John Nash created bitcoin

[pooya87]

with Craig Wright claims to be satoshi and the way many newbies, unaware of how bitcoin works, believed him and how the public media such as big news agencies (other than shitty bitcoin new sites) believed the story i expect more and more people come out as being Satoshi candidates either by themselves or by others after the fact.

[1713283971]

1713283971

[1713283971]

1713283971

[1713283971]

1713283971

[Ironsides]

Craig Wright and Andressen wants to split Bitcoin, for that Wright pretends to be Satoshi. Further in Satoshi's hide he will say that BU is not a alt.

[franky1]

Craig Wright and Andressen wants to split Bitcoin, for that Wright pretends to be Satoshi. Further in Satoshi's hide he will say that BU is not a alt.

the craig wright, andressen, adam back social drama is all orchestrated by coindesk, who has ownership stakes in blockstream(adamback) and bloq(gavin andressen).

if you didnt realise it, andressen is still part of the side you desire to control you, so when you look at the ties to who is paying them(barry silbert(coindesk)). you realise the game being played on you. you might wake up to this fake social drama.
the whole last 2 years of distractions of the r3cked campaigns was to point their own actions in a different direction by making a couple of their own the fall guys so people think they are safe under the control of centralists.

maybe less time being conned reading con artists scripts made to distract you, and instead doing your own research would help you more

[Juggy777]

Another thread how many people are going to claim he or that is satoshi. Why can't people just digest the fact that satoshi identity will never be told to the world. He shall never ever reveal himself and all those who are claiming that they know satoshi are trying for their ratings to go high. Why do people really need to know the real identity, just move on with life and get on there's more to do than find out his identity.

[traincarswreck]

Another thread how many people are going to claim he or that is satoshi. Why can't people just digest the fact that satoshi identity will never be told to the world. He shall never ever reveal himself and all those who are claiming that they know satoshi are trying for their ratings to go high. Why do people really need to know the real identity, just move on with life and get on there's more to do than find out his identity.

This thread doesn't claim Nash is satoshi, you mutt.

[ReLieD]

Few people are saying that the creator of bitcoin is Satoshi.
But now I get to hear that some John Nash is the creator.
Like you have to just post any topic just for increasing your posts
Count. It's very irritating , I am sure that this might
But answered by many but I don't feel that this topic
Needs any explanation.
Thankyou

[traincarswreck]

Few people are saying that the creator of bitcoin is Satoshi.
But now I get to hear that some John Nash is the creator.
Like you have to just post any topic just for increasing your posts
Count. It's very irritating , I am sure that this might
But answered by many but I don't feel that this topic
Needs any explanation.
Thankyou

Nash had understood unbreakable encryption, the solution to all finite games with n players, the value of money in trade, and a design for AI by the time he was 25.  Subsequently he fled the US because of his insight he call "ideal money".  This was 55 years ago.  Then he spent his time quietly at princeton, as the legend goes, scribbling on chalk boards at night. In 1995 he started touring the world explaining that an e-currency with a stably issued supply, is going to asymptotically take power from the central banks and he METHODICALLY explained how this would happen.

He left a note on his homepage saying he has come up with something based on new axioms, in which he is afraid to consult other people on, and I quoted that this axiom was that money should be issued in a way that it has a stable value.  And he left a note saying he developed a program that could search for the next prime.

He also said he has been purposefully obfuscating his lecture and work, up until at least 2013, out of fear from government reprisal.

[franky1]

lol.. dang this trainwreck cant see passed his own nose.

he thinks he has found something big, but doesnt realise that he is like a few years out of date in all his research..
people have already supplied far more stuff than trainwreck has and this john nash ploy of his is not original.

seems he needs to be the one that does more research

[traincarswreck]

lol.. dang this trainwreck cant see passed his own nose.

he thinks he has found something big, but doesnt realise that he is like a few years out of date in all his research..
people have already supplied far more stuff than trainwreck has and this john nash ploy of his is not original.

seems he needs to be the one that does more research

I am the only person that has done research and provided it to the community on the subject of Nash Ideal Money and its relation to bitcoin, dumbass.  Everyone.  Look at this idiot, talking about someone they know nothing about.

[OneUnderBridge]

john nash was a maths guy not a code guy... keep trying though

you obviously didn't read the article where i cited the programming he was doing in regard to searching for the next prime number.  Or the part where cederic villiani explained how nash was known for solving problems far outside his own expertise, by arranging different experts in different fields to solve certain problems he formulated for them to solve, which came together to solve a problem of an unbelievable order.  

