believed that America is a perfect country, but I was wrong. Now I know how many Americans are idiots.

Half of your posts here are in the Russian language, and you seems to be either from Ukraine or Moldova. Trump won the democratically held elections in the United States, and you need to respect the choice of the people there. Why you are so bothered about something happening in the US?

The fact that you don't write posts in the Russian language does not hide the fact that you're Russian. You are also worried about the choice Americans. Why? It's simple. America is a great country and world leader. What happens in the USA affects all countries.

[Oggy1987]

No matter what he do, I think next great recession is on its way, and Donald will be blamed for it. And for many other things also, whether he is guilty or not. Sure he sounds cruel in some terms, but its still too early to judge him.

[Spendulus]

No matter what he do, I think next great recession is on its way, and Donald will be blamed for it. And for many other things also, whether he is guilty or not. Sure he sounds cruel in some terms, but its still too early to judge him.

So the blame game will be trying to play catch up with the hurricane of actions.

Should be interesting.

Should be easy to sort the truth out too.

[Sithara007]

No matter what he do, I think next great recession is on its way, and Donald will be blamed for it. And for many other things also, whether he is guilty or not. Sure he sounds cruel in some terms, but its still too early to judge him.

The next recession will be caused by the ballooning federal debt of the United States (approaching $20 trillion as of now), and not due to Donald Trump. And 50% of this debt is the contribution of the Nobel prize winner, Barack Obama.

[BCEmporium]

I really wonder why now everybody want to go to USA...  
For crying out loud! It's their country! Lots of countries have visa's restriction and no whining babies come around to cry! Why is that? No touristic places there?
The press just pick on Trump and will undermine anything he does, amplifying it to sound like the ultimate disgrace in the world. Don't be a fool and don't get fooled by that!
Americans didn't vote for him by mistake, at best for lack of options, but not by mistake.

And by "educated and informed" I think many mean "brainwashed".

[t2yax]

We are truly blind what will gonna happen in terms of his presidency. We cannot predict what will gonna happen, in his terms, we create a lot of ideas, and knowledge, or we sometimes accused him. As we all know, President Trump is like Hitler, or they say that, he is kind of dictator in United States.

[21kevin21]

We are truly blind what will gonna happen in terms of his presidency. We cannot predict what will gonna happen, in his terms, we create a lot of ideas, and knowledge, or we sometimes accused him. As we all know, President Trump is like Hitler, or they say that, he is kind of dictator in United States.

Indeed, Trump is dictatorial but he is stupid and I think that stupid dictator is even worse. I do not believe that Trump is able to change the situation in the country by such methods it offers.

[Spendulus]

We are truly blind what will gonna happen in terms of his presidency. We cannot predict what will gonna happen, in his terms, we create a lot of ideas, and knowledge, or we sometimes accused him. As we all know, President Trump is like Hitler, or they say that, he is kind of dictator in United States.

Indeed, Trump is dictatorial but he is stupid and I think that stupid dictator is even worse. I do not believe that Trump is able to change the situation in the country by such methods it offers.

In political propaganda, a lot of people seem to be led to think that some one in politics is "stupid."

Too much propaganda in politics is what got Trump elected.

[SirPol85]

We are truly blind what will gonna happen in terms of his presidency. We cannot predict what will gonna happen, in his terms, we create a lot of ideas, and knowledge, or we sometimes accused him. As we all know, President Trump is like Hitler, or they say that, he is kind of dictator in United States.

Indeed, Trump is dictatorial but he is stupid and I think that stupid dictator is even worse. I do not believe that Trump is able to change the situation in the country by such methods it offers.

In political propaganda, a lot of people seem to be led to think that some one in politics is "stupid."

Too much propaganda in politics is what got Trump elected.

Americans have 1 chance in four years to elect the President. Propaganda nothing to do with it. The Americans chose heart and will now pay for their choice. And perhaps no. Who knows. Problems need to be solved as they arrive.

[Spendulus]

We are truly blind what will gonna happen in terms of his presidency. We cannot predict what will gonna happen, in his terms, we create a lot of ideas, and knowledge, or we sometimes accused him. As we all know, President Trump is like Hitler, or they say that, he is kind of dictator in United States.

Indeed, Trump is dictatorial but he is stupid and I think that stupid dictator is even worse. I do not believe that Trump is able to change the situation in the country by such methods it offers.

In political propaganda, a lot of people seem to be led to think that some one in politics is "stupid."

Too much propaganda in politics is what got Trump elected.

Americans have 1 chance in four years to elect the President. Propaganda nothing to do with it. The Americans chose heart and will now pay for their choice. And perhaps no. Who knows. Problems need to be solved as they arrive.

Propaganda statements bolded.

[Sithara007]

Propaganda statements bolded.

Actually I would encourage this sort of liberal-leftist propaganda. The American society is getting polarized. Large numbers of American citizens are angered by the leftist lying. This will help Trump in the long term.

[gabmen]

We are truly blind what will gonna happen in terms of his presidency. We cannot predict what will gonna happen, in his terms, we create a lot of ideas, and knowledge, or we sometimes accused him. As we all know, President Trump is like Hitler, or they say that, he is kind of dictator in United States.

Indeed, Trump is dictatorial but he is stupid and I think that stupid dictator is even worse. I do not believe that Trump is able to change the situation in the country by such methods it offers.

In political propaganda, a lot of people seem to be led to think that some one in politics is "stupid."

Too much propaganda in politics is what got Trump elected.

Americans have 1 chance in four years to elect the President. Propaganda nothing to do with it. The Americans chose heart and will now pay for their choice. And perhaps no. Who knows. Problems need to be solved as they arrive.

Propaganda statements bolded.

I dont think trump's what people say he is. He's a thinking person and definitely he's not stupid. Its just that he's the unconventional type of leader that makes unconventional decisions. I don't think he won via majirity or popular vote and we may be seeing a lot of americans either regretting or changing their view about trump but its still too early to say at this time if he can actually make america great again or leave it in disarray after his term

[Sithara007]

its still too early to say at this time if he can actually make america great again or leave it in disarray after his term

Obama left the United States in complete disarray. The federal debt is about to cross the $20 trillion mark. The US is one of the few countries, where the federal debt is greater than the GDP. It can't get any worse than this.

[Fireblazer]

its still too early to say at this time if he can actually make america great again or leave it in disarray after his term

Obama left the United States in complete disarray. The federal debt is about to cross the $20 trillion mark. The US is one of the few countries, where the federal debt is greater than the GDP. It can't get any worse than this.

And how many countries on the contrary have America money? Obama left the country Trump in very good condition. More than 3 years there is a stable growth of the economy. Unemployment is around 4%. A look that will make Trump.

[Spendulus]

its still too early to say at this time if he can actually make america great again or leave it in disarray after his term

Obama left the United States in complete disarray. The federal debt is about to cross the $20 trillion mark. The US is one of the few countries, where the federal debt is greater than the GDP. It can't get any worse than this.

And how many countries on the contrary have America money? Obama left the country Trump in very good condition. More than 3 years there is a stable growth of the economy. Unemployment is around 4%. A look that will make Trump.

You believe those fake cooked numbers?

[darklus123]

Hmm, I guess it is still to early for us to tell if what will going to happen to US because trump was been in the position for short awhile. Although I do not totally agree to what all trump do during his terms for the past few weeks. Good thing about him is even if he is only in the position quite a while he decides and act quickly and not like the other previous US presidents.

Have you checked the latest news? Trump has appointed Neil Gorsuch to the SCOTUS, to fill the vacancy left by Scalia. Ruth Ginsberg may die soon, and Trump is going to appoint her replacement as well. He may remain as a president for only 4 years. But he will change the future of the United States forever.

