Marami talagang makaka away kapag sobrang strikto pupunahin at oobserbahan ka talaga lalo nat nahuli ngayon na nang eextort pala siya tapos kung maka saway siya sa mga nagbebenta ng account at low quality post sobra tapos may kabalbalan pala siyang ginagawa. Ok na sana yung work niya as a staff kasi mabilis umaksyon ng mga reports kaso lang manager din siya sa isang signature campaign medyo may conflict na.
I do not see any conflict being a manager of a signature campaign and staff. This two position have common goal, as a staff to monitor for spammers, and forum rule breaker which actually almost the same function as Campaign manager to check participants for spammers and forum rule breaker. So what is the conflict in there? Aside from that being in Default trust gives Lauda an opportunity to tag people who were caught spamming and this is in conflict to some explanation about tagging neg rep because theymos clearly stated,
-snip-
On feedback pages, you can leave trade feedback. There are no rules for this, but here are some guidelines:
- List all of the trades that you do with people (or at least the major ones). This is not like #bitcoin-otc where you give people just one score.
- Do not rate people based on the quality of their posts.
- Older ratings count for more, so don't delete old ratings if you can avoid it.
- "Risked BTC" is how much money you could have lost if the person you're rating had turned out to be a scammer. Or, if they are a scammer, it's how much you lost. Use the BTC value at the time of reporting.
- It's OK to post a rating about the person in general, not tied to a specific trade.
- If you want to make a rating stronger, increase "Risked BTC". 50 extra risked BTC is equivalent to an additional rating.
-snip-
Note: Spamming is a moderation issue not a trust rating issue