You wholly just judged something in which you have no idea what you are talking about didn't you?

he used his mind and written and verbal words. he didnt do things like learn c++
he was a theorist and white paper writer. he left it for other people to translate the math into programming.

im pretty sure you havnt really dug deep into what he done in his later years (beyond lectures), after the millenium to realise that he is not really the coder level capable person to have wrote bitcoin.

but as i said.. keep digging

While I don't really believe that Nash was instrumental in the coding of bitcoin, I do believe his thinking influenced those who were involved, in some way.  And, coding was part of the curriculum in many higher math and science degrees then, but more so now (Nash, no doubt, was at least fluent in Fortran).  Now days, a simple B.S.E.E requires c++, assembly, and Matlab.  So, we could assume that Nash was at least exposed to coding. Mathematica is, after all, a staple in most courses in higher mathematics.  It's hard to separate the coding from the math now days.  I don't think (very seriously doubt) Nash is the coding guy but his thoughts may have influenced the thinking somewhere along the line.  Right?  Maybe?

[Senor.Bla]

I did not read it nor heard the provided materials. Anyone care to give a tl;dr? Besides that i do not care if he invented it or not. Since he is dead i would be even kind of glad, because he can not be used to manipulate the minds of people.

[OneUnderBridge]

lol.. dang this trainwreck cant see passed his own nose.

he thinks he has found something big, but doesnt realise that he is like a few years out of date in all his research..
people have already supplied far more stuff than trainwreck has and this john nash ploy of his is not original.

seems he needs to be the one that does more research

I am the only person that has done research and provided it to the community on the subject of Nash Ideal Money and its relation to bitcoin, dumbass.  Everyone.  Look at this idiot, talking about someone they know nothing about.

You are not the only one.  That idea has been suggested countless times.  You may be onto a trail that many others have been on but that trail may lead you closer to the truth.  I agree with Franky1, keep digging; the more you dig the more interesting things become.  Interesting find though, thanks!  Nash is one of my all time favorites.

[traincarswreck]

You are not the only one.  That idea has been suggested countless times.  You may be onto a trail that many others have been on but that trail may lead you closer to the truth.  I agree with Franky1, keep digging; the more you dig the more interesting things become.  Interesting find though, thanks!  Nash is one of my all time favorites.

You are referring to ALL me. No one else has read the material, numb nuts.

[traincarswreck]

While I don't really believe that Nash was instrumental in the coding of bitcoin, I do believe his thinking influenced those who were involved, in some way.  And, coding was part of the curriculum in many higher math and science degrees then, but more so now (Nash, no doubt, was at least fluent in Fortran).  Now days, a simple B.S.E.E requires c++, assembly, and Matlab.  So, we could assume that Nash was at least exposed to coding. Mathematica is, after all, a staple in most courses in higher mathematics.  It's hard to separate the coding from the math now days.  I don't think (very seriously doubt) Nash is the coding guy but his thoughts may have influenced the thinking somewhere along the line.  Right?  Maybe?

It's weird how you have an opinion but haven't traversed the material you have an opinion about.

[traincarswreck]

I did not read it nor heard the provided materials. Anyone care to give a tl;dr? Besides that i do not care if he invented it or not. Since he is dead i would be even kind of glad, because he can not be used to manipulate the minds of people.

John Nash got the idea for ideal money when we went crazy and was forcibly confined in psychiatric care. 50 years later he started to tour the world talking about how an international e-currency would take power from central banks to print money. He also explained in great detail, how this will all unfold, and what will be the result-and exactly how we should move forward with bitcoin.

[OneUnderBridge]

You are not the only one.  That idea has been suggested countless times.  You may be onto a trail that many others have been on but that trail may lead you closer to the truth.  I agree with Franky1, keep digging; the more you dig the more interesting things become.  Interesting find though, thanks!  Nash is one of my all time favorites.