Actually no haven't hear it and not familiar with neil either. I agree he is something altho sometimes i doubt his intentions with all his laws.

But he will change the future of the United States forever. In your point of view is it for good? or for worse?

It seems to me that Trump will not be President of the United States all 4 years. No one is interested in it. Trump broke all tradition in American politics. In its best case, he will be declared the impeachment, and at worst it is waiting for the fate of Kennedy.

Well i agree on the same terms. Trump uses now a america firt policy which is very far from the code of united states which is called as the land of the free and now it is obviously not. I cant tell either if there would be an impeachment that is going to happen for the next 4 years

[Flamma]

The future of america is bright with Donald Trump as President.

But we need americans who are educated & informed, who support the right policies for Trump to be effective.

 

Yes this maybe true. Donald Trump might sound greedy and wants America to prosper. But at the same time, not everything he says make sense. We need people who are intelligent enough to help him out. The will is there and it's great but he can't just go around and do whatever. The American people should be more vigilant and cautious. Things may back fire and the people will be the first one to suffer.

[Spendulus]

The word "impeachment" seems to keep coming up, no doubt by persons that don't understand the process in the USA.

There will not be an impeachment of Trump so let's get real.

[21kevin21]

The word "impeachment" seems to keep coming up, no doubt by persons that don't understand the process in the USA.

There will not be an impeachment of Trump so let's get real.

Never say never! Why do you think that impeachment is not possible. At Trump a lot of dark spots in its history. I'm sure that now the opponents of this clown looking for all possible avenues for impeachment.

[Emoclaw]

The word "impeachment" seems to keep coming up, no doubt by persons that don't understand the process in the USA.

There will not be an impeachment of Trump so let's get real.

Never say never! Why do you think that impeachment is not possible. At Trump a lot of dark spots in its history. I'm sure that now the opponents of this clown looking for all possible avenues for impeachment.

"The Constitution gives the House of Representatives the right to impeach the president. Impeachment means that a charge of misconduct is filed against the president. A majority of the members of the House must vote for these charges in order to impeach the president."
The House is also Red, making impeachment even more impossible.

I also find it quite funny that the only 2 presidents that were ever impeached were Democrats.

[Sithara007]

"The Constitution gives the House of Representatives the right to impeach the president. Impeachment means that a charge of misconduct is filed against the president. A majority of the members of the House must vote for these charges in order to impeach the president."
The House is also Red, making impeachment even more impossible.

Any republican legislator who is even remotely supporting the impeachment proceedings will be treated like a mad dog by the grassroots GOP supporters. The majority of the GOP rank and file voted for Trump not because they were especially fond of him, but because of the pending SCOTUS vacancies. If Trump is impeached and the successor Democrat president nominates ultra-liberal nominees like Kagan and Sotomayor, then there will be a bloodbath within the GOP.

[sportis]

i wanna know your thoughts ^^

Really maybe is more easy to predict the bitcoin price than the future actions of Trump but I will try.

He will redeploy the North Atlantic alliance with another role because believes that NATO must adapt to the 21st century (terrorism and ISIS).
Probably he will abolishes the economic TTIP agreement between US and EU, affecting about 850 million inhabitants in the USA and Europe, which represent 45% of global GDP. Likely to sign a bilateral trade agreement with the United Kingdom as soon withdraw from the European Union.
Gradually he will 'sabotage' the euro. Malloch may be the future US ambassador to EU had commented that euro is a currency that "not only is failing, but a real problem and could collapse within a year or year and a half"
He will improve the US relations with Russia. Trump said that he would overturn proposing the cancelling of sanctions against Russia, in exchange for an agreement to reduce the nuclear weapons.

[3daysGrace]

"The Constitution gives the House of Representatives the right to impeach the president. Impeachment means that a charge of misconduct is filed against the president. A majority of the members of the House must vote for these charges in order to impeach the president."
The House is also Red, making impeachment even more impossible.

Any republican legislator who is even remotely supporting the impeachment proceedings will be treated like a mad dog by the grassroots GOP supporters. The majority of the GOP rank and file voted for Trump not because they were especially fond of him, but because of the pending SCOTUS vacancies. If Trump is impeached and the successor Democrat president nominates ultra-liberal nominees like Kagan and Sotomayor, then there will be a bloodbath within the GOP.

Trump once again in another scandal. He stood up for the daughter whose designer clothes refused to sell. Now, the Commission on ethics of civil servants. The principle seems to Trump a day without scandal.

[Spendulus]

The word "impeachment" seems to keep coming up, no doubt by persons that don't understand the process in the USA.

There will not be an impeachment of Trump so let's get real.

Never say never! Why do you think that impeachment is not possible. At Trump a lot of dark spots in its history. I'm sure that now the opponents of this clown looking for all possible avenues for impeachment.

Yeah, get real.  You don't like Trump, then look at his actions and produce substantive logical arguments against them.

Calling him a clown won't get any traction.

[DooMAD]

Trump tells judges who ruled against the travel ban "SEE YOU IN COURT", surprising many with his elementary understanding of where judges work.   

You don't like Trump, then look at his actions and produce substantive logical arguments against them.

Calling him a clown won't get any traction.

Trump opens the floodgates for the next financial crisis and round of bank bailouts because, like most politicians, he only cares about the banks and his other rich friends.

Let's see you justify dismantling Dodd-Frank, then.  Did you learn nothing from 2008?  I suppose on the plus side, we wouldn't be here on this particular forum right now hodling our bitcoins if it weren't for that mess.  But I honestly don't see the point in not just repeating past mistakes but also compounding them.  The banks need to be kept on a short leash or they will continue to abuse their power to magically create money IOUs, which some people like to pretend are money, from thin air.  The word "responsibility" isn't even in their vocabulary.  There are at least four reasons listed here why trump is a clown.  I promise you this won't end well.

The word "impeachment" seems to keep coming up, no doubt by persons that don't understand the process in the USA.

There will not be an impeachment of Trump so let's get real.

Two American legal experts disagree with you.  

'Unprecedented corruption of the Oval Office', they say.

[Sithara007]

"The Constitution gives the House of Representatives the right to impeach the president. Impeachment means that a charge of misconduct is filed against the president. A majority of the members of the House must vote for these charges in order to impeach the president."
The House is also Red, making impeachment even more impossible.

Any republican legislator who is even remotely supporting the impeachment proceedings will be treated like a mad dog by the grassroots GOP supporters. The majority of the GOP rank and file voted for Trump not because they were especially fond of him, but because of the pending SCOTUS vacancies. If Trump is impeached and the successor Democrat president nominates ultra-liberal nominees like Kagan and Sotomayor, then there will be a bloodbath within the GOP.

Trump once again in another scandal. He stood up for the daughter whose designer clothes refused to sell. Now, the Commission on ethics of civil servants. The principle seems to Trump a day without scandal.

Are you sure that when Bill Clinton was the president, he didn't exerted pressure on the business leaders so that his wife daughter could get business? Trump is not surviving on revenues from Ivanka's cloth sales. Just admit it and move on.

[SameHow]

You don't like Trump, then look at his actions and produce substantive logical arguments against them.

Calling him a clown won't get any traction.

Trump opens the floodgates for the next financial crisis and round of bank bailouts because, like most politicians, he only cares about the banks and his other rich friends.

Let's see you justify dismantling Dodd-Frank, then.  Did you learn nothing from 2008?  I suppose on the plus side, we wouldn't be here on this particular forum right now hodling our bitcoins if it weren't for that mess.  But I honestly don't see the point in not just repeating past mistakes but also compounding them.  The banks need to be kept on a short leash or they will continue to abuse their power to magically create money IOUs, which some people like to pretend are money, from thin air.  The word "responsibility" isn't even in their vocabulary.  There are at least four reasons listed here why trump is a clown.  I promise you this won't end well.