You are referring to ALL me. No one else has read the material, numb nuts.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2gzoxa/john_nash_is_satoshi_nakamoto/

http://www.coindesk.com/did-john-nash-help-invent-bitcoin/

https://cointelegraph.com/news/john-nashs-death-prompts-renewed-speculation-over-bitcoin-creation

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/called-the-inventor-of-bitcoin-satoshi-nakamoto/

https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@jokerpravis/why-there-is-so-much-talk-about-john-nash-s-possible-relationship-to-bitcoin

http://bitcoinpricelive.com/john-nash-satoshi-nakamoto-bitcoin/

https://thewealthofchips.wordpress.com/2014/10/01/why-bitcoin-is-and-isnt-ideal-money/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUyCO3FXHS4

http://themonetaryfuture.blogspot.com/2011/07/bitcoin-decentralization-and-nash.html

....ad infinitum

[traincarswreck]

You are not the only one.  That idea has been suggested countless times.  You may be onto a trail that many others have been on but that trail may lead you closer to the truth.  I agree with Franky1, keep digging; the more you dig the more interesting things become.  Interesting find though, thanks!  Nash is one of my all time favorites.

You are referring to ALL me. No one else has read the material, numb nuts.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2gzoxa/john_nash_is_satoshi_nakamoto/

http://www.coindesk.com/did-john-nash-help-invent-bitcoin/

https://cointelegraph.com/news/john-nashs-death-prompts-renewed-speculation-over-bitcoin-creation

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/called-the-inventor-of-bitcoin-satoshi-nakamoto/

https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@jokerpravis/why-there-is-so-much-talk-about-john-nash-s-possible-relationship-to-bitcoin

http://bitcoinpricelive.com/john-nash-satoshi-nakamoto-bitcoin/

https://thewealthofchips.wordpress.com/2014/10/01/why-bitcoin-is-and-isnt-ideal-money/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUyCO3FXHS4

http://themonetaryfuture.blogspot.com/2011/07/bitcoin-decentralization-and-nash.html

....ad infinitum

thats ALL from ME dumbass.

[franky1]

lol.. dang this trainwreck cant see passed his own nose.

he thinks he has found something big, but doesnt realise that he is like a few years out of date in all his research..
people have already supplied far more stuff than trainwreck has and this john nash ploy of his is not original.

seems he needs to be the one that does more research

I am the only person that has done research and provided it to the community on the subject of Nash Ideal Money and its relation to bitcoin, dumbass.  Everyone.  Look at this idiot, talking about someone they know nothing about.

lol RESEARCH HARDER

2015 - http://www.indiabitcoin.com/can-bitcoin-be-john-nashs-ideal-money-newsbtc/
2015 - http://www.coindesk.com/did-john-nash-help-invent-bitcoin/
2014 - http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/30/business-finance-investing/john-nash-created-bitcoin-1432655/
2013 - https://freedom-to-tinker.com/2013/11/11/game-theory-and-bitcoin/

trainwreck.. your not original. you also have not even shown any proof. just opinions. and as i said a few times your not the first to try saying it.

research harder,

[Hazir]

I am not denying nor supporting this thesis. But I find it is very convenient to call Nash creator of BTC, since he is unfortunately dead.
So there is no way for him to deny or confirm this revelation defectively making him a great candidate to force Satoshi title on him.
Until real Satoshi will reveal himself one day, Nash may be "Tier 1" candidate along with: Adam Back ,Charles Bry, David Chaum
Michael Clear, Wei Dai, Hal Finney, Neal J. King, Martti Malmi, Shinichi Mochizuki, Tatsuaki Okamoto, Vladimir Oksman and Nick Szabo.
 

[traincarswreck]

lol.. dang this trainwreck cant see passed his own nose.

he thinks he has found something big, but doesnt realise that he is like a few years out of date in all his research..
people have already supplied far more stuff than trainwreck has and this john nash ploy of his is not original.

seems he needs to be the one that does more research

I am the only person that has done research and provided it to the community on the subject of Nash Ideal Money and its relation to bitcoin, dumbass.  Everyone.  Look at this idiot, talking about someone they know nothing about.

lol RESEARCH HARDER

2015 - http://www.indiabitcoin.com/can-bitcoin-be-john-nashs-ideal-money-newsbtc/
2015 - http://www.coindesk.com/did-john-nash-help-invent-bitcoin/
2014 - http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/30/business-finance-investing/john-nash-created-bitcoin-1432655/
2013 - https://freedom-to-tinker.com/2013/11/11/game-theory-and-bitcoin/

trainwreck.. your not original. you also have not even shown any proof. just opinions. and as i said a few times your not the first to try saying it.

research harder,

You are still quoting me dumbass. plus the last links is irrelevant. I told you.  I am the ONE.