The banking system is built so that it can not be curbed. Governments need banks and money depends on them. People, too, are hostages of loans. It seems to me that the us problem is not migrants, and the Federal reserve.

[DooMAD]

You don't like Trump, then look at his actions and produce substantive logical arguments against them.

Calling him a clown won't get any traction.

Trump opens the floodgates for the next financial crisis and round of bank bailouts because, like most politicians, he only cares about the banks and his other rich friends.

Let's see you justify dismantling Dodd-Frank, then.  Did you learn nothing from 2008?  I suppose on the plus side, we wouldn't be here on this particular forum right now hodling our bitcoins if it weren't for that mess.  But I honestly don't see the point in not just repeating past mistakes but also compounding them.  The banks need to be kept on a short leash or they will continue to abuse their power to magically create money IOUs, which some people like to pretend are money, from thin air.  The word "responsibility" isn't even in their vocabulary.  There are at least four reasons listed here why trump is a clown.  I promise you this won't end well.

The banking system is built so that it can not be curbed. Governments need banks and money depends on them. People, too, are hostages of loans. It seems to me that the us problem is not migrants, and the Federal reserve.

I'd even go a step further than that and say the economic problem everywhere is not migrants, but the way in which the bankster cartels abuse their position.  Most research shows that migrants are a net contributor to the economy.  The UK, for example, is full of people bitching about immigration and how they're all supposedly here to claim benefits, but the latest findings estimate that recent immigrants from the 10 countries that joined the EU in 2004 contributed £1.12 for every £1 they received in state assistance.  Those from the rest of the EU put in £1.64 for every £1.  If there's money being drained from the economy, it's the damn banksters and the politicians getting the free handouts, not the migrants.  Trump tearing apart the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, while stopping people coming to the US to work and contribute to the economy is just one poor judgement atop another.

[darklus123]

The word "impeachment" seems to keep coming up, no doubt by persons that don't understand the process in the USA.

There will not be an impeachment of Trump so let's get real.

Exactly, maybe that is the reason why they are one of the strongest among all other countries. because basically they have a very different approach when it comes to all things. Tho his leadership would still be very interesting just like our president(philippines).

[DooMAD]

The word "impeachment" seems to keep coming up, no doubt by persons that don't understand the process in the USA.

There will not be an impeachment of Trump so let's get real.

Exactly, maybe that is the reason why they are one of the strongest among all other countries. because basically they have a very different approach when it comes to all things. Tho his leadership would still be very interesting just like our president(philippines).

It all depends on your interpretation of the US Constitution’s Foreign Emoluments Clause, Domestic Emoluments Clause and the federal STOCK Act.  Some argue that he either already has violated, or is close to violating, all of them.  And that's probably the least of his worries, heh.  Whether it be hotel soirees with diplomats, alleged collusion with the Russian government, dozens of open lawsuits or multiple accusations of sexual assault, there are a multitude of things that could conceivably get him impeached.

[varyspro]

The word "impeachment" seems to keep coming up, no doubt by persons that don't understand the process in the USA.

There will not be an impeachment of Trump so let's get real.

Exactly, maybe that is the reason why they are one of the strongest among all other countries. because basically they have a very different approach when it comes to all things. Tho his leadership would still be very interesting just like our president(philippines).

It all depends on your interpretation of the US Constitution’s Foreign Emoluments Clause, Domestic Emoluments Clause and the federal STOCK Act.  Some argue that he either already has violated, or is close to violating, all of them.  And that's probably the least of his worries, heh.  Whether it be hotel soirees with diplomats, alleged collusion with the Russian government, dozens of open lawsuits or multiple accusations of sexual assault, there are a multitude of things that could conceivably get him impeached.

Trump has already broken everything you can break. After the scandal with the Russian trace in his administration, today the white house said he hopes that Russia will return the annexed Crimea to Ukraine. I hope that won't save him from impeachment

[Balthazar]

[Spendulus]

Lol, I think Trump and Putin will get along splendidly.

It was Hillary that needed a fake "enemy, Evil Russia" to divert attention from her own many flaws.

[popcorn1]

You don't like Trump, then look at his actions and produce substantive logical arguments against them.

Calling him a clown won't get any traction.

Trump opens the floodgates for the next financial crisis and round of bank bailouts because, like most politicians, he only cares about the banks and his other rich friends.

Let's see you justify dismantling Dodd-Frank, then.  Did you learn nothing from 2008?  I suppose on the plus side, we wouldn't be here on this particular forum right now hodling our bitcoins if it weren't for that mess.  But I honestly don't see the point in not just repeating past mistakes but also compounding them.  The banks need to be kept on a short leash or they will continue to abuse their power to magically create money IOUs, which some people like to pretend are money, from thin air.  The word "responsibility" isn't even in their vocabulary.  There are at least four reasons listed here why trump is a clown.  I promise you this won't end well.

The banking system is built so that it can not be curbed. Governments need banks and money depends on them. People, too, are hostages of loans. It seems to me that the us problem is not migrants, and the Federal reserve.

I'd even go a step further than that and say the economic problem everywhere is not migrants, but the way in which the bankster cartels abuse their position.  Most research shows that migrants are a net contributor to the economy.  The UK, for example, is full of people bitching about immigration and how they're all supposedly here to claim benefits, but the latest findings estimate that recent immigrants from the 10 countries that joined the EU in 2004 contributed £1.12 for every £1 they received in state assistance.  Those from the rest of the EU put in £1.64 for every £1.  If there's money being drained from the economy, it's the damn banksters and the politicians getting the free handouts, not the migrants.  Trump tearing apart the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, while stopping people coming to the US to work and contribute to the economy is just one poor judgement atop another.

The immigrants are not making the masses of the uk money they are making the few money..
Now when they under fund the nhs we the natives suffer..
More people are here using the public services a longer wait..Not for the rich though they made all the money of the immigrants..

Some immigration is good and i would hate to walk around and everybody is a white person BUT an open door policy is crazy..
Do you own an electric company?..Train company?..Loads of homes?..Then yes i understand why people want immigration..GREED

And also if your labour party invite poor and they will vote for us..
You will see it was labour who started all this open door policy so they could get more poor immigrants votes..
So it proves more poor immigrants than rich ones..And the more poor will flood the NHS SCHOOLS public services..

Imagine you only got 100 pounds to feed 10 people add 50 more how hungry will you be..

Now if your a rich immigrant what money do they give?..
Nothing much because it's mostly the poor worker who gets taxed the rich get away with it..


IF WE MAKE SO MUCH MONEY OF IMMIGRANTS..WHY DO WE KEEP BORROWING MONEY..
I mean all this tax from immigrants we should be a debt free country..

They keep adding immigrants to try and get the debt down and the vote but they are making it worse and worse..
To many to fund the public services..

Explain in 1970s the uk was skint..How come i could get a doctor to come to my home at anytime but cannot get one now..
You think because of all this immigration i could get to see a doctor so easy?..
All this money we make of immigrants ..

TONY BLAIR IS A RAT..Got paid by saudi and who ever else and sold his country and solders out..For money and the poor immigrants votes..

[DimidoffVany]

Lol, I think Trump and Putin will get along splendidly.

It was Hillary that needed a fake "enemy, Evil Russia" to divert attention from her own many flaws.

Trump never not get along with Putin. America is the Bastion of democracy, and Russia's reserve of communism. Putin is no different from Hitler. If Trump tries to get closer to Putin will be impeached.

[Tyrantt]

Well he had a good start, tho I'm more interested what will those who were chosen by him do, more than what he will do. He already did and started doing things he promised in his campaign. Also, I'm eager to see what will be with US and RUS relations.

[squatz1]

He's going to be fine, this is what happens in the start of any new administration with intense scrutinity from all outsides groups on any move that he makes while in office, it may be a bit heightned at the moment due to the controversial nature of the moves but he's going to be fine, just like the country is going to be fine.

He is going to focus solely on the interest of the US and the US alone. As should what the other President should have done especially Obama.

This is something I will agree on that most other U.S presidents haven't and it's sad, you shouldn't be looking out for the interests of your political party or interests, you should be looking out for the American people and that's all that matters.

[Sithara007]

Trump never not get along with Putin. America is the Bastion of democracy, and Russia's reserve of communism. Putin is no different from Hitler. If Trump tries to get closer to Putin will be impeached.

Trump has said that he respects Putin. But he does disagree with Putin on may points. Iran is a prime example. Trump want to impose embargoes and sanctions on Iran, while Putin is opposed to the idea.

[zero1ten]

i wanna know your thoughts ^^

Our president is eerily similar with Trump in terms of how he perceived the media as bias and how he doesn't handle criticism very well, and so far our government is already losing much enthusiasm from the people and starting to realize how stupid making him as our president so I think americans will surely realize this as well sooner or later.

[igorokavg13]

Trump never not get along with Putin. America is the Bastion of democracy, and Russia's reserve of communism. Putin is no different from Hitler. If Trump tries to get closer to Putin will be impeached.

Trump has said that he respects Putin. But he does disagree with Putin on may points. Iran is a prime example. Trump want to impose embargoes and sanctions on Iran, while Putin is opposed to the idea.

It's actually a game. Putin is not beneficial to the lifting of sanctions against Iran. There's a lot of oil and this immediately leads to the decline in world oil prices and a decline in sales to Russia. It is likely that actions Trump in favor of Russia.

[bryant.coleman]

Trump never not get along with Putin. America is the Bastion of democracy, and Russia's reserve of communism. Putin is no different from Hitler. If Trump tries to get closer to Putin will be impeached.

Trump has said that he respects Putin. But he does disagree with Putin on may points. Iran is a prime example. Trump want to impose embargoes and sanctions on Iran, while Putin is opposed to the idea.

It's actually a game. Putin is not beneficial to the lifting of sanctions against Iran. There's a lot of oil and this immediately leads to the decline in world oil prices and a decline in sales to Russia. It is likely that actions Trump in favor of Russia.

In the long-term, the Iranian oil production doesn't matter much. If the price of the crude oil remains constantly above the $55 per barrel mark, then the American frackers will start ramping up their daily production. So there is no long term benefit for Russia. In addition to that, Russia knows that Trump is not very reliable. He can crack under pressure from the GOP senators.

[ovvidiy]

Trump never not get along with Putin. America is the Bastion of democracy, and Russia's reserve of communism. Putin is no different from Hitler. If Trump tries to get closer to Putin will be impeached.

Trump has said that he respects Putin. But he does disagree with Putin on may points. Iran is a prime example. Trump want to impose embargoes and sanctions on Iran, while Putin is opposed to the idea.

It's actually a game. Putin is not beneficial to the lifting of sanctions against Iran. There's a lot of oil and this immediately leads to the decline in world oil prices and a decline in sales to Russia. It is likely that actions Trump in favor of Russia.

In the long-term, the Iranian oil production doesn't matter much. If the price of the crude oil remains constantly above the $55 per barrel mark, then the American frackers will start ramping up their daily production. So there is no long term benefit for Russia. In addition to that, Russia knows that Trump is not very reliable. He can crack under pressure from the GOP senators.

When Barack Obama wanted to remove the sanctions against Iran are only the news of this provoked the fall of prices on the market, besides, Iran is not going to cut oil production by OPEC's decision. Iran is not beneficial to Russia

[TrumpD]

Before the election many people viewed Donald Trump as the lesser of two evils since Hillary Clinton is seen as the same old corrupt politician. Now we see that his lack of experience combined with the incompetence of the people surrounding him (eg Sean Spicer), make the future unpredictably bad. I just hope he will be impeached

[Aikonio]

Before the election many people viewed Donald Trump as the lesser of two evils since Hillary Clinton is seen as the same old corrupt politician. Now we see that his lack of experience combined with the incompetence of the people surrounding him (eg Sean Spicer), make the future unpredictably bad. I just hope he will be impeached

Are you sure that Trump the lesser evil? I'm not so sure. Can you imagine what will happen if it turns out that Trump really recruited by Putin? Look how many scandals related to the Russian trace in his team.

[Spendulus]

Before the election many people viewed Donald Trump as the lesser of two evils since Hillary Clinton is seen as the same old corrupt politician. Now we see that his lack of experience combined with the incompetence of the people surrounding him (eg Sean Spicer), make the future unpredictably bad. I just hope he will be impeached

Are you sure that Trump the lesser evil? I'm not so sure. Can you imagine what will happen if it turns out that Trump really recruited by Putin? Look how many scandals related to the Russian trace in his team.

Sure, and Obama was recruited by Iran.

Much more likely, actually.

[Alfa123]

Before the election many people viewed Donald Trump as the lesser of two evils since Hillary Clinton is seen as the same old corrupt politician. Now we see that his lack of experience combined with the incompetence of the people surrounding him (eg Sean Spicer), make the future unpredictably bad. I just hope he will be impeached

Are you sure that Trump the lesser evil? I'm not so sure. Can you imagine what will happen if it turns out that Trump really recruited by Putin? Look how many scandals related to the Russian trace in his team.

Sure, and Obama was recruited by Iran.

Much more likely, actually.

And what have Obama to Iran? It seems to me that Obama has done anything to Iran curtailed its nuclear program. And mind you did this without war. Trump restores sanctions against Iran to take out the competition for the Russian market.

[Sithara007]

When Barack Obama wanted to remove the sanctions against Iran are only the news of this provoked the fall of prices on the market, besides, Iran is not going to cut oil production by OPEC's decision. Iran is not beneficial to Russia

Iran is one of the top importers of Russian defense equipment (partly because they can't get the western stuff). The bilateral trade between Russia and Iran is huge and they have shared interests in Yemen and Syria. So you can't say that Iran is not beneficial to Russia.

[ovvidiy]

When Barack Obama wanted to remove the sanctions against Iran are only the news of this provoked the fall of prices on the market, besides, Iran is not going to cut oil production by OPEC's decision. Iran is not beneficial to Russia

Iran is one of the top importers of Russian defense equipment (partly because they can't get the western stuff). The bilateral trade between Russia and Iran is huge and they have shared interests in Yemen and Syria. So you can't say that Iran is not beneficial to Russia.

Iran is beneficial for Russia only as a buyer of Russian weapons obsolete. As long as Iran is under sanctions he could not buy Western weapons and can not trade oil. All this suggests that when Trump decides to extend sanctions against Iran, he acts in the interests of Russia.

[Sithara007]

When Barack Obama wanted to remove the sanctions against Iran are only the news of this provoked the fall of prices on the market, besides, Iran is not going to cut oil production by OPEC's decision. Iran is not beneficial to Russia

Iran is one of the top importers of Russian defense equipment (partly because they can't get the western stuff). The bilateral trade between Russia and Iran is huge and they have shared interests in Yemen and Syria. So you can't say that Iran is not beneficial to Russia.

Iran is beneficial for Russia only as a buyer of Russian weapons obsolete. As long as Iran is under sanctions he could not buy Western weapons and can not trade oil. All this suggests that when Trump decides to extend sanctions against Iran, he acts in the interests of Russia.

Trump wants to punish Iran (for obvious reasons). He is not much bothered about Russia. And Iran is not the top-most importer of the Russian equipment. India comes first, if I am not wrong.

[Spoetnik]

I think Early Culyer will get elected again..
and Drumpf will have the law changed so he can stay in power like Adolph Hitler.



USE THE CREAM !

[Nathan047]

So far so good. I like his policies and hope he does well.

[Sithara007]

Drumpf will have the law changed so he can stay in power like Adolph Hitler.

Trump is already 70 years old, and I don't think that he is greedy for power. I am not even sure whether he will run again in 2020. He will be able to do a lot in the next four years. And after that, it is up to the American people to review his rule.

[J Gambler]

i wanna know your thoughts ^^

He wanted to be fame hahahaha and i think he wants to troll the world with his own instinct trump are too old to handle big problems in their country he wanted to divide people on his land , abusing his power

[Spendulus]

Drumpf will have the law changed so he can stay in power like Adolph Hitler.

Trump is already 70 years old, and I don't think that he is greedy for power. I am not even sure whether he will run again in 2020. He will be able to do a lot in the next four years. And after that, it is up to the American people to review his rule.

Should be interesting.
Odd that people pulling out the Hitler Stalin Mao false analogies.

Merkel has destroyed her country and maybe all of Europe - what is she?

[Sithara007]

Drumpf will have the law changed so he can stay in power like Adolph Hitler.

Trump is already 70 years old, and I don't think that he is greedy for power. I am not even sure whether he will run again in 2020. He will be able to do a lot in the next four years. And after that, it is up to the American people to review his rule.

Should be interesting.
Odd that people pulling out the Hitler Stalin Mao false analogies.

Merkel has destroyed her country and maybe all of Europe - what is she?

The Nazi reference suits Angela Merkel much better than anyone else. She single-handedly destroyed the European civilization by importing all these hordes of Muslims from the middle east.

[DooMAD]

Merkel has destroyed her country and maybe all of Europe - what is she?

The Nazi reference suits Angela Merkel much better than anyone else. She single-handedly destroyed the European civilization by importing all these hordes of Muslims from the middle east.

If you can, imagine for just a second that you weren't both so spectacularly and obsessively intolerant of Muslims and actually had thoughts and feelings about other matters of governance.  I know it's a bit of a stretch, but just try to imagine it.  Now name one other aspect of Merkel's leadership that is destroying Europe.  Nothing even remotely related to people from outside countries or migration in general.  I'd certainly argue that some of the economic policies need some revision, still a bit too neoliberal for my tastes, but aside from that I don't really have many issues with her.

I find it telling that people who are intolerant of foreign people think that Trump is some kind of saviour and Merkel is the new Hitler, when people who have no issues at all with migration are actually pretty indifferent towards Merkel and see Trump as the fascist, authoritarian tyrant.  Even Robert Mugabe is a fan of Trump.  Peas in a pod.

Also, Tiny Trump meme wins the internet this week.  


Oh, and I'm still waiting for someone to explain why annihilating Dodd-Frank isn't justification to call Trump the biggest clown of them all.  Pretty sure it is:

More batshit mental executive orders.  Trump opens the floodgates for the next financial crisis and round of bank bailouts because, like most politicians, he only cares about the banks and his other rich friends.  If the countless idiots who voted for him get thrown under the bus and ripped off again, he isn't going to care in the slightest.  As long as the money flows to the top of the pyramid, all is well in Mr Trump's world (Hint: you aren't a part of his world, you're just collateral damage waiting to happen).

Let's see you justify dismantling Dodd-Frank, then.  Did you learn nothing from 2008?  I suppose on the plus side, we wouldn't be here on this particular forum right now hodling our bitcoins if it weren't for that mess.  But I honestly don't see the point in not just repeating past mistakes but also compounding them.  The banks need to be kept on a short leash or they will continue to abuse their power to magically create money IOUs, which some people like to pretend are money, from thin air.  The word "responsibility" isn't even in their vocabulary.  There are at least four reasons listed here why trump is a clown.  I promise you this won't end well.

[Spendulus]

.....
Let's see you justify dismantling Dodd-Frank, then.  Did you learn nothing from 2008?  I suppose on the plus side, we wouldn't be here on this particular forum right now hodling our bitcoins if it weren't for that mess.  But I honestly don't see the point in not just repeating past mistakes but also compounding them.  The banks need to be kept on a short leash or they will continue to abuse their power to magically create money IOUs, which some people like to pretend are money, from thin air.  The word "responsibility" isn't even in their vocabulary.  There are at least four reasons listed here why trump is a clown.  I promise you this won't end well.

You're defending a piece of complex legislation written by bankers for bankers, and asserting it's for the benefit of the little man.

I don't buy that.  Not one bit.

Neither have you offered a shred of evidence that your assertions have backing.

Neither does the article you quote support your personal faith in Dodd Frank.

[Sithara007]

Merkel has destroyed her country and maybe all of Europe - what is she?

The Nazi reference suits Angela Merkel much better than anyone else. She single-handedly destroyed the European civilization by importing all these hordes of Muslims from the middle east.

If you can, imagine for just a second that you weren't both so spectacularly and obsessively intolerant of Muslims and actually had thoughts and feelings about other matters of governance.  I know it's a bit of a stretch, but just try to imagine it.  Now name one other aspect of Merkel's leadership that is destroying Europe.

Stop this political correctness BS. I am intolerant of Muslims because the Muslims are intolerant of me. And regarding Merkel, her policies have been a disaster. She has caused the disintegration of the European Union, as a result of her authoritarian policies.

[DooMAD]

.....
Let's see you justify dismantling Dodd-Frank, then.  Did you learn nothing from 2008?  I suppose on the plus side, we wouldn't be here on this particular forum right now hodling our bitcoins if it weren't for that mess.  But I honestly don't see the point in not just repeating past mistakes but also compounding them.  The banks need to be kept on a short leash or they will continue to abuse their power to magically create money IOUs, which some people like to pretend are money, from thin air.  The word "responsibility" isn't even in their vocabulary.  There are at least four reasons listed here why trump is a clown.  I promise you this won't end well.

You're defending a piece of complex legislation written by bankers for bankers, and asserting it's for the benefit of the little man.

I don't buy that.  Not one bit.

Neither have you offered a shred of evidence that your assertions have backing.

Neither does the article you quote support your personal faith in Dodd Frank.

You don't buy that there were unsound and unsafe banking practices that led to the 2008 crash?  Or you don't buy that the law curbs some of those risks?  You're defending a move which is clearly profitable for bankers and increases the risk of casino-style banking and the threat of future bailouts/bailins.  Incontrovertibly, not having to pay for the mistakes of the finance sector is in the benefit of the little man.  If you have any dealings in fiat, it's in your benefit not to pay for those mistakes either.

I'm not saying Dodd-Frank was perfect, by any means, but opening the floodgates to irresponsible lending, reckless derivatives speculation, corruption and general instability is dumb.

Merkel has destroyed her country and maybe all of Europe - what is she?

The Nazi reference suits Angela Merkel much better than anyone else. She single-handedly destroyed the European civilization by importing all these hordes of Muslims from the middle east.

If you can, imagine for just a second that you weren't both so spectacularly and obsessively intolerant of Muslims and actually had thoughts and feelings about other matters of governance.  I know it's a bit of a stretch, but just try to imagine it.  Now name one other aspect of Merkel's leadership that is destroying Europe.

Stop this political correctness BS. I am intolerant of Muslims because the Muslims are intolerant of me. And regarding Merkel, her policies have been a disaster. She has caused the disintegration of the European Union, as a result of her authoritarian policies.

As soon as you stop this populist correctness BS.   

Care to name any specific authoritarian policies which aren't related to migration that are destroying Europe?  Or are you just pissing into the wind here?  Until I see that you are capable of taking off your hate-goggles and looking at the overall picture, I can't take you seriously.

As for Muslims, a tiny fraction of extremists are intolerant of you.  I'm fairly sure the average Muslim just thinks you're an irrelevant bigot not worth a second thought, but aside from that bears you no ill will.  The fact that you tar over a billion people with the same brush also does little for the possibility of me taking you seriously.

Now name one other specific aspect of Merkel's leadership that is destroying Europe.

[Spendulus]

.....
Let's see you justify dismantling Dodd-Frank, then.  Did you learn nothing from 2008?  I suppose on the plus side, we wouldn't be here on this particular forum right now hodling our bitcoins if it weren't for that mess.  But I honestly don't see the point in not just repeating past mistakes but also compounding them.  The banks need to be kept on a short leash or they will continue to abuse their power to magically create money IOUs, which some people like to pretend are money, from thin air.  The word "responsibility" isn't even in their vocabulary.  There are at least four reasons listed here why trump is a clown.  I promise you this won't end well.

You're defending a piece of complex legislation written by bankers for bankers, and asserting it's for the benefit of the little man.

I don't buy that.  Not one bit.

Neither have you offered a shred of evidence that your assertions have backing.

Neither does the article you quote support your personal faith in Dodd Frank.

You don't buy that there were unsound and unsafe banking practices that led to the 2008 crash?  Or you don't buy that the law curbs some of those risks?  You're defending a move which is clearly profitable for bankers and increases the risk of casino-style banking and the threat of future bailouts/bailins.  Incontrovertibly, not having to pay for the mistakes of the finance sector is in the benefit of the little man.  If you have any dealings in fiat, it's in your benefit not to pay for those mistakes either.

I'm not saying Dodd-Frank was perfect, by any means, but opening the floodgates to irresponsible lending, reckless derivatives speculation, corruption and general instability is dumb.
.....

Assuming that a large and complex piece of legislation written by bankers for bankers has any relation at all to the bolded above is really not logical.  Think about it.  How many bankers went to jail?  Why?

[The_prodigy]

i wanna know your thoughts ^^

Trump are too old to handle kind of problems on his country USA is the most powerful country where he is the most powerful man trump already did some good but trump looks like always trolling and fooling people hoping trump will be a good president of america and all people will loved him soon.

[DooMAD]

You don't buy that there were unsound and unsafe banking practices that led to the 2008 crash?  Or you don't buy that the law curbs some of those risks?  You're defending a move which is clearly profitable for bankers and increases the risk of casino-style banking and the threat of future bailouts/bailins.  Incontrovertibly, not having to pay for the mistakes of the finance sector is in the benefit of the little man.  If you have any dealings in fiat, it's in your benefit not to pay for those mistakes either.

I'm not saying Dodd-Frank was perfect, by any means, but opening the floodgates to irresponsible lending, reckless derivatives speculation, corruption and general instability is dumb.
.....

Assuming that a large and complex piece of legislation written by bankers for bankers has any relation at all to the bolded above is really not logical.  Think about it.  How many bankers went to jail?  Why?

America's inability to prosecute bankers isn't in question.  We know that's never going to change regardless of what regulatory measures are or aren't in place.  Although to answer your question, some argue it's around 35, but Dodd-Frank probably wasn't pertinent to all of them.  Sure, if more punitive measures had been involved in drafting that legislation, more banksters would be locked up.  And some critics did complain that the law didn't go far enough in that regard.  But how the immoral activities are punished isn't the question here.  It's how you define which activities are permissible and which aren't permissible to begin with.  That emphasis will now shift because the focus is now on keeping the money flowing at all costs, whereas before it was keeping the money flowing while taking safe practices into consideration.  Repealing the legislation means a greater number of questionable practices will be deemed permissible than before.  Complexity and authorship aside, this is a dangerous change in ethos.

Also, don't pretend for a second that the puppetmasters behind this deregulation aren't banksters:

The president had praise for Jamie Dimon, whose bank, JPMorgan Chase, was often a target of regulatory actions by the Obama administration.
“There’s nobody better to tell me about Dodd-Frank than Jamie, so you’re going to tell me about it,” Mr. Trump said.

The meeting underscored the degree to which the architects of Mr. Trump’s economic strategy are now some of the people he denounced in his campaign, which ended with a commercial that described “a global power structure that is responsible for the economic decisions that have robbed our working class, stripped our country of its wealth and put that money into the pockets of a handful of large corporations.”

The advertisement flashed an image of the chief executive of Goldman Sachs, which has become a virtual feeder for top Trump administration officials. Steven Mnuchin, his nominee for Treasury secretary; Gary Cohn, the chairman of his national economic council; and Stephen K. Bannon, Mr. Trump’s chief strategist, all had worked at Goldman.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/03/business/dealbook/trump-congress-financial-regulations.html

Quite literally, the lunatics are taking over the asylum.  The banksters call the shots now.  Yet you cry that banksters wrote the legislation, so getting rid of it must be great.  Even though it's banksters getting rid of it?  Yeah, sounds logical.  

[criptix]

You don't buy that there were unsound and unsafe banking practices that led to the 2008 crash?  Or you don't buy that the law curbs some of those risks?  You're defending a move which is clearly profitable for bankers and increases the risk of casino-style banking and the threat of future bailouts/bailins.  Incontrovertibly, not having to pay for the mistakes of the finance sector is in the benefit of the little man.  If you have any dealings in fiat, it's in your benefit not to pay for those mistakes either.

I'm not saying Dodd-Frank was perfect, by any means, but opening the floodgates to irresponsible lending, reckless derivatives speculation, corruption and general instability is dumb.
.....

Assuming that a large and complex piece of legislation written by bankers for bankers has any relation at all to the bolded above is really not logical.  Think about it.  How many bankers went to jail?  Why?

America's inability to prosecute bankers isn't in question.  We know that's never going to change regardless of what regulatory measures are or aren't in place.  Although to answer your question, some argue it's around 35, but Dodd-Frank probably wasn't pertinent to all of them.  Sure, if more punitive measures had been involved in drafting that legislation, more banksters would be locked up.  And some critics did complain that the law didn't go far enough in that regard.  But how the immoral activities are punished isn't the question here.  It's how you define which activities are permissible and which aren't permissible to begin with.  That emphasis will now shift because the focus is now on keeping the money flowing at all costs, whereas before it was keeping the money flowing while taking safe practices into consideration.  Repealing the legislation means a greater number of questionable practices will be deemed permissible than before.  Complexity and authorship aside, this is a dangerous change in ethos.

Also, don't pretend for a second that the puppetmasters behind this deregulation aren't banksters:

The president had praise for Jamie Dimon, whose bank, JPMorgan Chase, was often a target of regulatory actions by the Obama administration.
“There’s nobody better to tell me about Dodd-Frank than Jamie, so you’re going to tell me about it,” Mr. Trump said.

The meeting underscored the degree to which the architects of Mr. Trump’s economic strategy are now some of the people he denounced in his campaign, which ended with a commercial that described “a global power structure that is responsible for the economic decisions that have robbed our working class, stripped our country of its wealth and put that money into the pockets of a handful of large corporations.”

The advertisement flashed an image of the chief executive of Goldman Sachs, which has become a virtual feeder for top Trump administration officials. Steven Mnuchin, his nominee for Treasury secretary; Gary Cohn, the chairman of his national economic council; and Stephen K. Bannon, Mr. Trump’s chief strategist, all had worked at Goldman.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/03/business/dealbook/trump-congress-financial-regulations.html

Quite literally, the lunatics are taking over the asylum.  The banksters call the shots now.  Yet you cry that banksters wrote the legislation, so getting rid of it must be great.  Even though it's banksters getting rid of it?  Yeah, sounds logical.  

This is prime example of cognitive bias.
Unable to see the wood for the trees.

[Spendulus]

You don't buy that there were unsound and unsafe banking practices that led to the 2008 crash?  Or you don't buy that the law curbs some of those risks?  You're defending a move which is clearly profitable for bankers and increases the risk of casino-style banking and the threat of future bailouts/bailins.  Incontrovertibly, not having to pay for the mistakes of the finance sector is in the benefit of the little man.  If you have any dealings in fiat, it's in your benefit not to pay for those mistakes either.

I'm not saying Dodd-Frank was perfect, by any means, but opening the floodgates to irresponsible lending, reckless derivatives speculation, corruption and general instability is dumb.
.....

Assuming that a large and complex piece of legislation written by bankers for bankers has any relation at all to the bolded above is really not logical.  Think about it.  How many bankers went to jail?  Why?

America's inability to prosecute bankers isn't in question.  We know that's never going to change regardless of what regulatory measures are or aren't in place.  Although to answer your question, some argue it's around 35, but Dodd-Frank probably wasn't pertinent to all of them.  Sure, if more punitive measures had been involved in drafting that legislation, more banksters would be locked up.  And some critics did complain that the law didn't go far enough in that regard.  But how the immoral activities are punished isn't the question here.  It's how you define which activities are permissible and which aren't permissible to begin with.  That emphasis will now shift because the focus is now on keeping the money flowing at all costs, whereas before it was keeping the money flowing while taking safe practices into consideration.  Repealing the legislation means a greater number of questionable practices will be deemed permissible than before.  Complexity and authorship aside, this is a dangerous change in ethos.

Also, don't pretend for a second that the puppetmasters behind this deregulation aren't banksters:

The president had praise for Jamie Dimon, whose bank, JPMorgan Chase, was often a target of regulatory actions by the Obama administration.
“There’s nobody better to tell me about Dodd-Frank than Jamie, so you’re going to tell me about it,” Mr. Trump said.

The meeting underscored the degree to which the architects of Mr. Trump’s economic strategy are now some of the people he denounced in his campaign, which ended with a commercial that described “a global power structure that is responsible for the economic decisions that have robbed our working class, stripped our country of its wealth and put that money into the pockets of a handful of large corporations.”

The advertisement flashed an image of the chief executive of Goldman Sachs, which has become a virtual feeder for top Trump administration officials. Steven Mnuchin, his nominee for Treasury secretary; Gary Cohn, the chairman of his national economic council; and Stephen K. Bannon, Mr. Trump’s chief strategist, all had worked at Goldman.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/03/business/dealbook/trump-congress-financial-regulations.html

Quite literally, the lunatics are taking over the asylum.  The banksters call the shots now.  Yet you cry that banksters wrote the legislation, so getting rid of it must be great.  Even though it's banksters getting rid of it?  Yeah, sounds logical.  

You are making things up.  I'm not crying. 

I'm suggesting that your advocacy of the goodness of Dodd-Frank if not without any factual basis, is too strong to be credible.

[Sithara007]

Now name one other specific aspect of Merkel's leadership that is destroying Europe.

If Merkel was a little bit less authoritarian, then the United Kingdom would have been still a part of the European Union. The Brexit happened solely as a result of Merkel's romance with Erdogan.

[DooMAD]

Now name one other specific aspect of Merkel's leadership that is destroying Europe.

If Merkel was a little bit less authoritarian, then the United Kingdom would have been still a part of the European Union. The Brexit happened solely as a result of Merkel's romance with Erdogan.

I love how you think freedom of movement is authoritarian.  It's adorable.  Telling people where they can and can't go is authoritarian.  You are the authoritarian, only you're too blinded by your hate to see it.

As someone who lives in the UK, I can assure you that Brexit only happened because the tabloids and the politicians constantly scapegoat foreign people and the public are gullible enough to buy it.  Parties like UKIP carried on where the BNP and EDL left off.  They somehow managed to legitimise casual racism and discrimination.  People have become increasingly isolationist and xenophobic.  Brexit wouldn't have happened if Britain hadn't become an island primarily populated by easily misled bigots.  I'm ashamed that I get lumped in with the rest of the populace by association.

Still, the fascists will do what they always do.  Take it too far.  Then people will remember how dangerous you are.  Then all you "alt-right" goons will be marginalised for another few decades.  Enjoy your time in the sun.  It won't last.  

I'm suggesting that your advocacy of the goodness of Dodd-Frank if not without any factual basis, is too strong to be credible.

I'm suggesting that your advocacy of the goodness of Trump if not without any factual basis, is too strong to be credible.

I guess we'll let history be the judge.

[Casanova18]

Now name one other specific aspect of Merkel's leadership that is destroying Europe.

If Merkel was a little bit less authoritarian, then the United Kingdom would have been still a part of the European Union. The Brexit happened solely as a result of Merkel's romance with Erdogan.

Where did you get information about a romantic relationship Merkel and Erdogan? This is probably fake? Germany is indeed a very large Turkish community. And the Turks behave in Germany quite well. It was formed before the arrival of Merkel in politics. But it seems to me that she thought the Syrians are civilized people like the Turks, but it was not so.

[BADecker]

Trump Nominated For Nobel Peace Prize - And The Internet Is Freaking Out

Following what appears to be a successful first meeting with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, U.S. President Donald Trump has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize by two Norwegian lawmakers. Though the deadline for this year's prize has already passed, the nomination should make Trump eligible for the prize in 2019.

Fortune writes:

U.S. President Donald Trump was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize for his work in reaching an agreement to work toward de-nuclearization of the Korean peninsula.

Nominations for the world's most coveted prize are open to lawmakers, academics and researchers from around the world. The Nobel Committee in Oslo typically receives hundreds of nominations each year, and past candidates have also included Russian President Vladimir Putin and Former Cuban leader Fidel Castro. A record 330 people were nominated this year.

While supporters of the President are praising the nomination as evidence of Trump's good will and desire to maintain stability and world peace on the Korean Peninsula, not everyone agrees.

Leading left-leaning web site The Huffington Post highlighted in a headline that the lawmakers who voted for trump were part of Norway's far right:

Read more and click the links at http://www.dcclothesline.com/2018/06/14/trump-nominated-for-nobel-peace-prize-and-the-internet-is-freaking-out/.

[popcorn1]

Trump will win another 4 years easy  ..
Media played stupid games for the political elite and now they will pay for many many years to come..

Look at the date WHAT DOES IT SAY?

Why are so many children trying to cross the US border? - BBC News
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-28203923
30 Sep 2014 - Many children are being held in crowded detention centres, ... President George Bush prevents the US from returning children who are not from .

Gary Tuchman explores why there has been a rise in child immigrants crossing the U.S.-Mexico border in recent months. More from CNN at http://www.cnn.com/

Child immigrants creating US border crisis - BBC News - BBC.com
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-echochambers-27874901
16 Jun 2014 - There is a surge of unaccompanied minors crossing into the US along its southern border that is overwhelming US facilities and creating a political dilemma ... In the 2013 fiscal year, the US Border Patrol caught 38,833 juveniles .... The plight of the detained children is putting a painfully human face on the . LOOK AT THE DATE ..

Orphaned by deportation: the crisis of American children left behind ...
https://www.theguardian.com/.../2014/.../immigration-boy-reform-obama-deportation...
15 Oct 2014 - Andrés Sr spent months in a detention facility in Florida before he was forced to ... A 2013 report by Human Impact Partners found that nearly 75% of ... Immigration groups expect Obama to curb deportations and grant relief to the ..... And to use a child by putting words into his mouth is as Evil as you can get.



Hillary Clinton Defends Call To Deport Child Migrants | HuffPost
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/.../hillary-clinton-child-migrants_us_55d4a5c5e4b05...
08/19/2015 01:56 pm ET. Hillary Clinton Defends Call To Deport Child Migrants ... Now that the border crisis has largely passed, however, Clinton said U.S. immigration authorities should focus on expediting the deportation cases of children

[popcorn1]

Clinton: Send some immigrant kids home - YouTube
Video for Clinton's child immigrants 2014▶ 2:41
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1FP6t0OUlk
18 Jun 2014 - Uploaded by CNN
Clinton: Send some immigrant kids home. CNN. Loading... Unsubscribe from CNN? ... Published on Jun 18

linton In 2014: Immigrant Children “Should Be Sent Back” - YouTube
Video for Clinton's child immigrants 2014▶ 1:06
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dwTmN2wbJ0A
12 Feb 2016 - Uploaded by America Rising ICYMI
Clinton In 2014: Immigrant Children “Should Be Sent Back”. America Rising ICYMI. Loading... Unsubscribe from ...


So OK for Clinton Bush Obama   BUT when trump does the same thing    Trump is the devil ..
Oh how the media trick STUPID PEOPLES MINDS  ..

At least check on google to see what you complain about that the person your sticking up for hasn't done the same thing ..

Now are you all going to also complain about BUSH CLINTON AND OBAMA?

IDIOT HUMANS ..

[mymenace]

Standing on the outside looking in

I am not a US citizen

North Korea lost the war to the CIA in 1953, the CIA just did not tell anyone.
Trump was able to cease control of the CIA and blow up the nuclear base (This happened, NK mountain implodes)
Everything else was a show to ease the public into a peaceful solution with North Korea


Kim is a Manchurian candidate
I love his pudgy gaming face and body that adores basketball and obviously junk food
Knows nothing, does nothing, you only ever hear a newspaper speak


next the Manchurian candidate run Iranian dictatorship


I wonder if trump will explore the option of the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monroe_Doctrine
Britain, Europe, Australia certainly did something nasty in this IG report




As far as I can see I support who is behind Donald Trump and he supports them, so far so good


Robert F Kennedy - Mercury Project
Andrew Jackson - I Killed the Banks
John G Trump - Physicist FBI Tesla Files

[mineroc]

indictment incoming, that's what I think

[popcorn1]

I think he will have a big statue saying .

             THE DEAL MAKER 
The man who saved the USA from collapse
           MR DONALD J TRUMP

And then the stories   NO good stories

Mr trump is doing what his people voted for and they are so pleased   i am for them ..
The USA has created so many jobs for the poor fired up factories and lifting so many lives out of poverty ..

Remember money is not work people work ..
Make a vase and smash it   now replace it <<Nothing to do with money < Money is a ticket a bit of paper
that promises someone else to do work ..

The ticket doesn't do the work the humans do ..
Money is a pretend to trick you into being a slave ..

So why not give a UNIVERSAL INCOME then people can choose to be a slave ..
People will work even if they get a universal income ..

10K starting point to live will not get you a nice home or a boat or a villa   just about live     so in order to get those nice things in life we must work ..
Then just thinks no one will care about free movement ..

BUT no you want the free movement because it keeps the citizens busy with terror so you can spend our taxes on what you like ?..
SO why not give a UNIVERSAL INCOME   then you can do what you likes    ..

You get it when reach 21 years old everyone gets it till you die even if you find work or become rich you still get your UNIVERSAL INCOME..
The nobody can ever say they never had a chance in life because everyone did   ..
Your on 10k a year if in the UK plus you can find work ..If you go wrong it's your fault no one else ..

200 pounds job a week plus your universal income  will be enough for you to do something else as in move up the ladder ..
And that a small amount 200 a week ..Some will be lazy but the many wont be ..
So why do people make more monies ?   So why will a UNIVERSAL INCOME stop people wanting to make even more
wouldn't the rich just stop then?.. NO you want more so you can have nice things in life FACT..

[IsusCu]

He's probably going to fail miserably at some point. He's a great businessman but a country is not a company (or maybe it is)..

[mymenace]

He's probably going to fail miserably at some point. He's a great businessman but a country is not a company (or maybe it is)..

Come on
a nutless monkey could do a better job than most nations leaders



When you can start adding 1+1=2
There is no stopping you..


1. People want natural organic food chemical free (Food+Natural=Healthy)

2. People want climate change (Clean Water+More Trees=Air)

and so on and so on



People in power will call you stupid for making things simple

But smart people know to use the KISS method - Keep it simple stupid

[IsusCu]

He's probably going to fail miserably at some point. He's a great businessman but a country is not a company (or maybe it is)..

Come on
a nutless monkey could do a better job than most nations leaders



When you can start adding 1+1=2
There is no stopping you..


1. People want natural organic food chemical free (Food+Natural=Healthy)

2. People want climate change (Clean Water+More Trees=Air)

and so on and so on



People in power will call you stupid for making things simple

But smart people know to use the KISS method - Keep it simple stupid

I don't think it's that simple. Being a nation's leader is not an easy job.

[mymenace]

He's probably going to fail miserably at some point. He's a great businessman but a country is not a company (or maybe it is)..

Come on
a nutless monkey could do a better job than most nations leaders

When you can start adding 1+1=2
There is no stopping you..
1. People want natural organic food chemical free (Food+Natural=Healthy)
2. People want climate change (Clean Water+More Trees=Air)
and so on and so on

People in power will call you stupid for making things simple
But smart people know to use the KISS method - Keep it simple stupid

I don't think it's that simple. Being a nation's leader is not an easy job.

If you say. I will agree with you then.
Lets see if Mr business man can at least bring North Korea to the table
That would be some great political feat no other politician has achieved


Oh wait it already happened
This trump guy, damn I wish he were not alt right all the time

[Spendulus]

Donald Trump is making some serious mistakes in his presedential tenure. He needs to review his decision. The current situation with Turkey is very serious. He needs to realize that his actions could start World War III. Russia also have some serious tensions with Donald Trump.

No kidding? Wait, they were all telling us that he was colluding with Russia.

You don't suppose maybe it's they - those other people that are making the serious mistakes and not Trump?

[byteball]

...she [A Merkel] thought the Syrians are civilized people like the Turks, but it was not so...

Syrian society is layered like any other.
Obviously, refugees that had to run away are less civilized than the upper layers.

I think the future for Donald Trump is bright.
He pretended to be idiot, his enemies believed him, and got lured into his trap.

[fortresscoin]

The stock market is up and unemployment is down.  North Korea & US are talking for the first time since the end of the Clinton Administration with Madeleine Albright.  Iran is being economically squeezed and its proxies are being exposed for drug running to fund terrorist activities as opposed to being coddled by the last administration.  What is not a laughing matter is that Trump pulled out of the Paris climate agreement which may have been very reckless….too early to see. 

[Spendulus]

The stock market is up and unemployment is down.  North Korea & US are talking ....

Talking?

Hello?

Buried personnel mines are being removed jointly both sides of the DMZ.

That's frikking YUGE!!!!